The abstract versus the concrete: differing opinions of medical residents in obstetrics and gynaecology about abortion and punishment of abortion.

Purpose: To investigate the opinions of Brazilian medical residents in Obstetrics and Gynaecology on abortion legislation according to their personal beliefs.Material and methods: A multicentre cross-sectional study. Residents at 21 university teaching hospitals completed a self-report questionnaire on their opinions in abstract terms, and about punishing women who abort in general and women they know.Results: In abstract terms, 8% favoured allowing abortion under any circumstances (fully liberal); 36% under socioeconomic or psychological constraints (broadly liberal); 75.3% opposed punishing a woman who has aborted (liberal in general practice); and 90.2% opposed punishing women they knew personally (liberal in personal practice). Not having a stable partner and not being influenced by religion were factors associated with liberal opinions. In personal practice, however, 80% of those who are influenced by religion were liberal. The percentage of respondents whose opinions were liberal was significantly greater among those who believed that abortion rates would remain the same or decrease following liberalisation.Conclusions: Judgements regarding the penalisation of women who abort are strongly influenced by how close the respondent is to the problem. Accurate information on abortion needs to be provided. Although about one third of the respondents were broadly liberal, the majority oppose punishment.

Understanding How Health Providers Identify Women with Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify how health providers recognize postpartum hemorrhage early and the difficulties involved in it. METHODS: An exploratory, descriptive study using a qualitative approach through a semi-structured interview technique. In total, 27 health professionals (nursing technicians, nurses, medical residents in Gynecology and Obstetrics, hired medical doctors, and medicine professors) working in a tertiary-level hospital of reference in women's health care in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, participated in the study through an invitation. After they accepted the invitation, they signed the free and informed consent form. All interviews were recorded and transcribed, and a thematic analysis was conducted. We found three analysis categories: a) perception of the severity: "there is something wrong with the women"; b) difficulties in the early diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage; and c) the process to improve obstetrical care. RESULTS: Caregivers believe teamwork and communication should be improved. Besides the visual estimation of blood loss, the nursing team is attentive to behavioral symptoms like irritability, while the medical staff follow protocols and look for objective signs, such as altered vital signs. CONCLUSION: Besides the objective evaluations, the subjective perceptions of the providers are involved in the clinical judgement regarding the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage, and this should be included in a broader diagnosis strategy.

OBJETIVO: Identificar como os profissionais de saúde reconhecem precocemente os casos de hemorragia pós-parto e as suas dificuldades. MéTODOS: Realizou-se um estudo exploratório, descritivo, com uma abordagem qualitativa por meio da técnica de entrevista semiestruturada. Por meio de um convite, participaram do estudo 27 profissionais saúde (técnicas de enfermagem, enfermeiras, residentes de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, e médicos contratados e docentes) que trabalhavam em um hospital de nível terciário de referência no atendimento à saúde da mulher no estado de São Paulo. Depois que os participantes aceitaram o convite, eles assinaram o termo de consentimento livre e esclarecido. Todas as entrevistas foram gravadas, transcritas, e realizou-se uma análise temática. Identificaram-se três categorias de análise: a) percepção da gravidade: "há algo de errado com as mulheres"; b) dificuldades no diagnóstico precoce da hemorragia pós-parto; e c) o processo para melhorar a atenção em obstetrícia. RESULTADOS: Os profissionais de saúde acreditavam que o trabalho em equipe e a comunicação deviam ser aperfeiçoados. Além da estimativa visual da perda de sangue, a equipe de enfermagem estava atenta a sintomas comportamentais como irritabilidade, ao passo que o pessoal médico seguia protocolos e procurava sinais objetivos, como sinais vitais alterados. CONCLUSãO: Além das avaliações objetivas, as percepções subjetivas dos provedores estão envolvidas no julgamento clínico do diagnóstico de hemorragia pós-parto, e isto deve ser incluído em uma estratégia de diagnóstico mais ampla.

Understanding of changes in abortion rate following liberalization of abortion law among Brazilian residents in obstetrics and gynecology.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate residents' knowledge about the evolution of abortion rates in countries where abortion has been legalized, and to assess whether such knowledge correlates with residents' sociodemographic characteristics and experience in abortion care. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in 21 Brazilian hospitals with 404 medical residents in obstetrics and gynecology. Data collection occurred during February 2015 through January 2016. Data were collected through a self-administered, anonymous questionnaire. The χ2 test, Fisher exact test, and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: Of residents, 60% believed that the abortion rate would increase after legalization; 82% had been involved in the care of women with incomplete abortion and 71% in the care of women admitted for legal abortion. Associations were found between knowledge of the evolution of the abortion rate after legalization and region of birth, region of medical school, and importance attached to religion. Multiple regression confirmed that studying medicine in the south/southeast of Brazil and attaching little importance to religion were associated with knowing that legalization does not lead to an increase in abortion rate. CONCLUSION: Information relating to abortion in medical schools and during residency is very limited and should be improved.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Medical Abortion, According to Brazilian Residents in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

OBJECTIVE: To find out which was the opinion of residents in obstetrics and gynecology about the advantages and disadvantages of medical abortion as compared with surgical procedures. METHOD: Cross-sectional multicenter study among residents in obstetrics and gynecology from 21 maternity hospitals located in 4 different geographical regions of Brazil, using a self-responded questionnaire with 31 questions related to their opinion and experience on providing abortion services. RESULTS: Most residents agreed that "being less invasive" (94.7%), "does not require anesthesia" (89.7%), "can be accompanied during the process" (89.1%), "prevents physical trauma" (84.4%) were the main advantages of medical abortion. CONCLUSION: Residents perceived both clinical and personal issues as advantages of medical abortion.

OBJETIVO: Descobrir qual foi a opinião dos residentes em ginecologia e obstetrícia sobre as vantagens e desvantagens do aborto medicamentoso em relação aos procedimentos cirúrgicos. MéTODOS: Estudo multicêntrico transversal entre residentes de ginecologia e obstetrícia de 21 maternidades localizadas em 4 diferentes regiões geográficas do Brasil, utilizando um questionário autorrespondido com 31 questões relacionadas à sua opinião e experiência na prestação de serviços de aborto. RESULTADOS: A maioria dos residentes concordou que "ser menos invasivo" (94,7%), "não necessitar de anestesia" (89,7%), "poder ser acompanhado durante o processo" (89,1%), "prevenir trauma físico" (84,4%) foram as principais vantagens do aborto medicamentoso. CONCLUSãO: Os residentes perceberam tanto questões clínicas como pessoais como sendo vantagens do aborto medicamentoso.

Knowledge on medical abortion among Brazilian medical residents in Gynecology and Obstetrics. / Conhecimento de médicos residentes em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia sobre o aborto medicamentoso.

Medical or drug-induced abortion has been proven as an effective means for termination of pregnancy. However, training of providers in the use of misoprostol has been limited. The current article aims to identify the degree of knowledge on medical abortion among Brazilian medical residents in Gynecology and Obstetrics. A multicenter cross-sectional study was performed with residents regularly enrolled in residency programs in Gynecology and Obstetrics in 21 teaching hospitals. A self-responded questionnaire was used. Correct responses to each of the alternatives were identified, and a binary response variable (≥ P70, < P70) was defined by the 70th percentile of the number of questions on misoprostol. Four hundred and seven medical residents returned the questionnaire, of which 404 were completed and three were blank. The majority (56.3%) of the residents were 27 years or younger, females (81.1%), and single or not living with a partner (70%). Two-thirds (68.2%) were in the first or second year of residency. Only 40.8% of the participants answered 70% or more of the questions correctly. In the multivariate analysis, enrollment in the third year of residency or greater (OR = 2.18; 95%CI: 1.350-3.535) and having participated in treatment of a woman with induced or probably induced abortion (OR = 4.12; 95%CI: 1.761-9.621) were associated with better knowledge on the subject. Among Brazilian medical residents in Gynecology and Obstetrics, knowledge on medical abortion is very limited and poses an obstacle to proper care in cases of legal termination of pregnancy.

O aborto medicamentoso ou farmacológico tem demonstrado ser um meio eficaz para a interrupção da gravidez. Entretanto, o treinamento de provedores no uso do misoprostol tem sido limitado. O presente artigo tem como objetivo identificar o grau de conhecimento dos médicos residentes em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia sobre aborto medicamentoso. Realizou-se um estudo transversal multicêntrico com residentes regularmente inscritos no programa de residência em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia de vinte e um hospitais de ensino. Foi utilizado um questionário de autorresposta. As respostas corretas a cada uma das alternativas foram identificadas e uma variável de resposta binária (≥ P70, < P70) foi definida pelo percentil 70 do número de perguntas sobre o misoprostol. Quatrocentos e sete médicos residentes devolveram o questionário, sendo que 404 estavam preenchidos e três em branco. A maioria (56,3%) dos residentes tinha até 27 anos de idade, era do sexo feminino (81,1%) e não vivia junto com um(a) companheiro(a) (70%). A maior proporção (68,2%) estava cursando o primeiro ou segundo ano da residência. Apenas 40,8% dos participantes acertaram 70% ou mais das afirmativas. Na análise múltipla, cursar o terceiro ano de residência ou superior (OR = 2,18; IC95%: 1,350-3,535) e ter participado do atendimento a uma mulher com abortamento induzido ou provavelmente induzido (OR = 4,12; IC95%: 1,761-9,621) mostraram-se associados a um maior conhecimento sobre o tema. Entre os médicos brasileiros residentes em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, o conhecimento sobre o aborto medicamentoso é muito reduzido e constitui um obstáculo para o bom atendimento dos casos de interrupção legal da gestação.

El aborto con medicamentos o farmacológico ha demostrado ser un medio eficaz para la interrupción del embarazo. No obstante, la capacitación de los médicos en el uso del misoprostol ha sido limitada. El objetivo de este artículo es identificar el grado de conocimiento de los médicos residentes en Ginecología y Obstetricia sobre el aborto con medicamentos. Se realizó un estudio transversal multicéntrico con residentes regularmente inscritos en el programa de residencia en Ginecología y Obstetricia de veintiún hospitales de enseñanza. Se utilizó un cuestionario de autorrespuesta. Las respuestas correctas de cada una de las alternativas fueron identificadas y una variable de respuesta binaria (≥ P70, < P70) se definió por el percentil 70 del número de preguntas sobre el misoprostol. Cuatrocientos siete médicos residentes devolvieron el cuestionario, siendo que 404 estaban cumplimentados y tres en blanco. La mayoría (56,3%) de los residentes tenía hasta 27 años de edad, eran de sexo femenino (81,1%); no vivía junto a un(a) compañero(a) (70%). La mayor proporción (68,2%) estaba cursando el primero o segundo año de residencia. Solamente un 40,8% de los participantes acertaron un 70% o más de las afirmaciones. En el análisis múltiple, estar en el tercer año de residencia o superior (OR = 2,18; IC95%: 1,350-3,535) y haber estado implicado en la atención a una mujer con aborto inducido o probablemente inducido (OR = 4,12; IC95%: 1,761-9,621) se mostraron asociados a un mayor conocimiento sobre el tema. Entre los médicos brasileños residentes en Ginecología y Obstetricia, el conocimiento sobre aborto con medicamentos es muy reducido y constituye en obstáculo para una buena atención de los casos de interrupción legal de la gestación.

Process for obtaining informed consent: women's opinions.

UNLABELLED: In Brazil, every study involving human beings is required to produce an informed consent form that must be signed by study participants: this is stated in Resolution 196/96.(1) Consent must be obtained through a specific structured process. OBJECTIVE: To present the opinions of women regarding how the process of obtaining informed consent should be conducted when women are invited to participate in studies on contraceptive methods. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eight focus groups were conducted, involving a total of 51 women living in the metropolitan region of Campinas. The women involved in the study were either participating in a clinical trial in the area of women's health or had participated in such a trial in the previous 12 months. A thematic guide was used to conduct the focus group discussions; the discussions were recorded, transcribed and a thematic analysis performed. RESULTS: In general, the person who invites a woman to participate in a study should be a member of the research team but not the principal investigator. Information relating to the study should be given orally and in writing, both individually and in the group setting. Study volunteers should be informed about, among other things, the risks, possible side effects and discomforts, including long-term effects. The use of audiovisual aids to provide information was suggested. CONCLUSION: The process for obtaining informed consent was seen as a means of establishing a relationship between the volunteers and the investigator/research team. The information that the study participants expected to be given coincides with the requirements established under Resolution 196/96. The use of audiovisual aids would improve understanding of the information provided.

[Voluntary surgical sterilization in Greater Metropolitan Campinas, São Paulo State, Brazil, before and after legal regulation of the procedure]. / Esterilização cirúrgica voluntária na Região Metropolitana de Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil, antes e após sua regulamentação.

This cross-sectional study compared the provision of surgical sterilization in public health services in Greater Metropolitan Campinas, São Paulo State, Brazil, and the characteristics of women and men who underwent sterilization before and after its legal regulation. Structured and pre-tested questionnaires were applied to 398 women, 15 directors of municipal family planning programs, and 15 coordinators of basic health units. Eight municipalities in Greater Metropolitan Campinas provided tubal ligation and nine performed vasectomy. Approximately half reported following the guidelines of the prevailing family planning legislation. There were no significant differences before or after legal regulation in terms of the characteristics of women and men sterilized or the waiting time for surgery. Most tubal ligations were still performed in combination with cesarean sections (the additional payment for sterilization had decreased, but the difference was not significant). There is strong evidence that in Greater Metropolitan Campinas the changes expected from legal regulation of surgical sterilization did not materialize. Although progress has been made, several distortions still need to be corrected.

[Adolescents as research subjects and free informed consent: knowledge and opinion of researchers and adolescents]. / Adolescentes como voluntários de pesquisa e consentimento livre e esclarecido: conhecimento e opinião de pesquisadores e jovens.

This article presents the results of a study that evaluated the knowledge and opinions of researchers and adolescents that served as their research subjects on the legal norms that regulate the participation of the latter as research subjects, the capacity of adolescents to make autonomous decisions regarding participation, and the adolescent experience after agreeing to take part in a study. This was a qualitative study with a convenience sample, the size of which was defined by the criteria of informational redundancy. Interviews were conducted with three researchers who had used adolescents as research subjects and nine of these subjects. This number of interviews was sufficient to reach informational redundancy. Data was collected through recorded semi-structured interviews, with open questions. All the researchers were familiar with some legal document related to the participation of adolescents as subjects of research. On the other hand, the adolescents were surprised because they were not aware of the existence of such documents. However, they considered them necessary for their own protection. In general, researchers and adolescents believe that adolescents have the capacity to decide autonomously to participate as research subjects. The adolescents affirmed that they had decided to volunteer conscientiously.

Understanding How Health Providers Identify Women with Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Qualitative Study / Compreendendo como os profissionais de saúde identificam as mulheres com hemorragia pós-parto: um estudo qualitativo

Abstract Objective To identify how health providers recognize postpartum hemorrhage early and the difficulties involved in it. Methods An exploratory, descriptive study using a qualitative approach through a semi-structured interview technique. In total, 27 health professionals (nursing tech nicians, nurses, medical residents in Gynecology and Obstetrics, hired medical doctors, and medicine professors) working in a tertiary-level hospital of reference in women's health care in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, participated in the study through an invitation. After they accepted the invitation, they signed the free and informed consent form. All interviews were recorded and transcribed, and a thematic analysis was conducted. We found three analysis categories: a) perception of the severity: "there is something wrong with the women"; b) difficulties in the early diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage; and c) the process to improve obstetrical care. Results Caregivers believe teamwork and communication should be improved. Besides the visual estimation of blood loss, the nursing team is attentive to behavioral symptoms like irritability, while the medical staff follow protocols and look for objective signs, such as altered vital signs. Conclusion Besides the objective evaluations, the subjective perceptions of the providers are involved in the clinical judgement regarding the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage, and this should be included in a broader diagnosis strategy.

Resumo Objetivo Identificar como os profissionais de saúde reconhecem precocemente os casos de hemorragia pós-parto e as suas dificuldades. Métodos Realizou-se um estudo exploratório, descritivo, com uma abordagem qualitativa por meio da técnica de entrevista semiestruturada. Por meio de um convite, participaram do estudo 27 profissionais saúde (técnicas de enfermagem, enfermeiras, residentes de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, e médicos contratados e docentes) que trabalhavam em um hospital de nível terciário de referência no atendimento à saúde da mulher no estado de São Paulo. Depois que os participantes aceitaram o convite, eles assinaram o termo de consentimento livre e esclarecido. Todas as entrevistas foram gravadas, transcritas, e realizou-se uma análise temática. Identificaram-se três categorias de análise: a) percepção da gravidade: "há algo de errado com as mulheres"; b) dificuldades no diagnóstico precoce da hemorragia pós-parto; e c) o processo para melhorar a atenção em obstetrícia. Resultados Os profissionais de saúde acreditavam que o trabalho em equipe e a comunicação deviam ser aperfeiçoados. Além da estimativa visual da perda de sangue, a equipe de enfermagem estava atenta a sintomas comportamentais como irritabilidade, ao passo que o pessoal médico seguia protocolos e procurava sinais objetivos, como sinais vitais alterados. Conclusão Além das avaliações objetivas, as percepções subjetivas dos provedores estão envolvidas no julgamento clínico do diagnóstico de hemorragia pós-parto, e isto deve ser incluído em uma estratégia de diagnóstico mais ampla.

Filling out the compulsory notification in health services that care for women who suffer from sexual violence.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the proportion of health services that fill out the compulsory notification and what the main difficulties to fill it out are. METHODS: A study was carried out with two different approaches. For the quantitative approach, a cross sectional study was performed, with telephone data collection. In the state of São Paulo, 291 health services that had reported providing care to women who suffer from sexual violence were identified. The sample was composed of 172 services that reported providing emergency care to women. In the qualitative approach, case studies were conducted. Six cities were chosen by intention and convenience. For each of them, professionals from two health services were invited to participate. Forty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted. For quantitative data, a descriptive analysis was carried out. For qualitative data, a thematic analysis of content was performed. RESULTS: The proportion of health services which reported always filling out the notification in cases of sexual violence was 79.1%. More than half (53.5%) reported difficulties concerning the assisted women, one third reported reasons related to the form, and 29.7%, to the professionals. In the qualitative approach, the main difficulties were the size of the form, the problems to obtain the information about the woman and the difficulty for the professional to obtain this information. CONCLUSION: Although most health services claimed to fill out the compulsory notification, they also mentioned several difficulties to do so, especially with regard to the workload of professionals and the misunderstanding about the importance of the notification in the context of comprehensive care to women who suffer from sexual violence. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the proportion of health services that fill out the compulsory notification and what the main difficulties to fill it out are. METHODS: A study was carried out with two different approaches. For the quantitative approach, a cross sectional study was performed, with telephone data collection. In the state of São Paulo, 291 health services that had reported providing care to women who suffer from sexual violence were identified. The sample was composed of 172 services that reported providing emergency care to women. In the qualitative approach, case studies were conducted. Six cities were chosen by intention and convenience. For each of them, professionals from two health services were invited to participate. Forty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted. For quantitative data, a descriptive analysis was carried out. For qualitative data, a thematic analysis of content was performed. RESULTS: The proportion of health services which reported always filling out the notification in cases of sexual violence was 79.1%. More than half (53.5%) reported difficulties concerning the assisted women, one third reported reasons related to the form, and 29.7%, to the professionals. In the qualitative approach, the main difficulties were the size of the form, the problems to obtain the information about the woman and the difficulty for the professional to obtain this information. CONCLUSION: Although most health services claimed to fill out the compulsory notification, they also mentioned several difficulties to do so, especially with regard to the workload of professionals and the misunderstanding about the importance of the notification in the context of comprehensive care to women who suffer from sexual violence.

Postpartum Women's Perspectives on the Donation of Placentas for Scientific Research in Campinas, Brazil.

Little is known about public perspectives of scientific and therapeutic uses of placentas. Gaps in knowledge potentiate ethical and clinical problems regarding collection and applications. As such, this study sought to assess the perspectives of placenta donation of a sample of women. Postpartum women's perspectives on placental donation were assessed at the State University of Campinas in the Centro de Atençäo Integral a Saúde da Mulher (CAISM) maternity hospital using a cross-sectional survey (n = 384) and semi-structured interviews (n = 12). Surveys were analyzed quantitatively and interviews were analyzed qualitatively using grounded coding; results were compared. The average age of respondents was 27. Fifty-six percent had more than one child, 45% were Caucasian, 38% were mixed-race, 74% identified with a Christian faith, 52% had high school education or higher, 13% regarded the placenta as spiritually important, 72% felt that knowing what happens to the placenta after birth was somewhat or very important, 78% supported the use of the placenta in research and medicine, 59% reported that consent to collect the placenta was very or somewhat important, 78% preferred their doctor to invite donation, and only 7% preferred the researcher to invite donation. Interviews suggested women appreciate being part of research and that receiving information about studies was important to them. Informed by these results, we argue that women support scientific and therapeutic uses of placentas, want to be included in decision making, and desire information about the placenta. Placentas should not be viewed as "throwaway" organs that are poised for collection without the involvement and permission of women. Women want to be meaningfully included in research processes.

Advantages and disadvantages of medical abortion, according to brazilian residents in obstetrics and gynaecology / Vantagens e desvantagens do aborto medicamentoso, segundo os residentes brasileiros em ginecologia e obstetrícia

Abstract Objective To find out which was the opinion of residents in obstetrics and gynecology about the advantages and disadvantages of medical abortion as compared with surgical procedures. Method Cross-sectional multicenter study among residents in obstetrics and gynecology from 21 maternity hospitals located in 4 different geographical regions of Brazil, using a self-responded questionnaire with 31 questions related to their opinion and experience on providing abortion services. Results Most residents agreed that "being less invasive" (94.7%), "does not require anesthesia" (89.7%), "can be accompanied during the process" (89.1%), "prevents physical trauma" (84.4%) were the main advantages of medical abortion. Conclusion Residents perceived both clinical and personal issues as advantages of medical abortion.

Resumo Objetivo Descobrir qual foi a opinião dos residentes em ginecologia e obstetrícia sobre as vantagens e desvantagens do aborto medicamentoso em relação aos procedimentos cirúrgicos. Métodos Estudo multicêntrico transversal entre residentes de ginecologia e obstetrícia de 21 maternidades localizadas em 4 diferentes regiões geográficas do Brasil, utilizando um questionário autorrespondido com 31 questões relacionadas à sua opinião e experiência na prestação de serviços de aborto. Resultados A maioria dos residentes concordou que "ser menos invasivo" (94,7%), "não necessitar de anestesia" (89,7%), "poder ser acompanhado durante o processo" (89,1%), "prevenir trauma físico" (84,4%) foram as principais vantagens do aborto medicamentoso. Conclusão Os residentes perceberam tanto questões clínicas como pessoais como sendo vantagens do aborto medicamentoso.

Conhecimento de médicos residentes em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia sobre o aborto medicamentoso / Conocimiento de médicos residentes en Ginecología y Obstetricia sobre el aborto con medicamentos / Knowledge on medical abortion among Brazilian medical residents in Gynecology and Obstetrics

O aborto medicamentoso ou farmacológico tem demonstrado ser um meio eficaz para a interrupção da gravidez. Entretanto, o treinamento de provedores no uso do misoprostol tem sido limitado. O presente artigo tem como objetivo identificar o grau de conhecimento dos médicos residentes em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia sobre aborto medicamentoso. Realizou-se um estudo transversal multicêntrico com residentes regularmente inscritos no programa de residência em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia de vinte e um hospitais de ensino. Foi utilizado um questionário de autorresposta. As respostas corretas a cada uma das alternativas foram identificadas e uma variável de resposta binária (≥ P70, < P70) foi definida pelo percentil 70 do número de perguntas sobre o misoprostol. Quatrocentos e sete médicos residentes devolveram o questionário, sendo que 404 estavam preenchidos e três em branco. A maioria (56,3%) dos residentes tinha até 27 anos de idade, era do sexo feminino (81,1%) e não vivia junto com um(a) companheiro(a) (70%). A maior proporção (68,2%) estava cursando o primeiro ou segundo ano da residência. Apenas 40,8% dos participantes acertaram 70% ou mais das afirmativas. Na análise múltipla, cursar o terceiro ano de residência ou superior (OR = 2,18; IC95%: 1,350-3,535) e ter participado do atendimento a uma mulher com abortamento induzido ou provavelmente induzido (OR = 4,12; IC95%: 1,761-9,621) mostraram-se associados a um maior conhecimento sobre o tema. Entre os médicos brasileiros residentes em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, o conhecimento sobre o aborto medicamentoso é muito reduzido e constitui um obstáculo para o bom atendimento dos casos de interrupção legal da gestação.

El aborto con medicamentos o farmacológico ha demostrado ser un medio eficaz para la interrupción del embarazo. No obstante, la capacitación de los médicos en el uso del misoprostol ha sido limitada. El objetivo de este artículo es identificar el grado de conocimiento de los médicos residentes en Ginecología y Obstetricia sobre el aborto con medicamentos. Se realizó un estudio transversal multicéntrico con residentes regularmente inscritos en el programa de residencia en Ginecología y Obstetricia de veintiún hospitales de enseñanza. Se utilizó un cuestionario de autorrespuesta. Las respuestas correctas de cada una de las alternativas fueron identificadas y una variable de respuesta binaria (≥ P70, < P70) se definió por el percentil 70 del número de preguntas sobre el misoprostol. Cuatrocientos siete médicos residentes devolvieron el cuestionario, siendo que 404 estaban cumplimentados y tres en blanco. La mayoría (56,3%) de los residentes tenía hasta 27 años de edad, eran de sexo femenino (81,1%); no vivía junto a un(a) compañero(a) (70%). La mayor proporción (68,2%) estaba cursando el primero o segundo año de residencia. Solamente un 40,8% de los participantes acertaron un 70% o más de las afirmaciones. En el análisis múltiple, estar en el tercer año de residencia o superior (OR = 2,18; IC95%: 1,350-3,535) y haber estado implicado en la atención a una mujer con aborto inducido o probablemente inducido (OR = 4,12; IC95%: 1,761-9,621) se mostraron asociados a un mayor conocimiento sobre el tema. Entre los médicos brasileños residentes en Ginecología y Obstetricia, el conocimiento sobre aborto con medicamentos es muy reducido y constituye en obstáculo para una buena atención de los casos de interrupción legal de la gestación.

Medical or drug-induced abortion has been proven as an effective means for termination of pregnancy. However, training of providers in the use of misoprostol has been limited. The current article aims to identify the degree of knowledge on medical abortion among Brazilian medical residents in Gynecology and Obstetrics. A multicenter cross-sectional study was performed with residents regularly enrolled in residency programs in Gynecology and Obstetrics in 21 teaching hospitals. A self-responded questionnaire was used. Correct responses to each of the alternatives were identified, and a binary response variable (≥ P70, < P70) was defined by the 70th percentile of the number of questions on misoprostol. Four hundred and seven medical residents returned the questionnaire, of which 404 were completed and three were blank. The majority (56.3%) of the residents were 27 years or younger, females (81.1%), and single or not living with a partner (70%). Two-thirds (68.2%) were in the first or second year of residency. Only 40.8% of the participants answered 70% or more of the questions correctly. In the multivariate analysis, enrollment in the third year of residency or greater (OR = 2.18; 95%CI: 1.350-3.535) and having participated in treatment of a woman with induced or probably induced abortion (OR = 4.12; 95%CI: 1.761-9.621) were associated with better knowledge on the subject. Among Brazilian medical residents in Gynecology and Obstetrics, knowledge on medical abortion is very limited and poses an obstacle to proper care in cases of legal termination of pregnancy.

[Free informed consent: the experience of Brazilian researchers in the area of fertility regulation]. / Consentimento livre e esclarecido: experiência de pesquisadores brasileiros na área da regulação da fecundidade.

This study aimed to evaluate the experience of Brazilian researchers in relation to: assessment of the research protocol by a research ethics committee with the elaboration of a free informed term of consent (FITC) and the process of obtaining consent, as well as to verify whether the content and wording of the term of consent complies with Federal Ruling 196/96. Thirty-four researchers filled out a questionnaire and returned it by electronic mail. The vast majority of the respondents (91%) reported that the respective study protocol had been evaluated by a research ethics committee. More than half reported that they had received a previously prepared FITC; that consent from potential study subjects had been obtained by the researcher in charge; and that the subjects had received a copy of their signed FITC. Approximately one half of participants stated that the form of reimbursement of subjects was specified in the FITC, and 44% reported the same in relation to occasional damages resulting from the study. According to participants, in general the provisions of Ruling 196/96 had been met.

[Exclusive breastfeeding among working women with free daycare available at workplace]. / Aleitamento materno exclusivo entre trabalhadoras com creche no local de trabalho.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors related to the decision of exclusive breastfeeding, and the planned and the actual duration among working women with free daycare available at workplace. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted comparing a group of 15 women exclusively breastfeeding their babies with a similar group of women whose babies were already being fed with other food besides maternal milk at the time they started attending a daycare center. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were carried out for data collection. RESULTS: The factors related to the decision of breastfeeding and maintaining it when women went back to work were: the desire to breastfeed based on the importance women of both groups as well as their husbands and significant others attributed to it. The duration of exclusive breastfeeding was mainly associated to the baby's pediatrician counseling, which differed in each group. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of free daycare center at the work place seems an important aspect to breastfeeding maintenance after women go back to work, especially regarding exclusive breastfeeding. The duration of exclusive breastfeeding was related to the information received before and during pregnancy, and also in the postpartum. Women who have exclusively breastfed for almost six months believed the longer they breastfeed the better to their babies' health, while other women believed that three months of exclusive breastfeeding would be enough.

[Research on contraception: opinion of researchers, subjects and advocates of women rights]. / Pesquisa em contracepção: opinião de pesquisadores, sujeitos e defensoras dos direitos das mulheres.

OBJECTIVE: To survey the opinion of researchers, women -- subjects of research-- and of advocates of women's rights about the meaning of "research" and "guinea pigs". METHODS: Researchers (11), women (18) and advocates (10) were interviewed. The study was qualitative and a thematic analysis was carried out. RESULTS: Participants experienced difficulty to explain what research meant and some were unable to do so. For the researchers and most of the women, subjects are not guinea pigs, because they have freedom of choice. Most of the advocates, however, said that subjects are guinea pigs, even when they consent to participate in a study. CONCLUSIONS: The difficulty experienced by researchers when explaining the meaning of research was surprising. The different opinions about "guinea pig" reflect the controversy about its meaning in research. Certainly the expression "guinea pig" does not apply to all studies however the different meanings identified should make researchers cautious about the ethical issues involved in their studies.

[Institutional Review Boards: compliance with Resolution 196/96]. / Comitês de Etica em Pesquisa: adequação à Resolução 196/96.

PURPOSE: This article intends to evaluate the structure, functioning and performance of 17 Institutional Review Boards (IRB), from the viewpoint of their presidents, in relation to the instructions of Resolution 196/96 of the National Council of Health, Ministry of Health, Brazil. METHODS: Presidents of 33 IRBs, that evaluated proposals for research on fertility control, were indicated by the professionals responsible for the area of gynecology in 46 Brazilian medical schools and by the directors of four research centers on human reproduction . A letter with a questionnaire were sent to the presidents, asking them to volunteer for the study. RESULTS: Seventeen presidents completed the questionnaire. Results disclosed a series of violations of Resolution 196/96. Three IRBs did not include representatives of the community among their members; four took over a month to release the Board's decision on proposals and 13 did not follow-up the studies. Composition and filing of the research proposals were in agreement with the Resolution. However, in eight IRBs time of mandate differed from that set forth in the Resolution. Almost all presidents (about 14 of the 17) thought that the composition and activities of their IRBs were adequate. Eleven considered the Resolution appropriate but difficult to comply with. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that an extensive debate on the operational viability of the Resolution would be timely. This endeavor could bring forth valuable suggestions for the improvement and applicability of the Resolution contributing to the improvement of the scientific and ethical quality of research.

Ressarcimento das despesas de sujeitos de pesquisa: experiência de pesquisadores / Reimbursement of expenses to research subjects: Brazilian researchers experience

Objetivo: Conhecer a experiência e opinião de pesquisadores da área de ginecologia e Obstetrícia (GO) sobre o ressarcimento de despesas a sujeitos de pesquisa. Sujeitos e métodos: Estudo qualitativo em que se realizaram entrevistas semiestruturadas, por telefone, com sete pesquisadores-docentes de cinco programas de pós-graduação em GO de universidades paulistas. Realizou-se análise temática de conteúdo das entrevistas transcritas. Resultados: Cinco pesquisadores tinham experiência com estudos em que se fez o ressarcimento aos sujeitos, geralmente pago em dinheiro. Nenhum pesquisador referiu ter encontrado dificuldades para calcular o valor do ressarcimento porque isso era determinado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa (CEP) ou pelas agências de fomento. O projeto da pesquisa havia sido aprovado por um CEP que não questionou o valor do ressarcimento proposto. Os participantes concordaram que, além de transporte e alimentação, também se deveria considerar o tempo, dia de trabalho, em que consistiria a participação da pessoa e a complexidade da pesquisa para calcular o valor do ressarcimento. Este não pode ser alto porque pode 'comprar a consciência' ou produzir uma 'mercantilização', mas, se for baixo, 'não vale a pena' participar. Conclusão: Os pesquisadores não dispõem de parâmetros oficiais, regulamentados, para estabelecerem o valor do ressarcimento em cada pesquisa. Reconhecem que é difícil estabelecer esse valor para não constrangerem as pessoas, mas, ao mesmo tempo, entendem que o ressarcimento pode motivá- las a participarem das pesquisas. Evidencia-se a necessidade ampliar a discussão a esse respeito para prover diretrizes mais claras aos pesquisadores (AU)

Objective: To assess the experience and opinion of the researchers in the area of Gynecology and Obstetrics about the reimbursement of expenses to the research subjects. Subjects and Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in which semi-structured interviews were done by telephone, with seven researchers-professors from five post-graduate programs in Obstetrics and Gynecology in São Paulo universities. Thematic content analysis from the transcribed interviews was conducted. Results: Five researchers had experience with studies in which the compensation was made to the subjects, usually paid in cash. No researcher reported having any difficult to calculate the amount of compensation because it was determined by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) or by any agency which is given the funds for the research. The research project was approved by an REC which did not make any question about the amount proposed. Participants agreed that in addition to transportation and food, it is convenient to also take into account the time, day job, what exactly would be the subject participation and the complexity of the survey to calculate the amount of compensation. This may not be high because it can 'buy the conscience' or produce a 'way of commerce'; even in cases it is low; however, if the compensation is so low the participants reported that 'it does not worth' to take part of the study. Discussion: The researchers have no official rules regulated, to establish the amount of compensation for each survey. They recognize that it is difficult to establish this value not to constrain people, but at the same time, understand that the compensation can motivate them to participate in the research. They highlights the need to broaden the discussion about it to provide clearer guidelines to researchers (AU)

No disponible