ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Preoperative amiodarone effects on postorthotopic heart transplant (OHT) outcomes remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cumulative pre-OHT amiodarone exposure on severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed adult OHT recipients between August 2012 and June 2018. Primary outcome was severe PGD in patients receiving amiodarone at 3, 6, and 12 months prior to OHT compared with those not receiving amiodarone. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, early graft failure (EGF), mortality at 3, 6, and 12 months post-OHT, and 30-day incidence of postoperative tachyarrhythmias, bradycardia, permanent pacemaker implantation, and rejection. RESULTS: Incidence of severe PGD was 12.5% in those who received amiodarone compared to 6.8% in those who did not (14 vs 6, P = 0.18). Cumulative preoperative amiodarone significantly increased the odds of severe PGD at 3 months (odds ratio [OR]: 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.001-1.06; P = 0.044) and 6 months (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.003-1.044; P = 0.024) in a multivariate logistic regression. Patients on amiodarone had significantly higher rates of postoperative bradycardia (13.4% vs 4.5%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: A trend toward increased PGD was present in patients receiving preoperative amiodarone. This finding combined with the regression showing significantly increased odds of PGD with increasing 3 and 6 month cumulative amiodarone dose is clinically concerning. Escalation of care with pacemaker implantation was required more frequently in patients on pre-OHT amiodarone.
Subject(s)
Amiodarone , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents , Heart Transplantation , Primary Graft Dysfunction , Humans , Amiodarone/adverse effects , Amiodarone/administration & dosage , Amiodarone/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Primary Graft Dysfunction/epidemiology , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Length of Stay , Preoperative Care/methodsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Initial warfarin dosing and time in therapeutic range (TTR) are poorly characterized for early post-operative left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. This study evaluated TTR after LVAD implantation compared between patients receiving low-dose (<3 mg) and high-dose (≥3 mg) warfarin. This single-center, retrospective analysis included 234 LVAD patients who received warfarin within 5 days of implantation. The primary outcome was TTR during the 5 days following first international normalized ratio (INR) ≥2 compared between low-dose and high-dose groups. Secondary outcomes were hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, time to first INR ≥2, TTR after first INR ≥2, and reinitiation of parenteral anticoagulation. No difference in TTR was detected between warfarin groups (57.2% vs. 62.7%, P = 0.13). Multivariable analysis did not detect any factors predictive of TTR during the primary outcome timeframe, but age and body mass index were associated with the warfarin dose. The low-dose group received a mean warfarin dose of 1.9 mg (±0.64 mg), and the high dose group received 4.34 mg (±1.38 mg). Cohort TTR during the primary outcome timeframe was 60.5% and 56.5% for hospitalization. The low-dose group had longer intensive care unit length of stay, shorter time to therapeutic INR, and more frequently reinitiated parenteral anticoagulation. Patients with recent LVAD implantation are complex and have diverse warfarin sensitivity factors, which did not allow for optimal warfarin dose detection, although half of all patients received doses between 2.04 mg and 4.33 mg. Individualized dosing should be used, adjusting for patient-specific factors such as age, body mass index, and drug interactions.
Subject(s)
Heart-Assist Devices , Warfarin , Anticoagulants , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Humans , International Normalized Ratio , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cangrelor is an intravenous P2Y12 receptor antagonist approved for use during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reduce ischemic events associated with new stent placement and has been used off-label at reduced doses guided by platelet function testing as a "bridge" from discontinuation of oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists to surgical procedures when the long-term effects of oral agents are undesirable. OBJECTIVE: To describe the dosing, laboratory monitoring, and clinical outcomes of a series of patients who received cangrelor as a "bridging" antiplatelet agent. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of all patients within the study center with coronary stents who received cangrelor as a bridge to surgical procedure and had VerifyNow monitoring during treatment. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were identified for inclusion. The median cangrelor dose was 0.5 µg/kg/min (interquartile range = 0.5-0.5) and was maintained in 7 of 11 patients. Doses ranged from 0.25 to 2 µg/kg/min during therapy, and 81.6% of VerifyNow results assessed were within goal range (⩽208 P2Y12 reaction units). Bleeding complications during therapy occurred in 3 patients, all of whom were receiving concomitant heparin infusions, and no stent thrombosis was reported. Conclusion and Relevance: Low-dose cangrelor may represent an effective option for bridging antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary stents. This study demonstrated that the majority of patients received adequate platelet inhibition without any incidence of stent thrombosis on 0.5 µg/kg/min using the VerifyNow assay to monitor platelet inhibition, which represents a lower dose than previously reported in the literature.
Subject(s)
Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Coronary Thrombosis/surgery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Stents , Adenosine Monophosphate/administration & dosage , Adenosine Monophosphate/adverse effects , Administration, Oral , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Coronary Thrombosis/complications , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Substitution , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Platelet Function Tests , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Stents/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether clevidipine (CLEV) achieved faster blood pressure control compared to nicardipine (NIC) in patients presenting with either an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or a spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, cohort study conducted in patients with AIS or ICH admitted to the emergency department of a Comprehensive Stroke Center from November 2011 to June 2013 who received CLEV or NIC continuous infusion for acute blood pressure management. RESULTS: The study included 210 patients: 70 in the CLEV group and 140 in the NIC group. There was no difference in mean time (standard deviation [SD]) from initiation of the infusion to goal systolic blood pressure (SBP), CLEV: 50 (83) minutes versus NIC: 74 (103) minutes, P = .101. Comparison of the 2 agents within diagnosis showed no difference. Hypotension developed in 5 (7.1%) CLEV patients versus 14 (10%) NIC patients (P = .003). There was no difference in the percentage change at 2 hours; CLEV: -20% (16%) versus NIC: -16% (16%), P = .058. Mean (SD) time to alteplase administration from admission was 56 (22) minutes in the CLEV group versus 59 (25) minutes in the NIC group (P = .684). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the mean time from initiation of the infusion to the SBP goal between agents or in the secondary outcomes. Due to the lack of differences observed, each agent should be considered based on the patient care needs of the institution.
Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Nicardipine/administration & dosage , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Stroke/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Brain Ischemia/drug therapy , Brain Ischemia/physiopathology , Cerebral Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Cerebral Hemorrhage/physiopathology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Hypotension/chemically induced , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Nicardipine/adverse effects , Pyridines/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/physiopathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) reduces mortality and hospitalizations in adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, few are receiving GDMT. National registries show as few as 1% of patients are receiving appropriate GDMT. Development of heart failure clinics achieving optimal GDMT are crucial to improve outcomes for HFrEF patients. OBJECTIVE: We developed a multidisciplinary HF-Optimize clinic aimed at improving GDMT use along with providing education, resources, and comorbidity screening for adults with HFrEF. METHODS: We targeted patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF and/or recent or multiple admissions for 6 visits over 12 weeks. We measured medication use, ejection fraction, 6-minute walk test distance, and health-related quality of life (EuroQol Visual Analog Scale) at visits 1 and 6. RESULTS: One-hundred ten patients completed all visits. Patients were a mean age of 58 (±14) years, 37% were female, and 42% were of non-White race. From visit 1 to visit 6, utilization of GDMT increased from 35.5% to 85.5% (p < 0.001) and significant improvements in ejection fraction (25.9% to 35.5%, p < 0.001), 6-minute walk distance (1032 feet to 1121.7 feet, p = 0.001), and quality of life (63.8/100 vs 70.8/100, p = 0.002). Only 2 patients (1.8%) that completed HF-Optimize had a 30-day heart failure readmission. CONCLUSION: Our multidisciplinary HF-Optimize clinic improved medication usage and clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to validate outcomes of multidisciplinary GDMT clinics.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Adult , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Stroke Volume , Quality of Life , Ventricular Function, Left , Patient ReadmissionABSTRACT
Development of a new quantitative method for determining low concentrations of aqueous polyatomic anions using attenuated total reflectance (ATR) FTIR spectroscopy is described. Evaporated thin-film coatings of anion-selective tetraalkylated ferrocenium salts were applied to the surface of ATR crystals, which enabled anion detection limits to be lowered up to 23 000-fold below those achieved using the commercially available spectrometer with identical uncoated ATR crystals. Linear calibration curves based on d(absorbance)/dt, which is related to the rate of anion exchange in the thin film, were established in the 0.04-30 microM range. Limits of detection (10-min analyses) for perchlorate, chlorate, trifluoromethanesulfonate, perfluoro-n-butanesulfonate, perfluoro-n-octanesulfonate, tetrafluoroborate, hexafluorophosphate, and pinacolylmethylphosphonate in aqueous solution were 0.03, 0.2, 0.05, 0.07, 0.06, 0.06, 0.6, and 0.7 microM, respectively, using the thin-film coatings. This simple detection/quantification method afforded good reproducibility with relatively fast detection times.