Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Respir Res ; 25(1): 222, 2024 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38811943

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of serum anti-Jo-1 antibody levels with the disease activity and prognosis in anti-Jo-1-positive patients with antisynthetase syndrome (ASS). METHODS: This study included 115 anti-Jo-1-positive patients with ASS who were admitted to China-Japan Friendship Hospital between 2009 and 2019. Anti-Jo-1 antibody serum levels at initial admission and follow-up were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Global and organ disease activity was assessed at baseline and follow-up according to the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies guidelines. RESULTS: Among enrolled patients, 70 (60.9%) patients initially presented with interstitial lung disease (ILD), and 46 (40%) patients presented with with muscle weakness at initial admission. At baseline, patients with ILD had lower levels of anti-Jo-1 antibodies than those without ILD (p = 0.012). Baseline anti-Jo-1 antibody levels were higher in patients with muscle weakness, skin involvement, and arthritis (all p < 0.05) compared to those without these manifestations. Baseline anti-Jo-1 antibody levels were positively correlated with skin visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (r = 0.25, p = 0.006), but not with disease activity in other organs. However, changes in anti-Jo-1 antibody levels were significantly positively correlated with the changes in PGA (ß = 0.002, p = 0.001), muscle (ß = 0.003, p < 0.0001), and pulmonary (ß = 0.002, p = 0.013) VAS scores, but not with skin and joint VAS scores. Older age of onset (hazard ratio [HR] 1.069, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.010-1.133, p = 0.022) and higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (HR 1.333, 95% CI: 1.035-1.717, p = 0.026) were risk factors for death. CONCLUSION: Anti-Jo-1 titers appear to correlate more with disease activity changes over time rather than with organ involvement at baseline, which provides better clinical guidance for assessing the disease course using anti-Jo-1 levels.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear , Myositis , Humans , Myositis/blood , Myositis/immunology , Myositis/diagnosis , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Adult , Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Follow-Up Studies , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Biomarkers/blood , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/immunology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/blood , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis
2.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 40(2): 284-291, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34796847

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The clinical features of myositis specific antibody negative dermatomyositis (MSA negative DM) varied greatly, and there were few reports in the literatures. This study aimed to describe and expand the clinical phenotypes and prognoses of MSA negative DM patients. METHODS: MSA negative DM patients were identified from January 2010 to June 2020. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical features and laboratory data. The survival status was followed up until July 31. 2020 SPSS version 21.0 and R version 3.6.1 software were used for the statistical analyses. RESULTS: A total of 97 MSA negative DM patients were enrolled. The most common type of rashes was heliotrope rash (80.4%). More than half of the patients (55.7%) had interstitial lung disease (ILD), and seven of them developed rapid progressive ILD. There were eleven patients with tumours. During the follow-up, twelve patients died, of whom 5 (41.7%) died due to infection. Two phenotypes of MSA negative DM patients were identified by cluster analysis. Patients in cluster 1 developed muscle weakness, mechanic's hands, arthritis, and ILD more frequently. Patients in cluster 2 had a higher incidence of heliotrope rashes. Patients in cluster 1 tended to have worse prognoses, wherein the 1-year and 5-year survival rates (81.1% and 78.4%, respectively) were lower than those in cluster 2 (97.6% and 95.2%, respectively), with p value 0.04 and 0.056 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Through cluster analysis, different clinical phenotypes of MSA negative DM patients were determined. The prognoses of the two subgroups were different in terms of survival rate and cause of death.


Subject(s)
Dermatomyositis , Myositis , Autoantibodies , Dermatomyositis/diagnosis , Dermatomyositis/epidemiology , Dermatomyositis/therapy , Humans , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
3.
Med Sci Monit ; 26: e920442, 2020 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32198879

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Notoginsenoside R1 (NR) is a major dynamic constituent of Panax notoginseng found to possess anti-inflammatory activity against various inflammatory diseases. However, its protective effects against renal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury have not been elucidated. In male Wistar rats, we induced I/R under general anesthesia by occluding the renal artery for 60 min, followed by reperfusion and right nephrectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Rats were randomized to 4 groups: a sham group, an I/R group, an NR-pretreated (50 mg/kg) before I/R induction group, and an NR control group. All animals were killed at 72 h after I/R induction. Blood and renal tissues were collected, and histological and basic renal function parameters were assessed. In addition, levels of various kidney markers and proinflammatory cytokines were measured using RT-PCR, ELISA, and immunohistochemistry analysis. RESULTS After I/R induction, the onset of renal dysfunction was shown by the elevated levels of serum urea, creatinine levels, and histological evaluation, showing a 2-fold increase in the renal failure markers kim-1 and NGAL compared to control rats. Rats pretreated with NR before I/R induction had significantly better renal functions, with attenuated levels of oxidative markers, restored levels of inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), tumor growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1), INF-γ, and IL-6, and increased anti-inflammatory cytokine levels (IL-10) compared to I/R-induced rats. CONCLUSIONS NR suppressed I/R-induced inflammatory cytokines production by suppressing oxidative stress and kidney markers, suggesting that NR is a promising drug candidate for prevention, progression, and treatment of renal dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Ginsenosides/therapeutic use , Inflammation/prevention & control , Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Animals , Kidney/blood supply , Kidney/drug effects , Male , Nephrectomy , Random Allocation , Rats , Rats, Wistar
4.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 75(5): 1175-1182, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35921214

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to investigate the long-term survival rates and prognostic factors in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) based on myositis-specific antibody (MSA) stratification. METHODS: Exactly 628 patients with an IIM were included. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, univariate, and multivariate Cox regression were used to analyze the outcomes and risk factors. RESULTS: The cumulative 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates for IIM patients overall were 91.4%, 82.8%, and 75.6%, respectively. The survival rate in the MSA subset was significantly different (P < 0.001). The 1- and 10-year survival rates in the anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (anti-MDA-5)-positive subgroup were 79.5% and 58.5%, respectively, which were the lowest among all subgroups. The 10-year survival rate of anti-signal recognition particle (anti-SRP)-positive patients was the highest (96.4%). Independent risk factors that impacted the long-term prognosis for IIM patients included rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD), malignancy, and elevated serum ferritin levels (hazard ratio [HR] 17.47, 20.36, and 9.15, respectively, P < 0.01), whereas disease duration was a protective factor (HR 0.27, P = 0.003). Among these subsets, the strongest independent risk factor for death in the anti-MDA-5-positive subgroup was RP-ILD (HR 3.4, P = 0.017). Malignancy was an independent risk factor in the anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibody-positive, anti-transcription intermediary factor 1γ-positive, and MSA-negative subgroups (HR 46.69, 6.65, and 4.48, respectively; P < 0.001). RP-ILD was also a risk factor in the prognosis of individuals in the MSA-negative subgroup (HR 72.28, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite favorable overall survival in patients with IIM, the anti-MDA-5-positive subgroup had the highest mortality rate among all MSA subgroups, highlighting the distinctive prognosis for patients with different MSAs. RP-ILD and malignancy are the most common causes of death in IIM patients.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Myositis , Humans , Autoantibodies , Cohort Studies , Prognosis , Transcription Factors , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Retrospective Studies
5.
Front Surg ; 9: 1025557, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36338621

ABSTRACT

Background: Biochemical processes involved in complex skin diseases (skin cancers, psoriasis, and wound) can be identified by combining proteomics analysis and bioinformatics tools, which gain a next-level insight into their pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapeutic targets. Methods: Articles were identified through a search of PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE references dated to May 2022, to perform system data mining, and a search of the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection was utilized to conduct a visual bibliometric analysis. Results: An increased trend line revealed that the number of publications related to proteomics utilized in skin diseases has sharply increased recent years, reaching a peak in 2021. The hottest fields focused on are skin cancer (melanoma), inflammation skin disorder (psoriasis), and skin wounds. After deduplication and title, abstract, and full-text screening, a total of 486 of the 7,822 outcomes met the inclusion/exclusion criteria for detailed data mining in the field of skin disease tooling with proteomics, with regard to skin cancer. According to the data, cell death, metabolism, skeleton, immune, and inflammation enrichment pathways are likely the major part and hotspots of proteomic analysis found in skin diseases. Also, the focuses of proteomics in skin disease are from superficial presumption to depth mechanism exploration within more comprehensive validation, from basic study to a combination or guideline for clinical applications. Furthermore, we chose skin cancer as a typical example, compared with other skin disorders. In addition to finding key pathogenic proteins and differences between diseases, proteomic analysis is also used for therapeutic evaluation or can further obtain in-depth mechanisms in the field of skin diseases. Conclusion: Proteomics has been regarded as an irreplaceable technology in the study of pathophysiological mechanism and/or therapeutic targets of skin diseases, which could provide candidate key proteins for the insight into the biological information after gene transcription. However, depth pathogenesis and potential clinical applications need further studies with stronger evidence within a wider range of skin diseases.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL