Novel once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplants: one-year results of Phase III, double-blind, randomized trial.

This Phase III randomized trial examined efficacy and safety of a novel once-daily extended-release tacrolimus formulation (LCP-Tacro [LCPT]) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplantation. Primary efficacy end point was proportion of patients with treatment failure (death, graft failure, biopsy-proven acute rejection or lost to follow-up) within 12 months. Starting doses were, LCPT: 0.17 mg/kg/day and tacrolimus twice-daily: 0.1 mg/kg/day; 543 patients were randomized, LCPT: n = 268; tacrolimus twice-daily: n = 275. At 12 months treatment failure was LCPT: 18.3% and tacrolimus twice-daily: 19.6%; the upper 95% CI of the treatment difference was +5.27%, below the predefined +10% noninferiority criteria. There were no significant differences in the incidence of individual efficacy events or adverse events. Target tacrolimus trough levels were more rapidly achieved in the LCPT group. Following initial dose, 36.6% of patients in the LCPT group had rapidly attained trough levels within 6-11 ng/mL versus 18.5% of tacrolimus twice-daily patients; majority of tacrolimus twice-daily patients (74.7%) had troughs <6 ng/mL compared with 33.5% in the LCPT group. Overall, cumulative study dose was 14% lower for LCPT. Results suggest that use of once-daily LCPT in de novo kidney transplantation is efficacious and safe. Lower LCPT dose reflects the improved absorption provided by the novel formulation.

Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily extended release tacrolimus (LCPT): the phase III randomized MELT trial.

Phase III noninferiority trial examining efficacy and safety of converting stable renal transplant recipients from twice-daily tacrolimus to a novel extended-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation (LCPT) with a controlled agglomeration technology. Controls maintained tacrolimus twice daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients with efficacy failures (death, graft failure, locally read biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss to follow-up) within 12 months. Starting LCPT dose was 30% lower (15% for blacks) than preconversion tacrolimus dose; target trough levels were 4-15 ng/mL. A total of 326 patients were randomized; the mITT population (n = 162 each group) was similar demographically in the two groups. Mean daily dose of LCPT was significantly (p < 0.0001) lower than preconversion tacrolimus dose at each visit; mean trough levels between groups were similar. There were four efficacy failures in each group; safety outcomes were similar between groups. Frequency of premature study drug discontinuation was LCPT: 12% versus tacrolimus twice daily: 5% (p = 0.028). LCPT demonstrated noninferiority to tacrolimus twice daily in efficacy failure rates. LCPT may offer a safe and effective alternative for converting patients to a once-daily formulation. Compared to currently available tacrolimus formulation, LCPT requires lower doses to achieve target trough levels.

Associations of pretransplant serum albumin with post-transplant outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.

The association between pretransplant serum albumin concentration and post-transplant outcomes in kidney transplant recipients is unclear. We hypothesized that in transplant-waitlisted hemodialysis patients, lower serum albumin concentrations are associated with worse post-transplant outcomes. Linking the 5-year patient data of a large dialysis organization (DaVita) to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified 8961 hemodialysis patients who underwent first kidney transplantation. Mortality or graft failure and delayed graft function (DGF) risks were estimated by Cox regression (hazard ratio [HR]) and logistic regression (Odds ratio [OR]), respectively. Patients were 48 ± 13 years old and included 37% women and 27% diabetics. The higher pretransplant serum albumin was associated with lower mortality, graft failure and DGF risk even after multivariate adjustment for case-mix, malnutrition-inflammation complex and transplant related variable. Every 0.2 g/dL higher pretransplant serum albumin concentration was associated with 13% lower all-cause mortality (HR = 0.87 [95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.93]), 17% lower cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.83[0.74-0.93]), 7% lower combined risk of death or graft failure (HR = 0.93[0.89-0.97]) and 4% lower DGF risk (OR = 0.96[0.93-0.99]). Hence, lower pretransplant serum albumin level is associated with worse post-transplant outcomes. Clinical trials to examine interventions to improve nutritional status in transplant-waitlisted hemodialysis patients and their impacts on post-transplant outcomes are indicated.

Associations of body mass index and weight loss with mortality in transplant-waitlisted maintenance hemodialysis patients.

