An in-depth evaluation of acalabrutinib for the treatment of mantle-cell lymphoma.

Introduction: Regimens involving intensive immuno-chemotherapy, followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant represent the standard treatment for younger fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Targeted approaches (i.e. ibrutinib, bortezomib, and lenalidomide) represent the backbone of therapy for relapsed cases.Areas covered: Acalabrutinib is a novel small molecule with a butynamide moiety specifically designed to irreversibly inhibit Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), which is more potent and selective than ibrutinib. Relevant publications have been identified through literature searches using the terms 'mantle cell lymphoma' and 'acalabrutinib'.Expert opinion: Acalabrutinib has been approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) MCL patients. To date, clinical trials have reported some adverse effects such as cardiac toxicity or atrial fibrillation. Acalabrutinib in combination with other drugs, either in chemo-containing or chemo-free schedules, represent a valid option for MCL. However, none of the treatment schedules containing BTK inhibitors have been shown to be curative in MCL. Acalabrutinib may ultimately represent an option for patients who are 'fit' and exhibit well-controlled disease, which often characterizes only a limited 'niche' among MCL patients.

TP53 dysfunction in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: clinical relevance in the era of B-cell receptors and BCL-2 inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with TP53 dysfunction, assessed by del(17p) or TP53 mutations, respond poorly to chemo-immunotherapy and fare better with the new therapies (BCR and BCL-2 inhibitors); however, it is unclear whether their response is similar to that of patients without anomalies or whether there is currently an adequate determination of TP53 dysfunction. AREA COVERED: A literature search was undertaken on clinical trials and real-world experience data on patients with TP53 dysfunction treated with different protocols. Moreover, data on the TP53 biological function and on the tests currently employed for its assessment were reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: Although TP53 dysfunction has less negative influence on the new biological therapies, patients with these alterations, particularly those with biallelic inactivation of TP53, have a worst outcome with these therapies than those without alterations. At present, a determination of TP53, particularly with next generation sequencing (NGS) methodologies, may be sufficient for the identifications of the patients unsuitable for chemo-immunotherapy, although integration with del(17p) would be advisable. For the future, more extensive determinations of the TP53 status, including functional assays, may become part of the current armamentarium for a better patient stratification and treatment with newer protocols.