Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 53(7): 2180-7, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25926494

ABSTRACT

Legionella, a large group of environmental Gram-negative bacteria, represents an occasional cause of pneumonia. We analyzed the microbiological and clinical features of 33 consecutive cases of Legionella infections that occurred at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, from 2002 to 2014. The Legionella strains were isolated from bronchoscopy specimens (32 strains) and a blood culture (1 strain) and were identified by sequencing analysis of the full-length 16S rRNA gene. The 33 strains involved 12 Legionella species or subspecies: 15 strains of L. pneumophila subsp. pneumophila, 3 strains of L. pneumophila subsp. fraseri or L. pneumophila subsp. pascullei, 4 strains of "L. donaldsonii," 3 strains of L. micdadei, and one each of L. bozemanae, L. feeleii, L. gormanii, L. longbeachae, L. maceachernii, L. parisiensis, L. sainthelensi, and Legionella sp. strain D5382. All patients except one asymptomatic carrier showed pneumonia, including one with concurrent bacteremia. Nine patients died, with this infection being the immediate cause of death in six. Twenty-seven patients had underlying hematologic malignancies. Twenty-three patients were leukopenic. Six patients were recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, with their infections caused by five Legionella species. Together, these results suggest that diverse Legionella species infect patients with cancer in the Houston area and its vicinity. The five cases of pneumonia due to L. donaldsonii and Legionella sp. D5382 are likely the first reports of human infection with these organisms.


Subject(s)
Genetic Variation , Legionella/classification , Legionella/genetics , Legionellosis/microbiology , Legionellosis/pathology , Neoplasms/complications , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Aged , Cluster Analysis , DNA, Ribosomal/chemistry , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Female , Humans , Legionella/isolation & purification , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/pathology , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Survival Analysis , Texas
2.
Vet Microbiol ; 136(3-4): 226-32, 2009 May 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19091492

ABSTRACT

In order to better understand airborne transmission of Newcastle disease, a model system was established and two trials were conducted. Twenty-five principal specific pathogen free (SPF) chickens were inoculated with NDV and were housed in one isolator. 6 days after the chickens were challenged, 15 chickens were placed into another isolator which received its air supply from the first isolator. The NDV aerosol originating from inoculated chickens was collected with All Glass Impinger-30 (AGI-30) to study the occurrence and concentration of NDV aerosol. The antibody response to infection was assessed by the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test and viral shedding was detected by RT-PCR and Dot-ELISA. NDV aerosol was initially detectable by RT-PCR and cell culture at day 2 or 3 post-inoculation (dpi). The aerosol concentration peaked at 1.69x10(4)PFU/m(3) air at 13dpi in trial 1, 9.14x10(3)PFU/m(3) air at 11dpi in trial 2 and was consistently detectable up to 40dpi. NDV shedding was detectable from 2 to 40dpi of inoculated chickens and from 6 days post-aerosol exposed infection (dpi) to 33dpi of aerosol exposed chickens. The viral strain induced high antibody level, both in inoculated and in aerosol exposed chickens. Airborne transmission did occur, as shown by NDV shedding and seroconversion to NDV in aerosol exposed chickens. The results indicated that viruses shed from infected chickens readily aerosolized and airborne transmission of NDV was possible.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Chickens , Newcastle Disease/virology , Newcastle disease virus/physiology , Aerosols , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Chick Embryo , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests/veterinary , Newcastle Disease/blood , Newcastle Disease/transmission , Newcastle disease virus/genetics , Newcastle disease virus/isolation & purification , RNA, Viral/chemistry , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms , Virus Shedding
3.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 18(2): 558-562, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30009555

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is increasing understanding that sunscreen use is associated with reduced photoaging and that appearance-based messages are more effective than health-based messages in promoting daily sunscreen use. We hypothesized that persons with greater awareness of the effects of photoaging use sunscreen more consistently. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of adults in Dallas, TX, assessing sunscreen-related knowledge, behavior, and information source. RESULTS: Each respondent averaged 2.5 ± 1.7 hours of self-reported sun exposure daily with the least reported time being 0.15 hours. Eighty-eight percent reported that sun exposure caused skin cancer "a lot." Eighty-nine percent "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that "sun exposure causes most signs of skin aging." Over 70% "agreed" or "strongly agreed" to an appearance-based reason for their sunscreen use. Sixty-six percent reported they would consider using sunscreen if anticipating sun exposure lasting 2 hours or less. Only 30% reported using sunscreen daily. Greater photoaging knowledge was positively associated with sunscreen adherence (at least P < 0.05 with each knowledge item). Those with darker complexions or skin less likely to burn reported less knowledge of photoaging (ρ = -0.219, P ≤ 0.001) and had lower sunscreen use (ρ = 0.301, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite most respondents reporting knowledge of health and appearance risks of sun exposure and a motivation to prevent them with sunscreen, most do not use sunscreen adequately. This discrepancy could be due to people perceiving risks of sun exposure based on duration of continuous exposure. There may be misconceptions that short-interval sun exposure that does not result in sunburn is less harmful than extended exposure.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Skin Aging/drug effects , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Sunburn/prevention & control , Sunscreening Agents/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Appearance, Body/drug effects , Physical Appearance, Body/radiation effects , Skin/drug effects , Skin/radiation effects , Skin Aging/radiation effects , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Sunlight/adverse effects , Texas , Time Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL