Dramatic response of synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis syndrome to tofacitinib monotherapy: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: The synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome is a rare condition. Its treatment remains a challenge for clinicians, and often yields mixed results. CASE: We report the case of a 51-year-old Caucasian woman who presented with SAPHO syndrome with mainly axial involvement. She had been treated with sulfasalazine and anti-inflammatory drugs for many years without any success. A few weeks after starting treatment with tofacitinib, both clinical and biological parameters dramatically improved. Imaging also showed considerable regression of the vertebral and pelvic lesions. However, tofacitinib had to be discontinued due to the occurrence of pulmonary embolism. Consequently, recurrence of bone pain and biologic inflammation was rapidly observed. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-JAKs are an interesting treatment option in the management of SAPHO syndrome that need further clinical trials and assessment for validating response.

Biologicals in osteoporosis: teriparatide and parathyroid hormone in women and men.

Osteoporosis is characterized by the occurrence of a host of fractures. According to densitometric values, an operational definition for osteoporosis corresponds to a loss of 25% to 30% (-2.5 T-scores) compared with the mean values of bone mineral density of young premenopausal women. For years, research tried to develop drugs to improve the bone mineral density. According to the compounds, antiresorptive agents are able to decrease the fracture rate by about 30% to 70%, and to increase the bone mineral density. However, the agents increasing the most bone mineral density are not necessarily those that influence the most fracture rates. It has been known for years that parathyroid hormone (PTH) administered cyclically is able to increase bone mineral density. Two analogues of PTH have been developed: PTH (1-34) and PTH (1-84). Both of them are able to increase bone mineral density and reduce the rate of vertebral fracture but not of the hip, nor of nonvertebral fractures, the latter at least for PTH (1-84). Their exact place in the armamentarium of therapy of osteoporosis and their best time of administration are not yet definitely settled. New modes of administration (transdermal, intranasal, oral) will probably become available soon. With all the drugs available today and those still in development, it can be hoped that osteoporosis will become a disease of the past.

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry-based assessment of male patients using standardized bone density values and a national reference database.

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements from different manufacturers provide different bone mineral density (BMD) values and derived T-scores and Z-scores. These differences result partly from technical differences in the algorithms for the determination of bone mineral content and bone area and partly from the use of different manufacturer-derived reference databases. The present study was to implement a uniform expression of BMD in all male patients by using standardized BMD (sBMD) values and referring to a newly established national male reference sample. In 8 bone densitometry centers throughout Belgium 229 young healthy men were measured on Hologic (Bedford, MA) or GE-Lunar (Madison, WI) bone densitometers. Quality control procedures were implemented and site cross-calibration performed using the European Spine Phantom. Absolute BMD values were converted to standardized values by validated formulas (sBMD). Clinically acceptable between-center differences were noted. No discrepancy was observed in terms of mean sBMD and standard deviations at the lumbar spine and proximal femur between the Belgian and the US reference populations. Region-specific sBMD thresholds for the diagnosis of male osteoporosis were calculated. The current data provide a basis to implement a nation-wide, uniform expression of BMD in male patients and allow harmonization of the BMD-based diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in men.

An uncommon case of septic cortical osteitis.

A 39-year-old healthy female patient with an unremarkable medical history complained about a rapidly progressive pain for a period of 1 month at the level of the anterior part of the right leg that was not relieved by NSAIDs. She mentioned only that she resumed her high level sport training 6 months before the onset of the symptoms. There was no specific history of trauma, fever, or other distinctive symptoms. On clinical examination, the right pretibial skin was inflamed and extremely painful. Walking became difficult the last 2 weeks. No skin injury was observed on the right leg and foot. The early blood tests, consistent with moderate aspecific inflammation, showed a slightly elevated C-reactive protein and sedimentation rate, without any leukocytosis. Upon first consultation the plain radiographs of the right leg were normal, but control radiographs obtained 2 weeks later showed cortical and lamellar lucencies of the right tibial crest.

Is there a place for bone turnover markers in the assessment of osteoporosis and its treatment?

