ABSTRACT
We evaluated the effect of periosteal-releasing incisions on flap displacement in anterior maxillary sites following implant placement and simultaneously guided bone regeneration. Thirty patients, each requiring a single dental implant and guided bone regeneration in the maxillary esthetic zone, were recruited. After full-thickness flap elevation, the displacement of the flap was measured under a standardized tension of 1 Ncm. Then, a 2-step periosteal releasing incision was placed in the internal aspect of the flap, and the displacement was remeasured using the same standardized tension. Keratinized tissue width and mucosal thickness at the surgical site were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed at the 7- and 14-day recall visits. Flap displacement (primary outcome) was calculated before and after periosteal-releasing incisions. Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate the influence of mucosal thickness on flap displacement and adjusted for Keratinized tissue width. Primary wound closure was achieved in all patients. The mean difference in flap coronal displacement before and after the periosteal-releasing incisions was 8.2 mm (p < .0001). Adjusted regression models showed no association between mucosal thickness and keratinized tissue width with the amount of flap displacement (p = .770). Patient-reported outcome measures for pain, swelling, and bleeding amounted to 1.28 ± 1.93, 1.36 ± 1.87, and 0.0 ± 0.0 at 7 days and 0.11 ± 0.57, 0.56 ± 1.03, and 0.0 ± 0.0 at 14 days, respectively. Periosteal-releasing incisions using the 2-step procedure described here are a predictable technique to obtain coronal flap displacements >8 mm without increased surgical complications.
Subject(s)
Maxilla , Periosteum , Humans , Periosteum/surgery , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Maxilla/surgery , Bone Regeneration , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods , Surgical Flaps/surgery , Adult , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Aged , Dental Implants, Single-ToothABSTRACT
Objetivo: Analizar la necesidad de regeneración ósea guiada en pacientes sometidos a terapia implantológica entre el año 2012 y 2019 del Hospital San Camilo, San Felipe. Material y Método: Estudio observacional retrospectivo. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes pertenecientes al programa de implantes entre el 2012 y 2019. Los pacientes fueron organizados de acuerdo a la edad, género, marca de implante, uso de injerto, tiempo de carga y tasa de pérdida. Estos datos se evaluaron empleando estadística descriptiva calculando frecuencias y porcentajes en tablas de contingencias. Resultados: Se incluyeron 182 pacientes. La distribución por sexo fue de 121 mujeres y 61 hombres. La edad promedio de los pacientes fue de 51,23 años. El 41,76% casos del total requirió ROG. El 74,3% del grupo de implantes unitarios requirió injerto óseo. Sólo un 4,71% del grupo de sobredentadura requirió de injerto óseo. El tiempo de carga promedio fue de 3,68 meses. La tasa de pérdida en implantes fue de 3,85%. Conclusiones: El conocimiento y análisis de estos datos permite replantear la distribución de los recursos con el fin de realizar tratamientos más predecibles, disminuyendo las complicaciones y generando un ahorro de presupuesto.
Objective: To determine and analyze the need for guided bone regeneration (GBR) in patients who underwent implant therapy between 2012 and 2019 at the San Camilo Hospital, San Felipe. Material and methods: Retrospective observational study. All patients belonging to the implant program were included, with the need for either single implants or overdentures, which were installed between 2012 and 2019. Patients were organized according to their age, gender, implant brand, use of graft, loading time and loss rate. These data were evaluated using descriptive statistics calculating frequencies and percentages in contingency tables. Results: A total of 182 cases of implants were included. The distribution by sex was 121 women and 61 men. The average age of the patients was 51,23 years. The percentage of cases that required GBR was 41.76%. In the single implant group, 74.3% of cases required bone grafting. In the overdenture group, only 4.71% required bone grafting. The average loading time was 3,68 months. The implant loss rate was 3,85%. Conclusions: The knowledge and analysis of these data allow us to evaluate the distribution of resources to carry out more predictable treatments to reduce complications and generate budget savings.