Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Cell Tissue Bank ; 20(4): 513-526, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31451994

ABSTRACT

Traditionally, when antibody to the Hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) and antibody to the Hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) are positive, the donor is considered suitable. However, the literature contains cases with this profile and circulating hepatitis B virus DNA. The aim of the study is to analyze the incidence of occult hepatitis B virus infection (OBI). Retrospective data were evaluated for deceased tissue donors in ten Tissue Establishments (Spain) during 2017. The data included demographic data and the serological markers for hepatitis B that each tissue establishment performed. A total number of 1933 tissue donors were evaluated. A total of 180 donors were excluded: 6 (0.3%) with Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs positive), and 174 in which DNA testing was not performed. Anti-HBc was positive in 175 donors (10%), in which anti-HBs was negative in 30 (17.1%) and positive in 145 (82.9%). In total, 27 donors with DNA positive (1.5%) were found, of which 3 of 117 donors (1.7%) showed anti-HBc negative and anti-HBs positive (> 10 IU/ml), 4 of 30 donors (13.3%) showed anti-HBc positive and anti-HBs negative and 20 of 145 donors (13.8%) showed both anti-HBc and anti-HBs positive. The highest probability of finding DNA occurs when anti-HBc is positive, regardless of the presence of anti-HBs. In our study, the probability of OBI was 1.5%. The classic concept that when anti-HBc and anti-HBs are positive (even with a titer of over 100 IU/ml) the donor can be accepted should, therefore, be reconsidered, and DNA testing should be mandatory.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/analysis , Donor Selection , Hepatitis B Antibodies/analysis , Hepatitis B virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Aged , DNA, Viral/genetics , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/immunology , Hepatitis B/virology , Hepatitis B Antibodies/immunology , Hepatitis B Core Antigens/immunology , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/immunology , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Hepatitis B virus/immunology , Humans , Middle Aged , Occult Blood , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology , Tissue Donors
3.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 154(10): 381-387, 2020 05 22.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31806387

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk factors of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after heart transplant (HT) and its influence on long-term prognosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-centre study of 222 HT recipients. Risk factors for CMV infection were identified by means of multivariable Cox́s regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox́s regression were used to assess the long-term prognostic impact of CMV infection during the first post-transplant year. RESULTS: Donor-recipient CMV serologic matching (hazard ratio [HR] 1.92, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.2-3.09, p=.007), recipient age (HR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.1, p=.02), diabetes mellitus (HR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.4-3.05, p=.01), pre-transplant circulatory support (HR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.06-2.38, p=.03) and the use of tacrolimus (HR 1.64, 95% CI: 1.13-2.36, p=.009) were independently associated with increased risk of CMV infection. CMV infection during the first year post-HT was not associated with worse transplant outcomes in terms of mortality, incidence of heart failure, cardiac allograft vasculopathy or acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS: CMV infection was not associated with impaired long-term prognosis after HT.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Heart Transplantation , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/etiology , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/etiology , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Incidence , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
6.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 154(10): 381-387, mayo 2020. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS (Spain) | ID: ibc-195519

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Analizar el impacto pronóstico de la infección por citomegalovirus (CMV) durante el primer año tras el trasplante cardiaco (TC) y describir factores de riesgo. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico que incluyó 222 receptores de TC. La identificación de factores de riesgo de infección por CMV se llevó a cabo mediante la regresión multivariable de Cox. A través de los métodos de Kaplan-Meier y Cox se analizó la influencia de la infección por CMV durante el primer año sobre la supervivencia e incidencia de eventos clínicos adversos en el seguimiento a largo plazo. RESULTADOS: En el análisis multivariante, el estado serológico donante/receptor frente a CMV (hazard ratio [HR] 1,92, intervalo de confianza 95% [IC 95%] 1,2-3,09; p = 0,007), la edad del receptor (HR 1,02, IC 95%: 1,00-1,1; p = 0,02), la diabetes (HR 1,86, IC 95%: 1,4-3,05; p = 0,01), el soporte circulatorio mecánico (HR 1,59, IC 95%: 1,06-2,38; p = 0,03) y el uso de tacrolimus (HR 1,64, IC 95%: 1,13-2,36; p = 0,009) resultaron predictores independientes de infección por CMV postrasplante. No se detectó una influencia significativa de la infección por CMV durante el primer año postrasplante sobre la mortalidad, la incidencia de insuficiencia cardiaca, enfermedad vascular del injerto o rechazo agudo. CONCLUSIONES: La infección por CMV durante el primer año postrasplante no se asoció a un peor pronóstico a largo plazo


INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk factors of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after heart transplant (HT) and its influence on long-term prognosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-centre study of 222 HT recipients. Risk factors for CMV infection were identified by means of multivariable Cox́s regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox́s regression were used to assess the long-term prognostic impact of CMV infection during the first post-transplant year. RESULTS: Donor-recipient CMV serologic matching (hazard ratio [HR] 1.92, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.2-3.09, p=.007), recipient age (HR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.1, p=.02), diabetes mellitus (HR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.4-3.05, p=.01), pre-transplant circulatory support (HR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.06-2.38, p=.03) and the use of tacrolimus (HR 1.64, 95% CI: 1.13-2.36, p=.009) were independently associated with increased risk of CMV infection. CMV infection during the first year post-HT was not associated with worse transplant outcomes in terms of mortality, incidence of heart failure, cardiac allograft vasculopathy or acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS: CMV infection was not associated with impaired long-term prognosis after HT


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Prognosis , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Cytomegalovirus Infections/virology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Hospitalization , Immunosuppression Therapy , Ganciclovir/administration & dosage , Ganciclovir/therapeutic use , Graft Survival
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL