Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Epilepsy Behav ; 140: 109117, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36804846

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures (PNES) and Functional Motor Disorders (FMDs) commonly represent the main clinical manifestations of Functional Neurological Disorders (FNDs). Despite their high prevalence in pediatric neurological services, literature on this topic is still spare for this population. The present study aimed to deepen the clinical knowledge of a pediatric FNDs sample through a demographic and clinical characterization of the most recurrent clinical patterns during the pediatric age. Moreover, a comparison of neuropsychological and psychopathological profiles of PNES and FMD patients was carried out to identify specific vulnerabilities and therapeutic targets linked with these different clinical manifestations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 43 FNDs patients (age range 7-17 years old) were retrospectively included in our study, enrolled in two subgroups: 20 with FMDs and 23 with PNES diagnosis. They were inpatients and outpatients referred over a period of 5 years and a standardized neurological, neuropsychological (WISC-IV/WAIS-IV), and psychiatric (CDI-2, MASC-2, ADES, DIS-Q, PID-5) evaluation was assessed. RESULTS: In PNES patients the most common clinical phenotypes were functional tonic-clonic (52%) and atonic (32%) manifestations while in the FMDs group were gait alterations (60%), functional myoclonus (35%), and tremor (35%). A higher frequency of cognitive impairment was reported in PNES patients with higher anxiety-depressive symptom rates than FMDs patients. CONCLUSIONS: Notably, specific neurocognitive and psychopathological profiles were described in PNES and FMDs, highlighting higher cognitive and psychiatric vulnerabilities in PNES, suggesting as well different strategy for therapeutic approaches.


Subject(s)
Conversion Disorder , Motor Disorders , Humans , Motor Disorders/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/complications , Seizures/diagnosis , Conversion Disorder/complications , Conversion Disorder/diagnosis , Anxiety/psychology , Electroencephalography
2.
Brain Behav Immun ; 81: 665-669, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31425826

ABSTRACT

In Tourette Syndrome (TS) a role for autoantibodies directed against neuronal proteins has long been suspected, but so far results are still inconsistent. The aim of this study was to look for antibodies to specific or undefined neuronal proteins that could be involved in the aetiology of the disease. Sera from children with Tourette Syndrome or another chronic tic disorder (TS/TD), collected as part of the longitudinal European Multicenter Tics in Children Study, were investigated. Participants included 30 siblings of patients with TS/TD prior to developing tics (preclinical stage) and the same children after the first tic onset (onset), and 158 patients in the chronic phase undergoing an acute relapse (exacerbation). Presence of antibodies binding to rodent brain tissue was assessed by immunohistology on rat brain sections and by immunofluorescent staining of live hippocampal neurons. Live cell-based assays were used to screen for antibodies to NMDAR, CASPR2, LGI1, AMPAR and GABAAR. Immunohistology indicated evidence of antibodies reactive with brain tissue, binding mainly to the hippocampus, the basal ganglia or the cerebellum in 26/218 (12%), with 8% of the preclinical or onset sera binding to the dentate gyrus/CA3 region or cerebellum. Only two individuals (one pre-clinical, one chronic) had antibodies binding the NMDAR and the binding was only weakly positive. No other specific antibodies were detected. Despite some immunoreactivity towards neuronal antigens on brain tissue, this was not mirrored by antibodies binding to live neurons, suggesting the presence of non-specific antibodies or those that bind non-pathogenic intracellular epitopes. NMDAR or the other neuronal surface antibodies tested were very infrequent in these patients. The evidence for pathogenic antibodies that could be causative of TS is weak.


Subject(s)
Membrane Proteins/immunology , Neurons/immunology , Tourette Syndrome/immunology , Adolescent , Animals , Autoantibodies/blood , Autoantibodies/immunology , Autoantibodies/metabolism , Brain/metabolism , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Dentate Gyrus/metabolism , Female , Hippocampus/metabolism , Humans , Male , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Neurons/metabolism , Primary Cell Culture , Rats , Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate/metabolism , White People
3.
J Med Ethics ; 35(12): 753-61, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19948932

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To foster the development of a privacy-protective, sustainable cross-border information system in the framework of a European public health project. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A targeted privacy impact assessment was implemented to identify the best architecture for a European information system for diabetes directly tapping into clinical registries. Four steps were used to provide input to software designers and developers: a structured literature search, analysis of data flow scenarios or options, creation of an ad hoc questionnaire and conduction of a Delphi procedure. RESULTS: The literature search identified a core set of relevant papers on privacy (n = 11). Technicians envisaged three candidate system architectures, with associated data flows, to source an information flow questionnaire that was submitted to the Delphi panel for the selection of the best architecture. A detailed scheme envisaging an "aggregation by group of patients" was finally chosen, based upon the exchange of finely tuned summary tables. CONCLUSIONS: Public health information systems should be carefully engineered only after a clear strategy for privacy protection has been planned, to avoid breaching current regulations and future concerns and to optimise the development of statistical routines. The BIRO (Best Information Through Regional Outcomes) project delivers a specific method of privacy impact assessment that can be conveniently used in similar situations across Europe.


Subject(s)
Computer Security/legislation & jurisprudence , Information Systems/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Informatics/legislation & jurisprudence , Privacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Assurance, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Computer Security/ethics , Europe , Humans , Information Systems/ethics , Information Systems/organization & administration , Medical Informatics/ethics , Medical Informatics/organization & administration , Public Health , Quality Assurance, Health Care/ethics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL