ABSTRACT
At the stroke of the New Year 2020, COVID-19, a zoonotic disease that would turn into a global pandemic, was identified in the Chinese city of Wuhan. Although unique in its transmission and virulence, COVID-19 is similar to zoonotic diseases, including other SARS variants (e.g., SARS-CoV) and MERS, in exhibiting severe flu-like symptoms and acute respiratory distress. Even at the molecular level, many parallels have been identified between SARS and COVID-19 so much so that the COVID-19 virus has been named SARS-CoV-2. These similarities have provided several opportunities to treat COVID-19 patients using clinical approaches that were proven to be effective against SARS. Importantly, the identification of similarities in how SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 access the host, replicate, and trigger life-threatening pathological conditions have revealed opportunities to repurpose drugs that were proven to be effective against SARS. In this article, we first provided an overview of COVID-19 etiology vis-à-vis other zoonotic diseases, particularly SARS and MERS. Then, we summarized the characteristics of droplets/aerosols emitted by COVID-19 patients and how they aid in the transmission of the virus among people. Moreover, we discussed the molecular mechanisms that enable SARS-CoV-2 to access the host and become more contagious than other betacoronaviruses such as SARS-CoV. Further, we outlined various approaches that are currently being employed to diagnose and symptomatically treat COVID-19 in the clinic. Finally, we reviewed various approaches and technologies employed to develop vaccines against COVID-19 and summarized the attempts to repurpose various classes of drugs and novel therapeutic approaches.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/transmission , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease that may affect the myocardium. This study evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic value of 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). METHODS: Eighty-three patients with extracardiac, biopsy-proven sarcoidosis and definite/probable diagnosis of cardiac involvement diagnosed from January 2005 through December 2016 were included. Strain parameters in early stages of CS, in a subgroup of 23 CS patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) within normal limits (LVEF> 52% for men: > 54% for women, mean value: 57.3% ± 3.8%) and no wall motion abnormalities was compared with 97 controls (1:4) without cardiac disease. LV and right ventricular (RV) global longitudinal (GLS), circumferential (GCS), and radial (GRS) strain and strain rate (SR) analyses were performed with TomTec software and correlated with cardiac outcomes (including heart failure and arrhythmias). This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board, and all patients gave informed written consent to participate. RESULTS: Mean age of CS patients was 53.6 ± 10.8 years, and 34.9% were women. Mean LVEF was 43.2% ± 12.4%; LV GLS, - 12.4% ± 3.7%; LV GCS, - 17.1% ± 6.5%; LV GRS, 29.3% ± 12.8%; and RV wall GLS, 14.6% ± 6.3%. In the 23 patients with early stage CS with normal LVEF and RV systolic function, strain parameters were significantly reduced when compared with controls (respectively: LV GLS, - 15.9% ± 2.5% vs - 18.2% ± 2.7% [P = .001]; RV GLS, - 16.9% ± 4.5% vs - 24.1% ± 4.0% [P < .001]). A LV GLS value of - 16.3% provided 82.2% sensitivity and 81.2% specificity for the diagnosis of CS (AUC 0.91), while a RV value of - 19.9% provided 88.1% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity (AUC 0.93). Hospital admission and heart failure significantly correlated to impaired LV GLS (> - 14%). CONCLUSION: Reduced strain values in the LV GLS and RV GLS can be used in the diagnostic algorithm in patients with suspicion of cardiac sarcoidosis. These values also correlate with adverse cardiovascular events.
Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies/diagnostic imaging , Echocardiography, Doppler , Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging , Sarcoidosis/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Cardiomyopathies/physiopathology , Cardiomyopathies/therapy , Disease Progression , Female , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoidosis/physiopathology , Sarcoidosis/therapy , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left , Ventricular Function, RightABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive pulmonary disease characterized by aberrant tissue remodeling, formation of scar tissue within the lungs and continuous loss of lung function. The areas of fibrosis seen in lungs of IPF patients share many features with normal aging lung including cellular senescence. The contribution of the immune system to the etiology of IPF remains poorly understood. Evidence obtained from animal models and human studies suggests that innate and adaptive immune processes can orchestrate existing fibrotic responses. Currently, there is only modest effective pharmacotherapy for IPF. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-based therapies have emerged as a potential option treatment of IPF. This study characterizes the functionality of autologous MSCs for use as an IPF therapy and presents an attempt to determine whether the disease occurring in the lungs is associated with an alterated immune system. METHODS: Comprehensive characterization of autologous adipose-derived MSCs (aMSCs) from 5 IPF patient and 5 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HC) was done using flow cytometry, PCR (ddPCR), multiplex Luminex xMAP technology, confocal microscopy self-renewal capacity and osteogenic differentiation. Additionally, multi-parameter quantitative flow cytometry of unmanipulated whole blood of 15 IPF patients and 87 (30 age- and gender-matched) HC was used to analyze 110 peripheral phenotypes to determine disease-associated changes in the immune system. RESULTS: There are no differences between autologous aMSCs from IPF patients and HC in their stem cell properties, self-renewal capacity, osteogenic differentiation, secretome content, cell cycle inhibitor marker levels and mitochondrial health. IPF patients had altered peripheral blood immunophenotype including reduced B cells subsets, increased T cell subsets and increased granulocytes demonstrating disease-associated alterations in the immune system. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that there are no differences in aMSC properties from IPF patients and HC, suggesting that autologous aMSCs may be an acceptable option for IPF therapy. The altered immune system of IPF patients may be a valuable biomarker for disease burden and monitoring therapeutic response.
Subject(s)
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Animals , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy , Cellular Senescence/genetics , Humans , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/genetics , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/therapy , Lung/metabolism , OsteogenesisABSTRACT
Established technology, operational infrastructure, and nursing resources were leveraged to develop a remote patient monitoring (RPM) program for ambulatory management of patients with COVID-19. The program included two care-delivery models with different monitoring capabilities supporting variable levels of patient risk for severe illness. The primary objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of a multisite RPM program for management of acute COVID-19 illness. We report an evaluation of 7074 patients served by the program across 41 US states. Among all patients, the RPM technology engagement rate was 78.9%. Rates of emergency department visit and hospitalization within 30 days of enrollment were 11.4% and 9.4%, respectively, and the 30-day mortality rate was 0.4%. A multisite RPM program for management of acute COVID-19 illness is feasible, safe, and associated with a low mortality rate. Further research and expansion of RPM programs for ambulatory management of other acute illnesses are warranted.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To report the Mayo Clinic experience with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related to patient outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with COVID-19 diagnosed between March 1, 2020, and July 31, 2020, at any of the Mayo Clinic sites. We abstracted pertinent comorbid conditions such as age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index variables, and treatments received. Factors associated with hospitalization and mortality were assessed in univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: A total of 7891 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection with research authorization on file received care across the Mayo Clinic sites during the study period. Of these, 7217 patients were adults 18 years or older who were analyzed further. A total of 897 (11.4%) patients required hospitalization, and 354 (4.9%) received care in the intensive care unit (ICU). All hospitalized patients were reviewed by a COVID-19 Treatment Review Panel, and 77.5% (695 of 897) of inpatients received a COVID-19-directed therapy. Overall mortality was 1.2% (94 of 7891), with 7.1% (64 of 897) mortality in hospitalized patients and 11.3% (40 of 354) in patients requiring ICU care. CONCLUSION: Mayo Clinic outcomes of patients with COVID-19 infection in the ICU, hospital, and community compare favorably with those reported nationally. This likely reflects the impact of interprofessional multidisciplinary team evaluation, effective leveraging of clinical trials and available treatments, deployment of remote monitoring tools, and maintenance of adequate operating capacity to not require surge adjustments. These best practices can help guide other health care systems with the continuing response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , COVID-19/therapy , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a progressively fatal disease with limited treatments. The bleomycin mouse model is often used to simulate the disease process in laboratory studies. The aim of this study was to develop an ex vivo technique for assessing mice lung injury using lung ultrasound surface wave elastography (LUSWE) in the bleomycin mouse model. The surface wave speeds were measured at three frequencies of 100, 200, and 300â¯Hz for mice lungs from control, mild, and severe groups. The results showed significant differences in the lung surface wave speeds, pulse oximetry, and compliance between control mice and mice with severe pulmonary fibrosis. LUSWE is an evolving technique for evaluating lung stiffness and may be useful for assessing pulmonary fibrosis in the bleomycin mouse model.
Subject(s)
Elasticity Imaging Techniques , Lung Injury/diagnostic imaging , Animals , Biomechanical Phenomena , Disease Models, Animal , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BLABSTRACT
Pulmonary sarcoidosis presents substantial management challenges, with limited evidence on effective therapies and phenotypes. In the absence of definitive evidence, expert consensus can supply clinically useful guidance in medicine. An international panel of 26 experts participated in a Delphi process to identify consensus on pharmacological management in sarcoidosis with the development of preliminary recommendations.The modified Delphi process used three rounds. The first round focused on qualitative data collection with open-ended questions to ensure comprehensive inclusion of expert concepts. Rounds 2 and 3 applied quantitative assessments using an 11-point Likert scale to identify consensus.Key consensus points included glucocorticoids as initial therapy for most patients, with non-biologics (immunomodulators), usually methotrexate, considered in severe or extrapulmonary disease requiring prolonged treatment, or as a steroid-sparing intervention in cases with high risk of steroid toxicity. Biologic therapies might be considered as additive therapy if non-biologics are insufficiently effective or are not tolerated with initial biologic therapy, usually with a tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor, typically infliximab.The Delphi methodology provided a platform to gain potentially valuable insight and interim guidance while awaiting evidenced-based contributions.