Merkel cell carcinoma: value of sentinel lymph-node status and adjuvant radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph-node (LN) biopsy (SLNB) is a valuable tool to assess the regional LN status in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). However, its prognostic value is still debated. This study was undertaken to assess SLNB usefulness for MCC management and to determine the impact of SLNB status on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) by comparing SLNB-positive versus -negative patients according to demographic, clinical and treatment characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, multicenter observational study, SLNB was proposed to all patients referred for clinically N0 MCC. Treatment schedule consisted of wide-margin surgical resection of primary MCC followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) to the primary site and, for SLNB-positive patients, radical LN dissection followed by regional aRT. Univariate and multivariate analyses determined factors associated with DFS and OS. RESULTS: Among 87 patients with successful SLNB, 21 (24.1%) were SLNB-positive. Median follow-up for the entire series was 39 months; respective 3-year DFS and OS rates were 73% and 81.4%, respectively. Univariate analysis (all patients) identified SLNB-negativity as being associated with prolonged OS (P = 0.013) and aRT (all sites considered) was associated with longer DFS (P = 0.004) and OS (P = 0.018). Multivariate analysis (all patients) retained SLNB status and aRT (all sites considered) as being associated with improved DFS (P = 0.014 and 0.0008) and OS (P = 0.0020 and 0.0019). Moreover, for SLNB-negative patients, tumor-bed irradiation was also significantly associated with prolonged DFS (P = 0.006) and OS (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that SLNB-negativity is a strong predictor of longer DFS and OS in stage I and II MCC patients. The similar benefit for aRT on tumor bed observed in this study has to be confirmed by a prospective study. The results advocate for SLNB being considered to all MCC patients.

The standard tangential fields used for breast irradiation do not allow optimal coverage and dose distribution in axillary levels I-II and the sentinel node area.

BACKGROUND: Recent data from ACOSOG Z0011 and NSABP B32 trials suggested no need for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with micrometastatic involvement of the sentinel lymph node (SLN). The low rate of axillary recurrence was attributed to the axilla coverage by the tangential fields (TgFs) irradiation and systemic therapy. This study aimed to evaluate dose distribution and coverage of the axilla levels I-II and the SLN area. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and nine patients were analyzed according to three groups: group 1 (50 Gy; n = 18), group 2 (60 Gy; n = 34) and group 3 (66 Gy; n = 57). Patients were treated using the standard (STgF; n = 22) or high (HTgF; n = 87) TgF. RESULTS: The median doses delivered to level I using HTgF versus STgF were 33 and 20 Gy (P = 0.0001). The mean dose delivered to the SLN area was only 28 Gy. Additionally, the SLN area was totally included in the HTgF in 1 out of 12 patients who had intraoperative clip placement in the SNL area. CONCLUSIONS: TgFs provide a limited coverage of the axilla and the SNLB area. This information should be considered when only TgFs are planned to target the axilla in patients with a positive SLN without ALND. Standardization of locoregional radiotherapy in this situation is urgently needed.

Ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction: Incidence and radiological presentation.

PURPOSE: To assess the incidence and presentation of ipsilateral cancer recurrences (ICR) after deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 247 consecutive women with DIEP flap reconstruction after breast cancer in our institution between 1997 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 4.1years±3.2 (SD) (median: 3years; range: 1month - 14years). Thirty-one patients (12.5%, 95%CI: =8.7-17.3) presented 34 relapses, in average 4.1years±2.6 after mastectomy: 14 (41%) were ipsilateral, 6 (18%) contralateral and 14 (41%) metastatic. ICRs occurred earlier (3.9 vs. 5.8years; P<0.05) than non-ICRs. Most ICRs (10/14, 71%) involved the periphery of the flap and presented as palpable nodules. The remaining (4/14, 29%) involved the axilla and 3/4 (75%) were palpable. Imaging procedures detected infra-clinical ICRs in 3 of 10 imaged patients (30%). CONCLUSION: ICRs after DIEP flap reconstruction are more frequent than contralateral recurrences suggesting the need for imaging follow-up of the reconstructed breast.

Management of breast cancer in the elderly.

The management of breast cancer in elderly women was analysed by a retrospective study of 150 women over 70 years old referred to our department between 1984 and 1988. 80 were T1-T2, 33 were T3 and 34 were T4. 107 were N0 and 43 were N1-N2. 16 women (11%) were in poor health, preventing conventional treatment. Treatment choice varied with age: 60% of the women aged 70-79 (group 1) and 23% of the oldest women (group 2) were treated conventionally. The use of surgery decreased with age and surgical procedures were conventional in only 85% of the group 1 women and in 56% of the group 2 women. Definitive radiation therapy was used more frequently in the oldest women, as was primary hormone therapy. Quality of follow-up also varied with age. Five-year survival rates were still high in both groups while relapses were frequent. Breast cancer was consequently a frequent cause of death. The increase in the proportion of elderly people with breast cancers over the next few years will require validated guidelines. Specific protocols and specific rules of management must be drawn up.

Update on low dose rate irradiation for cancers of the oropharynx--May 1986.

At the conclusion of our recently published article in this Journal on low dose rate irradiation in moderately extensive cancers of the oropharynx, we updated our results in May 1986. Here we report on an expanded group of 65 patients with a 2 year minimum follow-up; 32 patients were treated by low dose rate irradiation and 33 by conventional fractionation. Forty-four percent (14/32) low dose irradiation patients survived with NED vs 8/33 (24%) conventional fractionation patients. The highly significant differences in the level of local recurrences between patients treated by low dose rate irradiation, 5/32 (16%), compared with conventional fractionation, 20/33 (61%), highlights the enhanced efficacy of the low dose rate irradiation technique in the local cure of cancers of the oropharynx. This superior local control however is achieved at the cost of a number of necrosis, 5/32 (16%).

A comparison between low dose rate radiotherapy and conventionally fractionated irradiation in moderately extensive cancers of the oropharynx.

We report the comparative results for local tumor control between two groups of patients treated by radiotherapy fractionated in a conventional manner at normal high dose rate (29 patients with 2 years minimum follow-up and 24 patients with 3 years minimum follow-up) and by low dose rate radiotherapy (19 patients with 2 years minimum follow-up, 14 patients with 3 years minimum follow-up) with moderately extensive cancers of the oropharynx (T2b-T3a, 3-5 cm in diameter). At 2 and 3 years follow-up, the number of local recurrences in the patients treated with low dose rate radiotherapy is half (26 and 21%) that for those treated with conventionally fractionated radiation at normal high dose rates (52 and 54%). These results require more rigorous confirmation.

Influence of dose rate on local control of breast carcinoma treated by external beam irradiation plus iridium 192 implant.

From 1971 to 1983, 20 T1, 267 T2, and 53 T3 biopsy-proven adenocarcinomas of breast were definitively managed by radiotherapy. The breast and regional nodes received 45 Gy of 60Co irradiation in 25 fractions over 5 weeks (45 Gy/25/5 wks). Electrons were used to deliver a further 15 Gy/7/1.5 weeks to the internal mammary chain and 25 Gy/11/2.5 weeks to the lower axilla. The primary tumor was boosted by Iridium 192 implant for a further 37 Gy prescribed at 85% of the basal dose rate (Paris system). Rigid needles were secured by templates in single plane (58/398) or double plane (340/398) geometry. Results of the 340 two-plane implants have been analyzed to look for a possible influence of dose rate on local control. Follow-up for patients free of local recurrence is 4-204 months (median: 92 months). The 340 tumors were divided into three groups according to dose rate: 0.32-0.49 Gy/hr (n = 95), 0.50-0.59 Gy/hr (n = 120), and 0.60-0.90 Gy/hr (n = 125). The three groups are statistically comparable according to age, tumor size, mean 60Co dose, mean Iridium dose, overall treatment time, and follow-up. The local failure rate in the three groups is 27% (26/95), 20% (24/120), and 13% (16/125) (p less than 0.03, Chi square). At 15 years the estimated local control (Kaplan Meier) is 60%, 72%, and 84% (p less than 0.02, Logrank), respectively. This analysis indicates that there is a significant effect of dose rate on local control for carcinoma of the breast treated by combined external beam (45 Gy) plus Iridium 192 implantation (37 Gy). To maximize local control the authors recommend an implant dose rate of greater than or equal to 0.6 Gy/hr.

Combined external irradiation and interstitial implantation for T1 and T2 epidermoid carcinomas of base of tongue: the Creteil experience (1971-1981).

Forty-eight patients with T1 or T2 epidermoid carcinomas of the base of tongue were treated at the Henri Mondor Hospital between 1971 and 1981. Forty-one patients received moderate dose 60Co external beam irradiation (mean: 48.6 Gy) to the primary tumor and regional nodes, followed by an interstitial iridium 192 implant to the primary tumor (mean: 32 Gy). This completed the treatment for the 30 node negative patients, but those with clinically positive nodes were managed by either an additional electron beam boost to the involved nodes or a neck dissection. Seven tumors were treated exclusively by implantation to the base of tongue (mean: 63 Gy). Five-year crude disease-free survival is 50% with 35% of patients dying of recurrent disease. Definitive local control for T1 lesions is 85% (11/13) and for T2 is 71% (25/35). A dose response effect was observed with local control of 79% (26/33) obtained with a combined dose greater than or equal to 75 Gy, but only 50% (4/8) for less than or equal to 70 Gy. For N0 patients definitive regional control is 97% and for N1-3 is 89%. Minor or moderate soft tissue ulceration was observed in 12 patients, including 3 cases that progressed to osteonecrosis. None required surgical intervention. No correlation exists between necrosis and tumor size or total dose.

A new combined approach in the conservative management of rectal cancer.

Between 1980 and 1987, 25 patients with rectal cancer were treated with a combination of preoperative external irradiation of 35 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks which was followed, 6 to 8 weeks later, by a tumorectomy and peroperative placement of a plastic tube loop for post-operative interstitial therapy by iridium-192. This boost dose was 20 Gy (Paris System) for submucosal lesions (seven patients) and 25 Gy for intramural (eight patients) and extramural (ten patients) lesions. With a mean follow-up of 40.5 months, there have been five local recurrences, the latest occurring 16 months post-tumorectomy. Two of these five patients are alive and disease-free 1 year post salvage abdominoperineal resection. The 20 patients with local control have preserved a full functional sphincter and 19 of them are disease-free; there were few complications. This sphincter preserving combined approach seems promising for patients with tumors of the middle and lower rectum who cannot undergo major surgery and for selected patients who refuse abdominoperineal resection.

Definitive radiation treatment for early stage carcinoma of the soft palate and uvula: the indications for iridium 192 implantation.

From 1971 to 1984 59 T1 and T2 carcinomas of the soft palate and uvula were treated definitively by irradiation at the Henri Mondor hospital. Included are ten patients previously irradiated to the oropharyngeal area for either a carcinoma of the soft palate or another malignancy. Sixteen patients were treated by external irradiation alone, 14 by Iridium 192 implantation, and 29 by a combination of the two. Two techniques of implantation were used: the guide gutter technique (33 patients) and the plastic tube technique (10 patients). Clinically negative neck nodes (51/59) either received prophylactic telecobalt therapy (39/51) or were surveilled (12/51). Clinically involved nodes (8/59) were managed either by external irradiation alone (4/8) or combined with neck dissection (4/8). Local failure was 25% (4/16) after exclusive telecobalt therapy, 18% (5/19) after combined telecobalt therapy and implantation, and 0% (0/14) after Iridium 192 implantation alone. No local failures were seen with the plastic tube technique (0/10) as compared to 15% (5/33) for guide gutters. Only two nodal failures were observed (2/59: 3%). Crude 5-year disease-free survival was 33%. Severe complications were limited to one osteonecrosis, one soft tissue necrosis, and one partial palatal incompetence. Salivary impairment was reduced when implantation was used for part or all of the treatment. We recommend 45 Gy external radiation followed by 30 Gy from Iridium 192 implantation using the plastic tube method unless there has been prior oropharyngeal irradiation, in which case we give 60 Gy from implantation alone. For clinically negative neck nodes, we recommend 45 Gy prophylactic external neck irradiation. For clinically positive lymph nodes, this should be followed by either a 25 to 30 Gy boost to the involved nodes or a neck dissection.

