Adjuvant cisplatin and vinorelbine for completely resected non-small cell lung cancer: subgroup analysis of the Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of adjuvant cisplatin-vinorelbine in completely resected non-small cell lung cancer and identify patients likely to benefit from this regimen in the Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation (LACE) database. The overall LACE meta-analysis showed survival benefit with cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (5-year survival benefit of 5.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, p = 0.004). Subgroup analysis for the cisplatin-vinorelbine regimen was prespecified in the LACE statistical analysis plan. Patients randomized to cisplatin-vinorelbine or observation were the largest subgroup (41%) and the most homogeneous in terms of drug doses and eligibility. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The LACE-vinorelbine cohort included trials evaluating cisplatin-vinorelbine versus observation. Overall survival was the primary end point. Other studies randomizing patients to other chemotherapy or observation (LACE-other) were also evaluated. RESULTS: The LACE-vinorelbine cohort included 1888 patients from four studies (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association, Big Lung Trial, International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial, and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group JBR.10). Baseline characteristics were similar to the LACE-other but had fewer patients with stage IA (2% versus 11%). Survival improvement at 5 years was 8.9% with cisplatin-vinorelbine versus observation (HR 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.91, p <0.001). Stage was a significant predictor for survival (test for trend, p = 0.02; benefit at 5 years: 14.7% [stage III], 11.6% [stage II], and 1.8% [stage I]). Similar benefits were seen for disease-free survival (HR 0.75 [0.67-0.85, p <0.001], stage III [HR 0.62, 0.50-0.76], stage II [HR 0.69, 0.57-0.83], and stage I [HR 0.95, 0.767-1.19]). The overall result was statistically superior to LACE-other (LACE other HR 0.95, 0.86-1.05, interaction p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In subgroup analyses, adjuvant cisplatin-vinorelbine provides a superior survival benefit and can be recommended in completely resected stages II and III non-small cell lung cancer.

Cisplatin-based three drugs combination (NIP) as induction and adjuvant treatment in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: final results.

INTRODUCTION: This phase III trial was conducted in non-small cell lung cancer patients with locally advanced stage II B (only T3N0) III A and III B (only T4 N0). Primary endpoint was 2-year survival; secondary were toxicity, disease-free survival, and overall survival. METHODS: After three cycles of vinorelbine (N) 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 5, ifosfamide/mesna (I) 3 g/m2 on day 1, cisplatin (P) (NIP), patients were treated by surgery and within 45 days were randomized to two additional cycles of NIP versus observation. RESULTS: Median tumor diameter was 5.5 cm (1.2-10.6). Overall, 155 of 156 patients received chemotherapy: 133 (85%) men, median age: 59 years (35-75). Sixty-five percentage of patients were stage III A, 28% II B, and 7% III B. The study has been closed prematurely because of the low inclusion rate. After three cycles of induction in 143 assessable patients, 82 reported an objective response (57.3%) (95% CI: 48.8-65.6), with 3.5% complete response and 53.8% partial response. Relative dose intensity during neoadjuvant NIP (%) was 97, 98, and 98.5 for vinorelbine, ifosfamide/mesna, and cisplatin, respectively. Tolerance: G3 to 4 neutropenia in 3% of patients and G3 to 4 anemia in 4%; nonhematological toxicities included G3 nausea/vomiting in 11%, G3 anorexia and G3 to 4 infection in 6.5%, G3 asthenia in 10% and G3 to 4 alopecia in 25.5%. After a median of 32 days after NIP, 107 patients (69%) underwent operation with complete resection (R0) in 74% (79 of 107 patients). Downstaging (N2 to N0) after surgery was 29%. Operative mortality rate was 2.8%. Twenty-one days (median) after surgery, 79 patients were randomized to adjuvant NIP (47%) or control (53%). Tolerance of adjuvant NIP: 12.5% G3 to 4 nausea/vomiting, 19% G3 alopecia, 6% G3 infection, and G3 asthenia. Overall median survival 32.3 versus 31.8 months in the observation and NIP arms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NIP allows 74% of R0 with no surgery delay. The few number of randomized patients did not allow to conclude on the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group.

PURPOSE: Several recent trials have shown a significant overall survival (OS) benefit from postoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation was to identify treatment options associated with a higher benefit or groups of patients who particularly benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual patient data were collected and pooled from the five largest trials (4,584 patients) of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in completely resected patients that were conducted after the 1995 NSCLC meta-analysis. The interactions between patient subgroups or treatment types and chemotherapy effect on OS were analyzed using hazard ratios (HRs) and log-rank tests stratified by trial. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 5.2 years, the overall HR of death was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.96; P = .005), corresponding to a 5-year absolute benefit of 5.4% from chemotherapy. There was no heterogeneity of chemotherapy effect among trials. The benefit varied with stage (test for trend, P = .04; HR for stage IA = 1.40; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.06; HR for stage IB = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.10; HR for stage II = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.95; and HR for stage III = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94). The effect of chemotherapy did not vary significantly (test for interaction, P = .11) with the associated drugs, including vinorelbine (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.91), etoposide or vinca alkaloid (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.07), or other (HR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.13). Chemotherapy effect was higher in patients with better performance status. There was no interaction between chemotherapy effect and sex, age, histology, type of surgery, planned radiotherapy, or planned total dose of cisplatin. CONCLUSION: Postoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improves survival in patients with NSCLC.

Oral vinorelbine and cisplatin with concomitant radiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has improved survival in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase I trial was performed in order to establish a dose recommendation for oral vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin and simultaneous radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with stage IIIB NSCLC received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 66 Gy and 2 cycles of cisplatin and oral vinorelbine which was administered at 3 different levels (40, 50 and 60 mg/m2). This was to be followed by 2 cycles of cisplatin/ vinorelbine oral consolidation chemotherapy. The study goal was to determine the maximal recommended dose of oral vinorelbine during concurrent treatment. RESULTS: 11 stage IIIB patients were entered into the study. The median radiotherapy dose was 66 Gy. Grade 3-4 toxicity included neutropenia, esophagitis, gastritis and febrile neutropenia. The dose-limiting toxicity for concurrent chemoradiotherapy was esophagitis. 9 patients received consolidation chemotherapy, with neutropenia and anemia/thrombocytopenia grade 3 being the only toxicities. The overall response was 73%. CONCLUSION: Oral vinorelbine 50 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15 over 4 weeks) in combination with cisplatin 20 mg/m2 (days 1-4) is the recommended dose in combination with radiotherapy (66 Gy) and will be used for concurrent chemoradiotherapy in a forthcoming phase III trial testing the efficacy of consolidation chemotherapy in patients not progressing after chemoradiotherapy.