As populations age, the number of osteoporotic fractures will increase. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement remains the major way to diagnose osteoporosis and to indicate therapy. The FRAX tool, based on clinical risk factors, estimates the 10-year risk of hip and major osteoporotic fractures. The association of BMD and FRAX measurements has improved the identification of patients who are most at risk. However, some patients can still be overlooked and denied therapy. It is sound that adding the measure of bone turnover markers to the former risk factors and their follow-up during therapy could best address the efficacy of treatment of osteoporosis. Whether this behavior is cost-effective remains to be settled.

Evidence-based guidelines for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club.

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are frequently prescribed for various inflammatory and/or life-threatening conditions concerning many systems in the body. However, they can provoke many aftereffects, of which osteoporosis (OP) is one of the most crippling complications, with its host of fractures. The dramatic increase in bone fragility is mainly attributable to the GC-induced rapid bone loss in all skeletal compartments. We have reviewed the meta-analyses and randomized controlled studies reporting medical therapeutic interventions currently registered in Belgium for the management of GC-OP comparatively with a placebo. Based on this research, an expert meeting developed a consensus on the prevention and therapy of GC-OP. The pathophysiology of GC-OP is complex. Several factors, acting separately or synergistically, have been described. Their great number could help to understand the rapidity of bone loss and of bone fragility occurrence, indicating that a rapid therapeutic intervention should be implemented to avoid complications. All patients on GCs are threatened with OP, so the prevention and/or therapy of GC-OP should be considered not only for postmenopausal females, but also for osteopenic premenopausal females and for males put on a daily dose of at least 7.5 mg equivalent prednisolone that is expected to last at least 3 months. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as exercise and avoidance of tobacco and alcohol, should be recommended, even if their role is not definitely settled in GC-OP prevention. Supplemental calcium and vitamin D should be considered as the first-line therapy because of the decrease in intestinal calcium absorption provoked by GCs. They also could be considered either as isolated therapy in patients taking less than 7.5 mg prednisolone daily and/or for a predicted period shorter than 3 months or as adjuvant therapy to other more potent drugs. Hormone replacement therapy could be considered in young postmenopausal females on GC, such as in postmenopausal OP, or in men with low androgen levels. Calcitonin appears to have a protective effect on trabecular bone in GC-OP, just as in postmenopausal OP. There is an increasing body of evidence supporting the antifracture efficacy of bisphosphonates, notably alendronate and risedronate. Preventative and curative therapy of GC-OP should be maintained as long as the patient is on GC treatment and could be stopped after weaning from GC, because there is more than circumstantial evidence of some recovery of BMD when GCs are stopped. There is no indication in GC-OP for any combination of two antiresorptive agents (except for calcium and vitamin D) or for an antiresorptive and an anabolic agent. There is indeed no proof that the increased costs of combined treatments will translate into increased therapeutic efficacy.

Role of alendronate in therapy for posttraumatic complex regional pain syndrome type I of the lower extremity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of the antiresorptive agent alendronate at a daily oral dose of 40 mg in patients with posttraumatic complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) of the lower extremity. METHODS: Forty patients were enrolled in this 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of alendronate therapy for CRPS I, a condition associated with regional osteoclastic overactivity. An optional 8-week open extension of alendronate therapy (weeks 12-20) was available after a 4-week period without therapy. Clinical assessments included joint mobility, edema of the lower extremity, tolerance to pressure in the lower extremity, and levels of spontaneous pain. Urinary levels of type I collagen N-telopeptide (NTX) were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients were examined at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. Statistical analysis included two-way factorial analysis of variance. RESULTS: In contrast to placebo-treated patients (n = 20), all of the alendronate-treated patients (n = 19) exhibited a marked and sustained improvement in levels of spontaneous pain, pressure tolerance, and joint mobility, as well as a significant reduction in urinary levels of NTX at weeks 4 and 8. The improvement was maintained at week 12. Twelve patients from each treatment group volunteered for the 8-week open trial, and all of them had a positive response to alendronate. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of oral alendronate in posttraumatic CRPS I. By reducing local acceleration of bone remodeling, alendronate might relieve pain by effects on nociceptive primary afferents in bone, pain-associated changes in the spinal cord, and possibly also through a central mechanism.