Selective Inhibition of NaV1.8 with VX-548 for Acute Pain.

BACKGROUND: The NaV1.8 voltage-gated sodium channel, expressed in peripheral nociceptive neurons, plays a role in transmitting nociceptive signals. The effect of VX-548, an oral, highly selective inhibitor of NaV1.8, on control of acute pain is being studied. METHODS: After establishing the selectivity of VX-548 for NaV1.8 inhibition in vitro, we conducted two phase 2 trials involving participants with acute pain after abdominoplasty or bunionectomy. In the abdominoplasty trial, participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive one of the following over a 48-hour period: a 100-mg oral loading dose of VX-548, followed by a 50-mg maintenance dose every 12 hours (the high-dose group); a 60-mg loading dose of VX-548, followed by a 30-mg maintenance dose every 12 hours (the middle-dose group); hydrocodone bitartrate-acetaminophen (5 mg of hydrocodone bitartrate and 325 mg of acetaminophen every 6 hours); or oral placebo every 6 hours. In the bunionectomy trial, participants were randomly assigned in a 2:2:1:2:2 ratio to receive one of the following over a 48-hour treatment period: oral high-dose VX-548; middle-dose VX-548; low-dose VX-548 (a 20-mg loading dose, followed by a 10-mg maintenance dose every 12 hours); oral hydrocodone bitartrate-acetaminophen (5 mg of hydrocodone bitartrate and 325 mg of acetaminophen every 6 hours); or oral placebo every 6 hours. The primary end point was the time-weighted sum of the pain-intensity difference (SPID) over the 48-hour period (SPID48), a measure derived from the score on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (range, 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain) at 19 time points after the first dose of VX-548 or placebo. The main analysis compared each dose of VX-548 with placebo. RESULTS: A total of 303 participants were enrolled in the abdominoplasty trial and 274 in the bunionectomy trial. The least-squares mean difference between the high-dose VX-548 and placebo groups in the time-weighted SPID48 was 37.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2 to 66.4) after abdominoplasty and 36.8 (95% CI, 4.6 to 69.0) after bunionectomy. In both trials, participants who received lower doses of VX-548 had results similar to those with placebo. Headache and constipation were common adverse events with VX-548. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with placebo, VX-548 at the highest dose, but not at lower doses, reduced acute pain over a period of 48 hours after abdominoplasty or bunionectomy. VX-548 was associated with adverse events that were mild to moderate in severity. (Funded by Vertex Pharmaceuticals; VX21-548-101 and VX21-548-102 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT04977336 and NCT05034952.).

A Pharmacological Evaluation of the Analgesic Effect and Hippocampal Protein Modulation of the Ketamine Metabolite (2R,6R)-Hydroxynorketamine in Murine Pain Models.

BACKGROUND: The ketamine metabolite (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine ([2R,6R]-HNK) has analgesic efficacy in murine models of acute, neuropathic, and chronic pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the α-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate (AMPA) dependence of (2R,6R)-HNK analgesia and protein changes in the hippocampus in murine pain models administered (2R,6R)-HNK or saline. METHODS: All mice were CD-1 IGS outbred mice. Male and female mice underwent plantar incision (PI) (n = 60), spared nerve injury (SNI) (n = 64), or tibial fracture (TF) (n = 40) surgery on the left hind limb. Mechanical allodynia was assessed using calibrated von Frey filaments. Mice were randomized to receive saline, naloxone, or the brain-penetrating AMPA blocker (1,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-6-nitro-2,3-dioxobenzo [f]quinoxaline-7-sulfonamide [NBQX]) before (2R,6R)-HNK 10 mg/kg, and this was repeated for 3 consecutive days. The area under the paw withdrawal threshold by time curve for days 0 to 3 (AUC 0-3d ) was calculated using trapezoidal integration. The AUC 0-3d was converted to percent antiallodynic effect using the baseline and pretreatment values as 0% and 100%. In separate experiments, a single dose of (2R,6R)-HNK 10 mg/kg or saline was administered to naive mice (n = 20) and 2 doses to PI (n = 40), SNI injury (n = 40), or TF (n = 40) mice. Naive mice were tested for ambulation, rearing, and motor strength. Immunoblot studies of the right hippocampal tissue were performed to evaluate the ratios of glutamate ionotropic receptor (AMPA) type subunit 1 (GluA1), glutamate ionotropic receptor (AMPA) type subunit 2 (GluA2), phosphorylated voltage-gated potassium channel 2.1 (p-Kv2.1), phosphorylated-calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (p-CaMKII), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), phosphorylated protein kinase B (p-AKT), phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK), CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), phosphorylated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 1 (p-EIF2SI), and phosphorylated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (p-EIF4E) to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). RESULTS: No model-specific gender difference in antiallodynic responses before (2R,6R)-HNK administration was observed. The antiallodynic AUC 0-3d of (2R,6R)-HNK was decreased by NBQX but not with pretreatment with naloxone or saline. The adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) antiallodynic effect of (2R,6R)-HNK in the PI, SNI, and TF models was 40.7% (34.1%-47.3%), 55.1% (48.7%-61.5%), and 54.7% (46.5%-63.0%), greater in the SNI, difference 14.3% (95% CI, 3.1-25.6; P = .007) and TF, difference 13.9% (95% CI, 1.9-26.0; P = .019) compared to the PI model. No effect of (2R,6R)-HNK on ambulation, rearing, or motor coordination was observed. Administration of (2R,6R)-HNK was associated with increased GluA1, GluA2, p-Kv2.1, and p-CaMKII and decreased BDNF ratios in the hippocampus, with model-specific variations in proteins involved in other pain pathways. CONCLUSIONS: (2R,6R)-HNK analgesia is AMPA-dependent, and (2R,6R)-HNK affected glutamate, potassium, calcium, and BDNF pathways in the hippocampus. At 10 mg/kg, (2R,6R)-HNK demonstrated a greater antiallodynic effect in models of chronic compared with acute pain. Protein analysis in the hippocampus suggests that AMPA-dependent alterations in BDNF-TrkB and Kv2.1 pathways may be involved in the antiallodynic effect of (2R,6R)-HNK.

Analgesic Effectiveness and Dorsal Root Ganglia Protein Modulation of a Peripheral Adenosine Monophosphate Kinase Alpha Activator (O304) Following Lumbar Disk Puncture in the Mouse.

BACKGROUND: Disk herniation is a primary cause of radicular back pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antiallodynic effective dose in 50% of the sample (ED 50 ) and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) protein modulation of a peripheral direct adenosine monophosphate kinase alpha (AMPKα) activator (O304) in a murine model of lumbar disk puncture. METHODS: Male (n = 28) and female (n = 28) mice (C57BL6/J) were assessed for hind paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) and burrowing. Abdominal surgery was performed on all mice, and 48 received a lumbar disk puncture (27-G needle), with 8 serving as nondisk puncture controls. Assessments were repeated at day 7, and mice were then randomized into 5 groups of equal numbers of males and females: O304 at 100 mg/kg (n = 10), 150 mg/kg (n = 10), 200 mg/kg (n = 10), and 250 mg/kg (n = 10) or drug vehicle (n = 8). Starting on day 7, mice received daily gavages of O304 or vehicle for 7 days. On days 14 and 21 PWT and on day 14 burrowing were assessed. The area under the PWT by time curve (AUC) from day 7 to 21 was determined by trapezoidal integration. DRG protein modulation was evaluated in male (n = 10) and female (n = 10) mice (C57BL6/J). Following disk puncture, mice were randomized to receive O304 200 mg/kg or vehicle for 7 days starting on day 7. On day 14, mice were euthanized; the DRG harvested and immunoblot performed for mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1), phosphorylated adenosine monophosphate kinase (p-AMPK), phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK), phosphorylated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 1 (p-EIF2S1), phosphorylated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4e (p-EIF4E), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GADPH). RESULTS: Disk puncture decreased PWT greater in female mice compared with male mice and decreased burrowing at 7 days. PWTs were increased with increasing doses of O304 from 150 to 250 mg/g on day 14 and sustained through day 21. The ED 50 (95% confidence interval [CI]) for reducing mechanical allodynia was 140 (118-164) mg/kg. Burrowing was not increased at day 14 compared to day 7 by O304 administration. Compared to vehicle-treated animals, O304 increased (95% CI) the p-AMPK/GADPH ratio, difference 0.27 (0.08-0.45; P = . 004) and decreased (95% CI) the ratios of p-TRPA1, p-ERK1/2, pEIF4E, and p-EIF2S1 to GADPH by -0.49 (-0.61 to -0.37; P < . 001), -0.53 (-0.76 to -0.29; P < . 001), -0.27 (-0.42 to 0.11; P = . 001), and -0.21 (-0.32 to -0.08; P = . 003) in the DRG, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The direct peripheral AMPK activator O304 reduced allodynia in a dose-dependent manner, and immunoblot studies of the DRG showed that O304 increased p-AMPK and decreased TRPA1, p-ERK1/2, as well as translation factors involved in neuroplasticity. Our findings confirm the role of peripheral AMPKα activation in modulating nociceptive pain.

The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC): Recommendations for Surgical Technique for Spinal Cord Stimulation.

INTRODUCTION: The field of neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic pain is a rapidly developing area of medicine. Although neurostimulation therapies have advanced significantly as a result of technologic improvements, surgical planning, device placement, and postoperative care are of equal importance to optimize outcomes. This Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) project intends to provide evidence-based guidance for these often-overlooked areas of neurostimulation practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Authors were chosen based on their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches of MEDLINE, BioMed Central, Current Contents Connect, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed from the last NACC publication in 2017 to the present. Identified studies were graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations are based on evidence strength and consensus when evidence was scant. RESULTS: This NACC project provides guidance on preoperative assessment, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative management in the form of consensus points with supportive evidence. These results are based on grade of evidence, strength of consensus, and expert opinion. CONCLUSIONS: The NACC has given guidance for a surgical plan that encompasses the patient journey from the planning stage through the surgical experience and postoperative care. The overall recommendations are designed to improve efficacy and the safety of patients undergoing these neuromodulation procedures and are intended to apply throughout the international community.

The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC): Recommendations on Best Practices for Cervical Neurostimulation.

INTRODUCTION: The International Neuromodulation Society convened a multispecialty group of physicians based on expertise with international representation to establish evidence-based guidance on the use of neurostimulation in the cervical region to improve outcomes. This Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) project intends to provide evidence-based guidance for an often-overlooked area of neurostimulation practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Authors were chosen based upon their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches of MEDLINE, BioMed Central, Current Contents Connect, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed from 2017 (when NACC last published guidelines) to the present. Identified studies were graded using the US Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations are based on the strength of evidence or consensus when evidence was scant. RESULTS: The NACC examined the published literature and established evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to guide best practices. Additional guidance will occur as new evidence is developed in future iterations of this process. CONCLUSIONS: The NACC recommends best practices regarding the use of cervical neuromodulation to improve safety and efficacy. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations should be utilized as a guide to assist decision making when clinically appropriate.

Opioid Stewardship Program and Postoperative Adverse Events: A Difference-in-differences Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: A 6-month opioid use educational program consisting of webinars on pain assessment, postoperative and multimodal pain opioid management, safer opioid use, and preventing addiction coupled with on-site coaching and monthly assessments reports was implemented in 31 hospitals. The authors hypothesized the intervention would measurably reduce and/or prevent opioid-related harm among adult hospitalized patients compared to 33 nonintervention hospitals. METHODS: Outcomes were extracted from medical records for 12 months before and after the intervention start date. Opioid adverse events, evaluated by opioid overdose, wrong substance given or taken in error, naloxone administration, and acute postoperative respiratory failure causing prolonged ventilation were the primary outcomes. Opioid use in adult patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty or colorectal procedures was also assessed. Differences-in-differences were compared between intervention and nonintervention hospitals. RESULTS: Before the intervention, the incidence ± SD of opioid overdose, wrong substance given, or substance taken in error was 1 ± 0.5 per 10,000 discharges, and naloxone use was 117 ± 13 per 10,000 patients receiving opioids. The incidence of respiratory failure was 42 ± 10 per 10,000 surgical discharges. A difference-in-differences of -0.2 (99% CI, -1.1 to 0.6, P = 0.499) per 10,000 in opioid overdose, wrong substance given, or substance taken in error and -13.6 (99% CI, -29.0 to 0.0, P = 0.028) per 10,000 in respiratory failure was observed postintervention in the intervention hospitals; however, naloxone administration increased by 15.2 (99% CI, 3.8 to 30.0, P = 0.011) per 10,000. Average total daily opioid use, as well as the fraction of patients receiving daily opioid greater than 90 mg morphine equivalents was not different between the intervention and nonintervention hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: A 6-month opioid educational intervention did not reduce opioid adverse events or alter opioid use in hospitalized patients. The authors' findings suggest that despite opioid and multimodal analgesia awareness, limited-duration educational interventions do not substantially change the hospital use of opioid analgesics.

Early Treatment With Metformin in a Mice Model of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Reduces Pain and Edema.

BACKGROUND: Metformin, an adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase activator, as well as a common drug for type 2 diabetes, has previously been shown to decrease mechanical allodynia in mice with neuropathic pain. The objective of this study is to determine if treatment with metformin during the first 3 weeks after fracture would produce a long-term decrease in mechanical allodynia and improve a complex behavioral task (burrowing) in a mouse tibia fracture model with signs of complex regional pain syndrome. METHODS: Mice were allocated into distal tibia fracture or nonfracture groups (n = 12 per group). The fracture was stabilized with intramedullary pinning and external casting for 21 days. Animals were then randomized into 4 groups (n = 6 per group): (1) fracture, metformin treated, (2) fracture, saline treated, (3) nonfracture, metformin treated, and (4) nonfracture, saline treated. Mice received daily intraperitoneal injections of metformin 200 mg/kg or saline between days 14 and 21. After cast removal, von Frey force withdrawal (every 3 days) and burrowing (every 7 days) were tested between 25 and 56 days. Paw width was measured for 14 days after cast removal. AMP-activated protein kinase downregulation at 4 weeks after tibia fracture in the dorsal root ganglia was examined by immunohistochemistry for changes in the AMP-activated protein kinase pathway. RESULTS: Metformin injections elevated von Frey thresholds (reduced mechanical allodynia) in complex regional pain syndrome mice versus saline-treated fracture mice between days 25 and 56 (difference of mean area under the curve, 42.5 g·d; 95% CI of the difference, 21.0-63.9; P < .001). Metformin also reversed burrowing deficits compared to saline-treated tibial fracture mice (difference of mean area under the curve, 546 g·d; 95% CI of the difference, 68-1024; P < .022). Paw width (edema) was reduced in metformin-treated fracture mice. After tibia fracture, AMP-activated protein kinase was downregulated in dorsal root ganglia neurons, and mechanistic target of rapamycin, ribosomal S6 protein, and eukaryotic initiation factor 2α were upregulated. CONCLUSIONS: The important finding of this study was that early treatment with metformin reduces mechanical allodynia in a complex regional pain syndrome model in mice. Our findings suggest that AMP-activated protein kinase activators may be a viable therapeutic target for the treatment of pain associated with complex regional pain syndrome.

Pain Management Best Practices from Multispecialty Organizations During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Public Health Crises.

BACKGROUND: It is nearly impossible to overestimate the burden of chronic pain, which is associated with enormous personal and socioeconomic costs. Chronic pain is the leading cause of disability in the world, is associated with multiple psychiatric comorbidities, and has been causally linked to the opioid crisis. Access to pain treatment has been called a fundamental human right by numerous organizations. The current COVID-19 pandemic has strained medical resources, creating a dilemma for physicians charged with the responsibility to limit spread of the contagion and to treat the patients they are entrusted to care for. METHODS: To address these issues, an expert panel was convened that included pain management experts from the military, Veterans Health Administration, and academia. Endorsement from stakeholder societies was sought upon completion of the document within a one-week period. RESULTS: In these guidelines, we provide a framework for pain practitioners and institutions to balance the often-conflicting goals of risk mitigation for health care providers, risk mitigation for patients, conservation of resources, and access to pain management services. Specific issues discussed include general and intervention-specific risk mitigation, patient flow issues and staffing plans, telemedicine options, triaging recommendations, strategies to reduce psychological sequelae in health care providers, and resource utilization. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 public health crisis has strained health care systems, creating a conundrum for patients, pain medicine practitioners, hospital leaders, and regulatory officials. Although this document provides a framework for pain management services, systems-wide and individual decisions must take into account clinical considerations, regional health conditions, government and hospital directives, resource availability, and the welfare of health care providers.

A Comparison of Refill Procedures and Patient Outcomes Following Ultrasound-Guided and Template-Guided Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems With Recessed Ports.

OBJECTIVE: Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) are refilled using templates and palpation. The 2017 Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference recommends ultrasound only when reservoir ports are difficult to identify. The purpose of this study was to compare procedural outcomes and patient's preference for refill method of IDDS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the Rush University IRB. Participants were randomized to have their IDDS with ultrasound or template using a 2:1 allocation. The time to reservoir port access, number of needle maneuvers/punctures, pain (NRS 0-10), complications, patient satisfaction, and patient refill modality preference, were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients underwent 192 refills. There were 67 template-guided refills and 125 ultrasound-guided refills. No procedural pain (NRS = 0) was reported in 84% of the ultrasound-guided refills compared with 67% of the template-guided procedures, difference - 17% (95% difference - 3% to -31%, p = 0.01). When adjusted for age, gender, procedure duration, needle sticks, needle maneuvers and refills in the same patient, the odds ratio for a pain-free procedure with ultrasound-guidance was 3.1 (95% CI 1.3 to 7.2, p = 0.01). There was no difference between the groups in needle punctures (p = 0.87) or redirections (p = 0.34). Following 35/67 (52%) template-guided procedures, patients stated they preferred the ultrasound-guided but following only 12/125 (10%) of ultrasound-guided procedures, patients stated they preferred template-guidance (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients preferred ultrasound even though it lengthened the duration of refills compared to template-guided procedures. Fewer patients experienced procedural pain with ultrasound compared with template-guided refills. No safety issues were observed in either group.

The James A. Rand Young Investigator's Award: Large Opioid Prescriptions Are Unnecessary After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether the quantity of opioid pills prescribed at discharge is associated with the number of opioid pills consumed or unused by patients after primary hip and knee arthroplasty within 30 days after discharge. METHODS: A total of 304 opioid-naïve patients were randomized to receive either 30 or 90 5-mg oxycodone immediate-release (OxyIR) pills at discharge. Daily opioid consumption, number of unused pills, and pain scores were calculated for 30 days with a patient-completed medication diary. Statistical analysis involved t-test, rank-sum, chi-squared tests, and multiple linear regression with alpha = 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 304 patients randomized, 161 patients were randomized to receive 30 pills and 143 to receive 90. In the first 30 days after discharge, the median number of unused pills was 15 in the 30 group vs 73 in the 90 group (P < .001). Within 90 days of discharge, 26.7% of the 30 group and 10.5% of the 90 group requested a refill (P < .001), leading to a mean of 777.1 ± 414.2 morphine equivalents vs 1089.7 ± 536.4 prescribed (P < .0001). There was no difference between groups in mean morphine equivalents consumed. Regression analysis demonstrated that being prescribed 90 OxyIR pills was independently associated with taking more OxyIR pills (P = .028). There was no difference in pain scores within the first 30 days and in patient-reported outcome scores at 6 weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Prescribing fewer OxyIR pills is associated with a significant reduction in unused opioid pills and decreased opioid consumption with no increase in pain scores and no difference in patient-reported outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I. Randomized controlled trial.

Oral Ketamine for Acute Pain Management After Amputation Surgery.

Objective: Intravenous ketamine has been shown to provide postoperative analgesia in many clinical trials, in particular to reduce opioid consumption. The primary objective of this pilot study is to determine if multiple dosing over a three-day perioperative period with oral ketamine is a safe treatment method for acute pain after amputation surgery. Methods: Three consented subjects (age 57-60 years) undergoing elective amputation of the lower extremity were included in the study (Institutional Review Board and Food and Drug Administration Investigational New Drug approved). An analgesic dose of oral ketamine (1.0 mg/kg) was administered one hour before surgery. Eight hours after the preoperative dose, a second dose was given. On the first postoperative day, subjects received oral ketamine (1.0 mg/kg) three times per day; and on the second postoperative day, this dose was reduced to 0.5 mg/kg three times per day. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of adverse events. Results: No serious and unexpected adverse events occurred; therefore, no subject required a dose reduction. The numerical rating score for postoperative pain of the body part adjacent to the amputation site ranged from 0.5-4.0. Morphine milligram equivalent opioid doses were in the range of 0-17.5 mg on the first postop day and 1.0-4.0 mg on the second postop day. Conclusions: Our pilot study suggests that oral ketamine is safe to use at 1 mg/kg three times per day, as well as convenient for hospital floor and potential home use. Future studies will determine if the perioperative oral ketamine also reduces the incidence of chronic stump or phantom limb pain.

Predictive Factors for Developing Chronic Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Total knee arthroplasty offers substantial improvements for patients as measured by functional status and quality of life; however, 8% to 34% of patients experience chronic postsurgical pain following surgery (CPSP). In addition to disruption in daily activities of life caused by the pain itself, CPSP has been associated with an overall reduction in quality of life following surgery. Risk factors for CPSP can be broadly defined as potentially modifiable or unlikely modifiable. Unlikely modifiable risks include gender, age, medical comorbidities, and socioeconomic status. Potentially modifiable risks include perioperative pain, physical function, psychological state, surgical factors, and possibly genomics. Understanding risks and the magnitude of their effect on outcomes such as CPSP is desirable because interventions designed to affect these factors may be able to dramatically improve outcomes.

Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks Provide Superior Ambulation and Pain Control Compared to Epidural Analgesia for Primary Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Adductor canal blocks (ACBs) are an alternative to femoral nerve blocks that minimize lower extremity weakness. However, it is unclear whether this block will provide analgesia that is equivalent to techniques, such as epidural analgesia. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare continuous ACBs with epidural analgesia for primary total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, 145 patients were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: combined spinal-epidural (CSE), spinal + continuous ACB (CACB), or general + CACB. Epidural analgesia was used postoperatively in the CSE group, and an adductor canal catheter was used in the CACB groups. Power analysis determined that 84 patients per group were needed to demonstrate a 35% increase in ambulation with an alpha of 0.05 at a power of 90%. RESULTS: At interim analysis, 13 patients were removed for protocol deviations, leaving 45 in CSE, 41 in spinal + CACB and 46 in general + CACB groups. Patient demographics were similar in all comparisons suggesting appropriate randomization. Patients in the CACB groups walked further on postoperative day 1, 2, and 3 (P = .02). Mean daily pain scores were lower in the CACB groups (4.1 CSE, 3.0 spinal + CACB, 3.4 general + CACB, P = .009). There was no significant difference in total opioid consumption between groups (158 morphine equivalents CSE, 149 spinal + CACB, and 172 general + CACB). More patients reported being "very satisfied" in CACB groups (68% general + CACB, 63% spinal + CACB, and 36% CSE; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Continuous adductor analgesia provides superior ambulation, lower pain scores, faster discharge, and greater patient satisfaction when compared to epidural analgesia for primary total knee arthroplasty.

Relationships Between Sleep Quality and Pain-Related Factors for People with Chronic Low Back Pain: Tests of Reciprocal and Time of Day Effects.

BACKGROUND: Poor sleep quality among people with chronic low back pain appears to be related to worse pain, affect, poor physical function, and pain catastrophizing. The causal direction between poor sleep and pain remains an open question, however, as does whether sleep quality exerts effects on low back pain differently across the course of the day. PURPOSE: This daily diary study examined lagged temporal associations between prior night sleep quality and subsequent day pain, affect, physical function and pain catastrophizing, the reverse lagged temporal associations between prior day pain-related factors and subsequent night sleep quality, and whether the time of day during which an assessment was made moderated these temporal associations. METHODS: Chronic low back pain patients (n = 105) completed structured electronic diary assessments five times per day for 14 days. Items included patient ratings of their pain, affect, physical function, and pain catastrophizing. RESULTS: Collapsed across all observations, poorer sleep quality was significantly related to higher pain ratings, higher negative affect, lower positive affect, poorer physical function, and higher pain catastrophizing. Lagged analyses averaged across the day revealed that poorer prior night sleep quality significantly predicted greater next day patient ratings of pain, and poorer physical function and higher pain catastrophizing. Prior poorer night sleep quality significantly predicted greater reports of pain, and poorer physical function, and higher pain catastrophizing, especially during the early part of the day. Sleep quality × time of day interactions showed that poor sleepers reported high pain, and negative mood and low function uniformly across the day, whereas good sleepers reported relatively good mornings, but showed pain, affect and function levels comparable to poor sleepers by the end of the day. Analyses of the reverse causal pathway were mostly nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep quality appears related not only to pain intensity but also to a wide range of patient mood and function factors. A good night's sleep also appears to offer only temporary respite, suggesting that comprehensive interventions for chronic low back pain not only should include attention to sleep problems but also focus on problems with pain appraisals and coping.

The ACTTION-APS-AAPM Pain Taxonomy (AAAPT) Multidimensional Approach to Classifying Acute Pain Conditions.

Objective: With the increasing societal awareness of the prevalence and impact of acute pain, there is a need to develop an acute pain classification system that both reflects contemporary mechanistic insights and helps guide future research and treatment. Existing classifications of acute pain conditions are limiting, with a predominant focus on the sensory experience (e.g., pain intensity) and pharmacologic consumption. Consequently, there is a need to more broadly characterize and classify the multidimensional experience of acute pain. Setting: Consensus report following expert panel involving the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION), American Pain Society (APS), and American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM). Methods: As a complement to a taxonomy recently developed for chronic pain, the ACTTION public-private partnership with the US Food and Drug Administration, the APS, and the AAPM convened a consensus meeting of experts to develop an acute pain taxonomy using prevailing evidence. Key issues pertaining to the distinct nature of acute pain are presented followed by the agreed-upon taxonomy. The ACTTION-APS-AAPM Acute Pain Taxonomy will include the following dimensions: 1) core criteria, 2) common features, 3) modulating factors, 4) impact/functional consequences, and 5) putative pathophysiologic pain mechanisms. Future efforts will consist of working groups utilizing this taxonomy to develop diagnostic criteria for a comprehensive set of acute pain conditions. Perspective: The ACTTION-APS-AAPM Acute Pain Taxonomy (AAAPT) is a multidimensional acute pain classification system designed to classify acute pain along the following dimensions: 1) core criteria, 2) common features, 3) modulating factors, 4) impact/functional consequences, and 5) putative pathophysiologic pain mechanisms. Conclusions: Significant numbers of patients still suffer from significant acute pain, despite the advent of modern multimodal analgesic strategies. Mismanaged acute pain has a broad societal impact as significant numbers of patients may progress to suffer from chronic pain. An acute pain taxonomy provides a much-needed standardization of clinical diagnostic criteria, which benefits clinical care, research, education, and public policy. For the purposes of the present taxonomy, acute pain is considered to last up to seven days, with prolongation to 30 days being common. The current understanding of acute pain mechanisms poorly differentiates between acute and chronic pain and is often insufficient to distinguish among many types of acute pain conditions. Given the usefulness of the AAPT multidimensional framework, the AAAPT undertook a similar approach to organizing various acute pain conditions.

Regional Anesthesia in Total Joint Arthroplasty: What Is the Evidence?

Total joint arthroplasty is one of the most common surgical procedures performed for end-stage osteoarthritis. The increasing demand for knee and hip arthroplasties along with the improvement in life expectancy has created a substantial medical and economic impact on the society. Effective planning of health care for these individuals is vital. The best method for providing anesthesia and analgesia for total joint arthroplasty has not been defined. Yet, emerging evidence suggests that the type of anesthesia can affect morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing these procedures.

Expectancy Effects on Conditioned Pain Modulation Are Not Influenced by Naloxone or Morphine.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that participant expectations influence pain ratings during conditioned pain modulation testing. The present study extends this work by examining expectancy effects among individuals with and without chronic back pain after administration of placebo, naloxone, or morphine. PURPOSE: This study aims to identify the influence of individual differences in expectancy on changes in heat pain ratings obtained before, during, and after a forearm ischemic pain stimulus. METHODS: Participants with chronic low back pain (n = 88) and healthy controls (n = 100) rated heat pain experience (i.e., "test stimulus") before, during, and after exposure to ischemic pain (i.e., "conditioning stimulus"). Prior to testing, participants indicated whether they anticipated that their heat pain would increase, decrease, or remain unchanged during ischemic pain. RESULTS: Analysis of the effects of expectancy (pain increase, decrease, or no change), drug (placebo, naloxone, or morphine), and group (back pain, healthy) on changes in heat pain revealed a significant main effect of expectancy (p = 0.001), but no other significant main effects or interactions. Follow-up analyses revealed that individuals who expected lower pain during ischemia reported significantly larger decreases in heat pain as compared with those who expected either no change (p = 0.004) or increased pain (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings confirm that expectancy is an important contributor to conditioned pain modulation effects, and therefore significant caution is needed when interpreting findings that do not account for this individual difference. Opioid mechanisms do not appear to be involved in these expectancy effects.

An International Survey to Understand Infection Control Practices for Spinal Cord Stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with significant healthcare costs and morbidity. Limited research exists specific to the prevention of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) SSIs. The objectives of this international survey were to examine current infection control practices for SCS trials and implants and to compare reported responses with evidence-based recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 33-question survey was developed based on an extensive literature review for infection control policies. The survey was hosted on the Internet. Dispersion of the survey occurred through professional associations and device manufacturers. Responses to 15 questions directly related to defined CDC, NICE, and SCIP evidence-based infection control practice recommendations were classified as either compliant or noncompliant. The survey was open for 20 days. Responses also were grouped and analyzed based on geographic location, practice location, and procedural volumes. RESULTS: Five hundred six physicians responded to the survey. Compliance rates for CDC, NICE, SCIP infection control practice recommendations were low with only four of the 15 questions having compliance rates ≥80%. Areas associated with high levels of noncompliance included weight-based antibiotic dosing, hair removal strategies, double gloving, surgical dressing, skin antiseptic agent selection, and postoperative continuation of antibiotics. Geographic and practice type variations existed for particular infection control practices. Procedural volume influenced operative implant times with low physician procedural volumes associated with extended operative times. CONCLUSIONS: The survey provided significant insight into current practices and will assist in the development of specific SCS infection control policies. Based on the survey, further education is warranted on infection control strategies for physicians performing spinal cord stimulator trials and implants.

Anti-cytokine autoantibodies in postherpetic neuralgia.

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms by which varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation causes postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), a debilitating chronic pain condition, have not been fully elucidated. Based on previous studies identifying a causative role for anti-cytokine autoantibodies in patients with opportunistic infections, we explored this possibility in PHN. METHODS: Sera from herpes zoster (HZ) patients without and with PHN (N = 115 and 83, respectively) were examined for the presence of autoantibodies against multiple cytokines, and other known autoantigens. In addition, a cohort of patients with complex regional pain syndrome or neuropathic pain was tested for autoantibodies against selected cytokines. Antibody levels against VZV, Epstein Barr virus, and herpes simplex virus-2 were also measured in the HZ and PHN patients. Patient sera with high levels of anti-cytokine autoantibodies were functionally tested for in vitro neutralizing activity. RESULTS: Six PHN subjects demonstrated markedly elevated levels of single, autoantibodies against interferon-α, interferon-γ, GM-CSF, or interleukin-6. In contrast, the HZ and the pain control group showed low or no autoantibodies, respectively, against these four cytokines. Further analysis revealed that one PHN patient with high levels of anti-interleukin-6 autoantibodies had a markedly depressed antibody level to VZV, potentially reflecting poor T cell immunity against VZV. In vitro functional testing revealed that three of the five anti-cytokine autoantibody positive PHN subjects had neutralizing autoantibodies against interferon-α, GM-CSF or interleukin-6. In contrast, none of the HZ patients without PHN had neutralizing autoantibodies. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the possibility that sporadic anti-cytokine autoantibodies in some subjects may cause an autoimmune immunodeficiency syndrome leading to uncontrolled VZV reactivation, nerve damage and subsequent PHN.

Safeguards to prevent neurologic complications after epidural steroid injections: consensus opinions from a multidisciplinary working group and national organizations.

BACKGROUND: Epidural corticosteroid injections are a common treatment for radicular pain caused by intervertebral disc herniations, spinal stenosis, and other disorders. Although rare, catastrophic neurologic injuries, including stroke and spinal cord injury, have occurred with these injections. METHODS: A collaboration was undertaken between the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Safe Use Initiative, an expert multidisciplinary working group, and 13 specialty stakeholder societies. The goal of this collaboration was to review the existing evidence regarding neurologic complications associated with epidural corticosteroid injections and produce consensus procedural clinical considerations aimed at enhancing the safety of these injections. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Safe Use Initiative representatives helped convene and facilitate meetings without actively participating in the deliberations or decision-making process. RESULTS: Seventeen clinical considerations aimed at improving safety were produced by the stakeholder societies. Specific clinical considerations for performing transforaminal and interlaminar injections, including the use of nonparticulate steroid, anatomic considerations, and use of radiographic guidance are given along with the existing scientific evidence for each clinical consideration. CONCLUSION: Adherence to specific recommended practices when performing epidural corticosteroid injections should lead to a reduction in the incidence of neurologic injuries.