Pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir with and without darunavir/cobicistat in healthy volunteers.

Background: Dolutegravir combined with darunavir/cobicistat is a promising NRTI-sparing and/or salvage strategy for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Methods: This Phase I, open-label, 57 day, crossover, pharmacokinetic (PK) study, enrolled healthy volunteers aged 18-65 years, who were randomized to one of two groups. Group 1 received dolutegravir (50 mg) once daily for 14 days followed by a 7 day washout, then a 14 day dolutegravir/darunavir/cobicistat (DTG/DRV/COBI) once-daily co-administration period followed by a 7 day washout and finally a 14 day period of darunavir/cobicistat (800/150 mg) once daily. Group 2 followed the same sequence starting with darunavir/cobicistat and concluding with dolutegravir. Each group underwent intensive PK sampling over 24 h on day 14 of each drug period and DTG/DRV/COBI concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. Results: Twenty participants completed all PK phases. Thirteen were female and median age and BMI were 33.5 years and 27 kg/m2. Dolutegravir geometric mean ratios (GMR, DTG/DRV/COBI versus dolutegravir alone) and 90% CI for Cmax, AUC0-24 and C24 were 1.01 (0.92-1.11), 0.95 (0.87-1.04) and 0.9 (0.8-1.0), respectively. Darunavir GMR (DRV/COBI/DTG versus darunavir/cobicistat alone) and 90% CI for Cmax, AUC0-24 and C24 were 0.90 (0.83-0.98), 0.93 (0.86-1.00) and 0.93 (0.78-1.11), respectively. No grade 3 or 4 adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were observed. Conclusions: Concentrations of dolutegravir and darunavir, when boosted with cobicistat, decreased by <10% during co-administration, suggesting this combination can be prescribed safely in the treatment of HIV-1, with no adjustment to current guideline-recommended dosages.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics of Efavirenz 400 mg Once Daily During Pregnancy and Post-Partum.

Background: A clinical trial showed that efavirenz 400 mg once daily (EFV400) is as effective as the standard adult dose. World Health Organization recommends EFV400 as an alternative first-line agent, but data are lacking in the third trimester of pregnancy (TT). We investigated the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and CYP2B6 pharmacogenetics in HIV-infected women (WLWH) on EFV400 during TT and post-partum (PP). Methods: An open-label 2-center study (United Kingdom, Uganda) was conducted in WLWH receiving antiretroviral regimens containing efavirenz 600 mg, who had their efavirenz dose reduced to EFV400. Weekly therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), steady-state pharmacokinetic profiles (TT and PP), safety, virological efficacy, and CYP2B6 polymorphisms at positions 516 (C > T) and 938 (T > C) were evaluated. Results: Twenty-five WLWH of African origin were enrolled. All had viral loads <50 copies/mL at baseline, which were maintained throughout the study. No infant was HIV infected. No WLWH were withdrawn due to low EFV400 TDM results. Geometric mean ratios (TT/PP; 90% confidence interval) for EFV400 maximum observed plasma concentration, area under the curve, and plasma concentration measured 24 hours after the observed dose were 0.97 (.85-1.10), 0.87 (.76-.99), and 0.77 (.65-.91), respectively. Five of 25 WLWH were slow metabolizers. Conclusions: Although EFV400 pharmacokinetic parameters were slightly lower for TT compared with PP values, efavirenz concentrations exceeded cutoff levels established by the study and those measured in antiretroviral-naive patients receiving EFV400 in ENCORE1. All subjects maintained a viral load <50 copies/mL, suggesting that EFV400 can be used in pregnant WLWH.

Pharmacokinetics (PK) of ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel co-administered with atazanavir/cobicistat.

Background and objectives: Access to safe and reliable contraception in the context of ARVs is essential. This study aimed to investigate the steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) of ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (EE/LNG) 30/150 µg (Microgynon®) and atazanavir/cobicistat (ATV/COBI) 300/150 mg (Evotaz®), co-administered in HIV negative female volunteers, and assess its safety and tolerability.Methods: This phase 1, open label, 57-day, cross over, PK study randomized participants to one of two groups: (i) group 1 received EE/LNG alone on days 1-21, EE/LNG (21 days) + ATV/COBI (14 days) in the co-administration phase (days 22-42) and ATV/COBI alone on days 43-56; (ii) group 2 followed the same sequence but started with ATV/COBI and concluding with EE/LNG. Each group underwent intensive PK sampling on days 14, 35, and 56. EE/LNG and ATV/COBI concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods.Results: Of 14 healthy female volunteers screened, 11 attended baseline and six completed all PK phases (five withdrew secondary to side effects). Paired data were available for analysis in six subjects for EE/LNG and eight for ATV/COBI. Geometric mean ratios (GMR, with versus without ATV/COBI) and 90% confidence intervals (CI) for LNG Cmax, AUC0-24, C24 were 0.83 (0.68-1.02), 0.92 (0.71-1.18), 1.01 (0.73-1.38). GMR and 90% CI for EE Cmax, AUC0-24, C24 were 1.05 (0.92-1.19), 1.01 (0.83-1.22), 0.75 (0.60-0.93). No grade 3 or 4 adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were observed in the women who completed the study.Conclusions: Our findings showed no significant changes in LNG concentrations and a 25% decrease in EE C24 when EE/LNG was co-administered with ATV/COBI.