Management of heart failure in cardiac amyloidosis using an ambulatory diuresis clinic.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent congestion in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) remains a management challenge, often requiring high dose diuretics and frequent hospitalizations. Innovative outpatient strategies are needed to effectively manage heart failure (HF) in patients with CA. Ambulatory diuresis has not been well studied in restrictive cardiomyopathy. Therefore, we aimed to examine the outcomes of an ambulatory diuresis clinic in the management of congestion related to CA. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively studied patients with CA seen in an outpatient HF disease management clinic for (1) safety outcomes of ambulatory intravenous (IV) diuresis and (2) health care utilization. Forty-four patients with CA were seen in the clinic a total of 203 times over 6 months. Oral diuretics were titrated at 96 (47%) visits. IV diuretics were administered at 56 (28%) visits to 17 patients. There were no episodes of severe acute kidney injury or symptomatic hypotension. There was a significant decrease in emergency department and inpatient visits and associated charges after index visit to the clinic. The proportion of days hospitalized per 1000 patient days of follow-up decreased as early as 30 days (147.3 vs 18.1/1000 patient days of follow-up, P< .001) and persisted through 180 days (33.6 vs 22.9/1000 patient days of follow-up, P< .001) pre- vs post-index visit to the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of ambulatory IV diuresis in patients with CA. Our findings also suggest that use of a HF disease management clinic may reduce acute care utilization in patients with CA. Leveraging multidisciplinary outpatient HF clinics may be an effective alternative to hospitalization in patients with HF due to CA, a population who otherwise carries a poor prognosis and contributes to high health care burden.

Assisted versus referred pharmacy smoking interventions for patients with thoracic malignancies or pulmonary nodules.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is the foremost preventable cause of death, disease, and disability in the United States. Continued tobacco use in malignant disease contributes to treatment failure and disease progression. Pharmacists are pivotal to tobacco cessation counseling, management, and follow up. METHODS: This retrospective, observational, single-center, cohort study of ambulatory cancer patients was designed to assess the impact of assisted versus "Ask, Advise, Refer" (AAR) pharmacy-driven smoking cessation interventions on patient-reported quit rates at 30- and 90-days. Those included were currently smoking or recently quit adults with a thoracic malignancy or nodule. Those in the assisted intervention were offered nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for free according to a personalized quit plan. After July 1, 2020, patients were enrolled in the AAR intervention, whereby participants were referred to obtain NRT through insurance or external resources. Both clinical interventions were provided as standard of care. RESULTS: 129 participants were included (assisted n = 83; AAR n = 46) with baseline characteristics evenly matched. After excluding those unable to be reached at 30-days, 30 (44.8%) in the assisted intervention quit smoking versus 11 (27.5%) in the AAR intervention, p = 0.08. Lung cancer patients were more likely to report quitting at 30-days in the assisted intervention, 16 (64.0%) versus 5 (29.4%) in the AAR intervention, p = 0.03. After excluding those unable to be reached at 90-days, 30 (45.5%) in the assisted intervention quit versus 11 (35.5%) in the AAR intervention, p = 0.35. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy-led smoking cessation initiatives that include providing NRT are especially impactful on smoking cessation in lung cancer patients.

Comparison of Clinical Scoring Tools to Predict Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Cardiac Surgery.

The 4Ts and HIT-Expert Probability (HEP) scoring tools for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) have not been validated in cardiac surgery patients, and the reported sensitivity and specificity of the Post-Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB) scoring tool vary widely in the 2 available analyses. It remains unclear which of the available scoring tools most accurately predicts HIT in this population. Forty-nine HIT-positive patients who underwent on-pump cardiac surgery within a 6-year period were loosely matched to 98 HIT-negative patients in a 1:2 case-control design. The 4Ts, HEP, and CPB scores were calculated for each patient. Sensitivity and specificity of each tool were calculated using standard cut-offs. The Youden method was utilized to determine optimal cut-offs within receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of each score, after which sensitivities and specificities were recalculated. Using standard cut-offs, the sensitivities for the CPB, HEP, and 4Ts scores were 100%, 93.9%, and 69.4%, respectively. Specificities were 51%, 49%, and 71.4%, respectively. The AUC of the scoring tool ROC curves were 0.961 for the CPB score, 0.773 for the HEP score, and 0.805 for the 4Ts score. Using the Youden method-derived optimal cut-off of  ≥3 points on the CPB score, sensitivity remained 100% with improved specificity to 88.9%. The CPB score is the preferred HIT clinical scoring tool in adult cardiac surgery patients, whereas the 4Ts score performed less effectively. A cut-off of ≥ 3 points on the CPB score could increase specificity while preserving high sensitivity, which should be validated in a prospective evaluation.