A body mass index (BMI) below morbid obesity range is often a requirement for kidney transplant wait-listing, but data linking BMI changes to mortality during the waitlist period are lacking. By linking the 6-year (7/2001-6/2007) national databases of a large dialysis organization and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified 14 632 waitlisted hemodialysis patients without kidney transplantation. Time-dependent survival models examined the mortality predictability of 13-week-averaged BMI, pretransplant serum creatinine as a muscle mass surrogate and their changes over time. The patients were on average 52 ± 13 years old, 40% women and had a BMI of 26.9 ± 6.3 kg/m². Each kg/m² increase of BMI was associated with a death hazard ratio (HR) of 0.96 (95%CI: 0.95-0.97). Compared to the lowest creatinine quintile, the 4th and 5th quintiles had death HRs of 0.75 (0.66-0.86) and 0.57 (0.49-0.66), respectively. Compared to minimal (< ± 1 kg) weight change over 6 months, those with 3 kg- < 5 kg and ≥ 5 kg weight loss had death HRs of 1.31 (1.14-1.52) and 1.51 (1.30-1.75), respectively. Similar associations were observed with creatinine changes over time. Transplant-waitlisted hemodialysis patients with lower BMI or muscle mass and/or unintentional weight or muscle loss have higher mortality in this observational study. Impact of intentional weight change remains unclear.

Outcomes of simultaneous heart-kidney transplant in the US: a retrospective analysis using OPTN/UNOS data.

Simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHK) remains uncommon in the US. We examined outcomes of SHK compared to heart transplant alone (HTA) and deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT). Data from OPTN/UNOS heart and kidney data bases were used to identify 16,710 HTA, 263 SHK transplants and 68,833 DDK transplants between 1998 and 2007. Outcomes included patient survival (PS), acute cardiac and renal rejection and renal graft survival (rGS). The adjusted risk of death was 44% lower with SHK compared to HTA. Over half of SHK were performed in cases where pretransplant dialysis was not initiated. In these cases, there was no significant difference in the risk of death between SHK and HTA (HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.67-1.50). Recipients of SHK had worse 1-year rGS and PS and had a higher relative risk of overall renal graft loss compared to DDKT recipients. One-year rates of cardiac (14.5%) and renal (6.5%) rejection were lower in SHK compared to HTA and DDKT, respectively. Recipients of SHK had a lower adjusted risk of death compared to HTA recipients, particularly in patients who required pretransplant dialysis. These data suggest that SHK should be considered in heart transplant candidates with renal failure requiring dialysis, whereas the utility of SHK in cases of renal failure not requiring dialysis warrants further study.

Predictive ability of pretransplant comorbidities to predict long-term graft loss and death.

Whether to include additional comorbidities beyond diabetes in future kidney allocation schemes is controversial. We investigated the predictive ability of multiple pretransplant comorbidities for graft and patient survival. We included first-kidney transplant deceased donor recipients if Medicare was the primary payer for at least one year pretransplant. We extracted pretransplant comorbidities from Medicare claims with the Clinical Classifications Software (CCS), Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities and used Cox regressions for graft loss, death with function (DWF) and death. Four models were compared: (1) Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN) recipient and donor factors, (2) OPTN + CCS, (3) OPTN + Charlson and (4) OPTN + Elixhauser. Patients were censored at 9 years or loss to follow-up. Predictive performance was evaluated with the c-statistic. We examined 25 270 transplants between 1995 and 2002. For graft loss, the predictive value of all models was statistically and practically similar (Model 1: 0.61 [0.60 0.62], Model 2: 0.63 [0.62 0.64], Models 3 and 4: 0.62 [0.61 0.63]). For DWF and death, performance improved to 0.70 and was slightly better with the CCS. Pretransplant comorbidities derived from administrative claims did not identify factors not collected on OPTN that had a significant impact on graft outcome predictions. This has important implications for the revisions to the kidney allocation scheme.

