Integrating skin color assessments into clinical practice and research: A review of current approaches.

Skin color classification can have importance in skin health, pigmentary disorders, and oncologic condition assessments. It is also critical for evaluating disease course and response to a variety of therapeutic interventions and aids in accurate classification of participants in clinical research studies. A panel of dermatologists conducted a literature review to assess the strengths and limitations of existing classification scales, as well as to compare their preferences and utilities. We identified 17 skin classification systems utilized in dermatologic settings. These systems include a range of parameters such as UV light reactivity, race, ethnicity, and degree of pigmentation. The Fitzpatrick skin type classification is most widely used and validated. However it has numerous limitations including its conflation with race, ethnicity, and skin color. There is a lack of validation data available for the remaining scales. There are significant deficiencies in current skin classification instruments. Consensus-based initiatives to drive the development of validated and reliable tools are critically needed.

Treatment for central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia-Delphi consensus recommendations.

BACKGROUND: There is no established standard of care for treating central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA), and treatment approaches vary widely. OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus statements regarding the use of various pharmacological therapies in treating adults with CCCA. METHODS: We invited 27 dermatologists with expertise in hair and scalp disorders to participate in a 3-round modified Delphi study between January and March 2023. Statements met strong consensus if 75% of respondents agreed or disagreed. Statements met moderate consensus if 55% or more but less than 75% agreed or disagreed. RESULTS: In round 1, 5 of 33 (15.2%) statements met strong consensus, followed by 9 of 28 (32.1%) in round 2. After the final round 3 meeting, strong consensus was reached for 20 of 70 (28.6%) overall statements. Two statements achieved moderate consensus. LIMITATIONS: This study included only English-speaking, US-based dermatologists and did not consider nonpharmacological therapies. CONCLUSION: Despite varying opinions among dermatologists, consensus was reached for several statements to help clinicians manage CCCA. We also highlight areas that lack expert consensus with the goal of advancing research and therapeutic options for CCCA.

Outcomes for Psoriasis by Self-Identified Racial Groups in Ixekizumab Clinical Trials: A Pooled Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Biologics have shown promising outcomes in psoriasis clinical trials. However, there is a paucity of data exploring the potential differences in outcomes between self-identified racial groups. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment response to ixekizumab in patients with psoriasis across different self-identified racial subgroups. METHODS: This study analyzed pooled data from 5 clinical studies (UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, UNCOVER-3, IXORA-R, and IXORA-S) with patients of different self-identified racial subgroups, who were treated with an on-label dose of ixekizumab for psoriasis through 12 weeks. Treatment response to ixekizumab was assessed using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and static Physician’s Global Assessment response rates. Patient Global Assessment of Disease Severity, Itch Numeric Rating Scale, Skin Pain Visual Analog Scale, and Dermatology Life Quality Index were used to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and impact on quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: A total of 1825 ixekizumab-treated patients from 5 pooled studies were included. Consistent with the clinical outcomes from the overall population, all self-identified racial groups showed rapid improvement in PASI through Week 12, although the response was somewhat slower in American Indian/Alaska Native patients. Differences in PROs and QoL assessments were observed among racial groups, especially in patients who identified as Black/African American and American Indian/Alaska Native. CONCLUSION: Ixekizumab is effective through 12 weeks of treatment for psoriasis across different self-identified racial groups. Sample sizes for some racial groups were small (N≤12), therefore, further research is required to understand potential differences in psoriasis treatment with ixekizumab between various racial groups.J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(2):17-22.  doi:10.36849/JDD.7672.

Promoting a Healthy Skin Barrier Using Skin Care in People With Mature Skin Xerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Most people are living into their sixties and beyond. Fundamental changes in chronologically aged skin have significant and widespread dermatological implications. This review discusses aging-associated alterations in epidermal function leading to xerosis and related pruritus and the benefits of maintaining or restoring a healthy skin barrier using skincare, specifically ceramide-containing skincare.   Methods: A panel of 7 dermatologists convened for a meeting to review aspects of xerosis in mature skin, skin barrier changes, and nuances in the treatment and maintenance of mature skin using gentle cleansers and moisturizers. From the selected literature, 13 statements were drafted. During the meeting, the draft statements underwent the panel's evaluation at a workshop, followed by a plenary discussion adopting 5 statements using evidence from the literature coupled with the panel's opinions and experiences. RESULTS: The exact etiology of xerosis is not entirely understood and likely depends on several genetic and environmental mechanisms. Aging-associated changes in epidermal function include a marked reduction in total lipids in the stratum corneum relative to young skin due to reduced epidermal lipid synthesis. In aging skin, xerosis is significantly associated with pruritus. Studies have shown that lipid-containing skin care, such as a gentle ceramide-containing cleanser and moisturizer, promotes a healthy barrier reducing xerosis and pruritus in individuals with mature skin.  Conclusions: The development of xerosis in mature skin involves several genetic and environmental mechanisms. Skincare, including gentle cleansers and moisturizers, has reduced xerosis and pruritus in mature skin individuals.     J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(1):1253-1259.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7560.

Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Moderate to Severe Hyperpigmentation and Skin Unevenness.

Dyschromia is the result of irregular facial pigmentation. These cutaneous manifestations can have a significant impact on the quality of life of those affected, especially among females and skin of color. In this randomized, double-blinded, two-cell, single-center, 16-week clinical study, all subjects had moderate to severe (scores 4-9 on the modified Griffiths Scale) hyperpigmentation and skin unevenness of the face such that approximately 20% of subjects had post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), 40% had overall mottled hyperpigmentation, and 40% had superficial melasma (Superficial Melasma was determined by Wood's Lamp Assessment). Study participants received either Product A (proprietary new formulation - Cysteamine HSA) or Product B (current marketed product - Cyspera®) and used the test product either in the morning or at night, beginning with every other day application, and then advanced to every day, or as tolerated. The results revealed that both Product A (Cysteamine HSA) and Product B (Cyspera®) had statistically significant improvement in facial hyperpigmentation and skin unevenness, however, Product A (Cysteamine HSA) had better tolerability results for scaling, peeling, burning, stinging, erythema, and dryness, indicating that Product A (Cysteamine HSA) outperformed Product B (Cyspera®). J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(1):1260-1265.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7584.

Benefit of Topical Combination Therapy for Acne: Analyzing Effect Size Using Number Needed to Treat.

BACKGROUND: Topical acne trials often are confounded by high vehicle response rates and differing outcome measures, making it difficult to compare treatments. Number needed to treat (NNT) can be a simple, clinically meaningful way to indirectly compare treatment options without head-to-head data. NNT is the number of patients who need to be treated with an intervention to observe one additional patient successfully achieving a desired outcome versus vehicle/placebo. While treatment attributes such as adverse events may not be captured, lower NNT is a good indicator of a more effective treatment. METHODS: Following a search of combination topical treatments for acne vulgaris, all treatments that reported pivotal trial efficacy data consistent with the 2018 FDA definition of success were included in NNT analyses.  Results: Of 13 treatments, 7 reported 12-week treatment success rates in 11 phase 3 trials, with similar baseline demographics/disease severity. Treatment success ranged from 26.8% with tretinoin 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 3% cream to 50% with triple-combination clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/BPO 3.1% gel. NNTs for the triple-combination gel were 4 and 5 (from 2 pivotal trials). Adapalene 0.3%/BPO 2.5% gel had an NNT of 5. Tretinoin/BPO had the largest range between trials, with NNTs of 4 and 9. The other 4 treatments had NNTs ranging from 6 to 8. CONCLUSION: A comparison of combination topical acne treatment trial data, using the same treatment outcome and similar patient populations, resulted in triple-combination clindamycin phosphate/adapalene/BPO gel and adapalene/BPO gel having the most favorable NNTs.J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(2):42-49.  doi:10.36849/JDD.7927.

Sunscreen Use for Photoprotection in Skin of Color: A Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: To understand the prevalence and types of publications addressing darker skin types within the existing evidence base for sunscreen use.  Evidence Review: PubMed was searched from 1988, the time point at which the first skin of color (SOC) article was identified, through December 2022 using PubMed's Medical Subject Headings terms and keyword searches in title and abstract, with and without terms for SOC and ethnicity. Identified articles were reviewed for relevance, de-duplicated, and categorized; results are summarized. FINDINGS: Of the 5927 articles on sunscreen overall, only 314 (5.3%) articles addressed SOC, with the majority published since 2007 and representing only 4% to 7% of total publications annually except in 2022 when the proportion of SOC articles was 23.5%. Of the articles on SOC, many reported sunscreen knowledge and patient behaviors (29%), but very few reported clinical trials (5%). The 3 conditions most often discussed were melasma, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, and dyschromia. South Asian ethnicities (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh) had the highest representation within the literature, followed by Hispanics. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although it was assumed there would be fewer papers discussing the use of sunscreen in darker skin types, the scale of the disparity revealed by this study is stark. The increase in a number of articles in 2022 suggests an increasing focus on SOC, but further discussion of the issues presented here will help the SOC community address gaps in the evidence base and better inform discussions on sunscreen and photoprotection between clinicians and patients.J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(7):575-577.  doi:10.36849/JDD.8250.

