Postoperative and long-term outcomes after redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: retrospective analysis of 50 patients and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis is a surgical challenge, but despite its technical difficulties and the high associated morbidity risk, it may represent the only valuable option to improve patients' quality of life by avoiding a permanent stoma and decreasing chronic pelvic symptoms. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyze postoperative and long-term outcomes, with particular focus on functional results, in patients undergoing redo surgery in comparison with previously published studies. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data in an institutional database. SETTING: The study was conducted in the colorectal unit of a tertiary referral teaching hospital in France. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients who underwent redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis from 1998 to 2011 were included. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (23 men, 27 women) were included. The median age at redo surgery was 62 years (range, 40-84). Twenty-six patients (52%) underwent a redo colorectal anastomosis and 24 patients a redo coloanal anastomosis (48%). Indications were anastomotic stricture (n = 20), chronic pelvic sepsis (n = 14), rectovaginal fistula (n = 3), prior Hartmann's procedure for complication of initial anastomosis (n = 8), and anastomotic cancer recurrence (n = 5). The median operative time was 435 minutes. Postoperative mortality was 0% and morbidity was 26%. No anastomotic leakage occurred. After a median follow-up of 21 (range, 1-137) months, 44 patients (88%) were evaluated for functional results. The median number of bowel movements per day was 2 (range, 1-10), with 70% of patients having fewer than 3 per day. LIMITATION: The study was limited by its retrospective nature and lack of data on quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis is a valuable surgical option which allows avoidance of a permanent stoma in nearly 90% of patients. It remains a major undertaking with high intraoperative and postoperative morbidity.

Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy for Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease and or Insufficient Weight-Loss: a Comparative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a popular surgical weight-loss procedure, but there are increasing reports of revisional Roux-Y-gastric-bypass (R-RYGB) to manage weight-loss failure (WLF) or proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after SG, with little data available in these settings. METHODS: This retrospective study included all consecutive patients undergoing R-RYGB for WLF or RGERD after SG in two bariatric care centers from 2012 to 2018. RESULTS: Of 720 patients, 46 (3.6%) underwent R-RYGB (RGERD, n = 25; 54.4%; WLF, n = 21; 45.6%) within 44.8 ± 27.5 months post-SG. SG had enabled 27% ± 11.6 total weight loss (TWL) in the RGERD group vs. 7.2% ± 12.5% TWL in the WLF group (p < 0.001). At R-RYGB, WLF-group patients had a higher BMI (47.8 ± 8.4 vs. 34.7 ± 6.1 kg/m2; p < 0.001) and a higher number of comorbidities (2.4 ± 1.5 vs 1.5 ± 1.2; p < 0.02) compared to RGERD-group patients, while severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) was not significantly different between groups (6.5% vs 2.1%, p = 0.6). %TWL was still higher in the RGERD group at 12 months post-R-RYGB (35.6% ± 10.4 vs. 23.8% ± 9.2; p < 0.01) but not after 24 months post-R-RYGB. R-RYGB corrected reflux symptoms in 32 (94%) patients and reduced PPI use in 29 (97%) patients (p < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference. A history of adjustable gastric banding (AGB) (N = 8;17.4%) prior to SG was associated with a similar prevalence of GERD at R-RYGB and a lower %TWL (AGB:13.1 ± 10.2 vs. No AGB:31.6 ± 8.5; p < 0.05) at 3 years post-R-RYGB. CONCLUSION: R-RYGB following SG provides remission of reflux symptoms in 94% of patients and extra weight loss in patients with WLF, except in patients with a history of AGB prior to SG.

Severe Vertex Epidural Hematoma in a Child: A Case Report of a Management without Expert Neurosurgical Care.

Vertex epidural hematomas (VEDHs) are an uncommon situation and difficulties may be encountered in their diagnosis and management. This is more complicated when the surgical management has to be performed by general surgeons, not specialized in neurosurgery, in a remote location. It was in this context that we were brought to care in charge a 2-year-old boy who required a neurosurgical emergency rescue for a severe VEDH in Djibouti. Through the description of this case, we want to emphasize the value of developing a network of teleconsultation for the benefit of remote and isolated locations and learning basic techniques of emergency neurosurgery.