The potential for therapeutic drug monitoring of belatacept and other biologicals in solid organ transplantation.

In solid organ transplantation (SOT), biologicals such as recombinant therapeutic proteins, monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins and conjugates are increasingly used for immunosuppression, desensitization, ABO (blood group) incompatibility, antibody-mediated rejections and atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome. In this paper, we review the medical evidence available for biologicals used in SOT and the potential for improvement by the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and model-informed precision dosing. Biologicals are used for off-label indications within the field of SOT, building on the experience from their use on labelled indications. Dosing is currently mostly standard, and experience vs. effect and toxicity is limited. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of these large, partly also immunogenic molecules differ from those of traditional small molecules. Individualization by concentration measurements and modelling has mostly been proof-of-concept or feasibility studies that lack the power to provide evidence for improvement in clinical outcome. For some drugs such as alemtuzumab, eculizumab, rituximab, tocilizumab and belatacept, studies have demonstrated significant interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics. Variability in absorption from subcutaneous administration may increase interindividual variability. There is also an economic aspect of appropriate dosing that needs to be pursued. Available assays and models to refine interpretation are in place, but trials of adequate size to document the usefulness of TDM and MIPD are scarce. Collaboration within the TDM community seems mandatory to establish studies of sufficient strength to provide evidence for the use of biologicals that are currently used off-label in SOT and furthermore to identify the settings where TDM may be beneficial.

Clinical performance of volumetric finger-prick sampling for the monitoring of tacrolimus, creatinine and haemoglobin in kidney transplant recipients.

AIMS: Finger-prick sampling has emerged as an attractive tool for therapeutic drug monitoring and associated diagnostics. We aimed to validate the clinical performance of using two volumetric devices (Capitainer® qDBS and Mitra®) for monitoring tacrolimus, creatinine and haemoglobin in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. Secondarily, we evaluated potential differences between finger-prick sampling performed by healthcare professionals vs. self-sampling, and differences between the two devices. METHODS: We compared finger-prick and venous sampling in three settings: microsampling performed by healthcare personnel, self-sampling under supervision, unsupervised self-sampling. The finger-prick samples were analysed with adapted methods and results compared to routine method analysis of the venous blood samples. RESULTS: Twenty-five KTx recipients completed the main study and 12 KTx recipients completed a post hoc validation study. For tacrolimus measurements and predicted area under the curve, the proportions within ±20% difference were 79%-96% for Capitainer and 77%-95% for Mitra. For creatinine and haemoglobin, the proportions within ±15% were 92%-100% and 93%-100% for Capitainer and 79%-96% and 67%-92% for Mitra, respectively. Comparing sampling situations, the success rate was consistent for Capitainer (92%-96%), whereas Mitra showed 72%-88% and 52%-72% success rates with samples collected by healthcare personnel and the patients themselves. CONCLUSIONS: Capitainer and Mitra are technically feasible for measuring tacrolimus, creatinine and haemoglobin. In the context of self-sampling, Capitainer maintained consistent sampling success and analytical quality. Implementing volumetric finger-prick self-sampling for the monitoring of tacrolimus, creatinine and haemoglobin may simplify and improve the follow-up of KTx recipients.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Dosage Adjustments of Immunosuppressive Drugs When Combined With Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Patients With COVID-19.

ABSTRACT: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) consists of a peptidomimetic inhibitor (nirmatrelvir) of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease and a pharmacokinetic enhancer (ritonavir). It is approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19. This combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir can mediate significant and complex drug-drug interactions (DDIs), primarily due to the ritonavir component. Indeed, ritonavir inhibits the metabolism of nirmatrelvir through cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) leading to higher plasma concentrations and a longer half-life of nirmatrelvir. Coadministration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir with immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) is particularly challenging given the major involvement of CYP3A in the metabolism of most of these drugs and their narrow therapeutic ranges. Exposure of ISDs will be drastically increased through the potent ritonavir-mediated inhibition of CYP3A, resulting in an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. Although a decrease in the dosage of ISDs can prevent toxicity, an inappropriate dosage regimen may also result in insufficient exposure and a risk of rejection. Here, we provide some general recommendations for therapeutic drug monitoring of ISDs and dosing recommendations when coadministered with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Particularly, tacrolimus should be discontinued, or patients should be given a microdose on day 1, whereas cyclosporine dosage should be reduced to 20% of the initial dosage during the antiviral treatment. Dosages of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (m-TORis) should also be adjusted while dosages of mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids are expected to be less impacted.

Monitoring Simvastatin Adherence in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Study Based on Pharmacokinetic Measurements in Blood Plasma.

BACKGROUND: Poor statin adherence remains a public health concern associated with adverse outcomes. We evaluated the use of pharmacokinetic measurements to monitor adherence to simvastatin in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Eighteen patients with CHD taking an evening dose of simvastatin 20 mg (n = 7), 40 mg (n = 5), or 80 mg (n = 6) were examined at steady-state pharmacokinetics. Ten patients were instructed to interrupt simvastatin dosing and return for blood sampling for the subsequent 3 days. Dose-normalized plasma concentrations of simvastatin lactone and simvastatin acid and the sum of the 2 were evaluated to discriminate between adherent dosing and dose omission. Bioanalytical quantification was performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: A simvastatin acid cutoff of 1.0 × 10 -2 nmol -1 ·L -1 ·mg -1 identified 100% of those omitting 2 doses and 60% of those omitting a single dose. Simvastatin acid showed superior ability to discriminate dose omission, as well as the best agreement between samples handled at ambient and cool temperatures (median deviation 3.5%; interquartile range -2.5% to 13%). The cutoff for a morning dose schedule, with a similar ability to discriminate, was estimated at 2.0 × 10 -3 nmol -1 ·L -1 ·mg -1 . CONCLUSIONS: The present method discriminated between adherence and reduced adherence to simvastatin therapy in patients with CHD. Sample handling is feasible for routine practice, and the assessment of adherence can be performed by direct measurement of simvastatin acid in a blood sample, according to defined cutoff values. Further studies validating the cutoff value and utility for clinical application are encouraged.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate as a measurement of kidney function. / Estimert glomerulær filtrasjonshastighet som mål på nyrefunksjon.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate is an established, routine clinical measurement for kidney function, but the estimate has limitations and cannot be used in all clinical situations. Estimated glomerular filtration rate has a high coefficient of variation, and deviations in the patient's height, weight or muscle mass may result in an imprecise estimate. If an accurate measurement of kidney function is essential, glomerular filtration rate can be measured using an exogenous substance.

Tacrolimus Measured in Capillary Volumetric Microsamples in Pediatric Patients-A Cross-Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus (Tac) is mandatory in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Finger-prick microsampling is more flexible and tolerable during the therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus and has been shown to be applicable in adult SOT recipients. In this study, a previously validated method applying volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) to measure Tac in adults was cross-validated in a pediatric population. METHODS: Patients with SOT scheduled for standard posttransplant follow-up visits were recruited. Blood samples were obtained by trained phlebotomists using standard venipuncture and capillary microsampling, before the morning dose of Tac as well as 2 and 5 hours after dosing. Tac concentrations were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Concordance between Tac concentrations obtained with venipuncture and VAMS was evaluated using Passing-Bablok regression, calculation of absolute and relative differences, and percentage of samples within ±20% and ±30% difference. RESULTS: A total of 39 SOT patients aged 4-18 years (22 male) were included. The median (range) predose venous blood concentration was 4.8 (2.6-13.6) mcg/L, with a difference between VAMS and venous blood samples of -0.2 ± 0.7 mcg/L. The relative mean difference was -1.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), -5.9% to 3.4%]. Ninety-two percent and 97% of the sample pairs demonstrated differences within ±20% and ±30%, respectively. Postdose (2 hours and/or 5 hours, n = 17) median concentration in venous blood was 7.9 (4.8-19.2) mcg/L. The difference between VAMS and venous blood samples was 0.1 ± 1.0 mcg/L, with a relative mean difference of -2.5% (95% confidence interval, -8.8% to 3.8%). Eighty-eight percent of the postdose sample pairs were within ±20% difference, and all were within ±30% difference. CONCLUSIONS: Tac concentrations can be accurately measured using VAMS technology in pediatric SOT recipients. This makes home-based Tac monitoring feasible in the pediatric population.

Prednisolone and Prednisone Pharmacokinetics in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Prednisolone (PL) is a standard component of most immunosuppressive protocols after solid organ transplantation (Tx). Adverse effects are frequent and well known. The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of PL and prednisone (PN), including cortisol (CL) and cortisone (CN) profiles, after PL treatment in renal Tx recipients in the early post-Tx phase. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, observational study included stable renal Tx recipients, >18 years of age, and in the early postengraftment phase. Blood samples were obtained predose and during a 24-hour dose interval [n = 26 samples per area under the curve (AUC0-24)], within the first 8 weeks post-Tx. PL, PN, CL, and CN concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: In renal Tx recipients (n = 28), our results indicated a relatively high PL exposure [median, range AUC0-24 = 3821 (2232-5382) mcg h/L], paralleled by strong suppression of endogenous CL profile, demonstrated by a low CL evening-to-morning ratio [median, range 11 (3-47)%]. A negative correlation (r = -0.83) between PL AUC0-24 and morning CL levels was observed. The best single PK variable to predict PL AUC0-24 was PL C6 (r2 = 0.82). An algorithm based on 3 PK sampling time points: trough, 2, and 4 hours after PL dosing, predicted PL AUC0-24 with a low percentage prediction error (PPE = 5.2 ± 1.5%) and a good correlation of determination (r2 = 0.91). PL AUC0-24 varied 3-fold among study participants, whereas CL AUC0-24 varied by 18-fold. CONCLUSIONS: The large interindividual variability in both PL exposure and suppression of endogenous CL implies a possible role for therapeutic drug monitoring. An abbreviated profile within the first 4 hours after PL dosing provides a good prediction of PL exposure in renal Tx recipients. The strong negative correlation between PL AUC0-24 and morning CL levels suggests a possible surrogate marker for drug exposure for further evaluation.

Personalized Therapy for Mycophenolate: Consensus Report by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology.

ABSTRACT: When mycophenolic acid (MPA) was originally marketed for immunosuppressive therapy, fixed doses were recommended by the manufacturer. Awareness of the potential for a more personalized dosing has led to development of methods to estimate MPA area under the curve based on the measurement of drug concentrations in only a few samples. This approach is feasible in the clinical routine and has proven successful in terms of correlation with outcome. However, the search for superior correlates has continued, and numerous studies in search of biomarkers that could better predict the perfect dosage for the individual patient have been published. As it was considered timely for an updated and comprehensive presentation of consensus on the status for personalized treatment with MPA, this report was prepared following an initiative from members of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT). Topics included are the criteria for analytics, methods to estimate exposure including pharmacometrics, the potential influence of pharmacogenetics, development of biomarkers, and the practical aspects of implementation of target concentration intervention. For selected topics with sufficient evidence, such as the application of limited sampling strategies for MPA area under the curve, graded recommendations on target ranges are presented. To provide a comprehensive review, this report also includes updates on the status of potential biomarkers including those which may be promising but with a low level of evidence. In view of the fact that there are very few new immunosuppressive drugs under development for the transplant field, it is likely that MPA will continue to be prescribed on a large scale in the upcoming years. Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse effects is relatively common, increasing the risk for late rejections, which may contribute to graft loss. Therefore, the continued search for innovative methods to better personalize MPA dosage is warranted.

Pharmacodynamic assessment of mycophenolic acid in resting and activated target cell population during the first year after renal transplantation.

AIMS: To explore the pharmacodynamics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) through inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) capacity measurement and purine levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) longitudinally during the first year after renal transplantation (TX). METHODS: PBMC were isolated from renal recipients 0-4 days prior to and 6-9 days, 5-7 weeks and 1 year after TX (before and 1.5 hours after dose). IMPDH capacity and purine (guanine and adenine) levels were measured in stimulated and nonstimulated PBMC. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients completed the follow-up period, of whom 24 received MPA. In stimulated PBMC, the IMPDH capacity (pmol 10-6 cells min-1 ) was median (interquartile range) 127 (95.8-147) before TX and thereafter 44.9 (19.2-93.2) predose and 12.1 (4.64-23.6) 1.5 hours postdose across study days after TX. The corresponding IMPDH capacity in nonstimulated PBMC was 5.71 (3.79-6.93), 3.35 (2.31-5.62) and 2.71 (1.38-4.08), respectively. Predose IMPDH capacity in nonstimulated PBMC increased with time, reaching pre-TX values at 1 year. In stimulated PBMC, both purines were reduced before (median 39% reduction across days after TX) and after (69% reduction) dose compared to before TX. No alteration in the purine levels was observed in nonstimulated PBMC. Patients needing dose reductions during the first year had lower pre-dose IMPDH capacity in nonstimulated PBMC (1.87 vs 3.00 pmol 10-6 cells min-1 , P = .049) at 6-9 days. CONCLUSION: The inhibitory effect of MPA was stronger in stimulated PBMC. Nonstimulated PBMC became less sensitive to MPA during the first year after TX. Early IMPDH capacity appeared to be predictive of dose reductions.

Tacrolimus Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Monitoring, Using Home-Based Volumetric Absorptive Capillary Microsampling.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of tacrolimus (Tac) is mandatory in renal transplant recipients (RTxR). Area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) is the preferred measure for Tac exposure; however, for practical purposes, most centers use trough concentrations as a clinical surrogate. Limited sampling strategies in combination with population pharmacokinetic model-derived Bayesian estimators (popPK-BE) may accurately predict individual AUC. The use of self-collected capillary microsamples could simplify this strategy. This study aimed to investigate the potential of AUC-targeted Tac TDM using capillary microsamples in combination with popPK-BE. METHODS: A single-center prospective pharmacokinetic study was conducted in standard-risk RTxR (n = 27) receiving Tac twice daily. Both venous and capillary microsamples (Mitra; Neoteryx, Torrance, CA) were obtained across 2 separate 12-hour Tac dosing intervals (n = 13 samples/AUC). Using popPK-BE, reference AUC (AUCref) was determined for each patient using all venous samples. Different limited sampling strategies were tested for AUC predictions: (1) the empiric sampling scheme; 0, 1, and 3 hours after dose and (2) 3 sampling times determined by the multiple model optimal sampling time function in Pmetrics. Agreement between the predicted AUCs and AUCref were evaluated using C-statistics. Accepted agreement was defined as a total deviation index ≤±15%. RESULTS: The AUC from capillary microsamples revealed high accuracy and precision compared with venous AUCref, and 85% of the AUCs had an error within ±11.9%. Applying microsamples at 0, 1, and 3 hours after dose predicted venous AUCref with acceptable agreement. Patients performed self-sampling with acceptable accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Capillary microsampling is patient-centered, making AUC-targeted TDM of Tac feasible without extended hospital stays. Samples obtained 0, 1, and 3 hours after dose, combined with popPK-BE, accurately predict venous Tac AUC.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Transplant Recipients Infected With SARS-CoV-2: Considerations Regarding Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Drug-Drug Interactions.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a novel infectious disease caused by the severe acute respiratory distress (SARS)-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Several therapeutic options are currently emerging but none with universal consensus or proven efficacy. Solid organ transplant recipients are perceived to be at increased risk of severe COVID-19 because of their immunosuppressed conditions due to chronic use of immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs). It is therefore likely that solid organ transplant recipients will be treated with these experimental antivirals. METHODS: This article is not intended to provide a systematic literature review on investigational treatments tested against COVID-19; rather, the authors aim to provide recommendations for therapeutic drug monitoring of ISDs in transplant recipients infected with SARS-CoV-2 based on a review of existing data in the literature. RESULTS: Management of drug-drug interactions between investigational anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs and immunosuppressants is a complex task for the clinician. Adequate immunosuppression is necessary to prevent graft rejection while, if critically ill, the patient may benefit from pharmacotherapeutic interventions directed at limiting SARS-CoV-2 viral replication. Maintaining ISD concentrations within the desired therapeutic range requires a highly individualized approach that is complicated by the pandemic context and lack of hindsight. CONCLUSIONS: With this article, the authors inform the clinician about the potential interactions of experimental COVID-19 treatments with ISDs used in transplantation. Recommendations regarding therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustments in the context of COVID-19 are provided.

Measuring Intracellular Concentrations of Calcineurin Inhibitors: Expert Consensus from the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Expert Panel.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the 2 calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), tacrolimus (TAC) and cyclosporin A, has resulted in improvements in the management of patients who have undergone solid organ transplantation. As a result of TDM, acute rejection (AR) rates and treatment-related toxicities have been reduced. Irrespective, AR and toxicity still occur in patients who have undergone transplantation, showing blood CNI concentrations within the therapeutic range. Moreover, the AR rate is no longer decreasing. Hence, smarter TDM approaches are necessary. Because CNIs exert their action inside T lymphocytes, intracellular CNIs may be a promising candidate for improving therapeutic outcomes. The intracellular CNI concentration may be more directly related to the drug effect and has been favorably compared with the standard, whole-blood TDM for TAC in liver transplant recipients. However, measuring intracellular CNIs concentrations is not without pitfalls at both the preanalytical and analytical stages, and standardization seems essential in this area. To date, there are no guidelines for the TDM of intracellular CNI concentrations. METHODS: Under the auspices of the International Association of TDM and Clinical Toxicology and its Immunosuppressive Drug committees, a group of leading investigators in this field have shared experiences and have presented preanalytical and analytical recommendations for measuring intracellular CNI concentrations.

Cardiovascular rEmodelling in living kidNey donorS with reduced glomerular filtration rate: rationale and design of the CENS study.

Purpose: Until recently, it has been believed that donating a kidney not represents any risk for development of cardiovascular disease. However, a recent Norwegian epidemiological study suggests that kidney donors have an increased long-term risk of cardiovascular mortality. The pathophysiological mechanisms linking reduced kidney function to cardiovascular disease are not known. Living kidney donors are screened for cardiovascular morbidity before unilateral nephrectomy, and are left with mildly reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after donation. Therefore, they represent an unique model for investigating the pathogenesis linking reduced GFR to cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular remodelling. We present the study design of Cardiovascular rEmodelling in living kidNey donorS with reduced glomerular filtration rate (CENS), which is an investigator-initiated prospective observational study on living kidney donors. The hypothesis is that living kidney donors develop cardiovascular remodelling due to a reduction of GFR.Materials and methods: 60 living kidney donors and 60 age and sex matched healthy controls will be recruited. The controls will be evaluated to fulfil the Norwegian transplantation protocol for living kidney donors. Investigations will be performed at baseline and after 1, 3, 6 and 10 years in both groups. The investigations include cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, bone density scan, flow mediated dilatation, laser Doppler flowmetry, nailfold capillaroscopy, office blood pressure, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate variability and investigation of microbiota and biomarkers for inflammation, cardiovascular risk and the calcium-phosphate metabolism.Conclusions: The present study seeks to provide new insight in the pathophysiological mechanisms linking reduced kidney function to cardiovascular disease. In addition, we aim to enlighten predictors of adverse cardiovascular outcome in living kidney donors. The study is registered at Clinical-Trials.gov (identifier: NCT03729557).

Effects of marine n-3 fatty acid supplementation in renal transplantation: A randomized controlled trial.

Marine n-3 fatty acids (FAs) may exert beneficial effects on inflammation, fibrosis, and endothelial function, which could preserve renal graft function. In this randomized controlled trial, 132 Norwegian renal transplant recipients received either 2.6 g of marine n-3 FAs or olive oil (control) daily for 44 weeks, in addition to standard care. Thirty patients did not complete the trial. The primary endpoint was change (Δ) in measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) during follow-up. We found no significant difference in Δ mGFR between the marine n-3 FA group and controls (6.7 vs 3.8 mL/min per 1.73 m2 , P = .15). Significant beneficial effects from marine n-3 FA supplementation were, however, seen in secondary endpoints plasma triglycerides, plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation. In the per-protocol population, the renal graft indices percent interstitial fibrosis and Chronic Allograft Damage Index also were significantly lower in the marine n-3 FA group. The cumulative incidence of adverse events did not differ between the marine n-3 FA group (n = 218) and controls (n = 240). In conclusion, marine FA supplementation did not improve renal function compared with controls, but was safe, lowered plasma triglyceride and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, and improved endothelial function (Clinical.Trials.gov identifier NCT01744067).

A novel direct method to determine adherence to atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary heart disease.

AIMS: Objective methods to monitor statin adherence are needed. We have established a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for quantification of atorvastatin and its metabolites in blood. This study aimed to develop an objective drug exposure variable with cut-off values to discriminate among adherence, partial adherence and nonadherence to atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary heart disease. METHODS: Twenty-five patients treated with atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 5), 20 mg (n = 6), 40 mg (n = 7) and 80 mg (n = 7) participated in a directly observed atorvastatin therapy study to confirm baseline adherence. After the directly observed therapy, half of the patients (test group) were instructed to stop taking atorvastatin and return for blood sample collection the subsequent 3 days. Levels of atorvastatin and metabolites were compared between the test group and the adherent control group. RESULTS: The sum of parent drug and all measured primary metabolites correlated well with the atorvastatin dose administered (Spearman's rho = 0.71, 95% CI 0.44-0.87). The dose-normalized atorvastatin plus metabolites concentrations completely separated the partially adherent test group from the controls at 0.18 nM/mg after 3 days without atorvastatin. To reduce the risk of misinterpreting adherent patients as partially adherent, a corresponding cut-off at 0.10 nM/mg is proposed. A metabolite level of 2-OH atorvastatin acid <0.014 nmol/L provided the optimal cut-off for nonadherence. CONCLUSION: A direct method to discriminate among adherence, partial adherence and nonadherence to atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary heart disease has been developed. This tool may be important for novel studies on adherence and potentially useful in clinical practice.

A Method for Direct Monitoring of Atorvastatin Adherence in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Quantification of the Total Exposure to Parent Drug and Major Metabolites Using 2-Channel Chromatography and Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Low adherence to statin therapy remains a public health concern associated with poor prognosis in cardiovascular disease patients. A feasible method for statin adherence monitoring in clinical practice has yet to be developed. In this article, we describe a novel method designed for the direct monitoring of atorvastatin adherence based on the sum of parent drug and major metabolites in blood samples. METHODS: Acid and lactone forms of atorvastatin, 2-OH-atorvastatin, and 4-OH-atorvastatin were assayed. Plasma proteins were precipitated with an acidified mixture of methanol, acetonitrile, and aqueous zinc sulfate, and the supernatant was analyzed with 2-channel reversed-phase chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Assay validation was performed according to the guidelines provided by the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration. RESULTS: The effective run time was 1 minute and 45 seconds per sample. Mean accuracy ranged from 92% to 110%, and coefficients of variation were ≤8.1% over the measurement ranges for individual compounds. The sum of acids and corresponding lactones was stable in clinical plasma samples kept at ambient temperature for up to 6 days after blood sampling (mean sum within 96.6%-101% of baseline). CONCLUSIONS: A fast and reliable assay for the quantification of atorvastatin and its 5 major metabolites in clinical blood samples is reported. Limitations of preanalytical stability were solved using the sum of the acid and lactone forms. The assay is feasible for implementation in clinical practice, and the sum of parent drug and metabolites may be used for direct monitoring of atorvastatin adherence.

Tacrolimus Can Be Reliably Measured With Volumetric Absorptive Capillary Microsampling Throughout the Dose Interval in Renal Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring is standard practice for the immunosuppressant tacrolimus (Tac). Venous blood sampling at outpatient clinics is time-consuming and impractical with regard to obtaining trough concentrations on clinical visit days. Home-based blood sampling may be patient friendly and pave the way for limited sampling strategies for the prediction of total drug exposure. The aim was to establish a Tac assay for dried capillary microsamples, ensuring reliable measurements during the full dose interval in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: An assay based on volumetric absorptive microsampling and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry was validated. The agreement between capillary microsamples and liquid venous samples was investigated in stable renal recipients on twice-daily Tac dosing. Sampling throughout the 12-hour dose interval was examined at 2 separate days, at least 1 week apart, for each participant. Two sets of samples were obtained at each time point, one delivered directly to the laboratory and one sent through mail. RESULTS: Twenty-seven renal transplant recipients were included, of whom 26 were investigated twice. Tac was efficiently extracted from the dried microsamples (mean recovery 94%-103%). The between-series mean accuracy was 88%-98% with coefficients of variation ≤5.0% (≤11% at the lower limit of quantification), measurement range 0.70-60 mcg/L. The mean difference between parallel microsamples was 5%-7%. Overall, the mean differences between dried microsamples and liquid samples were -3.1% when mailed (n = 679) and -4.2% when directly delivered (n = 682). Less than 8% were outside ±20%. The microsamples were stable for 1 month at ambient temperature. CONCLUSIONS: The microsample method demonstrated acceptable performance. Tac concentrations can be reliably quantified throughout the dose interval by using volumetric absorptive microsampling in renal transplant recipients, and the results are not influenced by postal shipment.

A Fully Automated Method for the Determination of Serum Belatacept and Its Application in a Pharmacokinetic Investigation in Renal Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Belatacept (Nulojix; Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY) is a biological immunosuppressive drug used for the prophylaxis of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Few studies have described belatacept pharmacokinetics, and the effect of therapeutic drug monitoring has not been investigated. We have developed a drug-capture assay (using drug target) to measure belatacept in serum and applied this assay in a pharmacokinetic study in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: CD80 was used to trap belatacept onto streptavidin-coated wells. Captured drug was quantified using Eu-labeled protein A and time-resolved fluorescence. The assay was applied in a pilot pharmacokinetic study in renal transplanted patients receiving belatacept infusions. Belatacept serum concentrations were determined at several time points between belatacept infusions. A simple population pharmacokinetic model was developed to visualize measured and predicted belatacept serum concentrations. RESULTS: The assay range was 0.9-30 mg/L with accuracy within 91%-99% and coefficients of variation ranging from 1.2% to 3.6%. Predilution extended the measurement range to 130 mg/L with an accuracy of 90% and coefficients of variation of 3.8%. Samples were stable during storage at 4°C for 15 days and during 2 freeze-thaw cycles. Belatacept concentrations were determined in a total of 203 serum samples collected during 26 infusion intervals from 5 renal transplant recipients. The population pharmacokinetic model visualized both measured and predicted concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed an automated, accurate, and precise assay for the determination of belatacept serum concentrations. The assay was successfully applied in a pharmacokinetic study in renal transplant recipients receiving belatacept infusions.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus-Personalized Therapy: Second Consensus Report.

Ten years ago, a consensus report on the optimization of tacrolimus was published in this journal. In 2017, the Immunosuppressive Drugs Scientific Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicity (IATDMCT) decided to issue an updated consensus report considering the most relevant advances in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacogenetics (PG), pharmacodynamics, and immunologic biomarkers, with the aim to provide analytical and drug-exposure recommendations to assist TDM professionals and clinicians to individualize tacrolimus TDM and treatment. The consensus is based on in-depth literature searches regarding each topic that is addressed in this document. Thirty-seven international experts in the field of TDM of tacrolimus as well as its PG and biomarkers contributed to the drafting of sections most relevant for their expertise. Whenever applicable, the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations were graded according to a published grading guide. After iterated editing, the final version of the complete document was approved by all authors. For each category of solid organ and stem cell transplantation, the current state of PK monitoring is discussed and the specific targets of tacrolimus trough concentrations (predose sample C0) are presented for subgroups of patients along with the grading of these recommendations. In addition, tacrolimus area under the concentration-time curve determination is proposed as the best TDM option early after transplantation, at the time of immunosuppression minimization, for special populations, and specific clinical situations. For indications other than transplantation, the potentially effective tacrolimus concentrations in systemic treatment are discussed without formal grading. The importance of consistency, calibration, proficiency testing, and the requirement for standardization and need for traceability and reference materials is highlighted. The status for alternative approaches for tacrolimus TDM is presented including dried blood spots, volumetric absorptive microsampling, and the development of intracellular measurements of tacrolimus. The association between CYP3A5 genotype and tacrolimus dose requirement is consistent (Grading A I). So far, pharmacodynamic and immunologic biomarkers have not entered routine monitoring, but determination of residual nuclear factor of activated T cells-regulated gene expression supports the identification of renal transplant recipients at risk of rejection, infections, and malignancy (B II). In addition, monitoring intracellular T-cell IFN-g production can help to identify kidney and liver transplant recipients at high risk of acute rejection (B II) and select good candidates for immunosuppression minimization (B II). Although cell-free DNA seems a promising biomarker of acute donor injury and to assess the minimally effective C0 of tacrolimus, multicenter prospective interventional studies are required to better evaluate its clinical utility in solid organ transplantation. Population PK models including CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 genotypes will be considered to guide initial tacrolimus dosing. Future studies should investigate the clinical benefit of time-to-event models to better evaluate biomarkers as predictive of personal response, the risk of rejection, and graft outcome. The Expert Committee concludes that considerable advances in the different fields of tacrolimus monitoring have been achieved during this last decade. Continued efforts should focus on the opportunities to implement in clinical routine the combination of new standardized PK approaches with PG, and valid biomarkers to further personalize tacrolimus therapy and to improve long-term outcomes for treated patients.