[Recommendations for thromboembolic disease in oncological processes. A view from primary care]. / Recomendaciones sobre enfermedad tromboembólica venosa en procesos oncológicos. Una visión desde la medicina de familia.

Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is a frequent complication in patients diagnosed with cancer and a cause of morbidity and mortality. Approximately 20% of thromboembolic episodes develop in association with active cancer. On the other hand, it is estimated that about 2-12% of cases, the thromboembolic episode is the first manifestation of an occult cancer, diagnosed at that time or subsequently, which offers an opportunity for early diagnosis and treatment. There are multiple factors that contribute to increase the risk of VTE in oncological patients in relation to specific characteristics of the patient, the tumor and the treatments. Knowledge of these risk factors will contribute to early diagnosis when signs of VTE appear, as well as the assessment of thromboprophylaxis if indicated. The diagnosis of VTE in patients with cancer does not differ of those who do not suffer from it. Regarding the treatment of VTE in these patients, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), direct acting anticoagulants (DACs) and antivitamin K (VKA) are the most commonly used, although the dosing regimen and length are not clear yet. The management of these patients should be interdisciplinary and early, so the primary care physician plays a key role in this process as he/she is liaise with his/her patients. It is also necessary to update knowledge in order to improve the care of these patients. For these reasons, this document has been prepared by the Working Group on Vasculopathies of the Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians (SEMERGEN) whose objective is to present the available information regarding the management of VTE that may appear in oncological patients, as well as the assessment of thromboprophylaxis and treatment, if appropriate, from an approach focused on a primary care field.

Chronic venous disease in Spain: doctor-patient correlation.

AIM: The present study aimed to demonstrate how the quality of life (QoL) perceived by patients with chronic venous disease (CVD) is correlated with the severity of their disease objectively assessed by primary care physician. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 1560 patients with CVD were evaluated using four measurement instruments: CEAP clinical classification, Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), SF-12 Health Survey and Chronic Lower Limb Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ-20). Statistical correlations between these tools were analysed using Spearman's coefficient. RESULTS: Patients were distributed in C0, 58 (3.7%); C1, 243 (15.6%); C2, 328 (21.0%); C3, 357 (22.9%); C4, 368 (23.6%); C5, 136 (8.7%); and C6, 70 (4.5%). The VCSS score for the whole cohort was 0.89 ± 0.53. The correlation between CEAP and VCSS was moderately strong (r = 0.69). The overall QoL scores measured by SF and CIVIQ were 56.84 ± 19.63 and 65.11 ± 14.35, respectively. The correlation between the two QoL questionnaires was very strong (r = 0.81). The correlations of the SF and CIVIQ with the VCSS were moderately strong (r = -0.47 and -0.48). The correlations between QoL questionnaires and CEAP were moderate and lower than those with VSCC. CONCLUSIONS: While there is correlation between VCSS, CEAP, modified CIVIQ and venous ultrasound findings, subgroup analysis indicates that this correlation is driven by different components of VCSS compared with the other venous assessment tools. Patients' opinions about their disease are correlated with those assessed by primary care physicians.

Evaluation of prophylaxis in primary prevention with acetylsalicylic acid in people with diabetes: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) prophylaxis for the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ACVD) remain controversial in people with diabetes (DM) without ACVD, because the possible increased risk of major bleeding could outweigh the potential reduction in the risk of mortality and of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) considered individually or together. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the overall risk-benefit of ASA prophylaxis in primary prevention in people with DM and to compare the recommendations of the guidelines with the results of the meta-analyses (MA) and systematic reviews (SR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for SR and MA published from 2009 to 2020 which compared the effects of ASA prophylaxis versus placebo or control followed up for at least one year in people with DM without ACVD. Heterogeneity among the randomized clinical trials (RCT) included in the SR and MA was assessed. Cardiovascular outcomes of efficacy (all-cause mortality [ACM], cardiovascular mortality [CVM], myocardial infarction [MI], stroke and MACE) and of safety (major bleeding events [MBE], major gastrointestinal bleeding events [MGIBE], and intracranial and extracranial bleeding) were shown. RESULTS: The recommendations of 12 guidelines were evaluated. The results of 25 SR and MA that included a total of 20 RCT were assessed. None of the MA or SR showed that ASA prophylaxis decreased the risk of ACM, CVM or MI. Only two of the 19 SR and MA that evaluated ischemic stroke showed a decrease in the stroke risk (mean 20.0% [SD±5.7]), bordering on statistical significance. Almost half of the MA and SR showed, bordering on statistical significance, a risk reduction for the MACE composite endpoint (mean 10.5% [SD±3.3]). The significant increases in MGIBE risk ranged from 35% to 55%. The significant increases in the risk of MBE and extracraneal bleeding were 33.4% (SD±14.9) and 54.5% (SD±0.7) respectively. CONCLUSION: The overall risk-benefit assessment of ASA prophylaxis in primary prevention suggests that it should not be applied in people with DM.

[COVID-19 and thromboprophylaxis: Recommendations for our clinical practice in Primary Care]. / COVID-19 y tromboprofilaxis: recomendaciones para nuestra práctica clínica en Atención Primaria.

The new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for a severe acute respiratory syndrome. Among its manifestations, it can develop a thrombotic disease, both venous and arterial, due to excessive inflammation that affects the vascular system, with platelet activation and endothelial dysfunction, among other mechanisms. Thrombosis is associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, increasing its severity and conferring a worse prognosis. Our performance as Family Physicians can contribute important actions in the management and control of this severe complication. Considering that many of our patients already receive antithrombotic or anticoagulant therapy, the fact that they may develop a COVID-19 infection will have implications for the choice, dosage and control of their treatment. In this document we review, with the information currently available, the relationship between disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 and thrombosis, as well as its management with a focus on Primary Care.

[Consensus document of the Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians and the Spanish Chapter of Phlebology and Lymphology of the Spanish Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery: Superficial vein thrombosis of the lower limbs in Primary Care]. / Documento de consenso de la Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria y Capítulo Español de Flebología y Linfología de la Sociedad Española de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular: trombosis venosa superficial de miembros inferiores en Atención Primaria.

Superficial vein thrombosis of the lower limbs used to be considered a benign condition with a self-limiting clinical course. It is now known that its potential complications can be serious or even fatal, such as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism. There are different forms of clinical presentation, risk factors and different treatments for its approach, mainly in Primary Care. The Vascular Diseases Working Group of the Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians (SEMERGEN) has developed this update using current scientific evidence and jointly with the Spanish Chapter of Phlebology and Lymphology of the Spanish Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery.

COVID-19 y tromboprofilaxis: recomendaciones para nuestra práctica clínica en Atención Primaria / COVID-19 and thromboprophylaxis: recommendations for our clinical practice in Primary Care

El nuevo coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) es el responsable de un síndrome respiratorio agudo severo (SARS). Entre sus manifestaciones puede desarrollar una enfermedad trombótica, tanto venosa como arterial, debido a la inflamación excesiva que afecta al sistema vascular, con activación plaquetaria y disfunción endotelial, entre otros mecanismos. La trombosis se asocia a la infección producida por el SARS- CoV-2, aumentando su gravedad y confiriendo un peor pronóstico. Nuestra actuación como Médicos de Familia puede aportar acciones importantes en el manejo y control de esta severa complicación. Teniendo en cuenta que muchos de nuestros pacientes ya reciben terapia antitrombótica o anticoagulante, el hecho de que puedan desarrollar una infección por COVID-19 tendrá implicaciones para la elección, la dosificación y el control en su tratamiento. En este documento, revisamos, con la información actualmente disponible, la relación entre enfermedad producida por el SARS-CoV-2 y trombosis, así como su manejo con un enfoque centrado en Atención Primaria

The new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for a severe acute respiratory syndrome. Among its manifestations, it can develop a thrombotic disease, both venous and arterial, due to excessive inflammation that affects the vascular system, with platelet activation and endothelial dysfunction, among other mechanisms. Thrombosis is associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, increasing its severity and conferring a worse prognosis. Our performance as Family Physicians can contribute important actions in the management and control of this severe complication. Considering that many of our patients already receive antithrombotic or anticoagulant therapy, the fact that they may develop a COVID-19 infection will have implications for the choice, dosage and control of their treatment. In this document we review, with the information currently available, the relationship between disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 and thrombosis, as well as its management with a focus on Primary Care

Venous leg ulcer in the context of chronic venous disease.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic venous disease (CVD) is a frequent disorder with a high socioeconomic impact. Little is known about the possible differences between healed ulcer (C5 group) and active ulcer (C6 group) in terms of disease severity and quality of life (QoL). Our aim was to determine the possible differences in severity disease and QoL between the C5-C6 and C1 (control) group. METHODS: Data from a national, multicentre, observational and cross-sectional study (n = 1598) were used to compare three groups of CVD: C1 (n = 243), C5 (n = 136) and C6 (n = 70). CVD severity was assessed with the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and QoL with the Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) and Chronic Lower Limb Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ-20). RESULTS: Patients with active ulcers had a higher mean total VCSS than patients with healed ulcers (P < 0.05). Both SF-12 and CIVIQ-20 QoL questionnaires indicated a poorer QoL in patients with ulcers than in those with C1 (P < 0.05). Compared with the C5 group, patients with active ulcers (C6) had lower QoL scores, but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with venous leg ulcers (C5-C6) are associated with high severity and poor QoL. However, the healing of a leg ulcer did not contribute to improvement of QoL.

Quality of life in patients with chronic venous disease: influence of the socio-demographical and clinical factors.

AIM: Chronic venous disease (CVD) is a well-defined and known disorder which impact on related-health quality of life (QoL). However, individuals factors which determinate quality of life on CVD are not well defined. The purposes of this study were to describe the QoL in patients with CVD and examine socio-demographical and clinical factors which influence QoL METHODS: One thousand five hundred sixty patients with CVD were evaluated. We calculated for each patient two disease-specific severity scores: The "C" grade (clinical) of the CEAP classification and the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). Additionally, two QoL questionnaires were recorded: Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and Chronic Lower Limb Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ-20). Two multivariate logistic regression analyses (SF-12 and CIVIQ-20 model) were conducted to determine whether demographic and clinical variables were independently associated with QoL. RESULTS: Both QoL questionnaires indicated that the QoL decreased significantly (P<0.05) as the C grade of CEAP increased. Each increase of 0.10 in VCSS score represented 2% worsening in QoL as measured by CIVIQ-20. Three factors were strongly associated with poor QoL on SF-12: increasing age, prior superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) or prior deep venous thrombosis. In the specific disease CIVIQ-20 questionnaire three factors (higher age, prior SVT and higher weight) were strongly associated with decrease QoL. CONCLUSION: Increasing disease severity by VCSS is associated with reductions in QoL. Subgroup analysis indicates that there are several significant individual determinants of worsening QoL.

¿Debemos tomar la presión arterial de forma simultánea en ambos brazos en los diabéticos? / Should we take blood pressure simultaneously on both arms in diabetics?

Introducción. Las diferencias de presiones arteriales (PA) en ambos brazos se asocia con un alto riesgo de morbimortalidad cardiovascular en los individuos con alto riesgo vascular, pero, ¿hay alguna diferencia al tomar la PA en ambos brazos de forma simultánea en los diabéticos? Métodos. Para comprobarlo se estudiaron de forma prospectiva las medidas de PA bilateral y simultánea en una cohorte inglesa de 727 personas con diabetes mellitus (DM) tipo 1 y 2, y 285 controles sin DM captados en atención primaria y especializada, seguidos por 52 meses. Las tomas de PA fueron realizadas por enfermeras entrenadas, con 2 esfigmomanómetros automáticos (Omron 705IT), con un protocolo establecido según las guías clínicas actuales de hipertensión arterial. Las diferencias de PA entre brazos se relacionó con enfermedades de órganos diana y mortalidad cardiovascular. Resultados. Se encontró que un 8,6% de los individuos con DM y el 2,9% de los controles tuvieron diferencias de presión arterial sistólica (PAS) ≥ 10 mmHg y se asociaron con enfermedad arterial periférica (OR: 3,4; IC 95% 1,2-9,3); las diferencias ≥ 15 mmHg se asociaron con retinopatía diabética (OR: 5,7; IC 95% 1,5-21,6) y enfermedad renal crónica (OR: 7; IC 95% 1,7-29,8), asociaciones que mantuvieron su significación estadística tras ajuste por edad, sexo, índice cintura/cadera, tabaquismo y PAS. Conclusiones. Concluyen que la mortalidad cardiovascular se incrementó cuando existieron diferencias entre las PAS entre brazos ≥ 10 mmHg, con HR de 3,5 (IC 95% 1,0-13), y ≥ 15 mmHg, con HR de 9 (IC 95% 2,0-41), y que la PA debería medirse en ambos brazos en los pacientes con DM por la relación descrita anteriormente (AU)

No disponible

Trombo flotante libre en carótida interna y riesgo vascular, a propósito de un caso / Free floating thrombus in the internal carotid and vascular risk: presentation of a case

No disponible

Perfil de los pacientes con claudicación intermitente en España. Estudio VITAL / Profile of patients with intermittent claudication in Spain. The VITAL Study

Introducción: La claudicación intermitente ( CI ) es frecuente entre la población occidental, incluida la española; sin embargo, sus características no son bien conocidas. El objetivo del estudio es conocer el perfil de los pacientes españoles con CI. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo, observacional, transversal, multicéntrico y no aleatorizado sobre 1.641 claudicantes, divididos en 2 grupos: a) angiología y cirugía vascular (ACV) (n = 920), y b) atención primaria (MAP) (n = 721). Los pacientes fueron sometidos a un cuaderno de recogida de datos (CRD), analítica, índice tobillo/brazo (ITB), cuestionario Walking Impairment Questionaire (WIQ) y cuestionario europeo de calidad de vida (EQ-5D). Resultados: Fueron varones el 75,3%, de 68,3 ± 9,4 años, destacando sobremanera el elevado número de factores de riesgo cardiovascular y enfermedades asociadas (fundamentalmente cardiacas), más frecuente en el grupo ACV. El ITB de la serie 0,66 ± 0,19, inferior en grupo ACV (p = 0,001). Los porcentajes WIQ fueron: daños motores (48,57 ± 20,12), distancia (35,09 ± 25,73), velocidad (36,18 ± 22,83) y escaleras (41,76 ± 27,62), peores en lo relativo a los daños motores (p < 0,001) y distancia (p = 0,007) en el grupo ACV. La puntuación EQ-5D fue 0,57 ± 0,21, sin diferencias entre grupos. Conclusiones: Los pacientes españoles con CI presentan 3 características: alto riesgo cardiovascular, limitada capacidad para el ejercicio e importante reducción de la calidad de vida. Existen diferencias entre grupos, dado que los ACV tratan pacientes con enfermedad más avanzada (AU)

Introduction: Intermittent claudication (IC) is a very prevalent condition in Western countries including the population of Spain. However, little is known about the medical profile and quality of life (QoL) of the IC in Spain. Aim: To determine the clinical characteristics and QoL in a large sample of Spanish patients with IC. Material and methods: An observational, prospective, cross sectional and multicentre study was performed between October 2010 and January 2011, with 625 investigators recruiting 1,641 consecutive patients with claudication. The sample was divided into two groups: a) patients evaluated by vascular surgeons (VS) (n = 920), and b) patients evaluated by general practitioners (GP) (n = 721). Demographical and clinical characteristics, analytical findings (glucose levels and lipid metabolism) and the Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) were recorded. Each patient included in the study also filled in two questionnaires: the Walking impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) and the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). Results: The population mean age was 68.3 ± 9.4 years; in 75.3% of the cases the patients were males. The presence of risk cardiovascular factors (49.5% of diabetes; 76.9% of hypertension and 65.3% of dyslipemia) and comorbid conditions (in particular, cardiovascular diseases) were high. The mean ABI of the series was 0.66 ± 0.19. Patients in the VS group had more severe IC than patients from GP Group (ABI = 0.63 vs ABI = 0.71, P<0.001). WIQ scores obtained were: a) walking distance = 35.09 ± 25.73; b) walking speed = 36.18 ± 22.83, and c) stair-climbing capacity = 41.76 ± 27.62. We only found significant statistical differences in walking distance between the VS Group and GP Group. The global EQ-5D score was 0,57 ± 0,21. No significant differences were observed between the VS and GP groups (AU)

