Breast cancer histopathology is predictive of low-risk Oncotype Dx recurrence score.

BACKGROUND: Oncotype Dx is a genetic test that has been incorporated into the 2017 AJCC breast cancer staging system for ER positive, HER2-negative, lymph node-negative patients to predict the risk of recurrence. Recent data suggest that immunohistochemistry (ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67) and histologic subtype may identify patients that will not benefit from Oncotype Dx testing. METHODS: A total of 371 patients underwent Oncotype Dx testing at our institution from 2012 to 2016. Oncotype recurrence score was categorized as low- (ORS = 0-10), intermediate- (11-25), or high risk (26-100). Invasive carcinomas were categorized based on histologic subtype as "favorable" (mucinous, tubular, cribriform, tubulolobular, and lobular) and "unfavorable" (ductal, mixed ductal and lobular, and micropapillary carcinoma). All cases were estrogen receptor positive and HER2-negative. Clinical and histologic predictors of low-risk ORS were assessed in univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 371 patients were categorized by ORS as low risk (n = 85, 22.9%), intermediate risk (n = 244, 65.8%), and high risk (n = 42, 11.3%). The histologic subtypes with the highest percentage of high-risk ORS were invasive micropapillary (n = 4/17, 23.5%), pleomorphic lobular (n = 2/10, 20%), and ductal carcinoma (n = 28/235, 11.9%). Low-grade invasive carcinomas with favorable histology rarely had a high-risk ORS (n = 1/97, 1%). In a simple multivariable model, favorable histologic subtype (OR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.10 to 5.15, P = 0.026), and histologic grade (OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.90, P = 0.025) were the only significant predictors of an ORS less than 11 in estrogen receptor positive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative patients. CONCLUSION: We question the utility of performing Oncotype Dx in subtypes of invasive carcinoma that are associated with excellent prognosis. We propose that immunohistochemistry for ER, PR, and HER2 is sufficient for patients with low-grade invasive carcinomas and can be used as a surrogate for Oncotype Dx.

Can Tumor Biology Predict Occult Multifocal Disease in Breast Cancer Patients?

The SHAVE trial is a prospective trial in which 235 women with stage 0 to 3 disease undergoing partial mastectomy were randomized intraoperatively to either have cavity shave`s (CSMs) taken at the time of initial surgery or not. In this study, 9 of the 76 patients (11.8%) with initially negative margins randomized to the "shave" group had occult cancers found in the CSM. Seven of these patients had sufficient primary tumor tissue available for further analysis. These patients were age and stage matched in a 1:2 ratio to other patients in the trial who had no further disease found in their CSM. A tissue microarray was created, stained for E-cadherin, MUC1, and beta-catenin, and evaluated by two independent pathologists (blinded to outcome). There were no significant differences between cases and controls in terms of median invasive tumor size, ductal carcinoma in situ size, volume of initial resection, and volume of CSM. Further, no differences were noted between cases and controls for median (staining intensity × per cent of cells staining) for each marker. Hence, although nearly 12 per cent of breast cancer patients with negative margins will have occult disease, this could not be predicted by primary tumor markers in this study.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is not a predictor of liver histology in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

OBJECTIVES: It has been reported that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can be measured relatively easily and can serve as a valuable index for much clinical pathology. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between NLR and hepatic histological findings in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 226 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD [nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH, n=105), borderline-NASH (n=74), and simple steatosis (n=47)] were enrolled. NASH and fibrosis were diagnosed histologically using the NAFLD Clinical Research Network criteria. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in aspartate aminotransferase (P<0.001), alanine aminotransferase (P<0.001) levels, and white blood cell (P=0.007) and neutrophil counts (P=0.042) between the three groups of patients. In addition, significantly higher BMI (P=0.024), waist circumference (P=0.011), aspartate aminotransferase (P=0.003), alanine aminotransferase (P=0.005), insulin (P=0.008), and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (P=0.009) levels were found in patients with fibrosis (n=133) in comparison with those without fibrosis (n=93). There was no correlation between NLR and glucose, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance, lipid parameters, and the NAFLD activity score. Analysis of the NLR in relation to histological findings also showed no association between these parameters. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study that has investigated these relationships in this clinically relevant condition. The findings of the present study show that NLR is not associated with the severity of hepatic inflammation or fibrosis and thus cannot be recommended as a surrogate marker of liver injury in patients with NAFLD.