Chronic therapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and survival in newly diagnosed cancer patients.

Depression might be associated with shorter disease specific survival. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were previously reported to increase the risk of certain malignancies. We aimed to evaluate the impact of SSRIs on cancer mortality. Five retrospective cohort studies were conducted in a UK population-representative database that included all individuals with an incident diagnosis of melanoma, breast, prostate lung and colorectal cancer. The primary exposure of interest was continuous use of SSRIs with past use as the comparison reference. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The study included 5,591 newly diagnosed cancer patients. Continuous SSRI use was associated with lower survival compared to past users for melanoma, breast, prostate, lung and colorectal cancers with HRs for the risk of death of 2.02 (95% CI 1.24-3.28), 1.91 (95% CI 1.53-2.38), 1.79 (95% CI 1.38-2.33), 1.44 (95% CI 1.19-1.75) and 1.51 (95% CI 1.21-1.72) respectively. The incidence of death during the first 2 years following cancer diagnosis associated with continuous SSRI use were elevated for breast (1.72, 95% CI 1.30-2.27), prostate (1.64, 95% CI 1.20-2.24) and lung cancers (1.45, 95% CI 1.26-1.66). In conclusion, continuous use of SSRIs might be associated with lower survival in cancer patients.

Impact of "critical lesions" on outcomes following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and complete cytoreduction are the best outcome predictors following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Lesions in critical areas, regardless of PCI, complicate surgery and impact oncological outcomes. We prospectively defined "Critical lesions" (CL) as penetrating the hepatic hilum, diaphragm at hepatic outflow, major blood vessels, pancreas, or urinary tract. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 352 CRS + HIPEC patients from 2015 to 2019. Excluded patients with aborted/redo operation (n = 112), or incomplete data (n = 19). Patients categorized by CL status and compared: operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), PCI, transfusions, hospital stay, post-operative complications and mortality, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Included 221 patients (78 CL; 143 no-CL). No difference in patients' characteristics: age, BMI, gender or co-morbidities noted. Operative time longer (5.3 h vs 4.3 h, p < 0.01), EBL higher (769 ml vs 405 ml, p < 0.01), transfusions higher (1.9 vs 0.7 Units, p < 0.001) and PCI higher (15.5 vs 9.5, p < 0.01) in CL. No difference in major complications. Postoperative complications, CL, OR-time and transfusions were predictive of OS in univariate analysis, while only complications remained on multivariate analysis. Median follow up of 21.4 months, 3-year DFS/OS was 22% vs 30% (p < 0.037) and 73% vs 87% (p < 0.014) in CL and non-CL, respectively. Despite CL complete resection, 17/38 patients (44.7%) that recurred had recurrence at previous CL site. CONCLUSIONS: Critical lesions complicate surgery and may be associated with poor oncological outcomes with high local recurrence rate, despite no significant difference in complications. Utilizing adjuvant or intra-operative radiation may be beneficial.

Colonoscopic screening of an average-risk population for colorectal neoplasia.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The role of screening colonoscopy in an asymptomatic, average-risk population remains to be determined. Moreover, the value of screening colonoscopy in individuals older than 75 years and for right-sided lesions has recently been questioned. The aims were to assess: (i) the risk of colorectal neoplasia in a large consecutively screened asymptomatic average-risk population, aged 40-85 years; (ii) whether colonoscopy is better than sigmoidoscopy for primary screening; and (iii) the prevalence of right-sided lesions at different ages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study, analyzed data from 1563 consecutive, asymptomatic, average-risk individuals, aged 40-85 years, who underwent screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Overall, neoplastic lesions were detected in 262 individuals (17% of the study population), of whom 75 had advanced lesions (5% of population) and nine had colorectal cancers (CRC) (0.6% of population). The prevalence of all lesions increased with age, with the highest percentages in the > 75 age group (26.5% with neoplastic and 6 % with advanced lesions). Higher age was also associated with relatively more right-sided lesions. In particular the prevalence of proximal neoplasia, without concurrent distal neoplasia, increased from 5% in those < 50 years to 24% in those > 75 years. Those with distal lesions had a higher overall risk for proximal lesions (odds ratio [OR] 3.2); nevertheless flexible sigmoidoscopy alone would have missed up to 40% of all lesions and up to 3.5% of advanced neoplastic lesions in this patient subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic, average-risk individuals is mandatory, as noteworthy numbers of advanced colorectal neoplasias have been detected in all age groups, especially in those aged > 75. Most importantly, many of the detected lesions were proximal and would not be revealed by sigmoidoscopy alone.