Predictors of Early and Late Mortality in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Older kidney patients with chronic kidney disease benefit significantly from kidney transplantation. However, these older transplant recipients have greater mortality after transplantation than younger transplant recipients. Understanding the impact of comorbidities on post-transplant mortality can improve risk stratification and patient selection. METHODS: A single-center analysis of 3105 kidney transplant recipients was performed over a 12-year period. Comorbidities associated with death were evaluated in older and younger transplant recipients. RESULTS: The 2 most important factors associated with increased mortality in the first 100 days after transplant were recipient age ≥60 and receipt of deceased donor organs (adjusted odds ratios, 3.29 and 5.80, respectively), with no statistically significant impact of recipient comorbidities. In the later post-transplant period (after the first 100 days), recipient age ≥60 and receipt of deceased donor organs (adjusted hazard ratios [HR] of 2.14 and 2.29, respectively) remained predictors of mortality. We also found that donor age ≥60 and the recipient having cardiovascular disease and diabetes were independent predictors of increased mortality. There was a statistically significant interaction between diabetes and heart disease and recipient age ≥60, with a lesser impact on late mortality in older patients compared to younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that comorbidities have a larger impact later after transplantation, with less effect on older recipients. These observations suggest that certain comorbid conditions should be evaluated differently in older patients compared to younger ones.

Can machine perfusion decrease the likelihood of discard among biopsied kidneys?

Many factors, such as donor risk factors and renal function, have been shown to be associated with an increased likelihood of discard after recovering kidneys from deceased donors. When these factors are insufficient for assessment, renal biopsy is often performed at the time of harvest to assess suitability. Our aims were to identify factors that predict the discard of a biopsied kidney and to assess the impact of machine perfusion (MP) on kidney discard. We biopsied 678 kidneys from deceased donors aged >or=40 years from 2001 to 2006. We used a logistic regression model to estimate the adjusted odds ratios for kidney discard. Thirty-nine percent (n = 261) of biopsied kidneys were discarded. Kidneys with glomerulosclerosis (GS) > 20% had the highest likelihood of discard. Other significant predictors of discard included extreme donor age, final resistance (>40), atherosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, arteriolosclerosis, and terminal serum creatinine value (SCr) > 1.5 mg/dL. MP kidneys (n = 69) were less likely to be discarded than cold storage (CS) kidneys after adjusting for other factors (adjusted odds ratio = .13, P < .001). In conclusion, abnormal biopsy findings were associated with the highest likelihood of discard. MP was used in only 10% of the cases; however, the use of MP was associated with a decreased likelihood of discard among biopsied kidneys.

Factors associated with discard of recovered kidneys.

We reviewed diseased donor (DD) kidney usage at a single Organ Procurement Organization in Southern California to more closely examine factors associated with discard. From 2001 to 2006, 3863 kidneys from 1959 DDs were recovered, but 454 (11.8%) were subsequently discarded. Among the discarded kidneys, 211 (46.5%) were discarded based upon biopsy findings, 19 (4.2%) due to anatomical abnormalities, 16 (3.5%) based on donor quality, and 14 (3.1%) because they were felt to be too old to be pumped. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using significant prognostic factors upon univariate analyses. According to the magnitude of the adjusted odds ratio (AOR), significant prognostic factors for discard were extreme donor age (AOR = 24.1 of age 70-80 years, P < .001; AOR = 6.34 age 50-69 years, P < .001; AOR = 2.77 age 40-49 years, P < .001; and AOR = 3.09 age <10 years, P < .001 vs age 10-39 years), high final resistance (AOR = 8.86 of >40 vs others, P = .006), glomerulosclerosis (GS) > 20% (AOR = 5.94 vs GS 0%-5%/no biopsy, P < .001), severe atherosclerosis (AOR = 4.66, P = .003), abnormal anatomy (AOR = 2.7, P < .001), and moderate or severe arteriolosclerosis (AOR = 2.2 vs none/mild/no biopsy, P < .001). Among biopsy findings, the presence of GS > 20% was associated with the highest likelihood of discard. A high final resistance increased the likelihood of discard as well. In conclusion, these findings may help to set the groundwork toward a more uniform approach to organ utilization in donor service areas.

Case Report: First Reported Combined Heart-Liver Transplant in a Patient With a Congenital Solitary Kidney.

We report a case of successful combined heart liver transplant in a patient with a congenital solitary kidney. The patient had normal renal function before combined heart-liver transplantation and developed acute kidney injury requiring slow continuous dialysis and subsequent intermittent dialysis for almost 8 weeks post transplantation. Her renal function recovered and she remains off dialysis now 7 months post transplantation. She only currently has mild chronic renal insufficiency. We believe this is the first reported case of successful heart liver transplant in a patient with a congenital solitary kidney.

Increased T cell immunosenescence and accelerated maturation phenotypes in older kidney transplant recipients.

Older kidney transplant recipients experience increased rates of infection and death, and less rejection, compared with younger patients. However, little is known about immune dysfunction in older compared with younger kidney transplant recipients and whether it is associated with infection. We evaluated T cell phenotypes including maturation, immune senescence, and exhaustion in a novel investigation into differences in older compared with younger patients receiving identical immune suppression regimens. We evaluated PBMC from 60 kidney transplant recipients (23 older and 37 matched younger patients) by multiparameter immune phenotyping. Older kidney transplant recipients demonstrated decreased frequency of naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and increased frequency of terminally differentiated, immune senescent, and NK T cells expressing KLRG1. There was a trend towards increased frequency of T cell immune senescence in patients experiencing infection in the first year after transplantation, which reached statistical significance in a multivariate analysis. This pilot study reveals immune dysfunction in older compared with younger transplant recipients, and suggests a likely mechanism for increased vulnerability to infection. The ability to assess T cell maturation and immune senescence in transplant recipients offers the potential for risk stratification and customization of immune suppression to prevent infection and rejection after transplantation.

Overview of renal transplantation.

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end stage renal disease patients. Recent advances, including newer immunosuppressants, revision of organ allocation policies, and better medical care of renal transplant recipients, have resulted in an increase number of transplants with improved outcomes. The major obstacles include the lack of improvement in long term outcomes, shortage of organs and long-term morbidity of candidates with chronic kidney disease. This review highlights transplant immunology, organ allocation, immunosuppressive medications, and complications of transplantation involving post transplantation infections, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

Meta-analysis: the dialysis mode and immunological response to hepatitis B virus vaccine in dialysis population.

BACKGROUND: Patients on maintenance dialysis typically show a suboptimal immune response to hepatitis B virus vaccine compared with the non-uraemic population. Some authors have claimed that dialysis mode has an impact on the immune response to hepatitis B virus vaccine but consistent information is lacking on this issue. AIM: To evaluate the relationship between dialysis mode and immune response to hepatitis B vaccine in dialysis population by performing a systematic review with a meta-analysis of clinical trials. METHOD: We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird; sources of heterogeneity in effect estimates were explored by performing sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The relative risk of failure to respond to hepatitis B vaccine among patients who underwent maintenance haemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis was the end point of interest. We identified 14 clinical trials involving 1211 unique patients on maintenance dialysis. Pooling of study results did not show a significant decreased risk of response to hepatitis B vaccine among haemodialysis patients (overall risk ratio: 1.0, 95% confidence intervals: 0.92-1.1). The P-value was 0.13 for our test of study heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: There is no significant link between dialysis mode and seroresponse to hepatitis B virus vaccine in dialysis population.

Multivariate analysis of antibody induction therapy and their associated outcomes in deceased donor transplants.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to describe factors associated with the use of overall induction, classes of induction agents, and to evaluate the incidence of acute rejection, short-term graft survival, and patient survival. METHODS: Of 24,901 transplants reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) between 1999 and 2001, 51% received induction therapy including Thymoglobulin (T; n = 3090), Simulect (S; n = 6063), or Zenapax (Z; n = 3755). Propensity scores (PS) were calculated to indicate factors associated with use of induction and for each induction agent. Outcome parameters included graft survival (GS), hazard ratio (HR) for graft loss (GL), and odds ratio (OR) for first-year acute rejection (AR). RESULTS: Pediatric (PS = 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.49, vs adults) and retransplanted recipients (PS = 1.36; 1.23-1.49, vs first) were more likely to receive induction. One-year GS (90.1 vs 88.0%; P < .001), GL = 0.92% (0.86-0.98; P = .01), and AR free = 0.74 (P < .001) were superior in patients receiving induction. Using multivariate analysis, the odds of rejection 0.73 (0.68-0.78), GL 0.91 (0.85-0.97), and death 0.90 (0.82-0.98) were lower in those receiving induction. Among patients given induction, those receiving T were more likely sensitized (PS = 1.50%; 1.31-1.71), retransplanted (PS = 1.51; 1.31-1.75), or had delayed graft function (PS = 1.75; 1.58-1.93). T decreased the odds of rejection compared with S or Z (OR = 0.74; 0.69-0.79), but the type of induction agent did not have an impact on graft outcome HR for T = 1.07 (0.96-1.19). CONCLUSIONS: The use of antibody induction was associated with lower risk of rejection and better GS. There were no differences in GS among individual regimens. Comparative safety data were not analyzed but should be taken into consideration when choosing antibody preparations.

Multivariate analysis of the effectiveness of using antibody induction therapy according to the degree of HLA mismatches.

OBJECTIVE: HLA mismatches have a strong impact on acute rejection and renal allograft survival. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of antibody induction according to the degree of HLA mismatches. METHODS: Of 20,429 deceased donor (DD) transplantations and 12,859 living donor (LD) transplantations reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) between 1999 and 2001, 51% of DD and 45% of LD transplant recipients received induction therapy. Propensity scores (PS) were calculated to indicate independent factors associated with the use of induction. Levels of HLA match examined for DD transplant recipients were 0 ABDR (n = 3239), 0 DR (n = 4210), and DR mismatched transplants (n = 12,980), and 0 (n = 1133), 1 (n = 3836), and 2 (n = 7890) haplotype mismatches for LD transplant recipients. Outcome parameters were reported as hazard ratios (HR) for graft loss and odds ratios (OR) for first-year acute rejection. RESULTS: Recipients with HLA mismatches were more likely to receive induction antibody for DR mismatch in DDs (PS = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.19) and for haplotype mismatch in LDs (PS = 1.36, 95% CI 1.22-1.52). Induction reduced the likelihood of acute rejection for DD transplant recipients regardless of the level of HLA mismatch (OR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.57-0.85 in 0 ABDR MM; OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.89 in 0 DR MM; and OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.62-0.77 in DR MM), and for 2 haplotype mismatched LD transplant recipients (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.96); in other LD transplant recipients, reductions in acute rejection rates were observed but not statistically significant. Induction reduced the risk of graft loss for DR mismatched DD transplant recipients by about 12% (HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.80-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Antibody induction resulted in a significant reduction of acute rejection and graft loss for patients with HLA mismatch.

Lamivudine in the treatment of HBV-related liver disease after renal transplantation: an update.

Diminished survival due to hepatitis B has been observed after renal transplantation (RT). Lamivudine, a second-generation nucleoside analogue, has been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with normal renal function. Numerous clinical experiences with lamivudine after RT have been recently published. Despite numerous shortcomings, all of these reports have shown encouraging results. The rate of clearance of HBV viremia ranged between 67% and 100%, and the frequency of ALT normalization was between 50% and 100% with lamivudine use. Even patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, a serious form of HBV-related liver disease with ominous course, have been successfully treated with lamivudine. Lamivudine therapy significantly improved the survival of HBsAg positive renal allograft recipients. However, numerous issues concerning the treatment of hepatitis B after RT remain unclear: the optimal time to initiate lamivudine, the appropriate duration of antiviral therapy after RT, and the role for pre-transplantation liver biopsy. Also, the management of lamivudine resistance remains a concern for physicians. Clinical trials are under way.

Intravenous immune globulin treatment inhibits crossmatch positivity and allows for successful transplantation of incompatible organs in living-donor and cadaver recipients.

BACKGROUND: Sensitization to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) is a significant barrier to transplantation. Currently, no proven therapy exists to improve access to transplantation for highly sensitized patients. Here, we report a novel approach using intravenous immune globulin to modulate anti-HLA antibody and improve the chances for successful transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five highly HLA-sensitized patients presented as candidates for living-donor kidney transplantation (n=28), cadaveric kidney transplantation (n=15), or heart transplantation (n=2). All patients had a positive CDC crossmatch (CMX) with their donors. In living-donor recipients, intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) was added to the CMX evaluation to determine whether blocking antibodies present in IVIG could inhibit cytotoxicity. For those who showed in vitro inhibition with IVIG (n=26), IVIG was administered (usually as a single dose, 2 g/kg) and the CDC CMX was repeated against the prospective donor immediately after IVIG infusion. If negative, the patient underwent transplantation with their living-donor kidney within 24 to 72 hr. A similar but modified protocol was performed for cadaver donor candidates, all of whom were highly sensitized and had had CMX positivity with multiple donors, negating transplantation. Reductions in CMX positivity, posttransplantation serum creatinine level, number and severity of rejection episodes, and patient and graft survival rates were determined. RESULTS: Forty-two patients underwent transplantation. IVIG treatment completely abrogated the donor-specific CMXs in 35 of 42 patients. In the remaining 7 patients, the CDC CMX was inhibited, but flow cytometry CMXs remained positive. A total of 13 (31%) of 42 recipients developed rejection episodes 3 to 49 days after transplantation. Three grafts (7%) were lost to rejection. Mean serum creatinine level at 24 months was 1.4+/-0.4 mg/dL. Patient and graft survival rates were 97.6% and 89.1%, respectively, at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro IVIG CMX technique predicts the ability of IVIG to reduce anti-HLA antibody levels in highly sensitized patients. Subsequent in vivo IVIG treatment of responders eliminates the positive CDC CMX and allows for successful transplantation. Thus a positive CMX result is not necessarily a contraindication for transplantation and allows access to transplantation for patients for whom it was previously contraindicated.

Meta-analysis: Effect of hepatitis C virus infection on mortality in dialysis.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of hepatitis C virus infection among patients on long-term dialysis treatment remains incompletely understood. Efforts to elucidate the natural history of hepatitis C virus in this population are difficult because of the slowly progressive nature of hepatitis C virus with often an unrecognized onset in patients whose life-expectancy is substantially diminished by end-stage renal disease. AIM: To conduct a systematic review of the published medical literature concerning the impact of hepatitis C virus infection on the survival of patients receiving chronic dialysis. The relative risk of mortality was regarded as the most reliable outcome end-point. METHODS: We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to generate a summary estimate of the relative risk for mortality with hepatitis C virus across the published studies. RESULTS: We identified four clinical trials (2341 unique patients); three (75%) of them were prospective, cohort studies; the fourth was a case-control study. Pooling of study results demonstrated that presence of antihepatitis C virus antibody was an independent and significant risk factor for death in patients on maintenance dialysis. The summary estimate for relative risk was 1.57 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.33-1.86. A test for homogeneity of the relative risks across the four studies gave a P-value of 0.77. As a cause of death, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis were significantly more frequent among antihepatitis C virus-positive than -negative dialysis patients. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that antihepatitis C virus-positive patients on dialysis have an increased risk of mortality compared with hepatitis C virus-negative patients. The excess risk of death in hepatitis C virus-positive patients may be at least partially attributed to chronic liver disease with its attendant complications. Clinical trials with extended follow-up are currently under way to assess the effect of hepatitis C virus treatment on the excess risk of mortality in this population.

Meta-analysis: the effect of age on immunological response to hepatitis B vaccine in end-stage renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients on maintenance dialysis typically show a suboptimal immune response to hepatitis B virus vaccine compared with the non-uraemic population. A variety of inherited or acquired factors have been implicated in this diminished response. Age-associated changes in immune status may contribute to decreased vaccine efficacy in older individuals although contradictory results have been reported in individuals with normal kidney function. AIMS: To evaluate the relationship between age and immune response to hepatitis B vaccine in patients with end-stage renal disease by performing a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical trials. METHOD: We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird; sources of heterogeneity in effect estimates were explored by performing sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: We identified 17 clinical trials (1800 unique patients); six (35%) were controlled studies. Pooling of study results demonstrated a significantly decreased risk of response to hepatitis B vaccine among older dialysis patients (overall risk ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence intervals: 0.70-0.79). The P-value was 0.0139 for our test of study heterogeneity. A lowered risk of response to hepatitis B vaccine persisted after exclusion of trials based on plasma-derived vaccines; it was present even when 'older' individuals were defined as being as 50 years (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.96) or more (cut-off 60 years RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66-0.85). An effect of age on seroprotection rate was present in all clinical reports, irrespective of the geographic origin of the study group: Europe (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.70-0.83) North America (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.60-0.74) or other countries (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71-0.97). Additional doses of vaccine did not appear to have an impact on RR of response by age. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed a clear association between older age and impaired response to hepatitis B virus vaccine in end-stage renal disease patients. Such a relationship is biologically plausible. Vaccination schedules with adapted vaccine doses and frequent serum testing for loss of immunity against hepatitis B virus are recommended in elderly patients on maintenance dialysis.