Salvage irradiation of oropharyngeal cancers using iridium 192 wire implants: 5-year results of 70 cases.

Between May 1971 and November 1980, 70 patients with recurrent or new oropharyngeal cancers arising in previously irradiated tissues were treated using iridium 192 afterloading techniques. The actuarial local control was 72% at 2 years and 69% at 5 years. Although local control of the tumor was achieved in the majority of these patients, only 10 patients remained alive at 5 years (14%). Patients with lesions of the faucial arch and posterior pharyngeal wall had the best results; local control was achieved in 100% of these patients. Patients with lesions of the base of tongue and of the glosso-tonsillar sulcus had poorer results; local control was achieved in 61%. Because these results compare favorably with the results of previously published series, we recommend re-irradiation with brachytherapy for recurrent or new malignancies arising in a previously irradiated oropharynx. When the lesion is located in the faucial arch, brachytherapy is the treatment of choice. When the lesion is located in the base of tongue, brachytherapy is a reasonable option.

Interstitial radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsillar region: the Creteil experience (1971-1981).

From July 1971 to December 1981, 33 selected patients with T1, T2 tumors of the tonsillar region were treated according to the following protocol: 1. Telecobalt therapy to the primary site and to neck nodes to a dose of 45 Gy. 2. Brachytherapy to the primary site to a dose of 30 Gy using iridium 192. 3. Boost dose to involved neck nodes with electrons, or radical neck dissection, whether N1, N2, or N3. The actuarial disease-free survival was 76% when all patient groups were included and 80% for the N0 patients. The local control rate was 100%. Disease control in the neck was 94% overall and 100% for the N0 group. These results favor the use of this protocol for superficial, minimally infiltrating tumors less than 4 cm in diameter, without obvious extension to the base of the tongue or retromolar trigone.

Place of Iridium 192 implantation in definitive irradiation of faucial arch squamous cell carcinomas.

PURPOSE: We have reviewed the results of 165 T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinomas of the faucial arch treated by definitive irradiation including or not Iridium 192 brachytherapy to ascertain whether a significant relationship existed between Iridium implantation, local control, complications, and survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From March 1971 to November 1990, 58 T1 and 107 T2 (NO: 107/165; N1: 30/165; N2: 9/165; N3: 19/165) biopsy proven squamous cell carcinomas of the tonsillar region (104/165) and the soft palate and uvula (61/165) were treated in Henri Mondor Hospital by definitive irradiation with curative intent. From 1971 to 1981 (period 1), only guide gutter technique was available, so that implants were reserved for small tumors: patients were either managed by definitive telecobaltherapy to tumor site and neck node areas (Group 1; n = 48; mean dose: 70 Gy; confidence interval: +/- 5.5; 5 fractions of 1.8 Gy per week) or by exclusive Iridium implant (Group 2; n = 11; all T1NO; 64 Gy +/- 4.8) or by a combination of external beam radiation therapy to tumor site and neck nodes areas and Iridium implant (Group 3; n = 40). In 1981 (Period 2), a new plastic tube technique, which enables implantation of larger areas, was introduced in the department and all patients (Group 4; n = 66) were then managed by external radiation therapy (Group 3 + 4: 47 Gy +/- 4.3) followed by an Iridium implant (31 Gy +/- 10.5). Clinically positive neck nodes either received additional external dose with electrons or were excised. RESULTS: Overall 5-year survival (Kaplan Meier) was 21%, 50.5%, and 60% in groups 1, 2, and 3 + 4, respectively (p < 0.001, log rank). Five-year local control was 58%, 100%, and 91%, respectively (p < 0.001). Five-year necrosis rate was 4.5%, 20.5% and 18%, respectively (N.S.). Comparison of results between the two periods of the study (Group 1 + 2 + 3 vs. group 4) show that these two groups are statistically comparable according to site and size of tumor and N status and that both local control (77% vs. 94% at 5 years; p < 0.01) and disease-free survival (56% vs. 71%; p = 0.03) were improved after 1980, while there was a trend to an increase in overall survival (42% vs. 53% at 5 years; p = 0.08); nodal control (86% vs. 95% at 5 years), and necrosis rate (11% vs. 20% at 5 years) were not modified. Multivariate analysis showed that both local control (p < 0.0001) and overall survival (p < 0.0001) were improved when tumor was implanted. CONCLUSION: We recommend then to treat T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinomas of the faucial arch by external radiation therapy to tumor site and neck areas (45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks) followed by a 30 Gy Iridium implant and, for patients with clinically positive nodes, either a further 25-30 Gy electron beam irradiation to the nodes or neck node dissection.

Second head and neck cancers following radiation therapy of T1 and T2 cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx.

The risk of second cancer in the head and neck region following definitive radiation therapy was evaluated among 600 patients who were treated for T1 and T2 cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx at the Henri Mondor hospital between January 1970 and March 1987. Seventy-five patients (12.5%) were managed with external irradiation only, 243 (40.5%) with RT and Iridium 192, and 282 (47%) with Iridium 192 alone. One hundred fifteen patients (19%) developed a second cancer from 3 to 183 months after initial therapy (median: 32 months), including 69 patients (11.5%) in whom the second malignancy was diagnosed in the head and neck region. An increased and constant actuarial risk of development of second head and neck cancer was found (2.7%/year of observation). Univariate analysis showed that age, sex, stage, and modality of the initial treatment did not influence the risk of second head and neck cancer; there was a greater risk of second head and neck malignancy for those patients with soft palate carcinoma (p less than 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the only group of patients who developed a second head and neck cancer more frequently were those who were irradiated with Iridium 192 only (p = 0.0076). There was a trend toward a greater risk of second head and neck malignancy for those with soft palate carcinoma (p = 0.059). Radical treatment of the second head and neck malignancy by surgery and/or re-irradiation was performed for 67% of patients. Patients initially treated by Iridium 192 only could undergo salvage treatment more often than those who previously received external beam radiotherapy (79% vs 53%, p = 0.02). The overall 2-year and 5-year survivals after the diagnosis of the second head and neck cancer were 32% and 10%, respectively.

External irradiation prior to conservative surgery for breast cancer treatment.

From 1981 to 1987, 138 patients with breast cancer unsuitable for primary tumorectomy received initial external radiotherapy (45 Gy/25f/35d) in order to reduce the tumor volume so that secondary limited surgery could be performed. There were 81 T2 and 57 T3. Fifty-seven percent of the patients had a tumor larger than 4.5 cm. After completion of the radiotherapy, 22 patients (16%) showed no more evidence of a tumor either clinically or radiologically and received a boost of 25 Gy. In 52 cases (38%) the tumor regression allowed for secondary tumorectomy followed by a boost of 20 Gy. Sixty-four patients (46%) showed either little or no tumor regression: radical surgery was performed in 14 cases (10%) and high dose boost curietherapy (37 Gy) in the 50 (36%) remaining patients who refused mastectomy. Breast conservation in good condition was thus obtained in 74 patients (54%). Sufficient tumor regression to allow secondary tumorectomy was more often observed in T2 than in T3, in poorly differentiated tumors or mucinous type, and in tumor with well defined mammographic aspects. Actuarial 5-year local control and disease-free survival rates after limited surgery were, respectively, 90% and 73%. No particular complications were observed after secondary tumorectomy. This therapeutic approach is encouraging in patients with large T2 and T3 breast tumors, but a longer follow-up is required to assess definitive conclusions.

Interstitial radiation therapy for carcinoma of the penis using iridium 192 wires: the Henri Mondor experience (1970-1979).

From 1970 to 1979, a group of 50 patients was treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis by interstitial irradiation using an afterloading technique and iridium 192 wires. The group included 9 patients with T1 tumors, 27 with T2 tumors, and 14 with T3 tumors. Forty-five patients presented with no metastatic inguinal nodes (N0), 3 patients with N1 nodes, and 2 patients had N3 nodes. After treatment, 11 patients (1 T1, 6 T2 and 4T3) developed local recurrences; 10 of these 11 patients underwent penile amputation which controlled the tumor in 7 of the patients. One patient refused amputation. Three patients developed post-therapeutic necrosis which necessitated partial amputation in 2 cases. Eight patients developed post-therapeutic urethral stenosis, which required surgical treatment in three of the cases. Overall, at their last follow-up examinations, 74% of the patients were free of disease with conservation of penile morphology and function. Most patients without metastatic nodes (37/45) at diagnosis did not receive prophylatic treatment of the groin. Two of these patients developed delayed metastatic nodes; one was successfully salvaged. All 5 patients presenting with metastatic nodes at diagnosis died, four with uncontrolled regional disease. Twenty-one percent of the patients died of their disease. We advocate interstitial irradiation using iridium 192 wires for the treatment of non-infiltrating or moderately infiltrating squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in which the largest dimension does not exceed 4 cm. Pre-implant circumcision and regular long-term follow-up are necessary. More extensive tumors are better managed surgically. When regular follow-up can be assured, it is reasonable to forgo prophylactic treatment of the inguinal nodes in patients presenting without groin metastasis.

Locoregional recurrences following radical external beam irradiation and interstitial implantation for operable breast cancer--a twenty three year experience.

Locoregional recurrences are reported in 493 consecutive with T1 T2 N0 N1 breast cancer patients who were treated with radical external beam irradiation and interstitial 192 Ir. implant between 1961 and 1979. Follow-up ranges from 5-23 years (mean 10 years) with 195 patients having 10-23 years follow up (mean 12 years). Tumorectomy was performed in 130/158 (88%) T1 and 73/335 (22%) T2 patients. There were 51 (10%) locoregional recurrences with 34 mammary, 14 combined mammary/axillary and 3 isolated axillary recurrences. The 10 year relapse rate was 20/195 (10%). The risk, timing and site of relapse varied according to TNM stage and tumorectomy. The risk was higher for T2 (42/335, 12.5%) than T1 (9/158, 5.5%) due to a larger number of recurrences occurring in the first 5 years (T2 32/335, 9.5% vs T1 4/158, 2.5%). Between 5-10 years, risk of relapse equalized to around 3% for both groups and only 1 relapse was seen after 10 years. Of the 48 mammary recurrences, 25 (52%) occurred in the implant volume, 7 (14%) occurred on the margin of the implant, 12 (25%) occurred at sites remote from the primary and in 4 (9%), the exact site could not be defined. 14/48 mammary recurrences were accompanied by axillary relapse, there were 3 isolated axillary recurrences and supraclavicular metastases accompanied axillary relapse in 3 cases. The overall risk, of axillary relapse was 3% (17/493) and there was significant correlation with initial N stage. Salvage surgery generally mastectomy and axillary dissection, was possible in 45/51 (90%) recurrences. 23/45 (50%) survive NED 0.2-9 years (mean 3 years) after salvage. 8/23 (35%) followed longer than 5 years after salvage survive NED. Our results have been compared with other series in the literature and changes in our current protocol are described.

Conservative treatment for breast cancer: long-term results (15 years).

From 1961 to 1974, 245 patients with unilateral "operable" breast cancer (25% T1, 56% T2, 19% T3) were treated with breast conservation and irradiation at the Gustave Roussy Institute (1961-1969) or at the Henri Mondor Hospital (1970-1974). The minimum follow-up is 15 years. Most patients with T greater than 3 cm underwent radiation therapy with the tumor in place, while the greater part of patients with T less than 3 cm received radiation therapy after tumorectomy. The breast and draining lymph node areas received widefield telecobalt irradiation to 45 Gy. The dose to the tumor site was boosted using iridium-192 implantation. Additional irradiation was given to the internal mammary and lower axillary nodes using an electron beam. The 15 years NED survival rate was 63%, 51% and 26% for T1, T2 and T3 tumors, respectively. The NED survival for T less than or equal to 1 cm was 86%. The local recurrence rate was 8, 12 and 19% for T1, T2 and T3 tumors, respectively. Of the patients with local recurrence, 85% underwent surgical salvage. Complications were rare. Cosmetic results were satisfactory in most patients including the T3 group. The proportion of breasts conserved among patients living NED at 15 years, was 97, 88 and 93% for T1, T2 and T3 tumors, respectively. In 1980, after almost 20 years experience using breast conserving techniques, we modified our treatment policies in close collaboration with our surgical team, hel cbye extending the indications for tumorectomy and associating routine surgical exploration of the lower axilla.

Time factors in breast carcinoma: influence of delay between external irradiation and brachytherapy.

From 1971 to 1983, 398 (33 T1, 309 T2, 56 T3) biopsy-proven breast adenocarcinomas were treated conservatively at Hôpital Henri Mondor by an initial course of external irradiation (45 Gy, 25 fractions, 5 weeks) followed by interstitial iridium-192 implant for a further 37 Gy to the tumor. The mean interval between external irradiation and brachytherapy was 5.9 weeks (S.D. 1.7, range 1-18). Seventy-seven local failures were observed at 10-148 months (median 34.5). The actuarial probabilities (S.E.) of local control at 5 and 10 years were 0.86 (0.02) and 0.74 (0.03), respectively. The follow-up for patients free of local recurrence was 4-205 months (median 95). Multivariate analysis showed an increasing probability of local failure with longer interval between external irradiation and brachytherapy (Relative Risk [R.R.] 1.23 [95% confidence limits: 1.07, 1.41] per week, p = 0.005), and a lower risk of failure in case of complete tumor regression after external irradiation (R.R. 0.47 [0.25, 0.90], p = 0.022), and higher brachytherapy dose rate (R.R. 0.13 [0.02, 1.02] per Gy/h, p = 0.053). No influence of tumor size and total dose (possibly because only limited variations in total dose were observed), or histological grading (not performed in 140 [35%] patients) was found. Because of the lack of dose-control relationship, quantification of the effects of delay between external irradiation and brachytherapy (in terms of compensatory dose) and of dose rate (Incomplete Repair Model) was not possible.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Radiotherapy in the management of epidemic Kaposi's sarcoma: a retrospective study of 643 cases.

PURPOSE: To report to the literature the largest published series of epidemic Kaposi's sarcoma (EKS), treated with radiation therapy, to summarize and discuss our 10 years experience in the treatment of this malignancy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From June 1986 to December 1996, 643 patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related epidemic Kaposi's sarcoma were treated with radiation therapy (RT) at the Cancerology Department of Henri Mondor University Hospital. The patients, 640 men and 3 women had an average age of 38.5 years (range 20-68 years). Three hundred eighty-seven patients (60.1 %) had received previous treatment for their Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). In total, 6777 fields were irradiated, as follows: face 1342 (19.8%), eyelid and conjunctiva 362 (5.3%), trunk 1903 (28.1%), upper and lower limbs 2866 (42.3%), genitals 189 (2.8%). and oral cavity 115 fields (1.7%). Radiation therapy consisted of 4 MV or 45-70 kV X-rays, depending on tumor size and location. Doses ranged from 10 to 30 Gy, according to tumor response and toxicity. RESULTS: Objective response (CR and PR) was observed in 92% (5947/6464) of all cases, treated for cutaneous form of EKS. All patients with irradiated oral lesions had an objective response. The overall tolerance was acceptable for the cutaneous lesions. By contrast, in oral lesions, mucosal reactions were often observed after relatively low doses of radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of 15 Gy for oral lesions, 20 Gy for lesions involving eyelids, conjunctiva, and genitals, have been shown to be sufficient to produce shrinkage of the tumor and good palliation of the symptoms. For the cutaneous EKS, we propose 30 Gy given in a local field, using a fractionated scheme with small size applicators. Radiotherapy has its own place in the management of EKS, as an efficient treatment.