Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 57
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Surg Endosc ; 36(4): 2334-2340, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33977377

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Robotic camera steering systems have been developed to facilitate endoscopic surgery. In this study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare conventional human camera control with the AutoLap™ robotic camera holder in terms of efficiency and user experience when performing routine laparoscopic procedures. Novelty of this system relates to the steering method, which is image based. METHODS: Patients undergoing an elective laparoscopic hemicolectomy, sigmoid resection, fundoplication and cholecystectomy between September 2016 and January 2018 were included. Stratified block randomization was used for group allocation. The primary aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of robotic and human camera control, measured with surgical team size and total operating time. Secondary outcome parameters were number of cleaning moments of the laparoscope and the post-study system usability questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were randomized to have robotic (50) versus human (50) camera control. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. In the robotic group, 49/50 (98%) of procedures were carried out without human camera control, reducing the surgical team size from four to three individuals. The median total operative time (60.0 versus 53.0 min, robotic vs. control) was not significantly different, p = 0.122. The questionnaire showed a positive user satisfaction and easy control of the robotic camera holder. CONCLUSION: Image-based robotic camera control can reduce surgical team size and does not result in significant difference in operative time compared to human camera control. Moreover, robotic image-guided camera control was associated with positive user experience.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Colectomy/methods , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Prospective Studies , Robotics/methods
2.
BMC Surg ; 22(1): 59, 2022 Feb 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35172810

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgeons have widely adopted endoscopic suturing techniques using conventional laparoscopic instruments and the more advanced robotic systems. The FlexDex is a novel articulating laparoscopic needle driver providing enhanced dexterity in laparoscopic surgery. This study evaluates and compares the learning curve of endoscopic suturing with conventional laparoscopy, the FlexDex and robotic suturing in novices. METHODS: Participants performed a minimal invasive suturing task in three different ways in a randomized order: with a conventional laparoscopic needle driver, using the FlexDex needle driver and third, using the Da Vinci Si surgical system. Primary outcome was suturing task time. Secondary outcome parameters were assessment of suturing quality and workload perception. RESULTS: A total of 10 novice participants were included and completed a total of 300 sessions. Median (IQR) suturing time of the first 5 sessions was 231 s (188-291) in the laparoscopic group versus 378 s (282-471) in the FlexDex group versus 189 s (160-247) in the DaVinci Si group. The last 5 sessions showed significant reduction of median suturing time of 143 s (120-190), 232 s (180-265) and 172 s (134-199) respectively. Analysis identified that the learning curve for the laparoscopic needle driver and Da Vinci Si was reached in 5 sessions, compared to 8 sessions for the Flexdex. The laparoscopic needle driver and Da Vinci Si showed a significant shorter median suturing time compared to the FlexDex (p = 0.00). The FlexDex quality assessment scores were significantly lower compared to the laparoscopic (p = 0.00) and robotic (p = 0.00) scores and perceived workload remains high for the FlexDex users. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo endoscopic suturing with the FlexDex demonstrated a prolonged learning curve compared to laparoscopic and robotic suturing. The learning curve of the FlexDex is fundamentally different from conventional laparoscopic and robotic instruments. This study provides further insights in the implementation and training of endoscopic suturing techniques.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Robotics , Clinical Competence , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Learning Curve , Suture Techniques , Sutures
3.
Tech Coloproctol ; 26(2): 85-98, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34812970

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is a widely accepted surgical treatment for rectal prolapse. Both synthetic and biologic mesh are used. No consensus exists on the preferred type of mesh material. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to establish an overview of the current literature on mesh-related complications and recurrence after VMR with synthetic or biologic mesh to aid evidence-based decision making in preferred mesh material. METHODS: A systematic search of the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane was performed (from inception until September 2020). Studies evaluating patients who underwent VMR with synthetic or biologic mesh were eligible. The MINORS score was used for quality assessment. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were eligible after qualitative assessment. Eleven studies reported on mesh-related complications including 4001 patients treated with synthetic mesh and 762 treated with biologic mesh. The incidence of mesh-related complications ranged between 0 and 2.4% after synthetic versus 0-0.7% after biologic VMR. Synthetic mesh studies showed a pooled incidence of mesh-related complications of 1.0% (95% CI 0.5-1.7). Data of biologic mesh studies could not be pooled. Twenty-nine studies reported on the risk of recurrence in 2371 synthetic mesh patients and 602 biologic mesh patients. The risk of recurrence varied between 1.1 and 18.8% for synthetic VMR versus 0-15.4% for biologic VMR. Cumulative incidence of recurrence was found to be 6.1% (95% CI 4.3-8.1) and 5.8% (95% CI 2.9-9.6), respectively. The clinical and statistical heterogeneity was high. CONCLUSIONS: No definitive conclusions on preferred mesh type can be made due to the quality of the included studies with high heterogeneity amongst them.


Subject(s)
Biological Products , Laparoscopy , Rectal Prolapse , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Rectal Prolapse/complications , Rectum/surgery , Recurrence , Surgical Mesh/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
4.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 35(10): 1959-1962, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32504330

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: No consensus exists regarding the use of preoperative bowel preparation for patients undergoing a low anterior resection (LAR). Several comparative studies show similar outcomes when a single time enema (STE) is compared with mechanical bowel preparation (MBP). It is hypothesized that STE is comparable with MBP due to a decrease in intestinal motility distal of a newly constructed diverting ileostomy (DI). METHODS: In this prospective single-centre cohort study, patients undergoing a LAR with primary anastomosis and DI construction were given a STE 2 h pre-operatively. Radio-opaque markers were inserted in the efferent loop of the DI during surgery, and plain abdominal X-rays were made during the first, third, fifth and seventh postoperative day to visualize intestinal motility. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included. Radio-opaque markers were situated in the ileum or right colon in 100%, 100% and 97.1% of the patients during respectively the first, third and fifth postoperative day. One patient had its most distal marker situated in the left colon during day five. In none of the patients, the markers were seen distal of the anastomosis. CONCLUSION: Intestinal motility distally of the DI is decreased in patients who undergo a LAR resection with the construction of an anastomosis and DI, while preoperatively receiving a STE.


Subject(s)
Ileostomy , Rectal Neoplasms , Anastomosis, Surgical , Cohort Studies , Gastrointestinal Motility , Humans , Postoperative Complications , Prospective Studies
5.
Br J Surg ; 106(4): 448-457, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30566245

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The results of the DIRECT trial, an RCT comparing conservative management with elective sigmoid resection in patients with recurrent diverticulitis or persistent complaints, showed that elective sigmoid resection leads to higher quality of life. The aim of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment at 1- and 5-year follow-up from a societal perspective. METHODS: Clinical effectiveness and resource use were derived from the DIRECT trial. The actual resource use and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L™ score) were documented prospectively per individual patient and analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle for up to 5 years after randomization. The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). RESULTS: The study included 106 patients, of whom 50 were randomized to surgery and 56 to conservative treatment. At 1- and 5-year follow-up an incremental effect (QALY difference between groups) of 0·06 and 0·43 respectively was found, and an incremental cost (cost difference between groups) of €6957 and €2674 respectively, where surgery was more expensive than conservative treatment. This resulted in an ICER of €123 365 per additional QALY at 1-year follow-up, and €6275 at 5 years. At a threshold of €20 000 per QALY, operative treatment has 0 per cent probability of being cost-effective at 1-year follow-up, but a 95 per cent probability at 5 years. CONCLUSION: At 5-year follow-up, elective sigmoid resection in patients with recurring diverticulitis or persistent complaints was found to be cost-effective. Registration number: NTR1478 (www.trialregistrer.nl).


Subject(s)
Colectomy/methods , Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Conservative Treatment/methods , Diverticulitis, Colonic/surgery , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Adult , Colectomy/economics , Colon, Sigmoid/pathology , Conservative Treatment/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diverticulitis, Colonic/diagnosis , Diverticulitis, Colonic/therapy , Elective Surgical Procedures/economics , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
6.
Br J Surg ; 106(4): 458-466, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30811050

ABSTRACT

This multicentre retrospective cohort study included 447 patients with Hinchey Ib and II diverticular abscesses, who were treated with antibiotics, with or without percutaneous drainage. Abscesses of 3 and 5 cm in size were at higher risk of short-term treatment failure and emergency surgery respectively. Initial non-surgical treatment of Hinchey Ib and II diverticular abscesses was comparable between patients treated with antibiotics only and those who underwent percutaneous drainage in combination with antibiotics, with regard to short- and long-term outcomes. Most do not need drainage.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Abscess/drug therapy , Abdominal Abscess/surgery , Colectomy/methods , Diverticulitis, Colonic/drug therapy , Diverticulitis, Colonic/surgery , Abdominal Abscess/diagnosis , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Diverticulitis, Colonic/diagnosis , Drainage/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Netherlands , Proportional Hazards Models , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
7.
Surg Endosc ; 32(5): 2533-2540, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29264759

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Training in robot-assisted surgery focusses mainly on technical skills and instrument use. Training in optimal ergonomics during robotic surgery is often lacking, while improved ergonomics can be one of the key advantages of robot-assisted surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess whether a brief explanation on ergonomics of the console can improve body posture and performance. METHODS: A comparative study was performed with 26 surgical interns and residents using the da Vinci skills simulator (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). The intervention group received a compact instruction on ergonomic settings and coaching on clutch usage, while the control group received standard instructions for usage of the system. Participants performed two sets of five exercises. Analysis was performed on ergonomic score (RULA) and performance scores provided by the simulator. Mental and physical load scores (NASA-TLX and LED score) were also registered. RESULTS: The intervention group performed better in the clutch-oriented exercises, displaying less unnecessary movement and smaller deviation from the neutral position of the hands. The intervention group also scored significantly better on the RULA ergonomic score in both the exercises. No differences in overall performance scores and subjective scores were detected. CONCLUSION: The benefits of a brief instruction on ergonomics for novices are clear in this study. A single session of coaching and instruction leads to better ergonomic scores. The control group showed often inadequate ergonomic scores. No significant differences were found regarding physical discomfort, mental task load and overall performance scores.


Subject(s)
Ergonomics , Robotic Surgical Procedures/education , Simulation Training , Adult , Female , Humans , Internship and Residency , Male , Random Allocation , Young Adult
8.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 32(10): 1375-1383, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28799055

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review is to identify risk factors that can predict complicated diverticulitis. Uncomplicated diverticulitis is a self-limiting and mild disease, but 10% of patients with diverticulitis develop complications requiring further treatment. It is important to estimate the risk of developing complicated diverticulitis at an early stage to set the right treatment at initial presentation. METHODS: Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting on risk factors for complicated diverticulitis. Complicated diverticulitis was defined as Hinchey ≥Ib or severe diverticulitis according to the Ambrosetti criteria. Meta-analyses were performed when at least four studies reported on the outcome of interest. This study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included with a total of 4619 patients. Most were of reasonable quality. Only the risk factors "age" and "sex" were eligible for meta-analysis, but none showed a significant effect on the risk for complicated diverticulitis. There was reasonable quality of evidence suggesting that high C-reactive protein; white blood cell count; clinical signs including generalized abdominal pain, constipation and vomiting; steroid usage; a primary episode; and comorbidity are risk factors for complicated diverticulitis. CONCLUSION: Although high-level evidence is lacking, this study identified several risk factors associated with complicated diverticulitis. Individually, these risk factors have little value in predicting the course of diverticulitis. The authors propose a prognostic model combining these risk factors which might be the next step to aid the physician in predicting the course of diverticulitis and setting the right treatment at initial presentation.


Subject(s)
Diverticulitis, Colonic/complications , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Age Factors , Body Mass Index , Body Temperature , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Comorbidity , Constipation/etiology , Diverticulitis, Colonic/blood , Diverticulitis, Colonic/therapy , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Steroids/therapeutic use , Vomiting/etiology
9.
Colorectal Dis ; 19(4): 372-377, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27611011

ABSTRACT

AIM: The optimal diet for uncomplicated diverticulitis is unclear. Guidelines refrain from recommendation due to lack of objective information. The aim of the study was to determine whether an unrestricted diet during a first acute episode of uncomplicated diverticulitis is safe. METHOD: A prospective cohort study was performed of patients diagnosed with diverticulitis for the first time between 2012 and 2014. Requirements for inclusion were radiologically proven modified Hinchey Ia/b diverticulitis, American Society of Anesthesiologists class I-III and the ability to tolerate an unrestricted diet. Exclusion criteria were the use of antibiotics and suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease or malignancy. All included patients were advised to take an unrestricted diet. The primary outcome parameter was morbidity. Secondary outcome measures were the development of recurrence and ongoing symptoms. RESULTS: There were 86 patients including 37 (43.0%) men. All patients were confirmed to have taken an unrestricted diet. There were nine adverse events in seven patients. These consisted of readmission for pain (five), recurrent diverticulitis (one) and surgery (three) for ongoing symptoms (two) and Hinchey Stage III (one). Seventeen (19.8%) patients experienced continuing symptoms 6 months after the initial episode and 4 (4.7%) experienced recurrent diverticulitis. CONCLUSION: The incidence of complications among patients taking an unrestricted diet during an initial acute uncomplicated episode of diverticulitis was in line with that reported in the literature.


Subject(s)
Diet/methods , Diverticulitis, Colonic/diet therapy , Diverticulitis/diet therapy , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
10.
Colorectal Dis ; 19(1): O46-O53, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27870169

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study compared the diagnostic capabilities of dynamic magnetic resonance defaecography (D-MRI) with conventional defaecography (CD, reference standard) in patients with symptoms of prolapse of the posterior compartment of the pelvic floor. METHOD: Forty-five consecutive patients underwent CD and D-MRI. Outcome measures were the presence or absence of rectocele, enterocele, intussusception, rectal prolapse and the descent of the anorectal junction on straining, measured in millimetres. Cohen's Kappa, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and the positive and negative likelihood ratio of D-MRI were compared with CD. Cohen's Kappa and Pearson's correlation coefficient were calculated and regression analysis was performed to determine inter-observer agreement. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were available for analysis. D-MRI underreported rectocele formation with a difference in prevalence (CD 77.8% vs D-MRI 55.6%), mean protrusion (26.4 vs 22.7 mm, P = 0.039) and 11 false negative results, giving a low sensitivity of 0.62 and a NPV of 0.31. For the diagnosis of enterocele, D-MRI was inferior to CD, with five false negative results, giving a low sensitivity of 0.17 and high specificity (1.0) and PPV (1.0). Nine false positive intussusceptions were seen on D-MRI with only two missed. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of D-MRI for diagnosing rectocele and enterocele is less than that of CD. D-MRI, however, appears superior to CD in identifying intussusception. D-MRI and CD are complementary imaging techniques in the evaluation of patients with symptoms of prolapse of the posterior compartment.


Subject(s)
Defecography/methods , Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Pelvic Floor Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Contrast Media , Female , Hernia/complications , Hernia/diagnostic imaging , Hernia/physiopathology , Humans , Intussusception/complications , Intussusception/diagnostic imaging , Intussusception/physiopathology , Likelihood Functions , Male , Middle Aged , Pelvic Floor Disorders/complications , Pelvic Floor Disorders/physiopathology , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/complications , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/physiopathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Rectocele/complications , Rectocele/diagnostic imaging , Rectocele/physiopathology , Rectum/diagnostic imaging , Regression Analysis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Statistics, Nonparametric
11.
Dig Surg ; 33(3): 197-202, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26889879

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the current opinion of gastroenterologists and surgeons on treatment strategies for patients, with recurrences or ongoing complaints of diverticulitis. BACKGROUND: Treatment of recurrences and ongoing complaints remains a point of debate. No randomized trials have been published yet and guidelines are not uniform in their advice. DESIGN: A web-based survey was conducted among gastroenterologists and GE-surgeons. Questions were aimed at the treatment options for recurrent diverticulitis and ongoing complaints. RESULTS: In total, 123 surveys were filled out. The number of patients with recurrent or ongoing diverticulitis who were seen at the outpatient clinic each year was 7 (0-30) and 5 (0-115) respectively. Surgeons see significantly more patients on an annual basis 20 vs. 15% (p = 0.00). Both surgeons and gastroenterologists preferred to treat patients in a conservative manner using pain medication and lifestyle advise (64.4 vs. 54.0, p = 0.27); however, gastroenterologists would treat patients with mesalazine medication, which is significantly more (28%, p = 0.04) than in the surgical group. Surgeons are inclined more towards surgery (31.5%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Both surgeons and gastroenterologists prefer to treat recurrent diverticulitis and ongoing complaints in a conservative manner. Quality of life, the risk of complications and the viewpoint of the patient are considered important factors in the decision to resect the affected colon.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Diverticulitis/surgery , Gastroenterology , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Specialties, Surgical , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Conservative Treatment , Diverticulitis/therapy , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Life Style , Netherlands , Patient Participation , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality of Life , Recurrence , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Tech Coloproctol ; 20(4): 235-42, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26883036

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe patients developing grade III and IV hemorrhoids requiring surgery after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) and to explore the relationship between developing such hemorrhoids and recurrence of rectal prolapse after LVMR. METHODS: All consecutive patients receiving LVMR at the Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands, between 2004 and 2013 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for recurrences. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients underwent LVMR. Sixty-five of these patients (actuarial 5-year incidence 24.3, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 18.6-30.0) developed symptomatic grade III/IV hemorrhoids requiring stapled or excisional hemorrhoidectomy. Re-do surgery for recurrent grade III/IV hemorrhoids was required for 15 of the 65 patients (actuarial 5-year recurrence rate 40.6, 95 % CI 23.2-58.0) after the primary hemorrhoidectomy. Three of the 65 patients developed an external rectal prolapse (ERP) recurrence and eight an internal rectal prolapse (IRP) recurrence. This generated a 5-year recurrence rate of 25.3 % (95 % CI 0-53.9) for ERP recurrence and 24.4 % (95 % CI 9.1-39.7) for IRP recurrence. The rest of the LVMR cohort not receiving additional surgery for hemorrhoids (n = 355) showed significantly lower actuarial 5-year ERP (0.8 %, p = 0.011) and IRP (11 %, p = 0.020) recurrence rates. CONCLUSION: High-grade hemorrhoids requiring surgery may be common after LVMR. The development of high-grade hemorrhoids after LVMR might be considered a predictor of rectal prolapse recurrence.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Hemorrhoids/surgery , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications , Rectal Prolapse/surgery , Female , Hemorrhoids/etiology , Hemorrhoids/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rectal Prolapse/pathology , Rectum/surgery , Recurrence , Surgical Mesh , Treatment Outcome
13.
J Surg Oncol ; 112(3): 266-70, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25997926

ABSTRACT

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common disorder of the GE-junction that allows gastric acid to enter the esophagus. Surgery is indicated when the presence of the disease is objectively documented. The laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication is the preferred treatment of GERD. There is no clear advantage in robotic assistance for primary antireflux surgery. In our center we find the robot to be of added value for redo surgery or large and giant hiatal repair.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Hernia, Hiatal/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Fundoplication/methods , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods
14.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 30(5): 665-71, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25739887

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: An important factor in the decision to perform laparoscopic sigmoid resection for patient suffering from recurrent and ongoing diverticulitis is quality of life (QoL). It is unknown whether quality of life relates to the severity of diverticulitis as seen in the resected colonic segment. The aim of this study is to analyze histopathological findings of patients suffering from recurrent or ongoing diverticulitis and their QoL before and after surgery in order to improve patient outcome prediction. METHODS: A cohort of consecutive patients with diverticulitis between January 2010 and April 2014 was analyzed. All patients were scheduled for surgery and had at least three episodes of diverticulitis or more within the last 2 years or experienced ongoing complaints for at least 3 months or more and confirmation by a radiologist. We compared QoL questionnaires, to known histopathological entities. RESULTS: For this study, 54 consecutive patients were included, 15 (27.8%) men and 39 (72.2%) women. A marked difference in quality of life before and after surgery for patients having a more severe histopathological entity was not found (p = 0.83). However, a clinically relevant higher VAS score 6 months after surgery was shown in patients with peritonitis. Furthermore, these patients had more fibrosis in the histopathological samples. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, even though a relation between the different pathological entities and QoL could not be determined, patients with diverticulitis and concomitant microscopic peritonitis had significantly more fibrosis and suffered from a higher VAS scores 6 months after surgery.


Subject(s)
Colon, Sigmoid/pathology , Diverticulitis, Colonic/pathology , Diverticulitis, Colonic/surgery , Peritonitis/pathology , Quality of Life , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Biopsy, Needle , Cohort Studies , Colectomy/adverse effects , Colectomy/methods , Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Colonoscopy/methods , Diverticulitis, Colonic/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/physiopathology , Peritonitis/etiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome
15.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 28(11): 1579-82, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23812007

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) is an established surgical technique for the treatment of both rectal prolapse and symptomatic rectoceles. It is, however, not known whether LVR influences sexual function (SF). The aim of this study was, therefore, to determine the impact of this procedure on the SF of patients. METHODS: All female patients after LVR procedure in a single institution were identified and were sent a questionnaire concerning SF. This addressed sexual activity, satisfaction, preoperative SF, and the impact of surgery on SF. Furthermore, the PISQ-12 validated sexual functioning questionnaire was sent to all female patients. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were sent a questionnaire. These patients underwent LVR for rectal prolapse, symptomatic rectocele, or enterocele between 2004 and 2011. Mean age was 62 years (range 22-89). Mean follow-up was 30 months (range 5-83). Response rate was 64 % (139 patients). The number of sexual active patients dropped from 71 to 54 % after surgery. The number of patients being satisfied with their SF remained relatively equal; 91 % of patients before and 85 % of patients after surgery. Forty-three percent of patients stated that the LVR procedure did not influence their sexual function, in 16 % of patients, the procedure positively influenced their SF, and in 13 % of respondents, SF decreased after surgery. The mean PISQ-12 score postoperatively was 34 out of 48. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of LVR on SF of patients seems limited in this cross-sectional study in a large cohort of patients.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Sexual Behavior/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
16.
Colorectal Dis ; 15(6): 695-9, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23406289

ABSTRACT

AIM: This retrospective study aimed to determine functional results of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) for rectal prolapse (RP) and symptomatic rectoceles in a large cohort of patients. METHOD: All patients treated between 2004 and 2011 were identified. Relevant patient characteristics were gathered. A questionnaire concerning disease-related symptoms as well as the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) and Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS) was sent to all patients. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients underwent operation. Twelve patients (5%) died during follow-up and were excluded. The remaining patients (224 women, nine men) were sent a questionnaire. Indications for LVR were external RP (n = 36), internal RP or symptomatic rectocele (n = 157) or a combination of symptomatic rectocele and enterocele (n = 40). Mean age and follow-up were 62 years (range 22-89) and 30 months (range 5-83), respectively. Response rate was 64% (150 patients). The complication rate was 4.6% (11 complications). A significant reduction in symptoms of constipation or obstructed defaecation syndrome was reported (53% of patients before vs 19% after surgery, P < 0.001). Mean CCCS during follow-up was 8.1 points (range 0-23, SD ± 4.3). Incontinence was reported in 138 (59%) of the patients before surgery and in 32 (14%) of the patients after surgery, indicating a significant reduction (P < 0.001). Mean CCIS was 6.7 (range 0-19, SD ± 5.2) after surgery. CONCLUSION: A significant reduction of incontinence and constipation or obstructed defaecation syndrome after LVR was observed in this large retrospective study. LVR therefore appears a suitable treatment for RP and rectocele with and without associated enterocele.


Subject(s)
Constipation/surgery , Fecal Incontinence/surgery , Rectal Prolapse/surgery , Rectocele/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Constipation/etiology , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Fecal Incontinence/etiology , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy , Male , Middle Aged , Rectal Prolapse/complications , Rectocele/complications , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Mesh , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
17.
Colorectal Dis ; 15(1): 115-9, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22726304

ABSTRACT

AIM: Validated guidelines for the surgical and non-surgical treatment of rectal prolapse (RP) do not exist. The aim of this international questionnaire survey was to provide an overview of the evaluation, follow-up and treatment of patients with an internal or external RP. METHOD: A 36-question questionnaire in English about the evaluation, treatment and follow-up of patients with RP was distributed amongst surgeons attending the congresses of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and the European Society of Coloproctology in 2010. It was subsequently sent to all the members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the European Society of Coloproctology by e-mail. RESULTS: In all, 391 surgeons in 50 different countries completed the questionnaire. Evaluation, surgical treatment and follow-up of patients with RP differed considerably. For healthy patients with an external RP, laparoscopic ventral rectopexy was the most popular treatment in Europe, whereas laparoscopic resection rectopexy was favoured in North America. There was consensus only on frail and/or elderly patients with an external prolapse, with a preference for a perineal technique. After failure of conservative therapy, internal RP was mostly treated by laparoscopic resection rectopexy in North America. In Europe, laparoscopic ventral rectopexy and stapled transanal rectal resection were the most popular techniques for these patients. CONCLUSION: The treatment of RP differs between surgeons, countries and regions. Guidelines are lacking. Prospective comparative studies are warranted that may result in universally accepted protocols.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Rectal Prolapse/surgery , Abdomen/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Europe , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , North America , Perineum/surgery , Postoperative Care , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiography , Rectal Prolapse/diagnostic imaging , Surveys and Questionnaires , Ultrasonography , Young Adult
18.
Colorectal Dis ; 15(5): 621-6, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23088216

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine the diagnostic value of serological infection markers and body temperature in discriminating complicated from uncomplicated diverticulitis. METHODS: Patients in whom diverticulitis was pathologically or radiologically proven at presentation were included. Patients were classified as either complicated (Hinchey Ib, II, III and IV) or uncomplicated (Hinchey Ia) diverticulitis. The discriminative value of C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC) count and body temperature at presentation was tested. RESULTS: A total of 426 patients were included in this study of which 364 (85%) presented with uncomplicated and 62 (15%) with complicated diverticulitis. Only CRP was of sufficient diagnostic value (area under the curve 0.715). The median CRP in patients with complicated diverticulitis was significantly higher than in patients with uncomplicated disease (224 mg/l, range 99-284 vs 87 mg/l, range 48-151). Patients with a CRP of 25 mg/l had a 15% chance of having complicated diverticulitis. This increased from 23% at a CRP value of 100 mg/l to 47% for 250 mg/l or higher. The optimal threshold was reached at 175 mg/l with a positive predictive value of 36%, negative predictive value of 92%, sensitivity of 61% and a specificity of 82%. CONCLUSION: WBC count and body temperature are of no value in discriminating complicated from uncomplicated diverticulitis. Only CRP can be used as an indicator for the presence of complications, but a low CRP does not mean that complicated disease can safely be excluded. Therefore, radiological examination remains central in the diagnostic work-up of patients presenting with diverticulitis.


Subject(s)
Body Temperature , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Diverticulitis, Colonic/blood , Diverticulitis, Colonic/diagnosis , Acute Disease , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Area Under Curve , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diverticulitis, Colonic/complications , Female , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
19.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 27(8): 1095-9, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22302593

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aims to provide an overview of all complications that may occur after construction of an ileostomy or colostomy (loop or end) in daily practice. METHODS: Between July 2007 and April 2008, all adult patients who underwent any type of intestinal stoma formation were asked to participate in this prospective cohort study. All relevant patient characteristics were gathered.Patients were evaluated for complications eight times in a1-year postoperative period. Enterostomal therapy nurses scored complications on specially designed forms. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included; two patients were lost before initial follow-up (FU). During FU, 21% of the patients deceased, and 15% were lost, physically unable to visit the outpatient clinic or withdrew from FU. In 37% of the patients, bowel continuity was restored. Only 26% of the patients were able to complete FU. Overall, 82% of all the patients had one or more stoma-related complications. Most common complications were skin irritation (55%), fixation problems (46%) and leakage (40%). Superficial necrosis,bleeding and retraction occurred in 20%, 14% and 9% of patients, respectively. More stoma related complications were found in stoma's on inappropriate locations. CONCLUSIONS: In this heterogenic patient population with formation of different stoma types, a high complication rate was detected.


Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications/etiology , Surgical Stomas/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
20.
Gut ; 60(4): 435-41, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21193452

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is the most frequently performed operation for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). However, 12% of the patients have persistent reflux symptoms and 19% develop gas-related symptoms after LNF. Weakly acidic reflux and inability to belch have been alleged to cause these symptoms, respectively. The effect of LNF on weakly acidic reflux and (supra) gastric belching was evaluated. METHODS: In 31 patients upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, stationary oesophageal manometry and 24-h impedance-pH monitoring off acid secretion inhibiting drugs was performed before and 6 months after primary LNF for GORD that was refractory to proton pump inhibitors. Patients filled out validated questionnaires on GERD-HRQoL before and 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: LNF reduced reflux symptoms (18.6→1.6; p = 0.015). The procedure drastically reduced the incidence (number per 24 h) of acid (76.0→1.6; p < 0.001) and weakly acidic (13.6→5.7; p = 0.001) as well as liquid (53.4→5.4; p<0.001) and mixed reflux episodes (36.3→1.9; p < 0.001). In contrast, gas reflux was reduced to lesser extent (35.6→25.7; p = 0.022). Proximal, mid-oesophageal and distal reflux were reduced to a similar extent. Persistent GORD symptoms were neither preceded by acid nor by weakly acidic reflux. The number of air swallows did not change, but the number of gastric belches (GBs) was greatly reduced (68.5→23.9; p < 0.001). Twenty-three patients had supragastric belches (SGBs), both before and after surgery, whereas eight patients had no SGBs at all. The majority of SGBs were not reflux associated and the frequency was greatly increased after LNF (20.8→46.0; p = 0.036). Reflux-associated SGBs were abolished after surgery (14.0→0.4; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LNF similarly controls acid and weakly acidic reflux, but gas reflux is reduced to lesser extent. Persistent reflux symptoms are neither caused by acid nor by weakly acidic reflux. LNF alters the belching pattern by reducing GBs (air venting from stomach) and increasing SGBs (no air venting from stomach). This explains the increase in belching experienced by some patients after LNF, despite the reduction in gastric belching. It can be hypothesised that the reduction in GBs after LNF incites patients to increase SGBs in a futile attempt to vent air from the stomach.


Subject(s)
Eructation/surgery , Fundoplication/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Adult , Aged , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Esophageal pH Monitoring , Esophagitis/etiology , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Manometry , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL