[Recommendations for the treatment of premature ejaculation]. / Recommandations pour le traitement de l'éjaculation prématurée.

OBJECTIVES: The Post-University Interdisciplinary Association of Sexology (AIUS) has brought together a panel of experts to develop French recommendations for the management of premature ejaculation. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature between 01/1995 and 02/2022. Use of the clinical practice guidelines (CPR) method. RESULTS: We recommend giving all patients with PE psychosexological counseling, and whenever possible combining pharmacotherapies and sexually-focused cognitive-behavioral therapies, involving the partner in the treatment process. Other sexological approaches could be useful. We recommend the use of dapoxetine as first-line, on-demand oral therapy for primary and acquired PE. We recommend the use of lidocaine 150mg/mL/prilocaine 50mg/mL spray as local treatment for primary PE. We suggest the combination of dapoxetine and lidocaine/prilocaine in patients insufficiently improved by monotherapy. In patients who have not responded to treatments with marketing authorisation, we suggest using an off-label SSRI, preferably paroxetine, in the absence of a contraindication. We recommend treating ED before PE in patients with both symptoms. We do not recommend using α-1 blockers or tramadol in patients with PE. We do not recommend routine posthectomy or penile frenulum surgery for PE. CONCLUSION: These recommendations should contribute to improving the management of PE.

[Practical recommendations for the management of testosterone deficiency]. / Recommandations pratiques pour la prise en charge du déficit en testostérone.

OBJECTIVES: The Francophone Society of Sexual Medicine (SFMS) and the Andrology and Sexual Medicine Committee (CAMS) of the French Association of Urology (AFU) have brought together a panel of experts to develop French recommendations for the management of testosterone deficiency (TD). METHODS: Systematic review of the literature between 01/2000 and 07/2019. Use of the method of recommendations for clinical practice (RPC) and the AGREE II grid. RESULTS: TD is defined as the association of clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of TD with a decrease in testosterone levels or serum androgen activity. Diagnosis requires a T lower than the reference values in young men on 2 successive assays. Sexual disorders are often at the forefront, and concern the whole male sexual function (desire, arousal, pleasure and orgasm). The most evocative symptoms are: decrease in sexual desire, disappearance of nocturnal erections, fatigue, loss of muscle strength. Overweight, depressed mood, anxiety, irritability and malaise are also frequently found. TD is more common in cases of metabolic, cardiovascular, chronic, andrological diseases, and in cases of corticosteroid, opioid, antipsychotic, anticonvulsant, antiretroviral, or cancer treatment. Since SHBG is frequently abnormal, we recommend that free or bioavailable T is preferred over total T. The treatment of TD requires a prior clinical (DRE, breast examination) and biological (PSA, CBC) assessment. Contraindications to T treatment are: progressive prostate or breast cancer, severe heart failure or recent cardiovascular event, polycytemia, complicated BPH, paternity project. It is possible in cases of sleep apnea syndrome, psychiatric history, stable heart disease, prostate cancer under active surveillance and after one year of complete remission of a low or intermediate risk localized prostate cancer treated in a curative manner. It includes long-term testosterone supplementation and life-style counseling. Treatment is monitored at 3, 6, 12 months and annually thereafter. It is clinical (annual DRE) and biological (total T, PSA, CBC), the most frequent side effect being polyglobulia. CONCLUSION: These recommendations should help improve the management of TD.

[RALP: comparison of the oncological and functional outcomes of the intrafascial and the interfascial approaches]. / Résultats carcinologiques et fonctionnels de l'abord interfascial de la prostatectomie robotique comparé avec l'abord intrafascial.

INTRODUCTION: Due to its technical ease and greater precision Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic radical Prostatectomy (RALP) allows a better preservation of the neurovascular bundles, thereby improving functional outcomes. The intrafascial dissection has been proposed to allow a more complete preservation of these bundles. However, this technique harbors a high rate of positive surgical margins, justifying another trend: the interfascial approach. To date, there are still few publications directly comparing these 2 techniques and our study is the first to offer a 2-year follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study focused on a two-hundred patients population divided into two consecutive groups. All the patients were continent preoperatively and had a satisfactory IIEF5 score: (1) Group 1 consisted of 100 patients who underwent RALP with the intrafascial approach. They had a mean age of 60.3 years (45-70). The majority of cancers were of the low or moderate risk group of d'Amico. The mean PSA was 7.43ng/ml. Seventy-five patients had a pT2, 24 a pT3 and one patient had a pT4. (2) Group 2 included 100 patients who underwent RALP with the interfascial technique. Patients had a mean age of 61.6±5.96 years (45-72), and their cancers were mostly of the low or moderate risk groups of d'Amico. The mean PSA was 6.3ng/ml. Seventy-four patients had a pT2, 22 a pT3a, and 4 had a pT3b. All patients were evaluated after one and two years of follow-up. RESULT: Rates of positive surgical margins were 45% and 19% respectively for groups 1 and 2 (P<0.0001). The rates of biochemical failure (PSA>0.2ng/ml) at 2 years were 10% and 3%, respectively for groups 1 and 2 (P=0.0447). At 2 years, 2 patients in group 1 and one patient in group 2 were using 2 or more urinary pads. Erection with or without oral medication was maintained in 65 (65%) and 31 (31%) patients respectively for groups 1 and 2 at one year. At 2 years 86 and 65 patients were having spontaneous erection, respectively in groups 1 and 2 (P=0.0006). In addition, 65 and 55 patients were also capable of sexual penetration, respectively in groups 1 and 2 (P=0.0045). CONCLUSION: The intrafascial approach exposed to a very high rate of positive surgical margins while offering only a little benefit in the erectile function preservation at 2 years compared to the interfascial variant. In our series, we did not notice any significant difference between the two techniques concerning the urinary continence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.