A Randomized Trial of Creatine-kinase Leak After Rosuvastatin in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLEAR-PCI).

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed at the same time of the peak concentration of rosuvastatin to reduce periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI). BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest that a high dose of statin before PCI reduce periprocedural myocardial infarction. However, there is no information regarding the elective PCI performed at the time of the peak of statin concentration to reduce PMI. METHODS: From 2001 to 2013, at a single center in Brazil we enrolled 544 patients who underwent elective PCI and after exclusions for baseline biases in clinical and angiographic characteristics, yielding 528 patients, we prospectively randomly assigned them to either a high loading dose of Rosuvastatin before PCI (n = 264) or standard treatment (n = 264). After exclusions for biases in procedural characteristics a total of 487 patients underwent to end points analysis. The primary outcome was the incidence of MB fraction of creatine kinase (CK-MB) greater than three times the upper limit of normal. RESULTS: The primary end point occurred in 7.6% in the rosuvastatin and 4.8% in the control group (P = 0.200). There was a higher incidence in elevation of CK-MB than normal baseline in the rosuvastatin (67.1% vs 59.2%, P = 0.701). There was no difference in major adverse event (0% in the rosuvastatin group vs 0.8% in control).

Volumetric analysis of in-stent intimal hyperplasia in diabetic patients treated with or without abciximab: results of the Diabetes Abciximab steNT Evaluation (DANTE) randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: In diabetic patients in the Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting (EPISTENT) trial, abciximab reduced target vessel revascularization by approximately 50% compared with placebo. Whether this is a result of a lower restenosis rate caused by inhibition of intimal hyperplasia remains to be defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: The purpose of this study was to determine whether abciximab at the time of stent implantation would reduce in-stent intimal hyperplasia measured by intravascular ultrasound at 6-month follow-up in type 2 diabetics. Ninety-six diabetic patients (96 lesions) who underwent elective stent implantation for a de novo lesion in a native coronary artery were randomly assigned to receive abciximab or no abciximab. In-stent intimal hyperplasia volume, expressed as percentage of stent volume, did not differ between groups: 41.3+/-21.0% for those treated with abciximab versus 40.5+/-18.3% for those treated without abciximab (P=0.9). There were also no significant differences in angiographic minimal luminal diameter at follow-up (1.74+/-0.69 versus 1.66+/-0.63 mm; P=0.5), late loss (1.03+/-0.63 versus 1.07+/-0.58 mm; P=0.7), restenosis rate (17.8% versus 22.9%; P=0.5), or cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 12 months (19.1% versus 20.4%; P=0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Six-month intravascular ultrasound volumetric analysis showed that abciximab, at the time of coronary stent implantation, was not associated with a reduction of in-stent intimal hyperplasia in diabetic patients.

Desfechos clínicos precoces e tardios após tratamento de enxertos de veia safena com stents MGuardTM vs. stents farmacológicos / Early and late clinical outcomes after saphenous vein graft treatment with MGuardTM stents vs. drug-eluting stents

Introdução: O stent MGuard™, revestido por malha polimérica microscópica, tem a finalidade de reduzir a embolização distal de fragmentos durante a intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) em enxertos de veia safena (EVS). Avaliamos os desfechos clínicos precoces e tardios de pacientes submetidos à ICP de EVS com stents MGuard™ vs. stents farmacológicos (SF). Métodos: Estudo observacional, retrospectivo, realizado em dois centros terciários, envolvendo uma coorte de pacientes com lesões em EVS, tratados de forma eletiva ou de emergência com stents MGuard™ ou SF. Resultados: Foram incluídos 271 pacientes, sendo 220 tratados com SF. O Grupo MGuard™ apresentou maior proporção de mulheres (25,5% vs. 10,5%; p=0,01), com média de idades de 65,0 ± 13,9 anos vs. 69,0 ± 9,6 anos (p = 0,06). O Grupo SF utilizou com maior frequência filtro de proteção distal (5,8% vs. 10,0%; p = 0,001). Sucesso angiográfico foi obtido na maioria dos casos (96,2% vs. 98,0%; p = 0,22). O Grupo MGuard™ teve menores taxas de eventos cardiovasculares adversos maiores (ECAM) na fase hospitalar que o Grupo SF (1,9% vs. 13,6%; p = 0,01) devido exclusivamente à menor incidência de infarto periprocedimento. Entretanto, a taxa de ECAM em 1 ano foi maior no grupo MGuard™ (14,3% vs. 4,4%; p = 0,01) à custa de maior taxa de revascularização da lesão alvo (7,1% vs. 1,3%; p = 0,048). Conclusões: A utilização de stent MGuard™ resultou em redução de eventos na fase hospitalar, porém, no longo prazo, os SF foram superiores em reduzir desfechos maiores, sobretudo a necessidade de revascularização da lesão alvo

Background: The MGuard™ stent, which has a microscopic polymer mesh coating, is intended to reduce the distal embolization of fragments during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in saphenous vein grafts (SVG). This study evaluated the early and late clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PCI in SVG with MGuard™ stents vs. drug­eluting stents (DES). Methods: Observational, retrospective study conducted at two tertiary centers, involving a cohort of patients with SVG lesions submitted to elective or emergency treatment with MGuard™ stents or DES. Results: A total of 271 patients were included, of whom 220 were treated with DES. The MGuard™ group had a higher proportion of women (25.5% vs. 10.5%; p = 0.01), with a mean age of 65.0 ± 13.9 years vs. 69.0 ± 9.6 years (p = 0.06). The DES group more frequently used distal protection filter (5.8% vs. 10.0%; p = 0.001). Angiographic success was attained in most cases (96.2% vs. 98.0%; p = 0.22). The MGuard™ group had lower rates of early major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) than the DES group (1.9% vs. 13.6%; p = 0.01), due solely to the lower incidence of periprocedural infarction. However, the MACE rate at 1 year was higher in the MGuard™ group (14.3% vs. 4.4%; p = 0.01) at the expense of a higher rate of target lesion revascularization (7.1% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.048). Conclusions: The use of the MGuard™ stent resulted in a reduction of events during hospitalization; however, in the long term the DES were superior in reducing major outcomes, mainly the need for target lesion revascularization

Utilização da Tomografia de Coerência Ótica na Abordagem de Lesão Intermediária em Paciente com Síndrome Coronariana Aguda / Optical Coherence Tomography in the Management of Intermediate Lesion in a Patient with Acute Coronary Syndrome

A tomografia de coerência ótica fornece imagens tomográficas da microestrutura coronária em alta resolução, possibilitando detalhada caracterização dos componentes e da morfologia da placa aterosclerótica, além de acurada determinação das dimensões vasculares. Relatamos aqui o caso de um paciente com lesão intermediária, na fase subaguda de um infarto do miocárdio, no qual a tomografia de coerência ótica foi utilizada como método diagnóstico complementar para a tomada de decisão e para guiar o procedimento...

Optical coherence tomography provides high-resolution tomography imaging of the coronary microstructure, allowing for detailed characterization of atherosclerotic plaque components and morphology, in addition to an accurate determination of vascular dimensions. We report the case of a patient with an intermediate coronary lesion, presenting in the subacute phase of a myocardial infarction, in whom optical coherence tomography was used as an adjunctive diagnostic method to aid in the decision-making process and to guide the interventional procedure...

Relação Balão/Artéria e Volume de Obstrução Neontimal Após Implante de Stent Eluidor de Zotarolimus / Balloon/Artery Ratio and Neointimal Hyperplasia Volume Obstruction After Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation

Introdução: O volume de hiperplasia intimal correlaciona-se com a injúria arterial após implante de stents não farmacológicos. No entanto, pouco se sabe a respeito do impacto da injúria arterial na resposta inflamatória/proliferativa com os stents farmacológicos. Investigamos o impacto da injúria arterial, avaliada pela relação balão/artéria, no volume de obstrução neontimal, avaliado pelo ultrassom intracoronário 12 meses após o implante de stents farmacológicos com eluição de zotarolimus. Métodos: A relação balão/artéria foi definida como a razão do diâmetro máximo do balão, obtido no implante ou na pós-dilatação, e o diâmetro de referência do vaso pré-procedimento. Os pacientes foram categorizados em dois grupos: relação balão/artéria alta (≥ 1,15) e relação balão/artéria baixa (< 1,15). Resultados: Foram incluídos 86 pacientes, nos grupos relação balão/artéria baixa (n = 47/48 lesões) ou relação balão/artéria alta (n = 39/48 lesões). As características clínicas, angiográficas e do procedimento não diferiram entre os grupos, à exceção do diâmetro de referência dos vasos (2,73 ± 0,45 mm vs. 2,97 ± 0,40 mm; p = 0,01). Aos 12 meses, observou-se semelhante perda tardia intra-stent (0,59 ± 0,32 mm vs. 0,62 ± ...

Background: Intimal hyperplasia volume is correlated to arterial injury after bare-metal stenting. However, little is known about the impact of arterial injury on the inflammatory/ proliferative response with drug-eluting stents. We investigated the impact of arterial injury, evaluated by the balloon/artery ratio, on neointimal hyperplasia volume obstruction, evaluated by intravascular ultrasound, 12 months after zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation. Methods: Balloon/ artery ratio was defined as the ratio of the maximum balloon diameter, using the maximal implantation or post-dilatation pressure, and the reference diameter of the vessel obtained before the procedure. Patients were divided into two groups: high balloon/artery ratio (≥ 1.15) and low balloon/artery ratio (< 1.15). Results: A total of 86 patients were included in the low balloon/artery ratio group (n = 47/48 lesions) or high balloon/artery ratio (n = 39/48 lesions). The clinical, angiographic and procedurerelated characteristics were not different between groups, except for the vessel reference diameter (2.73 ± 0.45 mm vs. 2.97 ± 0.40 mm; p = 0.01). At 12 months, similar in-stent late loss was observed (0.59 ± 0.32 mm vs. 0.62 ± 0.42 mm; p = 0.92), as well as binary restenosis (4.2% in both cohorts; p > 0.99). Instent neointimal hyperplasia volume obstruction (15.2 ± 14.3% vs. 12.5 ± 10.1%; p = 0.62) showed no difference between groups. No correlation was observed between balloon/artery ratio ...

Comparação da retração aguda do stent entre o suporte vascular bioabsorvível eluidor de everolimus e dois diferentes stents metálicos farmacológicos / Comparison of acute stent recoil between the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold and two different drug-eluting metallic stents

INTRODUÇÃO: Suportes vasculares bioabsorvíveis (SVB) têm sido desenvolvidos como forma de fornecer sustentação à parede do vaso enquanto ocorre o processo de cicatrização, após a intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP), sendo absorvido posteriormente. Pelo fato da plataforma ser de material polimérico, existe preocupação em relação à retração aguda do dispositivo. Avaliamos aqui a retração aguda do SVB com a de dois diferentes stents farmacológicos metálicos. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos 50 pacientes com lesões não complexas. Dentre esses pacientes, 25 foram tratados com SVB e comparados a outros 25 pacientes tratados com stent de cromo-cobalto eluidor de everolimus (EES; n = 12) ou stent de aço inoxidável eluidor de biolimus (BES; n = 13). A retração aguda foi definida como a diferença entre o diâmetro médio do balão durante a pressão máxima de inflação (X) e o diâmetro médio do stent após o esvaziamento do balão (Y). A porcentagem de retração aguda foi definida como (X - Y)/X. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença significativa em relação às características clínicas e angiográficas basais. O ganho luminal agudo foi menor com o SVB comparado ao EES e ao BES (1,51 ± 0,41 mm vs. 1,76 ± 0,28 mm vs. 1,9 ± 0,42 mm; P = 0,02). A retração aguda foi de 0,21 ± 0,13 mm vs. 0,15 ± 0,08 mm vs. 0,14 ± 0,08 mm (P = 0,21), e o porcentual de retração aguda foi de 7,0 ± 4,6% vs. 5,0 ± 2,2% vs. 5,7 ± 4,1% (P = 0,16). CONCLUSÕES: O SVB demonstrou ter retração aguda ligeiramente maior, embora não significativa, que os stents metálicos farmacológicos de segunda geração.

BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have been developed to provide support to the vessel wall during the healing process after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), being reabsorbed afterwards. Because the scaffold is made of polymeric material, there is a concern regarding the acute recoil of the device. We compared the BVS acute recoil with that of two different metallic drug-eluting stents. METHODS: Fifty patients with non-complex lesions were included. Twenty-five of these patients were treated with a BVS who were compared to 25 patients treated with a cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (EES, n = 12) or a stainless steel biolimus-eluting stent (BES, n = 13). Acute recoil was defined as the difference between the mean diameter of the balloon during maximum inflation pressure (X) and the mean diameter of the stent immediately after balloon deflation (Y). The percentage of acute recoil was defined as (X-Y)/X. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. Acute luminal gain was lower with BVS compared to EES and BES (1.51 ± 0.41 mm vs. 1.76 ± 0.28 mm vs. 1.9 ± 0.42 mm, P = 0.02). Acute recoil was 0.21 ± 0.13 mm vs. 0.15 ± 0.08 mm vs. 0.14 ± 0.08 mm (P = 0.21) and the percentage of acute recoil was 7.0 ± 4.6% vs. 5.0 ± 2.2% vs. 5.7 ± 4.1% (P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: BVS presented a slightly higher, although not significant, acute recoil than the two second-generation metallic drug-eluting stents.

Evolução clínica de pacientes diabéticos tratados por intervenção coronária percutânea utilizando stents com e sem eluição de fármacos / Clinical outcome of diabetic patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting and bare metal stents

INTRODUÇÃO: A revascularização percutânea de diabéticos é frequente e a utilização de stents farmacológicos (SF) é desejável, pois estes reduzem a reestenose e a necessidade de nova revascularização. O objetivo desse estudo foi comparar os resultados clínicos de longo prazo entre diabéticos tratados com e sem SF. MÉTODOS: Analisou-se uma coorte consecutiva de diabéticos submetidos à intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) entre janeiro de 2009 e dezembro de 2012, em hospital terciário da rede pública. Esses pacientes foram acompanhados prospectivamente. RESULTADOS: Avaliamos 939 diabéticos, sendo 359 (38,3%) tratados com SF e 580 (61,7%) tratados com stents não farmacológicos (SNF). A taxa de eventos cardiovasculares adversos maiores (ECAM) em 12,6 ± 3,4 meses foi maior no grupo SNF (9,5% vs. 14,8%; risco relativo - RR = 1,56; intervalo de confiança de 95% - IC 95% 1,07-2,27; P = 0,02), assim como o óbito (2,8% vs. 6,7%; RR = 2,41; IC 95% 1,22-4,77; P < 0,01) e a revascularização do vaso alvo (3,9% vs. 7,2%; RR = 1,85; IC 95% 1,03-3,35; P = 0,04). Não foram observadas diferenças na incidência de infarto do miocárdio (1,7% vs. 0,5%; RR = 0,30; IC 95% 0,07-1,23; P = 0,08) ou acidente vascular encefálico (1,1% vs. 0,2%; RR = 0,15; IC 95% 0,01-1,37; P = 0,07). A análise multivariada revelou que a doença renal crônica (RR = 2,05; IC 95% 1,40-2,98; P < 0,01) e a síndrome coronária aguda (RR = 2,08; IC 95% 1,42-3,02; P < 0,01) foram os únicos preditores independentes de ECAM. CONCLUSÕES: Em pacientes diabéticos não selecionados, a evolução clínica tardia foi pior para os tratados com SNF. Após o ajuste das variáveis de confusão, o uso de SF não se mostrou preditor independente da redução de ECAM.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous revascularization in diabetic is frequent and the use of drug-eluting stents (DES) is desirable, reducing restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization. The objective of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of diabetic patients treated with and without DES. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 01/2009 and 12/2012 in a public tertiary hospital was prospectively followed-up. RESULTS: Nine hundred and thirty-nine diabetic patients (38.3%) treated with DES and 580 (61.7%) treated with bare metal stents (BMS) were evaluated. The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in 12.6 ± 3.4 months was greater in the BMS group (9.5% vs. 14.8%; RR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.07-2.27; P = 0.02), as well as death (2.8% vs. 6.7%; RR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.22-4.77; P < 0.01), and target vessel revascularization (3.9% vs. 7.2%; RR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.03-3.35; P = 0.04). There were no differences in the incidence of myocardial infarction (1.7% vs. 0.5%; RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.07-1.23; P = 0.08) or stroke (1.1% vs. 0.2%; RR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.01-1.37; P = 0.07). Multivariate analysis indicated that chronic kidney disease (RR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.40-2.98; P < 0.01) and acute coronary syndrome (RR, 2.08; 95% CI 1.42-3.02; P < 0.01) were the only independent predictors of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: In non-selected diabetic patients the long-term clinical outcome was worse for patients treated with BMS. After adjusting for confounding variables, the use of DES was not an independent predictor of reduced MACE.

Incidência, manejo e prognóstico de perfurações coronárias / Incidence, management and prognosis of coronary perforations

INTRODUÇÃO: A perfuração coronária na atualidade é complicação rara, mas potencialmente catastrófica. Nosso objetivo foi avaliar a incidência, os preditores, o manejo e o prognóstico das perfurações coronárias na experiência de um serviço de cardiologia intervencionista com grande volume de intervenções coronárias percutâneas (ICPs). MÉTODOS: Comparamos as características clínicas, angiográficas e do procedimento e a evolução intra-hospitalar de pacientes que apresentaram ou não perfuração coronária. Análise univariada foi realizada para determinar os preditores dessa complicação. RESULTADOS: No período de dezembro de 2007 a janeiro de 2012, 5.585 pacientes consecutivos foram submetidos a ICP e 18 apresentaram perfuração coronária (0,32%), dos quais 55,5% eram do sexo feminino e 38,9% eram diabéticos. Nesse grupo, a artéria descendente anterior foi o vaso mais frequentemente tratado (61,1%), assim como a lesão do tipo C (61,1%), e as oclusões crônicas foram abordadas em 27,8% desses casos. A maioria das perfurações coronárias (11/18) apresentou menor complexidade de acordo com a classificação de Ellis modificada, enquanto as demais foram qualificadas como graus III (6/18) ou IV (1/18). O cateter-balão foi o dispositivo responsável pela perfuração em 61,1% dos casos. Realizou-se insuflação prolongada com cateter-balão e inativação da heparina com protamina em 72,2% e 88,9% dos casos, respectivamente. Apenas 1 paciente (5,6%) necessitou de abordagem cirúrgica de emergência em decorrência de tamponamento cardíaco. Não houve óbito associado à perfuração coronária. Na análise univariada, os preditores de perfuração coronária foram: sexo feminino (P = 0,03), doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (P = 0,006) e oclusão crônica (P < 0,01). CONCLUSÕES: Em nossa experiência, a perfuração coronária foi evento raro, controlada conservadoramente na maioria dos casos e com evolução hospitalar satisfatória.