Triple-Combination Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%/Adapalene 0.15%/Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1% Gel for Acne in Adult and Pediatric Participants.

BACKGROUND: Topical clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1% gel (CAB) is the first fixed-dose triple-combination approved for the treatment of acne. This post hoc analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of CAB in pediatric (<18 years) and adult (greater than or equal to 18 years) participants. METHODS: In two multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 studies (NCT04214639 and NCT04214652), participants greater than or equal to 9 years of age with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized (2:1) to 12 weeks of once-daily treatment with CAB or vehicle gel. Pooled data were analyzed for pediatric and adult subpopulations. Assessments included treatment success (greater than or equal to 2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator's Global Severity Score and a score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear], inflammatory/noninflammatory lesion counts, Acne-Specific Quality of Life (Acne-QoL) questionnaire, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and cutaneous safety/tolerability. RESULTS: At week 12, treatment success rates for both pediatric and adult participants were significantly greater with CAB (52.7%; 45.9%) than with vehicle (24.0%; 23.5%; P<0.01, both). CAB-treated participants in both subgroups experienced greater reductions from baseline versus vehicle in inflammatory (pediatric: 78.6% vs 50.4%; adult: 76.6% vs 62.8%; P<0.001, both) and noninflammatory lesions (pediatric: 73.8% vs 41.1%; adult: 70.7% vs 52.2%; P<0.001, both). Acne-QoL improvements from baseline to week 12 were significantly greater with CAB than with a vehicle. Most TEAEs were of mild-to-moderate severity; no age-related trends for safety/tolerability were observed.  Conclusions: CAB gel demonstrated comparable efficacy, quality of life improvements, and safety in pediatric and adult participants with moderate-to-severe acne. As the first fixed-dose, triple-combination topical formulation, CAB represents an important new treatment option for patients with acne. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):394-402.     doi:10.36849/JDD.8357.

Cysteamine Isobionic-Amide Complex Versus Kligman's Formula for the Treatment of Melasma: Equal Efficacy and Rapid Onset of Action.

BACKGROUND: Modified Kligman's formula (mKF) is the gold standard treatment for melasma; however, its prolonged use is not recommended due to side effects. Cysteamine is a potent, safe, and effective depigmenting agent. Here, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess the efficacy of cysteamine isobionic-amide -- a complex with enhanced depigmenting efficacy -- and compared it to mKF for the treatment of melasma. METHODS: This study involved a total of 80 patients divided into 3 groups: cysteamine-isobionic amide, placebo, or mKF. The modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI) score and spectrophotometric evaluation were conducted at baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 16. Dermatological assessment, patients’ feedback, and satisfaction including quality-of-life scores were also collected. RESULTS: At week 4, cysteamine isobionic-amide and mKF groups showed an equivalent onset of action in terms of mMASI and skin pigmentation contrast reduction. The 2 groups significantly reduced melasma severity and improved the overall skin condition with a comparable efficacy at week 16. Quality of life of melasma patients was significantly improved in the cysteamine isobionic-amide group at week 8 and further at week 16 (P<0.001) compared to the mKF group. Patients’ feedback and satisfaction were higher with the cysteamine isobionic-amide product compared to mKF. CONCLUSION: Cysteamine isobionic-amide provided a rapid onset of action and was as effective as the mKF for the treatment of melasma. The data suggest that cysteamine isobionic-amide could potentially be an acceptable alternative to mKF for the long-term treatment of melasma. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(2):9-16.  doi:10.36849/JDD.7428.

Efficacy, Convenience, and Safety of Calcipotriene-Betamethasone Dipropionate Cream in Skin of Color Patients With Plaque Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis affects diverse racial and ethnic groups. In July 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration approved calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate (CAL/BDP) 0.005%/0.065% cream to treat plaque psoriasis in adults. The efficacy and safety of CAL/BDP in patients with skin of color (SOC) who have psoriasis is not well characterized. METHOD: A post hoc analysis of phase 3 clinical trial data (NCT03308799) was conducted to assess the efficacy, convenience, and safety of CAL/BDP cream versus CAL/BDP topical solution and vehicle cream in people with Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI.   Results: This study included 784 participants, 280 (35.7%) of whom had Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI. Patients treated with CAL/BDP cream had greater disease improvement, treatment convenience scores, and overall satisfaction than those treated with CAL/BDP topical solution in the subgroup with skin types IV to VI and the total study population.  Adverse event rates were similar between the subgroup with skin types IV to VI and the total study population for all treatment arms.  Conclusion: Psoriasis is associated with a greater physical and psychosocial impact in patients with SOC. While many effective topical therapies exist, it may be helpful to conduct separate analyses of patients with SOC to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment in this population. This sub-analysis of phase 3 clinical trial data supports the efficacy and safety of CAL/BDP cream in the treatment of plaque psoriasis in patients with SOC. CAL/BDP cream also had greater convenience, formula acceptability, and overall satisfaction in both the subgroup with SOC and the total trial population, which may improve adherence to topical therapy and treatment outcomes for people with SOC who have psoriasis. Kontzias CL, Curcio A, Gorodokin B, et al. Efficacy, convenience, and safety of calcipotriene-betamethasone dipropionate cream in skin of color patients with plaque psoriasis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(7):668-672. doi:10.36849/JDD.7497.

Racial/Ethnic Variations in Acne: A Practical Algorithm for Treatment and Maintenance, Including Skincare Recommendations for Skin of Color Patients With Acne.

BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic differences in the clinical presentation, sequelae, and desired treatment outcomes for acne have been reported. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) frequently occurs in patients with richly pigmented skin complexions and can frequently be the most bothersome aspect of acne in this population. METHODS: The project used a modified Delphi hybrid process comprising face-to-face discussions followed by an online follow-up. A structured literature search was conducted to identify publications on racial/ethnic differences in the clinical presentation, sequelae, and desired treatment outcomes for skin of color (SOC) patients with acne . The advisors subsequently convened to review the results and draft an algorithm for the treatment and maintenance, including skincare recommendations, for SOC patients with acne. Online, the panel reviewed and adopted the algorithm using published evidence coupled with the panel's expert opinion and clinical experience. RESULTS: Studies suggest that strategies for improving outcomes in patients with acne who have SOC include: the early initiation and maintenance of treatment regimens; careful consideration of the tolerability of active ingredients, vehicle formulations, and dosing; and the use of skin care (eg, pH balanced, non-irritating cleansers, and non-comedogenic moisturizers) to minimize irritation or dryness. CONCLUSION: Acne treatment in patients with SOC involves unique therapeutic considerations, including management of PIH through efficacious longitudinal acne treatment, prevention of irritation, and potential active treatment of PIH. Skincare products are recommended as an adjunct to prescription therapy to maximize tolerability and may also play a role in maintenance therapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21:11(Suppl 2):s3-14.

Efficacy and Tolerability of a Retinoid Eye Cream for Fine to Moderate Wrinkles of the Periorbital Region.

INTRODUCTION: The periorbital region is susceptible to premature skin aging and among the first areas to manifest age-related changes. Retinoids are highly effective but can be irritating, limiting use in this vulnerable area. A hydrating formulation comprised of a double-conjugated retinoid/alpha hydroxy acid (lactic acid; AHARet-EM) has been developed to address photoaging of the periorbital area. This study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and subject satisfaction of nightly application of AHARet-EM, and a regimen that included application of a peptide-rich eye cream (InF-E; AM) and AHARet-EM (PM). DESIGN: A 12-week, dual-center, open-label study evaluated nightly application of AHARet-EM in subjects 35 to 65 years of age with fine to moderate lines/wrinkles in the periorbital area (3-7 score based on the Fitzpatrick Classification Wrinkle Scale [FCWS]). A subset of subjects applied AHARet-EM (PM) and InF-E (AM). Investigator assessments at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12 were based on the 9-point FCWS for lines/wrinkles (1 [Fine Wrinkles] to 9 [Deep Wrinkles]) and a 6-point scale (0 [None] to 5 [Severe]) for texture, erythema, and under-eye darkness, puffiness, and dryness. Subject satisfaction and adverse events (AEs) were captured over 12 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-six subjects, Fitzpatrick skin type III-VI, completed the study. Subjects applying AHARet-EM (n=16) demonstrated significant improvements from baseline at week 12 in the appearance of lines/wrinkles (33%; P<.0001), texture (37%, P<.0001), erythema (37%, P=.004), under-eye darkness (41%; P<.001), puffiness (55%, P<.0001) and dryness (94%, P<.0001). Significant improvements from baseline were demonstrated in subjects using the AM/PM regimen (n=10) at week 12 in the appearance of texture (33%; P=.002), erythema (68%; P=.001), under-eye darkness (32%; P=.007), puffiness (64%; P=.01) and dryness (90%; P<.0001). No AEs occurred related/possibly related to use of the study products. High levels of subject satisfaction were reported over 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: Nightly application of a hydrating, double-conjugated retinoid eye cream demonstrated significant improvements in the appearance of lines/wrinkles, under-eye darkness, puffiness, and dryness of the periorbital area at week 12. Morning application of a peptide-rich eye cream afforded additional benefits. The study products were non-irritating, and subjects reported high levels of satisfaction throughout the study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(9):932-937. doi:10.36849/JDD.6815.

Insights in Skin of Color Patients With Atopic Dermatitis and the Role of Skincare in Improving Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Research on the role of race and ethnicity in the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis (AD) is limited. Variations in the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and disease course in skin of color SOC AD patients have been reported. This manuscript seeks to offer insights into distinct features of AD in populations with (SOC) and provide recommendations on the role of skincare in treating AD amongst diverse populations. METHODS: A literature review followed by panel discussions and an online review process explored best clinical practices in treating AD patients with SOC and providing expert guidance for skincare use, including gentle cleansers and moisturizers. RESULTS: Some studies have identified differences in skin barrier properties in racial/ethnic groups affected by AD that may have implications for barrier function. Variations in the clinical presentation – including morphology, severity, and distribution – of AD in populations with SOC have been reported. Epidemiologic studies suggest a higher prevalence among self-identified Blacks/African Americans and greater health care utilization for AD among both Blacks/African Americans and Asian/Pacific Islanders. Pigmentary sequelae, including hyper- hypo- and depigmentation is a distinct feature of AD in patients with SOC that may contribute to the quality of life impact of the disorder. Xerosis may be more stigmatizing in SOC due to greater visibility of scale and dryness in the context of melanin-rich skin. Racial/ethnic variations in the prevalence of pruritus have also been reported, which may in turn have implications for AD in SOC. Treatment and maintenance of AD in patients with SOC should be proactive, effectively control inflammation longitudinally, include effective skin barrier protective strategies, and consider cultural practices. CONCLUSION: Robust comparative studies are needed to better understand racial/ethnic variations in AD. Further research will help to tailor patient education and foster individualized approaches to treatment, prevention, and adjunctive skin care across the diverse spectrum of patient populations. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(5):462-470. doi:10.36849/JDD.6609.

SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE: Scientific and Clinical Insights into the Facial Application of Mineralizing Volcanic Water.

BACKGROUND: The term "exposome" describes the totality of exposures an individual is subjected to from conception to death. Both internal and external exposome factors affect skin health. External exposures that contribute to facial skin aging include solar radiation, air pollution, tobacco smoke, and unbalanced nutrition. The review explores scientific and clinical insights into the exposome impact on facial skin aging and topical mineralizing volcanic water use potential benefits. METHODS: An expert panel of seven dermatologists and two clinical researchers specializing in aesthetic and dermatological indications reviewed and discussed the literature on the exposome and mineralizing volcanic water's role in relation to the exposome. Two virtual advisory boards were conducted between February and May 2021. Following the meetings, an additional systematic literature review explored publications relevant to the exposome, topical essential minerals, and skin health. The results of the two advisory boards, coupled with expert opinion and the outcome of the updated systematic literature review, informed the statements on which the advisors reached a consensus. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of in vivo, in vitro, and clinical data on topical mineralizing volcanic water application indicates that the serum supports the skin's antioxidant defenses and reduces skin inflammation. Additionally, the serum may have benefits as an adjunct for facial dermatoses and post-procedural skincare. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21:4(Suppl 1):s3-10.

Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion for Females With Acne: Analysis of Two Adult Age Groups.

BACKGROUND: Females aged ≥25 years may have acne with different etiology, presentation, burden, and treatment response than females 18–24 years. This post hoc analysis investigated efficacy and safety of tazarotene 0.045% lotion in females ≥18 years or ≥25 years of age. METHODS: In two phase 3 double-blind studies, participants 9 years of age and older with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized (1:1) to once-daily tazarotene 0.045% lotion or vehicle lotion for 12 weeks. Pooled data were analyzed for females aged ≥18 years (n=744) or ≥25 years (n=335). Assessments included inflammatory/noninflammatory lesion counts, treatment success (≥2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator’s Global Severity Score and score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear]), Acne-Specific Quality of Life (Acne-QoL) questionnaire, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and cutaneous safety/tolerability. RESULTS: At week 12, tazarotene-treated females in both age groups had greater reductions from baseline versus vehicle in inflammatory (≥18 years: 60.6% vs 53.7% [P<0.01]; ≥25 years: 60.9% vs 57.3% [P>0.05]) and noninflammatory lesions (59.0% vs 48.4% and 61.1% vs 48.8%; P<0.01, both). Rates of treatment success were greater with tazarotene versus vehicle; this difference was significant for females ≥18 years. Acne-QoL improvements were similar across age groups and generally greater with tazarotene than vehicle. TEAEs were mostly mild to moderate in severity. No age-related trends for safety or tolerability were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Tazarotene 0.045% lotion demonstrated comparable efficacy, improvement in quality of life, and safety in adult females aged ≥18 or ≥25 years with moderate-to-severe acne. This cosmetically elegant lotion is a well-studied and important treatment option for all patients, particularly adult females. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(5):587-595. doi:10.36849/JDD.6876.

Efficacy and Safety of Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion in Caucasian Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Acne.

BACKGROUND: While topical retinoids are a mainstay of acne treatment, acne can manifest differently in various skin types. The objective of these post hoc analyses from two pooled phase 3 studies was to examine efficacy and safety of tazarotene 0.045% and quality of life improvements in self-identified Caucasian adults with moderate-to-severe acne. METHODS: In two phase 3, double-blind, 12-week studies (NCT03168334; NCT03168321), participants aged ≥9 years with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized (1:1) to tazarotene 0.045% lotion or vehicle lotion (N=1,614); a subset of adults (≥18 years) who self-reported Caucasian (White) race (n=645) were examined. Coprimary endpoints were inflammatory/noninflammatory lesion counts and treatment (endpoint) success (≥2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator's Global Severity Score and a score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear]). Quality of life, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and cutaneous safety/tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: At week 12, tazarotene lotion significantly reduced lesion counts by ~60% (least-squares mean percent changes from baseline, tazarotene vs vehicle: inflammatory, -61.2% vs -51.1%; noninflammatory, -59.7% vs -49.3%; P<0.001, both). Significantly more participants achieved treatment success with tazarotene lotion versus vehicle (P<0.001). Numerical improvements in quality-of-life domains were observed from baseline to week 12. Most TEAEs were unrelated to treatment, and rates of moderate-to-severe erythema decreased from baseline to week 12 with tazarotene treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Tazarotene 0.045% lotion was efficacious and well tolerated over 12 weeks and led to quality-of-life improvements in Caucasian adults with moderate-to-severe acne. These results, along with those from patients with skin of color, demonstrate that once daily tazarotene 0.045% lotion is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option regardless of race or skin color.J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(10):1061-1069. doi:10.36849/JDD.6834.

The Alopecia Areata Consensus of Experts (ACE) study part II: Results of an international expert opinion on diagnosis and laboratory evaluation for alopecia areata.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the Alopecia Areata Consensus of Experts study, which presented results of an international expert opinion on treatments for alopecia areata. OBJECTIVE: To report the results of the Alopecia Areata Consensus of Experts international expert opinion on diagnosis and laboratory evaluation for alopecia areata. METHODS: Fifty hair experts from 5 continents were invited to participate in a 3-round Delphi process. Consensus threshold was set at greater than or equal to 66%. RESULTS: Of 148 questions, expert consensus was achieved in 82 (55%). Round 1 consensus was achieved in 10 of 148 questions (7%). Round 2 achieved consensus in 47 of 77 questions (61%). The final face-to-face achieved consensus in 25 of 32 questions (78%). Consensus was greatest for laboratory evaluation (12 of 14 questions [86%]), followed by diagnosis (11 of 14 questions [79%]) of alopecia areata. Overall, etiopathogenesis achieved the least category consensus (31 of 68 questions [46%]). LIMITATIONS: The study had low representation from Africa, South America, and Asia. CONCLUSION: There is expert consensus on aspects of epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, laboratory evaluation, and prognostic indicators of alopecia areata. The study also highlights areas where future clinical research could be directed to address unresolved hypotheses in alopecia areata patient care.

Racial/Ethnic Variations in Acne: Implications for Treatment and Skin Care Recommendations for Acne Patients With Skin of Color.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is among the most common dermatologic diagnoses observed, including skin color (SOC) populations. This project sought to help clarify the existing published data and provide consensus statements on acne presentation, prevention, treatment, and maintenance in SOC populations to help improve patient outcomes. METHODS: Six SOC dermatologists convened for a virtual meeting and used a modified Delphi process to address: 1) Are there racial/ethnic differences in the clinical presentation and sequela of acne? 2) Are there racial/ethnic differences in the therapeutic endpoint of acne treatment and patient expectations? 3) Is there a need for specialized approaches to therapeutic options and skincare in acne patients with SOC? The results of a literature review and the outcome of discussions, coupled with the panel's expert opinion and experience, are intended for health care providers caring for acne patients and clinician-researchers. RESULTS: Racial/ethnic differences in the clinical presentation, sequelae, and desired treatment outcomes for acne have been reported. Notwithstanding limitations in the number, size, and methodologies of studies to date, the available data suggest that strategies that improve outcomes in acne patients with SOC include: Early initiation and maintenance of treatment regimens and careful consideration of tolerability of active ingredients, vehicles, and dosing. Using pH-balanced, non-irritating cleansers and non-comedogenic ceramides containing moisturizers help minimize irritation or dryness. CONCLUSIONS: There a need for specialized approaches to therapeutic options and skincare in acne patients with SOC. OTC skincare products are recommended before and during prescription therapy and as part of a maintenance regimen. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(7):716-725. doi:10.36849/JDD.6169 THIS ARTICLE HAD BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO ACCESS THE FULL TEXT OF THIS ARTICLE WITHOUT LOGGING IN. NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLISHER WITH ANY QUESTIONS.

The Alopecia Areata Consensus of Experts (ACE) study: Results of an international expert opinion on treatments for alopecia areata.

BACKGROUND: A systematic review failed to identify any systemic therapy used in alopecia areata (AA) where use is supported by robust evidence from high-quality randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVE: To produce an international consensus statement on the use and utility of various treatments for AA. METHODS: Fifty hair experts from 5 continents were invited to participate in a 3-round Delphi process. Agreement of 66% or greater was considered consensus. RESULTS: In the first round, consensus was achieved in 22 of 423 (5%) questions. After a face-to-face meeting in round 3, overall, consensus was achieved for only 130 (33%) treatment-specific questions. There was greater consensus for intralesional treatment of AA (19 [68%]) followed by topical treatment (25 [43%]). Consensus was achieved in 45 (36%) questions pertaining to systemic therapies in AA. The categories with the least consensus were phototherapy and nonprescription therapies. LIMITATIONS: The study included a comprehensive list of systemic treatments for AA but not all treatments used. CONCLUSION: Despite divergent opinions among experts, consensus was achieved on a number of pertinent questions. The concluding statement also highlights areas where expert consensus is lacking and where an international patient registry could enable further research.

Safety and Efficacy of Clobetasol Propionate 0.05% Emollient Foam for the Treatment of Central Centrifugal Cicatricial Alopecia.

Background: There is currently an unmet need for the treatment of women with central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA). Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Clobetasol propionate 0.05% emollient foam for the treatment of women with CCCA. Methods: Adult women of African descent that presented with clinical evidence of early CCCA were enrolled (N=30). Clobetasol propionate 0.05% emollient foam was applied daily in an open-label fashion. Safety and efficacy assessments were performed at weeks 2, 6, 12, and 14. Results: Subjects achieved substantial improvements in pruritus, pain, tenderness, erythema and scaling. Scalp biopsies revealed considerable improvements in severe inflammation and perifollicular edema. Overall, clobetasol propionate 0.05% emollient foam was well-tolerated. Limitations: This was a nonrandomized, open-label study. Enrollment was limited to subjects with clinically mild CCCA. Conclusion: Subjects with CCCA that applied topical clobetasol propionate 0.05% emollient foam to their scalp daily demonstrated continuous clinical improvement throughout the 14-week study. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01111981 J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(7): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5201.