ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In 2016, WHO estimated there were roughly 374 million new infections among adults of the following four curable sexually transmitted infections (STIs): chlamydia (caused by Chlamydia trachomatis (CT)), gonorrhoea (Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG)), syphilis (Treponema pallidum) and trichomoniasis (Trichomonas vaginalis (TV)). Accurate point-of-care tests (POCTs) for screening of genital and extragenital CT, NG and TV infections are of great value and have been developed during recent decade. Several tests are commercially available and have shown encouraging performance compared with 'gold-standard' reference tests in laboratory-based studies. However, there is limited data on their clinical performance, including at the POC. Key populations, such as men who have sex with men (MSM), are at higher risk of these STIs at genital and extragenital sites and these STIs are often asymptomatic, especially in extragenital sites and in women. We will conduct a clinical-based evaluation to assess the performance characteristics and acceptability to end-users of molecular-based diagnostic technology for POC/near patient use of the Xpert CT/NG (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California, USA) test for screening of genital, anorectal and pharyngeal CT and NG infections in MSM and the Xpert CT/NG and Xpert TV (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California, USA) for screening of genital CT, NG and TV among women at risk for these STIs compared with gold-standard reference nucleic acid amplification tests. This master protocol outlines the overall research approach that will be used in seven countries. METHOD AND ANALYSES: Consecutive MSM and women at risk presenting at the clinical sites in high, and low- and middle-income countries will be enrolled. The POCTs to be evaluated are Xpert CT/NG and Xpert TV. All procedures will be carried out by trained healthcare staff and tests performed in strict accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for each POCT will be calculated. The study is ongoing with recruitment expected to be completed in all countries by mid-2022 to late-2022. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Prior to enrolment, this core protocol was independently peer-reviewed and approved by the research project review panel (RP2) of the WHO Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research and by the WHO Ethics Review Committee (ERC). The core protocol has been slightly adapted accordingly to individual countries and adaptations approved by both RP2 and ERC, as well as all relevant institutional review boards at each participating site. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant national/international conferences.
Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections , Gonorrhea , Homosexuality, Male , Point-of-Care Testing , Humans , Male , Female , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Gonorrhea/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Mass Screening/methods , Trichomonas vaginalis/isolation & purification , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Trichomonas Vaginitis/diagnosis , Trichomonas Vaginitis/epidemiology , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Sensitivity and Specificity , Adult , Point-of-Care SystemsABSTRACT
A collaborative study was designed to asses two freeze-dried human plasma preparations containing anti-Treponema pallidum antibodies, 05/132 and 05/122, for their suitability as international reference reagents for syphilis serology. Both preparations are intended as replacements of the first international standard (IS) for syphilitic serum antibodies (HS). Samples were tested by eight laboratories using the T. pallidum passive particle agglutination assay (TPPA), the venereal disease research laboratory test (VDRL) and the rapid plasma reagin test (RPR). In addition a range of immunoassays was also used. The outcome of the collaborative study revealed that candidate standard 05/132 contains T. pallidum-specific IgG and IgM and is reactive in VDRL or RPR, and that 05/122 contains T. pallidum-specific IgG but is not reactive in either the VDRL or RPR test. Both 05/132 and 05/122 are reactive in the TPPA. On the basis of these results the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization of the World Health Organization designated 05/132 as the 1st IS for human syphilitic plasma IgG and IgM with a unitage of 3 IU per ampoule relative to HS and 05/122 as the 1st IS for human syphilitic plasma IgG with a unitage of 300 mIU per ampoule relative to 05/132.
Subject(s)
Antibodies/analysis , Plasma/immunology , Syphilis Serodiagnosis/standards , Syphilis/diagnosis , Syphilis/immunology , Blood Specimen Collection/methods , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/analysis , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Plasma/chemistry , Protein Stability , Syphilis/blood , Syphilis Serodiagnosis/methods , Treponema pallidum/immunologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The optimum collection procedure for the evaluation of HIV-1 burden in ulcer secretions has not been well defined. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare ulcer swabs and ulcer lavages for the detection and quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in genital ulcers. STUDY DESIGN: A convenience sample of the first 84 HIV-positive participants in a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial of acyclovir episodic treatment among men with genital ulcer disease were included in this evaluation. At baseline, participants were screened for HIV, syphilis and HSV-2 by serology and for ulcer etiology by PCR. Ulcer specimens were collected by using (1) a non-traumatic washing procedure with 10ml of PBS, and (2) sterile dry swabs. Ulcer samples were tested with HIV-1 Amplicor 1.5 Ultra Sensitive Assay with a lower threshold of 50 copies/ml. RESULTS: Of ulcer samples 35 (41.7%) had HIV detected by ulcer lavage and 32 (38.1%) by swabs (p=0.68). Overall, 45 (53.6%) were positive by one or both methods. The overall proportion of agreement was 73% (61/84). The chance-corrected proportion of agreement was 0.46 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.65) as estimated by the Kappa statistic. The log mean viral load from lavages (1.49log(10) copies/ml, 95% CI: 1.17-1.81) did not differ significantly from that of swabs (1.41log(10) copies/ml, 95% CI: 1.16-1.71) (p=0.29) with a mean difference of 0.08log copies/ml (SD 0.96). CONCLUSION: Ulcer lavage and ulcer swab performed in moderate agreement in the detection and quantitation of HIV RNA from ulcer specimens.
Subject(s)
Genital Diseases, Male/virology , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/isolation & purification , RNA, Viral/analysis , Specimen Handling/methods , Ulcer/virology , Adult , Algorithms , HIV-1/genetics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sensitivity and Specificity , Therapeutic Irrigation , Virus SheddingABSTRACT
This article has been retracted.