Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
J Clin Med ; 10(21)2021 Oct 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34768332

ABSTRACT

Significant treatment variation exists in the Netherlands between teams treating patients with cleft lip, alveolus, and/or palate, resulting in a confusing and undesirable situation for patients, parents, and practitioners. Therefore, to optimize cleft care, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) were developed. The aim of this report is to describe CPG development, share the main recommendations, and indicate knowledge gaps regarding cleft care. Together with patients and parents, a multidisciplinary working group of representatives from all relevant disciplines assisted by two experienced epidemiologists identified the topics to be addressed in the CPGs. Searching the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases identified 5157 articles, 60 of which remained after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. We rated the quality of the evidence from moderate to very low. The working group formulated 71 recommendations regarding genetic testing, feeding, lip and palate closure, hearing, hypernasality, bone grafting, orthodontics, psychosocial guidance, dentistry, osteotomy versus distraction, and rhinoplasty. The final CPGs were obtained after review by all stakeholders and allow cleft teams to base their treatment on current knowledge. With high-quality evidence lacking, the need for additional high-quality studies has become apparent.

2.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 49(3): 198-202, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20403652

ABSTRACT

We have evaluated the survival of dental implants in extremely atrophic edentulous maxillas after autogenous bone grafting. We compared two techniques: the Le Fort I down-grafting procedure and conventional raising of the sinus floor with onlay bone grafting. Twenty-seven consecutive patients had their atrophic maxillas reconstructed, 10 of whom were treated with a Le Fort I osteotomy with down-grafting and interpositioning of bone, and 17 by raising the sinus floor and onlay grafts. All implants were placed 5-6 months after grafting. There was no difference in the survival of implants between the two groups. The choice of grafting technique will therefore be based primarily on the interarch relations and the need for soft tissue support.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods , Bone Transplantation/methods , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Maxilla/surgery , Maxillary Sinus/surgery , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Osteotomy, Le Fort/methods , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Bone Plates , Bone Substitutes , Chi-Square Distribution , Dental Restoration Failure , Female , Humans , Jaw, Edentulous/surgery , Male , Maxillary Diseases/surgery , Middle Aged , Osteotomy, Le Fort/instrumentation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL