Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prev Med ; : 108101, 2024 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39151806

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication of pregnancy and is associated with considerable psychological burden for women. In qualitative research, women with GDM describe increased awareness about their bonding with their infant, potentially resulting from the highly medicalised nature of the condition. The primary aim is to examine quantitatively whether GDM was associated with lower mother-infant bonding in the postnatal period. METHODS: Data were analysed from 10,419 women who participated in the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study from 2013 to 2017 in Japan. GDM status was collected from hospital records and measured using the oral glucose tolerance test. Mother-infant bonding was assessed using the Japanese version of Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS-J) at one-month postpartum, higher scores representing lower bonding. Data were analysed in SAS using multiple regression adjusting for relevant confounders. RESULTS: GDM did not appear to be associated with worse mother-infant bonding scores at one-month postpartum. There was a non-significant unadjusted trend in the mean mother-infant bonding scores and the proportion with bonding disorder (n = 4 (4.12%) versus n = 969 (9.39%)) in the GDM versus non GDM group respectively, indicating higher self-reported bonding in the GDM group, and this remained not statistically significant in the adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We observed the reverse of our hypothesis, that there was a trend for women with GDM to self-report higher bonding compared to non-GDM women. There is need to replicate this finding in cohorts specifically designed to measure GDM-specific psychological distress.

2.
Birth ; 51(3): 595-601, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38305668

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In an Australian randomized controlled trial (RCT), two techniques for intrapartum fetal surveillance were compared: ST analysis (STan) as an adjunct to cardiotocography (CTG), compared with CTG alone. The aim was to determine whether CTG + STan could reduce emergency cesarean birth rates while maintaining or improving neonatal outcomes. Secondary aims were to compare clinical, economic, and psychosocial outcomes. The purpose of this paper was to present psychosocial outcomes from one cohort enrolled in the trial. METHODS: The study was conducted at one tertiary referral hospital. Participants who had taken part in the trial from the outset were invited to complete a questionnaire between March 2018 and January 2020, approximately 8 weeks after giving birth. Outcomes included depression, psychological distress, health-related quality of life, and infant feeding practices. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: N = 207/527 participants completed the questionnaire (n = 113, STan; n = 94, CTG alone). Overall, no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences were found in the two groups for symptoms of depression, psychological distress, quality of life, or infant feeding. A statistically significant difference was observed for the subscale of pain-discomfort, where scores were higher on average in the CTG alone arm relative to that in the CTG + STan arm. CONCLUSIONS: Although STan as an adjunct to CTG constitutes a different clinical technology from CTG alone, both monitoring types appeared to produce similar results in terms of postnatal psychosocial outcomes for women. Findings from this study provide service users and staff with a comprehensive assessment of STan that can be used to make evidence-informed decisions about monitoring options should STan become more widely available.


Subject(s)
Cardiotocography , Quality of Life , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Australia , Cardiotocography/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Cesarean Section/psychology , Fetal Monitoring/methods , Depression , Infant, Newborn , Psychological Distress , Cohort Studies
3.
J Health Psychol ; : 13591053241241863, 2024 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38628073

ABSTRACT

Health-related stigma is associated with adverse outcomes including depression, stress and reduced engagement in health behaviours which are particularly harmful in pregnancy and the postpartum. Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) report negative psychosocial experiences and may be at risk of stigma related to the condition. We aimed to understand women's experiences of GDM-specific stigma. Individual interviews were conducted with n = 53 women living in the UK with a current or past (within 4 years) GDM. Grounded theory methodology was used to analyse the data. Four themes were identified: (1) Preconceptions and misconceptions; (2) Locating, regaining, and negotiating agency; (3) Tension about and resisting the dominant discourse of stigma; and (4) Reclaiming control over the body. GDM-specific stigma was diverse and far reaching and may have broader implications for perinatal mental health and postnatal wellbeing. It is pertinent to investigate possible prospective associations between GDM-specific stigma, and biomedical and mental health outcomes.

4.
Midwifery ; 131: 103949, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382415

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The National Health Service (NHS) in England plans to increase accessibility to evidence-based, trauma-informed psychological care for women in the perinatal period. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to 1) synthesise current guidance from clinical guidelines, policy documents, and care standards on trauma-informed approaches to care in maternal mental health settings within the context of pregnancy-related trauma and 2) to offer recommendations informing the implementation and evaluation of this type of care. METHODS: Nine electronic databases were searched and screened. Data were extracted and analysed using narrative synthesis. Included records were quality-assessed. RESULTS: After screening 1095 identified records, 11 records were included. The findings were synthesised into eight recommendations: 1) screening for trauma, 2) access to care, 3) clear and sensitive communication, 4) consistency and continuity of care, 5) offering individualised care whilst recognising diversity, 6) collaboration between women, families, and services, 7) care provider training to enhance skills and knowledge, and 8) supervision and peer support for care providers. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review are highly relevant given the current development, delivery, and evaluation of specific maternal mental health services, particularly in the United Kingdom, but also with the increase in perinatal mental health provision more globally.


Subject(s)
Mental Health Services , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Mental Health Services/standards , Maternal Health Services/standards , Adult , England , State Medicine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL