Efficacy of sotrastaurin plus tacrolimus after de novo kidney transplantation: randomized, phase II trial results.

Sotrastaurin, a novel immunosuppressant, blocks early T cell activation through protein kinase C inhibition. Efficacy and safety of sotrastaurin with tacrolimus were assessed in a dose-ranging non-inferiority study in renal transplant recipients. A total of 298 patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive sotrastaurin 100 (n = 77; discontinued in December 2011) or 200 mg (n = 73) b.i.d. plus standard tacrolimus (sTAC; 5-12 ng/mL), sotrastaurin 300 mg (n = 75) b.i.d. plus reduced tacrolimus (rTAC; 2-5 ng/mL) or enteric-coated mycophenolic acid (MPA) plus sTAC (n = 73); all patients received basiliximab and corticosteroids. Composite efficacy failure (treated biopsy-proven acute rejection ≥ grade IA, graft loss, death or loss to follow up) rates at Month 12 were 18.8%, 12.4%, 10.9% and 14.0% for the sotrastaurin 100, 200 and 300 mg, and MPA groups, respectively. The median estimated glomerular filtration rates were 55.7, 53.3, 64.9 and 59.2 mL/min, respectively. Mean heart rates were faster with higher sotrastaurin doses and discontinuations due to adverse events and gastrointestinal adverse events were more common. Fewer patients in the sotrastaurin groups experienced leukopenia than in the MPA group (1.3-5.5% vs. 16.5%). Sotrastaurin 200 and 300 mg had comparable efficacy to MPA in prevention of rejection with no significant difference in renal function between the groups.

Cyclosporine levels in cerebrospinal fluid after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms underlying cyclosporine neurotoxicity remain undefined. Particularly, whether cyclosporine (CyA) enters cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or brain tissue is disputed. METHODS: We analyzed CSF from 17 lumbar punctures performed in 14 liver recipients receiving CyA and experiencing neurological complications, fever of unknown origin, seizures, or altered mental status. Whole blood samples were assayed for CyA and its metabolites. Liver function tests, serum electrolytes, and cholesterol were also analyzed. RESULTS: Four patients had cyclosporine metabolites in the CSF. These patients had acute renal insufficiency and significantly higher blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and total and direct bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase levels than patients without CyA metabolites in CSF (P < 0.05). Whole blood levels of CyA parent drug were similar between groups. Levels of CyA metabolites in the blood were significantly higher in patients with metabolites in the CSF. CyA parent drug was undetectable in CSF in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective report of CyA metabolites in the CSF of transplant recipients. Acute renal insufficiency and high bilirubin levels may be associated with entry of CyA metabolites into the CSF.

Reduced acute rejection and superior 1-year renal allograft survival with basiliximab in patients with diabetes mellitus. The Global Simulect Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Renal allograft recipients with diabetes mellitus often demonstrate poorer clinical outcomes than nondiabetic patients. Basiliximab (Simulect), a chimeric anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, reduced the incidence of acute rejection in renal allograft recipients in 2 multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase III trials. METHODS: An analysis of pooled results from the 2 trials was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of basiliximab with placebo in renal transplant recipients with and without prior diabetes. Patients received either basiliximab (20 mg on day 0 and day 4 posttransplantation) or placebo in combination with cyclosporine for microemulsion (Neoral) and steroids. RESULTS: A total of 722 patients (150 diabetic, 572 nondiabetic) were eligible for intent-to-treat analysis. At 12 months, basiliximab as compared with placebo reduced the proportion of patients experiencing first acute rejection by 41% in diabetics (P<0.01) and by 29% in nondiabetics (P<0.001). Biopsy-confirmed rejection was reduced by 44% in diabetics (P<0.01) and by 26% in nondiabetics (P<0.01). The first acute rejection episode requiring augmented immunosuppression other than steroids was reduced by 49% in diabetics (P<0.01) and by 41% in nondiabetics (P<0.001); death, graft loss, or first rejection episode was reduced by 43% in diabetics (P=0.001) and by 22% in nondiabetics (P<0.01). Superior graft survival was maintained in diabetic recipients treated with basiliximab versus placebo (96% vs. 86%; P=0.022). There were no significant differences in safety between basiliximab and placebo in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab is associated with a significant reduction in acute rejection and an excellent safety profile in renal transplant recipients with and without diabetes mellitus. Superior graft survival was evident in diabetic patients.

New immunosuppressive agents for maintenance therapy in organ transplantation.

Traditional cyclosporin-based immunosuppressive protocols are associated with relatively high incidences of early acute rejection and late graft loss due to chronic rejection. In addition, long-term immunosuppression with cyclosporin and corticosteroids has been associated with significant metabolic, infectious, malignant and cosmetic adverse effects. In the last decade, the goals of immunosuppression strategies have included not only short-term survival but also graft acceptance, with a low incidence of early acute rejection and minimal long-term toxicity. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil are 2 new immunosuppressive agents that have recently been approved for use. The mechanism of action and toxicity profile of tacrolimus are similar to that of cyclosporin. Tacrolimus reduces early acute rejection and is also effective in salvage of allografts with refractory rejection. A wide spectrum of adverse effects, including nephrotoxic, neurotoxic, gastrointestinal, metabolic and hematological effects, has been reported in association with tacrolimus but, unlike cyclosporin, this agent is not associated with hirsutism or gingival hyperplasia. Mycophenolate mofetil, an antimetabolite, has been effective in reducing early acute rejection and in treatment of refractory rejection when used in combination with cyclosporin instead of azathioprine. Its myelosuppressive and gastrointestinal toxicities are mild and reversible, but it may be associated with an increased risk of infections. Both agents permit early corticosteroid withdrawal. Other new immunosuppressive agents that act on different stages of the cell cycle but that have not yet been introduced for wide clinical use, including sirolimus (rapamycin), brequinar, mizoribine and gusperimus, are also discussed in this review.

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract helps prevent bacterial infections in the early postoperative period after liver transplant.

UNLABELLED: In liver transplant (LTx) recipients, gut-associated bacterial and fungal organisms produce significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. We sought to assess the role of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) in preventing postoperative infections in a large single-center cohort of liver recipients transplanted under two non-simultaneous protocols. In 212 consecutive patients transplanted between 1/1/91 and 7/31/92, SDD (gentamicin 80 mg, polymyxin B 100 mg, nystatin suspension 10 mL) was employed, starting after induction of anesthesia and continued until POD 21 (SDD Group). In 157 consecutive patients transplanted between 1/1/93 and 12/31/93, SDD was not used (non-SDD Group). Both groups received IV vancomycin and cefotaxime prophylaxis. All culture-positive infections within the first 30 days post-LTx were recorded and classified as bacterial or fungal. Infection-related mortality (patients who died of infectious complications without any technical complication) was recorded. Groups did not differ in patient demographics, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status, use of veno-venous bypass, total/warm ischemia, or length of ICU stay. Infections developed in fewer SDD patients (56/212; 26%) than non-SDD patients (69/157; 44%) (p<0.001). The incidence of gram-negative infection was less in the SDD group (11% vs. 26%, p<0. 001) as was gram-positive infection (16% vs. 26%, p<0.001). Among patients who developed infection, there was no difference between groups in infections per patient. Primary graft non-function (PNF) developed in 20 SDD patients (7/20 had infections) and 8 non-SDD patients (6/8 had infections) (p=0.06). There were no differences in incidence of fungal infections or of infection-related mortality between groups. In the SDD group, there were fewer abdominal (p<0. 001), lung (p<0.001), wound (p<0.01), and urinary tract infections (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Use of SDD in liver recipients early after transplant was associated with significantly fewer infections in the early postoperative period.

Cost-benefit analysis of an aminoglycoside monitoring service.

The clinical and financial impact of an aminoglycoside monitoring service was determined. All patients admitted to a 74-bed general medicine unit and treated with tobramycin or gentamicin during a six-month study period were eligible for the study. The first three months served as a control period during which pharmacists used published audit criteria and modifications of those criteria to monitor the appropriateness of gentamicin and tobramycin use in patients but did not attempt to intervene in aminoglycoside prescribing. During the next three months, pharmacists provided physicians with recommendations for choice of drug, coordinated blood sampling times, and designed individualized dosage regimens for all patients treated with gentamicin or tobramycin. Data for financial analysis were obtained from pharmacy profiles and medical records, and the cost:benefit ratio for the service was calculated. A total of 118 patients were included in the study. Significant improvements in appropriateness of tobramycin therapy, adequacy of loading dose, frequency of monitoring for ototoxicity, and serum concentration monitoring were noted in the intervention group. Despite an increase in gentamicin use from 20% in the control group to 61% in the intervention group, the incidence of aminoglycoside toxicity did not increase significantly. The cost:benefit ratio was 1.13, which indicates that the service is an appropriate use of resources. The aminoglycoside monitoring service had a favorable impact on the use and cost of aminoglycoside antibiotics. Expansion of the service to all areas of the hospital served by satellite pharmacies could reduce drug expenditures by as much as $55,000 per year.

Methylphenidate in post liver transplant patients.

Methylphenidate (Ritalin, manufacturer: Ciba/Geigy) has been shown effective for the treatment of depression in various medically ill populations, but to our knowledge its use in organ transplant patients has not been described. The authors retrospectively reviewed clinical records of the first eight inpatients who received methylphenidate for treatment of depressive and/or cognitive symptoms in the post liver transplant period at Mount Sinai Medical Center. Target symptoms included psychomotor and cognitive slowing as well as lack of motivation for recovery, poor rehabilitation effort, social withdrawal, and apathy. A positive response was noted in seven patients, and in one patient the response was equivocal. Side effects noted were increased blood pressure (N = 2) and subjective restlessness/agitation (N = 3). Methylphenidate appears to be an effective, rapidly acting agent in this setting at dosages of 10-20 mg/day, with minimal side effects. Methylphenidate may have a significant role in the care of an ever-increasing population of organ transplant recipients with multiple medical problems and associated disabilities.

Low-dose aspirin therapy is associated with few side effects but does not prevent hepatic artery thrombosis in liver transplant recipients.

Hepatic artery thrombosis occurs in 4% to 10% of adult patients and in up to 26% of children undergoing liver transplantation. Aspirin has been used to prevent this complication but may increase procedure-related and gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of low-dose aspirin in the prophylaxis of hepatic artery thrombosis. The histories of 529 patients who survived liver transplantation between September 1988 and December 1993 were reviewed retrospectively. The routine clinical practice followed until 1992 was to initiate oral aspirin therapy on the first postoperative day (81 mg daily in adults and 40 mg daily in children) as prophylaxis for vascular thrombosis. This was done in 354 patients. Aspirin was not administered to the remaining 175 patients. Hepatic artery thrombosis occurred in 13 patients treated with aspirin (3.7%) and in 7 patients not treated with aspirin (4.0%) (P = .85). Recipient age of younger than 2 years and low donor liver weight were the only factors that predisposed the patients to hepatic artery thrombosis. A total of 1,651 percutaneous liver biopsies were performed in this series, with 1,111 performed in patients treated with aspirin. Significant bleeding after liver biopsy occurred in 12 patients treated with aspirin (1.1%) and in 3 patients not treated with aspirin (0.6%) (P = .29). Gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 66 patients treated with aspirin (18.9%) and in 23 patients not treated with aspirin (12.8%) (P = .08). Low-dose aspirin therapy is not shown to be effective in preventing hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation. Although aspirin does not produce a statistically significant increase in the risk of bleeding after liver biopsy, there is a trend toward an increased incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding.