The thrombin generation assay distinguishes inhibitor from non-inhibitor patients with severe haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with haemophilia A (HA) have impaired thrombin generation (TG) capacity and TG assay (TGA) values are linearly related to plasma factor VIII (FVIII) levels. AIM: This study carried out in patients with unmeasurable FVIII (<1 IU dL(-1) ) was aimed at unravelling any difference in TG capacity in patients with or without inhibitors. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from patients in a non-bleeding state, after a 5-day wash-out period from last treatment. RESULTS: TGA was performed in 102 patients with severe HA (15% with high-responding inhibitors; 51% with null F8 mutations, that as expected were more prevalent in inhibitor than in non-inhibitor patients). TG capacity was significantly lower in inhibitor than non-inhibitor patients and in those with null mutations than in those with non-null mutations. When the TG capacity was evaluated only in patients with null mutations with and without inhibitors it was lower in the presence of inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a greater TG impairment in inhibitor patients irrespective of FVIII levels, inhibitor titre and F8 mutation type, suggesting a role for the TGA in unravelling functional interferences of anti-FVIII inhibitors on coagulation system activation.

Low thrombin generation during major orthopaedic surgery fails to predict the bleeding risk in inhibitor patients treated with bypassing agents.

INTRODUCTION: In the presence of high-titre inhibitors, haemostatic bypassing agents are used to control bleeding and perform surgery. In this setting, no specific laboratory test is yet available to guide drug choice, monitor treatment efficacy and predict the risk of bleeding. AIM: The aims of this study, carried out in patients candidate to orthopaedic surgery, were to assess the dose-dependent increase in thrombin generation (TG) after infusion of bypassing agents and to evaluate whether or not a correlation existed between the haemostatic efficacy of bypassing therapies and perioperative TG values. METHODS AND RESULTS: TG was measured in 16 inhibitor patients, 10 of whom underwent 11 major orthopaedic procedures. In the non-bleeding state, TG significantly improved 30 min after whichever dose (P < 0.01), with no dose-response relationship when values obtained after different rFVIIa doses were compared. TG significantly improved 30 min after the preoperative bolus (P < 0.05), while during the postoperative period TG values measured before and after dosing did not differ. Moreover, postoperative TG values were similar or even more impaired (P ≤ 0.05) than those measured before preoperative dosing. No difference was found by comparing procedures with and without bleeding complications and yet no bleeding occurred in spite of persistently low TG values in one-third of procedures. CONCLUSION: This study fails to support a definite role for the TG assay as a reliable laboratory tool to monitor the haemostatic efficacy of bypassing therapies and as a predictor of the risk of bleeding in inhibitor patients using these agents during orthopaedic surgery.

Standardization of lupus anticoagulant. The Lupus Anticoagulant Sensitivity Index (LASI).

Results for lupus anticoagulant (LA) are expressed as ratio of patient-to-normal clotting times (LA-ratio) according to the equation LA-ratio = (Patient(Clotting time)/Normal(Clotting time)). However, numerical results vary according to the method used for testing, thus making difficult the between-method and between-laboratory comparison of results. The hypothesis that the standardization model currently employed for the international normalized ratio for patients on warfarin is valid also for LA standardization has been taken into consideration. The model calls for the determination of a LA-sensitivity index (LASI) for each commercial method for LA detection against a common standard method. The LASI is then used to convert the LA-ratio into a scale called standardized LA-ratio (SLA-ratio) according to the equation SLA-ratio = (LA-ratio)(LASI). The model proved effective in minimizing the between-method variability of results for LA detection. If implemented it could be a valuable tool to improve the comparability of results obtained in different laboratories, to quantify the LA potency and thus pave the way to the organization of collaborative clinical trials aimed at assessing whether the potency of LA is a risk factor for clinical events.

Thromboplastin standards.

The Prothrombin Time (PT) test is used for monitoring of treatment with Vitamin K-antagonists (VKA). The result of the PT test should be expressed as the International Normalized Ratio (INR). Calculation of INR is based on the availability of International Standards (IS) for thromboplastin and a calibration model. Calibration of a new PT test system is performed with the appropriate IS and fresh plasma samples of healthy (normal) volunteers and patients treated with VKA. The calibration model is based on the assumption of a linear relationship between the log(PT)'s obtained with the new PT system and the reference IS for both normal and patients' samples. Patients' samples for calibration should be selected by rejecting samples beyond the 1.5-4.5 INR range. Outliers should be rejected defined as points with a perpendicular distance greater than three residual standard deviations from the line of relationship. Selection of patients' samples and rejection of outliers result in a reduction of the between-laboratory variation of calibration. In addition to monitoring of VKA, the PT is used for management of patients with chronic liver disease. Likewise, INR(liver) should be based on calibration with an IS using samples from patients with chronic liver disease.

Interlaboratory variability in the measurement of direct oral anticoagulants: results from the external quality assessment scheme.

Essentials Tests for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are not widely applied. These tests are perceived to be difficult to run and subjected to large between-lab variation. We carried out proficiency testing surveys for DOAC testing in Italy. Interlab variability was small and similar to that of the international normalised ratio. SUMMARY: Background Tests for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are not widely available. The perception that they are difficult to perform and are subject to large between-laboratory variation makes their implementation difficult. Aims We carried out proficiency-testing surveys for DOACs within the activity of the external quality-assessment scheme of the Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centers. Design Participants were provided with coded freeze-dried plasmas without or with graded concentrations of the three main DOACs, and asked to measure prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time and DOAC concentrations with dedicated tests. The results were centralized for statistical analysis. Results and conclusions All participants (n = 235) reported results for PT and APTT, and approximately one-third reported results for DOAC concentration. PT and APTT showed variable responsiveness to DOACs: PT was more responsive to rivaroxaban than to dabigatran or apixaban. APTT was more responsive to dabigatran than to rivaroxaban or apixaban. The thrombin time ratio (test/normal) was close to unity for plasmas without dabigatran, and was high (i.e. 7.6-fold or 15.4-fold longer than the plasma free from the drug) for plasmas containing dabigatran at low (i.e. 42 ng mL-1 ) or high (i.e. 182 ng mL-1 ) concentration. Dedicated tests were responsive to the respective drugs, and their interlaboratory variability was relatively small (overall coefficients of variation of 8.7%, 8.4% or 10.3% for dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, respectively) and was comparable to that observed within the same survey for the International Normalized Ratio (i.e. 11.4%). In conclusion, tests for DOAC measurement performed reasonably well in a national quality-control scheme. Regulatory authorities should urgently issue recommendations on their use, and clinical laboratories should make them available.

International collaborative study for the calibration of proposed International Standards for thromboplastin, rabbit, plain, and for thromboplastin, recombinant, human, plain.

Essentials Two candidate International Standards for thromboplastin (coded RBT/16 and rTF/16) are proposed. International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of proposed standards was assessed in a 20-centre study. The mean ISI for RBT/16 was 1.21 with a between-centre coefficient of variation of 4.6%. The mean ISI for rTF/16 was 1.11 with a between-centre coefficient of variation of 5.7%. SUMMARY: Background The availability of International Standards for thromboplastin is essential for the calibration of routine reagents and hence the calculation of the International Normalized Ratio (INR). Stocks of the current Fourth International Standards are running low. Candidate replacement materials have been prepared. This article describes the calibration of the proposed Fifth International Standards for thromboplastin, rabbit, plain (coded RBT/16) and for thromboplastin, recombinant, human, plain (coded rTF/16). Methods An international collaborative study was carried out for the assignment of International Sensitivity Indexes (ISIs) to the candidate materials, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for thromboplastins and plasma used to control oral anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists. Results Results were obtained from 20 laboratories. In several cases, deviations from the ISI calibration model were observed, but the average INR deviation attributabled to the model was not greater than 10%. Only valid ISI assessments were used to calculate the mean ISI for each candidate. The mean ISI for RBT/16 was 1.21 (between-laboratory coefficient of variation [CV]: 4.6%), and the mean ISI for rTF/16 was 1.11 (between-laboratory CV: 5.7%). Conclusions The between-laboratory variation of the ISI for candidate material RBT/16 was similar to that of the Fourth International Standard (RBT/05), and the between-laboratory variation of the ISI for candidate material rTF/16 was slightly higher than that of the Fourth International Standard (rTF/09). The candidate materials have been accepted by WHO as the Fifth International Standards for thromboplastin, rabbit plain, and thromboplastin, recombinant, human, plain.

Variability of cut-off values for the detection of lupus anticoagulants: results of an international multicenter multiplatform study.

Essentials Between-lab variations of cut-off values in lupus anticoagulant detection are unknown. Cut-off values were calculated in 11 labs each testing plasma from 120 donors with 3 platforms. Major variation was observed even within the same platform. Cut-off values determined in different labs are not interchangeable. SUMMARY: Background Cut-off values for interpretation of lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection are poorly investigated. Aims (i) To assess whether results from healthy donors were normally distributed and (ii) the between-laboratories differences in cut-off values for screening, mixing and LA confirmation when calculated as 99th or 95th centiles, and (iii) to assess their impact on the detection rate for LA. Methods Each of 11 laboratories using one of the three widely used commercial platforms for LA detection was asked to collect plasmas from 120 healthy donors and to perform screening, mixing and LA confirmation with two methods (activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT] and dilute Russell viper venom [dRVV]). A common set of LA-positive or LA-negative freeze-dried plasmas was used to assess the LA detection rate. Results were centralized (Milano) for statistical analysis. Results and conclusions (i) Clotting times or ratios for healthy subjects were not normally distributed in the majority of cases. The take-home message is that cut-off values should be determined preferably by the non-parametric method based on centiles. (ii) There were relatively large inter-laboratory cut-off variations even within the same platform and the variability was marginally attenuated when results were expressed as ratios (test-to-normal pooled plasma). The take-home message is that cut-off values should be determined locally. (iii) There were differences between cut-off values calculated as 99th or 95th centiles that translate into a different LA detection rate (the lower the centile the greater the detection rate). The take-home message is that cut-off values determined as the 95th centile allow a better LA detection rate.

International collaborative study for the calibration of a proposed international standard for thromboplastin, rabbit, plain.

BACKGROUND: A preparation of rabbit brain thromboplastin, provisionally coded 04/162, is proposed as a candidate for the World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for thromboplastin (rabbit, plain), meant to replace the IS coded RBT/90 (rabbit, plain), stocks of which are now exhausted. RESULTS: The preparation was calibrated in an international collaborative study involving 21 laboratories from 13 countries and the calibration was performed against the existing WHO-IS (i.e. rTF/95 and OBT/79) and other Certified Reference Materials from the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements of the European Commission (i.e. CRM149 S) and from the European Action on Anticoagulation (i.e. EUTHR-01). An additional candidate rabbit brain thromboplastin coded as 04/106 was also included in the study. On the basis of predefined criteria (the within- and between-laboratory precision of the calibration and the conformity to the calibration model), 04/162 was the preferred candidate. CONCLUSIONS: The assigned International Sensitivity Index value was 1.15 and the inter-laboratory SD and coefficient of variation were 0.057% and 4.9%, respectively.

Effect of tamoxifen on measurements of hemostasis in healthy women.

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen citrate is being evaluated for primary prevention of breast cancer, but this drug with estrogen-like properties may cause changes in the hemostatic system that would increase the risk of thrombosis. METHODS: Women who had undergone hysterectomy were consecutively enrolled in the placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind Breast Carcinoma Chemoprevention Tamoxifen Study, which was designed to evaluate the efficacy of oral tamoxifen citrate (20 mg/d). Our substudy of hemostasis and lipid measurements included the first 68 consecutive women assigned to tamoxifen (n = 31) or placebo (n = 37). Blood specimens were obtained before treatment and after 1,2,4, and 6 months of treatment. Measurements included blood cell counts, lipid levels, coagulation activation markers, clotting factors, and anticoagulant and fibrinolysis proteins. RESULTS: Hematocrit and hemoglobin and platelet levels fell slightly but significantly in women treated with tamoxifen. No between-treatment differences were observed in any of the clotting factors. Naturally occurring anticoagulant proteins such as antithrombin and protein C fell slightly in women treated with tamoxifen. However, no significant changes were observed in any of the markers of activated coagulation or fibrinolysis (fibrinopeptide A, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, D-dimer). Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels fell significantly in women treated with tamoxifen. CONCLUSIONS: Tamoxifen induced a modest decrease in anticoagulant proteins, but without biochemical signs of activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis. Tamoxifen improved the lipid profile and induced changes in blood cell counts, which should determine an improvement in blood rheologic factors. These preliminary findings seem to justify continuation of the double-blind study in healthy women, but only direct comparison of thromboembolic complications in the 2 treatment groups will establish whether tamoxifen carries a risk of thrombosis.

Measurement of von Willebrand factor cleaving protease (ADAMTS-13): results of an international collaborative study involving 11 methods testing the same set of coded plasmas.

BACKGROUND: ADAMTS-13 is a von Willebrand factor (VFW)-cleaving protease. Its congenital or acquired deficiency is associated with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and more rarely with the hemolytic uremic syndrome. We report on a survey evaluating 11 methods for ADAMTS-13 measurement performed in different labs. DESIGN: Two plasmas, one normal and one from a patient with familial TTP, were mixed at the co-ordinating center to prepare 6 plasmas with 0%, 10%, 20%, 40%, 80% and 100% ADAMTS-13 levels. Each plasma was aliquoted and assembled into sets of 60 (coded from 1 to 60), each containing 10 copies of the original 6 plasmas. Plasmas were frozen and shipped in dry ice to 10 labs with a common frozen reference plasma. Laboratories were asked to measure ADAMTS-13 with their methods. Results were sent to the coordinating center for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of the 10 methods performed under static conditions 9 were quantitative and one was semiquantitative. One method performed under flow conditions evaluated the extent of cleavage of endothelial cell-derived ultralarge VWF string-like structures and expressed results as deficient, normal, or borderline. Linearity (expected-vs-observed levels), assessed as the squared correlation coefficient, ranged from 0.98 to 0.39. Reproducibility, expressed as the coefficient of variation for repeated measurements, ranged from < 10% to 83%. The majority of methods were able to discriminate between different ADAMTS-13 levels. The majority were able to detect the plasma with 0% level and some of them to discriminate between 0% and 10%. Overall the best performance was observed for three methods measuring cleaved VWF by ristocetin cofactor, collagen binding, and immunoblotting of degraded multimers of VWF substrate, respectively. The poor interlaboratory agreement of results was hardly affected by the use of the common standard. The method performed under flow conditions identified the plasmas with 0%, 10%, 20% and 40% activity as deficient in 7, 5, 1 and 3 of the 10 replicate measurements. The plasmas with 80% and 100% were identified as normal in all of the 10 replicate measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The survey shows varied performance, but supports an optimistic view about the reliability of current methods for ADAMTS-13.

Recombinant tissue factor as substitute for conventional thromboplastin in the prothrombin time test.

Relipidated recombinant tissue factor (r-TF) has been assessed in comparison with conventional rabbit brain thromboplastin (Manchester Reagent) for its suitability for measurement of prothrombin time (PT). The International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of r-TF calibrated against the International Reference Preparation BCT/253 (human plain) was found to be 0.96 and 1.12 with instrumental and manual techniques. Our study of plasmas from patients with congenital deficiencies of clotting factors covering a wide range of severity demonstrates that r-TF is able to detect even minor deficiencies of factors involved in the extrinsic and common coagulation pathways. Patients with liver diseases were correctly diagnosed with a prevalence of abnormal results comparable for both reagents. Between-assay reproducibility expressed as coefficient of variation was 2.3% and 3.9% at normal and abnormal PT levels. In conclusion, our evaluation shows that relipidated r-TF possesses the necessary requisites of sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility which make it a suitable candidate for PT determination both for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy and diagnosing congenital and acquired clotting factor deficiencies. Moreover, being a highly defined reagent it may constitute a step forward in the standardization of PT testing.

A comparison of two sodium citrate concentrations in two evacuated blood collection systems for prothrombin time and ISI determination.

The prothrombin time is usually measured in citrated plasma. The W.H.O. recommended concentration of sodium citrate for blood collection for laboratory control of oral anticoagulant therapy is 0.109 M. Some evacuated blood collection systems include 0.105 M sodium citrate. The purpose of the present study was to establish the difference in ISI calibration between 0.109 and 0.105 M citrate, using 7 types of thromboplastin and various types of instrumentation. The two citrate concentrations were provided in both evacuated siliconised glass tubes and in evacuated polyethylene terephtalate (PET) tubes. The ISI difference between the two citrate concentrations was 5.4% for one system but not greater than 3% for all other systems when blood samples were collected with either siliconized glass or PET tubes. Most of the ISI differences between the two citrate concentrations were not significant at the 5% level. It is concluded that the ISI differences between 0.105 M and 0.109 M citrate are not of practical importance. In contrast, ISI differences between siliconised glass and PET tubes, using either 0.105 or 0.109 M citrate, were significant (p <0.05) for most thromboplastin systems and amounted to 7%. ISI interchange between these glass and PET tubes could induce INR differences amounting to 14%, which could affect clinical dosage of oral anticoagulants.

Determination of the International Sensitivity Index of a new near-patient testing device to monitor oral anticoagulant therapy--overview of the assessment of conformity to the calibration model.

A key issue for the reliable use of new devices for the laboratory control of oral anticoagulant therapy with the INR is their conformity to the calibration model. In the past, their adequacy has mostly been assessed empirically without reference to the calibration model and the use of International Reference Preparations (IRP) for thromboplastin. In this study we reviewed the requirements to be fulfilled and applied them to the calibration of a new near-patient testing device (TAS, Cardiovascular Diagnostics) which uses thromboplastin-containing test cards for determination of the INR. On each of 10 working days citrated whole blood and plasma samples were obtained from 2 healthy subjects and 6 patients on oral anticoagulants. PT testing on whole blood and plasma was done with the TAS and parallel testing for plasma by the manual technique with the IRP CRM 149S. Conformity to the calibration model was judged satisfactory if the following requirements were met: (i) there was a linear relationship between paired log-PTs (TAS vs CRM 149S); (ii) the regression line drawn through patients data points, passed through those of normals; (iii) the precision of the calibration expressed as the CV of the slope was <3%. A good linear relationship was observed for calibration plots for plasma and whole blood (r = 0.98). Regression lines drawn through patients data points, passed through those of normals. The CVs of the slope were in both cases 2.2% and the ISIs were 0.965 and 1.000 for whole blood and plasma. In conclusion, our study shows that near-patient testing devices can be considered reliable tools to measure INR in patients on oral anticoagulants and provides guidelines for their evaluation.

Standardization of the APC resistance test. Effects of normalization of results by means of pooled normal plasma.

Results for APC resistance tests are expressed as the ratio of the clotting time with and without APC (APC ratio). Normalization by dividing the patient's APC ratio by that of the pooled normal plasma (PNP) (n-APC ratio) was proposed to minimize between-lot reagent variability. To evaluate the merits of different expressions of the results, sets of 80 coded frozen plasmas from carriers (n = 30), non-carriers (n = 30) of the FV:Q506 mutation and 10 copies each of two control plasmas were sent to 7 expert laboratories which were asked to assess APC resistance by their methods. Results were expressed as APC ratio and n-APC ratio by the local PNP and 2 common PNP (A and B). These contained plasmas from the same (n = 20) non-carriers. In PNP A, plasma from one non-carrier was replaced with that from one heterozygous carrier. The merits of different expression of results were judged by (i) within-laboratory reproducibility: (ii) discrimination of carriers from non-carriers: (iii) between-method comparability of results. The influence of FV:Q506 plasma in the preparation of PNP was also assessed. Reproducibility, generally good even with results expressed as APC ratio (median CV 4.6% and 3.0% for normal and abnormal control), was not changed by normalization. Discrimination did not change whatever the method of result expression. Between-method comparability of results was scarcely affected by normalization with the local PNP, whereas it was considerably improved after normalization with the common PNP, but only for the non-carriers. APC ratios for PNP A by all methods were significantly lower than those for PNP B. Thus, the presence of mutant FV in a proportion as low as 2.5% may reduce the APC ratio of the PNP.

Poor comparability of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 values measured by two commercial ELISA methods: influence of different anticoagulants and standards.

We compared F 1 + 2 results obtained with two commercial ELISA methods (Behring and Baxter) assaying the same plasma samples. There was little correlation between the results of the two methods, as shown by the low correlation coefficient (r = 0.50) and by low percentage of concordant classification (normal or abnormal) of the samples (24%). Such poor correlation is probably due to the different anticoagulants suggested, because correlation improved when both methods were carried out in plasmas collected with the same anticoagulant. However, the Baxter method still gave significantly lower F 1 + 2 values than the Behring method. Assuming that this difference is due to the use of standards with different F 1 + 2 concentrations, the standards from Behring and Baxter were evaluated by both methods. Parallel dose-response curves were obtained when the standards were run by the Behring method but not by the Baxter method, indicating that the two standards are qualitatively different. This study demonstrates that the two F 1 + 2 methods give different values for the same samples and that these values are poorly correlated. Standardization of the F 1 + 2 assays cannot be achieved easily simply by using a common standard and the use of different anticoagulants appears to be the main reason for poor standardization.

Calibration of local systems with lyophilized calibrant plasmas improves the interlaboratory variability of the INR in the Italian external quality assessment scheme.

Calibration with lyophilized calibrant plasmas certified in terms of PT with International Reference Preparations for thromboplastin has been proposed to minimize the effect of coagulometers on the INR. Aim of this study was to test the ability of local calibration with lyophilized calibrant plasmas, combined with a modified statistical approach, to improve the interlaboratory variability of the INR measured on two test plasmas (one coumarin and one artificially-depleted) by participants in the External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS). Sets of lyophilized calibrant and test plasmas were sent to the participants in the EQAS, who were asked to determine PT with their own reagent/ instrument combination (local system). Results were returned as PT together with information on the type of local system, the stated International Sensitivity Index (ISI) and the geometric mean of PTs determined by testing with the local system fresh plasmas from 20 healthy subjects. Ninety-two participants using 9 and 11 brands of reagents and instruments returned results. The CV of the INR determined with the stated ISI for the coumarin (Mean INR = 4.39) and artificially-depleted (Mean INR = 4.23) test plasmas were 11.2% and 10.3% and were reduced on the average by 34% and 54%, respectively, when the INR was calculated with the local ISI. In conclusions, results from this field study involving laboratories and testing systems representative of the real situation in oral anticoagulant monitoring in our country, indicate that local calibration by artificially-depleted plasmas, combined with the proposed statistical approach, is suitable to improve the interlaboratory agreement on the INR.

Assessment of the influence of citrate concentration on the International Normalized Ratio (INR) determined with twelve reagent-instrument combinations.

Citrate concentration is one of the variables that can affect coagulation tests. However, few studies have so far been performed to assess the magnitude of this effect on coagulation tests in general and PT in particular. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of influence of citrate concentration on the PT test with results expressed as INR. Twelve reagent-instrument combinations (systems) were calibrated vs. the Reference Preparation BCT/441 using plasmas collected in either 105 mM or 129 mM citrate from normals and anticoagulated patients (OAT). PTs for plasmas collected in 129 mM citrate were longer than those collected in 105 mM both for normals and patients on OAT, but the ratios (patient-to-normal clotting times) for the two citrate concentrations were significantly different in many instances, implying that the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) is also different. ISIs for calibrations with plasmas collected in 105 mM were greater (up to 10%) than those with plasmas collected in 129 mM citrate. When PT ratios were transformed into INR using crossover ISIs (i.e., plasmas collected in 105 mM and ISI determined with plasmas collected in 129 mM citrate, or vice versa) we found that an INR of 4.5 could be up to 20% apart from the value that would have been obtained if the appropriate ISI was used. Moreover, if the ISI determined with the manual technique was used to convert PTs obtained with a particular instrument into INR, the effect of citrate concentration was even greater (INR difference up to 64%). Should these observations be valid for other systems, they might provide additional explanations for the frequent reports which document discrepancies in the INR determined with different systems to which incorrect ISI might have been applied. World-wide consensus on a single citrate concentration to collect patients' as well as lyophilized plasmas to be used in External Quality Assessment Schemes and for local system calibration is therefore urgently needed.

International collaborative study for the calibration of a proposed reference preparation for thromboplastin, human recombinant, plain. On behalf of the Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation.

Stocks of the International Reference Preparation (IRP) for thromboplastin, human, plain, coded BCT/253 and held by the World Health Organization (WHO) are nearly exhausted and must be replaced. For practical reasons the choice of the replacement candidate was restricted to two available human recombinant preparations which were coded as X/95 and Y/95 and calibrated in an international collaborative study involving 19 laboratories from Europe, Australia, Canada and Argentina. To minimize the differences between routes of calibration, the two candidates were calibrated against the existing WHO-IRP from human, rabbit and bovine origin and the final ISI was the resultant average value. On the basis of predefined criteria (i.e., within- and between-laboratory precision of the calibration and the conformity to the calibration model), X/95 was the preferred candidate. The assigned ISI (SE of the mean) value is 0.940 (0.0060) and the interlaboratory coefficient of variation 4.7%.

Effects of hirudin on activated partial thromboplastin time determined with ten different reagents.

Hirudin prolongs the APTT when added to normal plasma and the extent of prolongation depends on the type of reagent used. The aim of this study was to compare the dose-response curves of 10 widely used APTT reagents for linearity and parallelism. On each of 10 working days a normal pooled plasma was mixed with increasing amounts of recombinant hirudin (HBW023) ranging from 0 to 5 micrograms/ml and tested for APTT by photo optical coagulometer. Within each working day, clotting times were measured in duplicate and the order of testing with each reagent was changed every day. Results were expressed as ratios of clotting times with hirudin to clotting times without hirudin, and the values plotted against the hirudin concentration on a log-log scale. The dose-response curves for all reagents were linear over 0.3-1.2 micrograms/ml. The reagent-related slopes ranged from 0.225 +/- 0.003 to 0.303 +/- 0.003 (mean +/- SE) and were significantly different. Precision studies indicated that the least sensitive reagent was also the least precise. These findings indicate that the clotting time values obtained for patients treated with hirudin will vary depending on the APTT reagent used.

Are capillary whole blood coagulation monitors suitable for the control of oral anticoagulant treatment by the international normalized ratio?

The 512 Coagulation Monitor is a portable coagulation photometer that uses disposable cartridges containing a lyophilized rabbit brain thromboplastin to measure the PT for capillary whole blood. It has been proposed as a suitable system for patient self monitoring at home, but its performance has never been thoroughly assessed for results expressed as International Normalized Ratio (INR). In particular, there is no available information about the adequacy of the WHO calibration model with the Monitor. The aims of the study were to determine the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) against the secondary International Reference Preparation for rabbit thromboplastin and to assess the precision of the INR. The study demonstrates that the Monitor can be calibrated with the WHO model, because log-transformed PTs for patients stabilized on oral anticoagulants and normal individuals are linearly related and because the same orthogonal regression line describes patient and normal data points adequately. However, the ISI calculated in this study (2.715) is higher than that adopted by the manufacturer (2.036). The between-assay reproducibility of the Monitor is acceptable (CV = 9.7%) with results expressed in seconds, but become unacceptably poor when the results are converted into INR (CV = 18.8%) because of the high ISI value of the thromboplastin used. We think that the Monitor might be suitable for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy if the manufacturer would provide a more sensitive thromboplastin in the cartridges.