Conclusions: Spanish patients with IC showed three characteristics: high cardiovascular risk, limited ability to tolerate exercise, and reduction in the quality of their life. There are differences between groups; compared to general practitioners, vascular surgeons treated patients with more advanced disease (AU)

Determinantes de la gravedad en la insuficiencia venosa crónica. Estudio C-VIVES / Determining factors of the severity of chronic venous insufficiency. C-VIVES study

Introducción: La evaluación de la insuficiencia venosa crónica (IVC) puede medirse mediante escalas de gravedad venosa. Sin embargo, los factores individuales que la condicionan no están bien descritos. El objetivo del estudio es conocer las características sociodemográficas y clínicas de una muestra de pacientes portadores de IVC para permitir la búsqueda de los factores que incrementan la gravedad de la misma. Material y método: Estudio promovido por la Sociedad Española de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular en colaboración con otras sociedades científicas españolas sobre 1.560 pacientes con IVC y a los que se han aplicado 2 instrumentos: clasificación clínica CEAP y Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). Resultados: La distribución de pacientes por estadios clínicos fue: C0, 3,3%; C1, 15,6%; C2, 21,0%, C3, 22,9%; C4, 23,6%; C5, 8,7%; C6, 4,5%. La puntuación VCSS para toda la cohorte fue de 0,89 ± 0,53, siendo superior a la media en 4 de los 10 atributos medidos: dolor (1,59 ± 0,75), venas varicosas (1,80 ± 0,74), edema (1,40 ± 0,89), y pigmentación (1,05 ± 0,98). A mayor CEAP le corresponde mayor puntuación VCSS. En el análisis por subgrupos destacan como factores de gravedad el género, varón, edad, peso, sedentarismo, antecedentes personales y familiares de enfermedad venosa. En el análisis de regresión múltiple, los determinantes fundamentales de gravedad son: 1) edad; 2) antecedente de trombosis venosa superficial o profunda, y 3) peso del paciente. Conclusiones: Existe una relación positiva entre CEAP y VCSS. El análisis por subgrupos define factores fuertes y débiles de gravedad, que quedan clarificados mediante regresión múltiple(AU)

Introduction: Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) can be evaluated using venous clinical severity scores. However, the individual factors that may lead to this condition have not been well described. The objective of this study is to analyse the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of sample of patients who suffer from CVI in order determine the factors that increase the severity of their condition. Material and method: A study, promoted by the Spanish Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery in collaboration with other scientific societies, was conducted on 1,560 patients with CVI using two measurement tools: CEAP (clinical grade, etiology, anatomy, pathophysiology) classification and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). Results: The patient distribution by clinical status (C0 to C5) was: C0: 3.3%; C1: 15.6%; C2: 21.0%, C3: 22.9%; C4: 23.6%; C5: 8.7%; C6: 4.5%. The VCSS score for the whole cohort was 0.89 ± 0.53, being greater than the mean in four of the ten measurements attributed to: pain (1.59 ± 0.75), varicose veins (1.80 ± 0.74), oedema (1.40 ± 0.89), and pigmentation (1.05 ± 0.98). A higher CEAP corresponded to a higher VCSS. In the analysis by subgroups, the risk severity factors were associated with, being male, weight, being sedentary, personal and family history of venous disease. In the multiple regression analysis, the main determining factors were: 1) age; 2) history of superficial of deep venous thrombosis; and 3) patient weight. Conclusions: There is a positive relationship between CEAP and VCSS. The analysis by sub-groups defines strong and weak factors of severity, that are made clear using multiple regression analysis(AU)