BACKGROUND: Coronary perforation is currently a rare, but potentially catastrophic complication. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence, predictors, management and prognosis of coronary perforations at a hospital with a large number of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). METHODS: Clinical, angiographic, procedural and in-hospital outcomes of patients with or without coronary perforations were compared. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the predictors of this complication. RESULTS: From December 2007 to January 2012, 5,585 consecutive patients were submitted to PCI and 18 had coronary perforation (0.32%), of whom 55.5% were female and 38.9% were diabetic. In this group, the left anterior descending artery was the most frequently treated vessel (61.1%) as well as type C lesion (61.1%) and chronic occlusions were approached in 27.8% of these cases. Most of the coronary perforations (11/18) had a lower complexity according to the modified Ellis classification, whereas the remaining perforations were classified as grades III (6/18) or IV (1/18). The balloon-catheter device was responsible for perforation in 61.1% of the cases. Prolonged inflation with a balloon-catheter and heparin reversal with protamine was performed in 72.2% and 88.9% of the cases, respectively. Only 1 patient (5.6%) required an emergency surgery due to cardiac tamponade. There were no deaths associated with coronary perforation. According to the univariate analysis, coronary perforation predictors were: female gender (P = 0.03), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.006) and chronic occlusion (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, coronary perforation was a rare event, which was managed conservatively in most of the cases and was associated with a good in-hospital outcome.

Randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of the polymer-based 17-beta estradiol-eluting stent for treatment of native coronary artery lesions: six-month results of the ETHOS I trial.

OBJECTIVES: The ETHOS I trial was the first in-human experience evaluating the safety and efficacy of two different release formulations of the 17-beta estradiol-eluting R-Stent versus uncoated control stents for the treatment of patients with single de novo native coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: Estrogens were reported to inhibit neointimal proliferation and to accelerate endothelial regeneration after coronary angioplasty and thus could be an ideal compound to deliver on a stent for the purpose of reducing in-stent restenosis. METHODS: Ninety-five patients were randomized to receive a slow-release (n = 32) or the moderate release (n = 31) formulations or the bare metal stent (n = 32). The primary end point was the 6-month percent in-stent volume obstruction by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). RESULTS: Diabetes was present in 29.5% of patients; the mean reference vessel diameter was 2.90 mm; and the mean lesion length was 13.5 mm. Primary endpoint, 6-month percent in-stent volume obstruction by IVUS, did not differ significantly between the 3 groups (31% +/- 14%, 33% +/- 11%, and 31% +/- 14%, P = 0.83). Secondary endpoints also did not differ significantly between the groups including 6-month rates of in-lesion binary angiographic restenosis (13.3%, 14.3%, and 12.5%, P = 0.98), in-stent late loss (0.82 +/- 0.49 mm, 0.86 +/- 0.53 mm, and 0.84 +/- 0.46 mm, P = 0.97), target lesion revascularization (12.5%, 6.9%, and 6.5%, P = 0.64), and major adverse cardiac events (18.8%, 10.3%, and 6.5%, P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: In this first-in-man randomized trial, the 17-beta estradiol-eluting R-Stent, in either slow- or moderate-release formulations, was well-tolerated, but showed no benefit for treatment of coronary lesions when compared to controls.

Impacto do escore SYNTAX na estratificação de risco após intervenção coronária percutânea em pacientes não-selcionados / Impact of the SYNTAX score on risk stratification after percutaneous coronaty intervention in non-selected patients

Introdução: O escore SYNTAX foi desenvolvido como ferramenta para graduar a complexidade angiográfica da doença arterial coronária em pacientes com acometimento de três vasos e/ou com lesão de tronco. Avaliamos seu papel em predizer desfechos clínicos após intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) em pacientes não-selecionados, tratados na prática diária de um hospital de referência. Métodos: Análise de pacientes submetidos a ICP entre março e setembro de 2009 e acompanhadospor até 12 meses. Os pacientes foram divididos em tercis de acordo com o escore SYNTAX. O desfecho primáriofoi composto de eventos cardíacos adversos maiores (ECAM) – óbito, infarto agudo do miocárdio não-fatal e revascularização do vaso-alvo. O desempenho do escore SYNTAX em predizer ECAM foi avaliado pela curva ROC (Receiver Operator Characteristic).Resultados: Foram incluídos 234 pacientes com escore SYNTAX médio de 11,6 ± 6,2 pontos. O tercil I apresentouescore SYNTAX < 9 (média de 5,9); o tercil II, > 9 e < 13 (média de 10,8); e o tercil III, > 13 (média de 18,3).No seguimento clínico de 7,2 ± 4,9 meses, a incidência de ECAM foi maior no tercil III em comparação com os tercis I e II (2,5% vs. 6,4% vs. 14,1%; P = 0,0075). A curva ROC mostrou área sob a curva de 0,667 (P = 0,012), indicando moderada capacidade de prever a ocorrência de ECAM nessapopulação. Conclusões: O escore SYNTAX mostrou ser útil em prever a ocorrência de ECAM em pacientes pós-ICP tratados na prática clínica diária.

Perfil clínico e evolução tardia de pacientes com trombose de stent não-farmacológico / Clinical profile and late follow-up of patients with bare-metal stent thrombosis

INTRODUÇÃO: A trombose de stent é a oclusão súbita de uma artéria tratada com stent em decorrência da formação de trombos. Nosso objetivo foi identificar variáveis associadas à trombose definitiva de stent (TS) em stents não-farmacológicos e avaliar a evolução dos pacientes que apresentaram esse evento. MÉTODOS: Foram analisados pacientes tratados consecutivamente entre dezembro de 2007 e agosto de 2012. Aqueles com TS foram comparados ao grupo sem TS quanto às características clínicas e angiográficas, e evoluções inicial e tardia. RESULTADOS: De um total de 6.495 intervenções coronárias percutâneas (ICPs), foram observados 36 (0,55%) casos de TS, sendo em 18 (50%) precoce, em 14 (38,9%) tardia e em 4 (11,1%) muito tardia. Pacientes com TS mostraram ser mais jovens, com maior prevalência de insuficiência renal crônica e síndrome coronária aguda. TS ocorrereu mais frequentemente em lesões de bifurcação (11% vs. 4%; P = 0,03) ou lesões com presença de trombo visível à angiografia (55,5% vs. 2,8%; P < 0,01). Todos os pacientes foram submetidos a ICP de emergência, sendo observados, na fase intra-hospitalar, infarto do miocárdio (IM) e óbito em 33,3% e 16,6%, respectivamente. O tempo médio de seguimento foi de 30,2 ± 16,3 meses e a descontinuação precoce da terapia antiplaquetária dupla foi verificada em 6 dos 36 casos de TS (16,7%). Na evolução tardia observou-se revascularização do vaso-alvo em 33,3%, IM em 20% e nenhum óbito adicional. CONCLUSÕES: A TS mostrou ser evento com elevada mortalidade hospitalar e alta morbidade tardia. A ocorrência desse evento foi associada a características clínicas e angiográficas de maior complexidade e a menor aderência à terapêutica antiagregante dupla.

BACKGROUND: Stent thrombosis is the sudden occlusion of a stented coronary artery due to thrombus formation. Our objective was to identify variables associated to definite stent thrombosis (ST) and assess the outcomes of patients treated with bare-metal stents. METHODS: Consecutive patients treated between December 2007 and August 2012 were analyzed. Those with ST were compared to those without ST as to clinical and angiographic characteristics, and early and late outcomes. RESULTS: Of a total of 6,495 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), 36 cases of ST (0.55%) were observed, of which 18 were early (50%), 14 (38.9%) late and 4 (11.1%) very late ST. Patients with ST were younger, with a greater prevalence of chronic renal failure and acute coronary syndromes. ST was more frequent in bifurcation lesions (11% vs. 4%; P = 0.03) or lesions with visible thrombus at angiography (55.5% vs. 2.8%; P < 0.01). All patients were submitted to emergency PCI, and in the in-hospital phase, myocardial infarction (MI) and death were observed in 33.3% and 16.6%, respectively. Mean follow-up was 30.2 ± 16.3 months and early discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy was observed in 6 of the 36 cases (16.7%). In the late follow-up target vessel revascularization was observed in 33.3%, MI in 20% and no additional deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: ST proved to be an event with high in-hospital mortality and late morbidity. The occurrence of this event was associated to more complex clinical and angiographic characteristics and lower compliance with dual antiplatelet therapy.

Intervenção coronária percutânea pela via radial: incorporação da técnica e resultados de um centro de formação em cardiologia intervencionista / Percutaneous coronary intervention by radial approach: technique incorporation and outcomes of an interventional cardiology training center

INTRODUÇÃO: A via radial evoluiu na última década para uma abordagem versátil, mostrando resultados equivalentes ou superiores aos da via femoral. Avaliamos a incorporação da técnica radial em um centro formador de cardiologistas intervencionistas, e comparamos seus resultados aos da técnica femoral. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional, unicêntrico, que incluiu pacientes consecutivos submetidos a intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) entre 2007 e 2011. A via de acesso foi escolhida pelo residente, em conjunto com o intervencionista responsável pela ICP. Comparamos o desfecho combinado de óbito, infarto do miocárdio (IM) periprocedimento, acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico ou sangramentos maiores entre os dois grupos na fase hospitalar. RESULTADOS: Foram submetidos a ICP 5.545 pacientes, 29,8% pela via radial e 70,2% pela via femoral. A média de idade foi de 60,8 ± 11,7 anos, sendo 68,9% do sexo masculino e 29% portadores de síndromes coronárias agudas. Houve aumento do uso da via radial até 2010, e estabilização no ano subsequente (11,8% em 2008, 26,1% em 2009, 45,1% em 2010 e 42,6% em 2011). Os pacientes que utilizaram a via radial tinham perfil tanto clínico como angiográfico menos complexo. Não houve diferenças nos desfechos combinados (5% vs. 5,9%; P = 0,18), no óbito (0,1% vs. 0,8%; P = 0,71), no acidente vascular cerebral (0,06% vs. 0,03%; P = 0,53) ou no IM periprocedimento (4,5% vs. 3,8%; P = 0,27). Contudo, menor incidência de sangramentos maiores (0,4% vs. 1,3%; P < 0,01) e de complicações vasculares (0,5% vs. 2,2%; P < 0,01) foi observada com a via radial. CONCLUSÕES: Em nosso centro formador de cardiologistas intervencionistas, a ICP pela via radial foi rapidamente incorporada, e trouxe, para pacientes selecionados, resultados equivalentes aos da via femoral, com redução dos índices de sangramentos maiores e de complicações vasculares.

BACKGROUND: The radial artery access has evolved into a flexible approach in the last decade, showing similar or superior results when compared to the femoral approach. We assessed the incorporation of the radial artery access in a training center for interventional cardiologists and compared the results to those of the femoral artery access. METHODS: Observational, single-center study, including consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2007 and 2011. The access route was chosen by the resident along with the interventionist responsible for PCI. We compared the composite endpoint of death, periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke or major bleeding between the two groups during hospitalization. RESULTS: Among 5,545 patients undergoing PCI, 29.8% used the radial approach and 70.2 used the femoral approach. Mean age was 60.8 ± 11.7 years, 68.9% were males and 29% had acute coronary syndromes. There was an increase in the use of the radial approach until 2010 and stabilization in the subsequent year (11.8% in 2008, 26.2% in 2009, 45.1% in 2010 and 42.6% in 2011). Patients using the radial approach had a less complex clinical and angiographic profile. There were no differences in the composite endpoint (5% vs. 5.9%; P = 0.18), death (0.1% vs. 0.8%; P = 0.71), stroke (0.06% vs. 0.03%; P = 0.53) or periprocedural MI (4.5% vs. 3.8%; P = 0.27). However, there was a lower incidence of major bleeding events (0.4% vs. 1.3%; P < 0.01) and vascular complications (0.5% vs. 2.2%; P < 0.01) with the radial approach. CONCLUSIONS: At our interventional cardiology training center, PCI through the radial approach was quickly incorporated and provided, for selected patients, outcomes similar to those of the femoral approach, with decrease of major bleeding and vascular complication rates.

Avaliação do recolhimento elástico tardio de stents farmacológicos de primeira e segunda gerações / Evaluation of the late stent recoil of first and second generation drug-eluting stents

Introdução: A expansão radial e a sustentação da parede do vaso pelos stents melhoraram os resultados da angioplastia coronária por balão. Entre as características dos stents mais contemporâneos destacam-se a redução da espessura de suas hastes e plataformas com novos desenhos, mas não está claro se essas modificações podem resultar em próteses de menor força radial e suscetíveis a recolhimento elástico, especialmente em evoluções muito tardias. Este estudo teve como objetivo investigar se ocorre recolhimento elástico tardio em duas gerações de stents farmacológicos (SFs) em avaliação por ultrassom intracoronário (USIC) seriado a longo prazo. Métodos: O estudo avaliou 25 pacientes com lesões coronárias únicas, de novo, tratados com SFs (12 CypherTM e 13 BioMatrixTM) e submetidos a USIC pós-procedimento e 4-6 meses e 4-5 anos após o implante. Foram comparados os volumes dos stents no período compreendido entre o procedimento índice e os reestudos de médio e longo prazos. O recolhimento elástico do stent foi definido como diminuição > 10% do volume índice do stent. Resultados: A maioria dos pacientes era do sexo masculino (52%), com média de idade de 58,8 ± 7,6 anos, e 28% eram diabéticos. O volume do stent índice, objetivo primário deste estudo, foi de 7,7 ± 1,5 mm3/mm no pós-procedimento, de 7,7 ± 2,1 mm3/mm aos 4-6 meses, e de 7,8 ± 1,6 mm3/mm aos 4-5 anos, com variação tardia de -0,02 ± 1,6 mm3/mm (P = 0,97). A variação a longo prazo do volume do stent índice foi de 0,13 ± 1,8 mm3/mm (1,7%) para o stent CypherTM e de -0,05 ± 1,3 mm3/mm (-0,6%) para o stent BioMatrixTM (P = 0,78). Conclusões: A avaliação invasiva seriada por meio do USIC mostrou que SFs de aço inoxidável, de diferentes gerações, não demonstraram evidência de recolhimento elástico a longo prazo.

BACKGROUND: Radial expansion and vessel wall scaffolding properties of stainless steel stents have improved the outcomes of coronary balloon angioplasty. Thinner struts and new platform designs are characteristic of more contemporaneous stents, but it is not clear whether these changes may result in devices with less radial strength, susceptible to elastic recoil, especially in the very late follow-up. This study was aimed at assessing late stent recoil in two generations of drug-eluting stents (DES) using serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with single de novo coronary lesions, treated with DES (12 CypherTM and 13 BioMatrixTM), were included and serial IVUS analysis was performed after stent implantation and at 4-6-months and 4-5 years of follow-up. Stent volume index was compared between the procedure and the mid and long-term follow-ups. Stent recoil was defined as a decrease > 10% of the stent volume index. RESULTS: Most of the patients were male (52%), with mean age of 58.8 ± 7.6 years, and 28% were diabetic. Stent volume index, the primary objective of this study, was 7.7 ± 1.5 mm³/mm post-procedure, 7.7 ± 2.1 mm³/mm at 4-6 months and 7.8 ± 1.6 mm³/mm at 4-5 years, with a delta of -0.02 ± 1.6 mm³/mm (P = 0.97). The long-term delta stent volume index was 0.13 ± 1.8 mm³/mm (1.7%) for the CypherTM stent and -0.05 ± 1.3 mm³/mm (-0.6%) for the BioMatrixTM stent (P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Serial IVUS analysis showed that stainless steel DES of different generations did not show evidence of long-term elastic recoil.

Pilot study with an intensified oral sirolimus regimen for the prevention of in-stent restenosis in de novo lesions: a serial intravascular ultrasound study.

This pilot study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an intensified oral sirolimus regimen (15-mg loading dose 24 hr before PCI, followed by a daily dose of 5 mg for 4 weeks) in 15 patients subjected to elective bare metal coronary stent implantation for de novo lesions. Mean patient age was 59+/-9; 73% were male, and 13% were diabetic patients. The reference diameter was 3.04+/-0.38 mm, and the lesion length was 14+/-2 mm. Angiographic and volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analyses were performed in all patients at 6.0+/-0.2 months. Two patients (13%) met the definition of in-segment binary restenosis; in-stent and in-segment angiographic late loss was 0.61+/-0.31 mm and 0.67+/-0.45 mm, respectively, and the percent neointimal volume was 28.5+/-15.8%. At adjacent reference segments, there was neither significant plaque increase nor constrictive vascular remodeling. At 24-month follow-up no deaths, myocardial infarctions, or target lesion revascularizations were detected. Mean sirolimus blood level was 13+/-7 ng/ml. No correlations were found between drug levels and late loss (r=0.15, P=0.59) or IVUS percent neointimal volume (r=0.23, P=0.47). Side effects were frequent (80%), leading to dose reductions in four and drug discontinuation in one patient. The results of this pilot study suggest that an intensified 5-mg oral sirolimus regimen resulted in no relevant improvements in the angiographic and IVUS parameters of restenosis after stent implantation in de novo lesions when compared with historic controls. Considering the efficacy/safety balance, our results do not encourage further trials evaluating the current protocol for the prevention of in-stent restenosis.