Association of Heparin Dose, Route, Timing, and Duration With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) varies by population and the type and duration of heparinoid exposure; however, the association with unfractionated heparin (UFH) dose, route, timing, and duration has not been evaluated in cardiac surgery patients. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study matched HIT-positive adult cardiac surgery patients (positive platelet factor 4 immunoglobulin G and serotonin release assays) 1:1 with HIT-negative controls. Total UFH dose, route, timing, and duration were compared between groups. RESULTS: The study included 124 patients, 92 male (74%), with mean age of 65 ± 11 years. Significantly more HIT-positive patients received intravenous UFH preoperatively or postoperatively compared with patients without HIT (55 [88.7%] vs 23 [37.1%]; P < .001). There were no significant differences regarding intraoperative or subcutaneous UFH dose or duration. When controlling for obesity and cardiopulmonary bypass duration using multivariable conditional logistic regression, the odds of HIT were increased 10-fold in patients who received preoperative or postoperative intravenous UFH continuous infusion (odds ratio 10.2, 95% confidence interval, 3.1 to 33.7; P < .001). Receiver-operating characteristic curves demonstrated that receiving preoperative or postoperative intravenous UFH infusion total dose greater than 32,000 units (sensitivity 82%, specificity 74%, area under the curve 0.78) or longer than 7 hours (sensitivity 87%, specificity 68%, area under the curve 0.77) was associated with HIT. CONCLUSIONS: Odds of HIT were increased 10-fold in adult cardiac surgery patients receiving preoperative or postoperative intravenous UFH infusion. Intraoperative UFH dose and subcutaneous route were not associated with HIT. Future study should evaluate incorporation of intravenous UFH administration, dose, and duration in HIT scoring tools for cardiac surgery patients.

Highest Obesity Category Associated With Largest Decrease in N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitutes half of hospitalized heart failure cases and is commonly associated with obesity. The role of natriuretic peptide levels in hospitalized obese patients with HFpEF, however, is not well defined. We sought to evaluate change in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels by obesity category and related clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF hospitalized for acute heart failure. Methods and Results A total of 89 patients with HFpEF hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure were stratified into 3 obesity categories: nonobese (body mass index [BMI] <30.0 kg/m2, 19%), obese (BMI 30.0-39.9 kg/m2, 29%), and severely obese (BMI ≥40.0 kg/m2, 52%), and compared for percent change in NT-proBNP during hospitalization and clinical outcomes. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with normal NT-proBNP (≤125 pg/mL) and elevated NT-proBNP. Admission NT-proBNP was inversely related to BMI category (nonobese, 2607 pg/mL [interquartile range, IQR: 2112-5703]; obese, 1725 pg/mL [IQR: 889-3900]; and severely obese, 770.5 pg/mL [IQR: 128-1268]; P<0.01). Severely obese patients had the largest percent change in NT-proBNP with diuresis (-64.8% [95% CI, -85.4 to -38.9] versus obese -40.4% [95% CI, -74.3 to -12.0] versus nonobese -46.9% [95% CI, -57.8 to -37.4]; P=0.03). Nonobese and obese patients had significantly worse 1-year survival compared with severely obese patients (63% versus 76% versus 95%, respectively; P<0.01). Patients with normal NT-proBNP (13%) were younger, with higher BMI, less atrial fibrillation, and less structural heart disease than those with elevated NT-proBNP. Conclusions In hospitalized patients with HFpEF, NT-proBNP was inversely related to BMI with the largest decrease in NT-proBNP seen in the highest obesity category. These findings have implications for the role of NT-proBNP in the diagnosis and assessment of treatment response in obese patients with HFpEF.

Randomized Evaluation of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Dopamine: The ROPA-DOP Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare a continuous infusion diuretic strategy versus an intermittent bolus diuretic strategy, with the addition of low-dose dopamine (3 µg/kg/min) in the treatment of hospitalized patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). BACKGROUND: HFpEF patients are susceptible to development of worsening renal function (WRF) when hospitalized with acute heart failure; however, inpatient treatment strategies to achieve safe and effective diuresis in HFpEF patients have not been studied to date. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, clinical trial, 90 HFpEF patients hospitalized with acute heart failure were randomized within 24 h of admission to 1 of 4 treatments: 1) intravenous bolus furosemide administered every 12 h; 2) continuous infusion furosemide; 3) intermittent bolus furosemide with low-dose dopamine; and 4) continuous infusion furosemide with low-dose dopamine. The primary endpoint was percent change in creatinine from baseline to 72 h. Linear and logistic regression analyses with tests for interactions between diuretic and dopamine strategies were performed. RESULTS: Compared to intermittent bolus strategy, the continuous infusion strategy was associated with higher percent increase in creatinine (continuous infusion: 16.01%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.58% to 23.45% vs. intermittent bolus: 4.62%; 95% CI: -1.15% to 10.39%; p = 0.02). Low-dose dopamine had no significant effect on percent change in creatinine (low-dose dopamine: 12.79%; 95% CI: 5.66% to 19.92%, vs. no-dopamine: 8.03%; 95% CI: 1.44% to 14.62%; p = 0.33). Continuous infusion was also associated with greater risk of WRF than intermittent bolus (odds ratio [OR]: 4.32; 95% CI: 1.26 to 14.74; p = 0.02); no differences in WRF risk were seen with low-dose dopamine. No significant interaction was seen between diuretic strategy and low-dose dopamine (p > 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: In HFpEF patients hospitalized with acute heart failure, low-dose dopamine had no significant impact on renal function, and a continuous infusion diuretic strategy was associated with renal impairment. (Diuretics and Dopamine in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [ROPA-DOP]; NCT01901809).