Fanconi-like anemia related to a FANCM mutation.

Fanconi anemia is primarily inherited as an autosomal recessive genetic disorder with common delays in diagnosis and challenging treatments. Fanconi anemia patients have a high risk of developing solid tumors, particularly in the head and neck or anogenital regions. The diagnosis of Fanconi anemia is primarily based on the chromosomal breakage but FA gene sequencing is recommended in all patients with a positive chromosome fragility test. Here, we present a 32-year-old man with advanced tonsil squamous cell carcinoma and fatal toxicity after the first cycle of chemotherapy. No anemia was present. A recent variant mutation if the FANCM gene was detected (c1511_1515delGAGTA (pArg504AsnfsTer29)). Homozygous or double heterozygous pathogenic variants have been reported in FANCM and linked to azoospermia and primary ovarian failure without anemia. Alterations in this gene have also been associated with a genetic predisposition for solid tumors (breast and ovarian cancer) and hematological malignancies (B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia). Due to the hypersensitivity of these patients to DNA-damaging agents such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, surgery is the best treatment option for malignant solid tumors. Dose reductions or alternative regimens of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy are recommended in FA patients who develop a malignant tumor.

Pegfilgrastim and daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: patterns of use and neutropenia-related outcomes in cancer patients in Spain--results of the LEARN Study.

Daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factors [(G-CSFs); e.g. filgrastim, lenograstim] are frequently used to reduce the duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in cancer patients. A pegylated formulation of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, which is administered once per cycle, was introduced in Spain in 2003. LEARN was a multi-centre, retrospective, observational study in Spain comparing patterns of use of daily G-CSF and pegfilgrastim, and CIN-related outcomes in adults with non-myeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Outcome measures were the percentage of patients receiving G-CSF for primary prophylaxis versus secondary prophylaxis/treatment, duration of treatment with G-CSF and incidence of CIN-related complications. Medical records from consecutive patients with documented pegfilgrastim (n = 75) or daily G-CSF (n = 111) use during 2003 were included. The proportion of patients receiving primary or secondary prophylaxis was comparable between the pegfilgrastim (39 and 48% respectively) and daily G-CSF (40 and 48% respectively) groups. However, there was a trend towards less frequent use to treat a neutropenic event such as FN or neutropenia in the pegfilgrastim group (17 versus 30% with daily G-CSF). Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related complications were less frequent in patients receiving pegfilgrastim (e.g. FN 11 versus 24% with daily G-CSF). This is the first study to show the potential benefits of pegfilgrastim over daily G-CSF in Spanish clinical practice.

Safety of vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600 mutated metastatic melanoma: the Spanish experience.

OBJECTIVES: Vemurafenib tolerability was assessed in a large, open-label, multicentre study in patients with BRAF V600 mutated advanced melanoma. We investigated safety, tolerability and efficacy of vemurafenib in Spanish patients participating in that study. METHODS: Patients with previously treated or treatment-naive, unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV, BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma received vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or death. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 301 Spanish patients were included, 70 % with M1c disease, 22 % with brain metastases and 51 % with prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Most frequent adverse events included fatigue (48 %), arthralgia (45 %), rash (41 %), photosensitivity (34 %) and skin neoplasms (21 %). Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 156 patients (52 %), including cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (including keratoacanthoma; 16 %), fatigue (6 %) and arthralgia (5 %). The ORR was 28 % (95 % CI 23-34 %). Responses occurred in patients with brain metastases (18 %), elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase (19 %) and poor performance status (15 %), and elderly patients (22 %). Median PFS was 5.8 (95 % CI 5.0-6.4) months; median OS was 10.5 (95 % CI 9.5-13.5) months. CONCLUSION: Our results for Spanish patients in the vemurafenib safety study indicate similar efficacy and a comparable safety profile in Spanish patients with no new safety signals compared with the overall population. Clinical benefit was demonstrated in poor-prognosis patients and in those with favourable baseline characteristics, suggesting that poor-prognosis patients may also benefit from vemurafenib treatment.

Safety of vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutated metastatic melanoma: the Spanish experience

Objectives. Vemurafenib tolerability was assessed in a large, open-label, multicentre study in patients with BRAFV600 mutated advanced melanoma. We investigated safety, tolerability and efficacy of vemurafenib in Spanish patients participating in that study. Methods. Patients with previously treated or treatment-naive, unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV, BRAFV600 mutation-positive melanoma received vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or death. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results. 301 Spanish patients were included, 70 % with M1c disease, 22 % with brain metastases and 51 % with prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Most frequent adverse events included fatigue (48 %), arthralgia (45 %), rash (41 %), photosensitivity (34 %) and skin neoplasms (21 %). Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 156 patients (52 %), including cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (including keratoacanthoma; 16 %), fatigue (6 %) and arthralgia (5 %). The ORR was 28 % (95 % CI 23-34 %). Responses occurred in patients with brain metastases (18 %), elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase (19 %) and poor performance status (15 %), and elderly patients (22 %). Median PFS was 5.8 (95 % CI 5.0-6.4) months; median OS was 10.5 (95 % CI 9.5-13.5) months. Conclusion. Our results for Spanish patients in the vemurafenib safety study indicate similar efficacy and a comparable safety profile in Spanish patients with no new safety signals compared with the overall population. Clinical benefit was demonstrated in poor-prognosis patients and in those with favourable baseline characteristics, suggesting that poor-prognosis patients may also benefit from vemurafenib treatment (AU)

No disponible

Weekly irinotecan plus UFT and leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

We evaluated the antitumoral efficacy and safety of CPT-11 125 mg/m2 (weekly 90 min i.v. infusion; days 1, 8 and 15) combined with UFT (oral combination of tegafur and uracil) 200 mg/m2/day plus leucovorin (LV) 45 mg/m2/day (both divided into three separate oral doses every 8 h, days 1-21) every 4 weeks as first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Fifty-three patients > or =18 years old with histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced CRC and bidimensionally measurable disease were enrolled. Three patients (6%) showed CR and 8 patients (15%) showed PR (ORR = 21% (95% CI, 10-32). Stable disease was reported in 19 patients (36%) [tumor control rate = 57% (95% CI, 43-70)]. The median time to progression and overall survival were 7.9 and 18.2 months, respectively (1-year rate = 74%; 2-years rate = 26%). CPT-11/UFT/LV treatment was well tolerated: the most reported grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (11% of patients) and delayed diarrhea (28% of patients). No significant differences in response rate, survival or toxicity were found between younger (< or =65 years) and older patients (> 65 years). Weekly CPT-11 plus UFT/LV was found effective and safe as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic CRC. The addition of CPT-11 to UFT/LV doubled the response rate compared to the results previously reported with UFT/LV, while myelosuppression remained low.

Advances in cutaneous melanoma

After several decades of slow progress in the field of melanoma, significant advances have been reported in recent years. These include a better understanding of the molecular biology of the tumour, a new staging classification system, insights into the patterns of relapse in early stage, and new drugs for the treatment of advanced disease. Ipilimumab and vemurafenib have just been approved and provide a survival benefit in stage IV. Both compounds are under evaluation in the adjuvant setting, where interferon remains the only drug with proven efficacy. Further investigation is required to treat patients with primary or secondary resistance to new drugs (AU)

XXXI Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: revisión de los conceptos clínicos más relevantes / No disponible

El simposio sobre cáncer de mama de San Antonio (Texas,EE. UU.) es una de las reuniones científicas más importantesdel mundo sobre cáncer de mama. Debe resaltarse la cantidady calidad de comunicaciones presentadas con carácter multidisciplinar.En este artículo especial se presentan los temasconsiderados de más interés en el manejo clínico del cáncer demama de los expuestos en su XXXI edición. Desde un puntode vista didáctico se presentan agrupados bajo epígrafes específicos(AU)

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (Texas, USA) isone of the most important scientific meetings in the worldabout breast cancer. Quantity and quality of multidisciplinarycommunications should be remarked. This special articleshows topics about clinical management of breast cancer thathave been presented in its XXXIst edition. From a teachingpoint of view they have been grouped under specific subheadings(AU)