CT esophagogram in the emergency setting: typical findings and suggested workflow.

PURPOSE: Esophageal perforation (EP) can be a diagnostic challenge. Computed tomography (CT) and CT esophagography (CTE) are often used to rule out EP in the emergency setting with promising diagnostic performance, but the standard of care remains fluoroscopic esophagography (FE). We assess the diagnostic performance of CT and CTE when interpreted by expert and generalist radiologists and created an imaging workflow guide. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients presenting with suspected EP. Two expert radiologists independently reviewed blinded CT/CTE studies, recorded CT findings, and assigned an esophageal injury grade. We also collected initial (general radiologist) CT findings and interpretation and FE diagnoses. We assessed inter-reader reliability and diagnostic performance. RESULTS: EP was diagnosed in 46/139 (33%) encounters. The most common CT/CTE findings in EP were esophageal wall thickening (46/46, 100%), pneumomediastinum (42/46, 91%), and mediastinal stranding (39/46, 85%). CT and CTE sensitivity for detecting EP was 89% and 89% for expert radiologists, respectively, and 79% and 82% for general radiologists, compared with 46% for FE. Inter-reader agreement for detecting EP by CT and CTE was kappa 0.35 and 0.42 (both p < .001) between expert and generalist radiologists. We present radiographic images for key CT/CTE findings and a suggested workflow for the evaluation of possible EP. CONCLUSION: CT and CTE are more sensitive than FE for EP in the emergency setting. Due to the rarity of EP and current wide variability in imaging interpretation, an imaging workflow and injury grading system based on esophageal and mediastinal CT findings are offered to help guide management.

Axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration in the preoperative evaluation of the breast cancer patient: an algorithm based on tumor size and lymph node appearance.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the utility of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of the axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients depending on the size of the primary tumor and the appearance of the lymph nodes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Data were collected about tumor size, lymph node appearance, and the results of ultrasound-guided FNA and axillary surgery of 224 patients with breast cancer undergoing 226 ultrasound-guided FNA. Lymph nodes were classified as benign if the cortex was even and measured < 3 mm, indeterminate if the cortex was even but measured ≥ 3 mm or measured < 3 mm but was focally thickened, and suspicious if the cortex was focally thickened and measured ≥ 3 mm or the fatty hilum was absent. The results of ultrasound-guided FNAs were analyzed by the sonographic appearance of the axillary lymph nodes and by the size of the primary tumor. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound-guided FNA were calculated with axillary surgery as the reference standard. The sensitivity and specificity of axillary ultrasound to predict the ultrasound-guided FNA result were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 224 patients, 51 patients (23%) had a positive ultrasound-guided FNA result, which yields an overall sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 100%. The sensitivity of ultrasound-guided FNA was 29% in patients with primary tumors ≤ 1 cm, 50% in patients with tumors > 1 to ≤ 2 cm, 69% in patients with tumors > 2 to ≤ 5 cm, and 100% in patients with tumors > 5 cm. The sensitivity of ultrasound-guided FNA in patients with normal-appearing lymph nodes was 11%; indeterminate lymph nodes, 44%; and suspicious lymph nodes, 93%. Sonographic characterization of lymph nodes as suspicious or indeterminate was 94% sensitive and 72% specific in predicting positive findings at ultrasound-guided FNA. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided FNA of the axillary lymph nodes is most useful in the preoperative assessment of patients with large tumors (> 2 cm) or lymph nodes that appear abnormal.

Percutaneous umbilical blood sampling: current trends and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To report our contemporary experience with PUBS, including indications and complications, stratified by the presence of hydrops fetalis. STUDY DESIGN: All PUBS performed from 1988 to 2013 at a single tertiary care center were identified using a comprehensive ultrasound database. We recorded patient demographics, relevant obstetric, fetal and neonatal data, indication for and success of PUBS and any complications. Data were analyzed using SAS, version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). RESULTS: 455 PUBS were performed on 208 pregnant women, 97.8% of which were successful. The average gestational age at the time of PUBS was 26.7 weeks (SD 5.1 weeks, range 17.5-41.3 weeks). Indications were available for 441: 245 (55.6%) isoimmunization, 77 (17.5%) non-immune hydrops fetalis (NIHF), 98 (22.2%) chromosomal diagnosis, and 21 (4.8%) other indications. Isoimmunization was a less common indication for PUBS in 2008-2013 as compared to 1988-1992 (51.7% vs 66.2%, p=0.07). Amongst PUBS performed in the setting of hydrops, isoimmunization was much less common in the later time period (61.1% vs 0%, respectively; p<0.01). The procedure complication rate (bradycardia or fetal demise at procedure) of 2.5% was stable over the study period and was most common with NIHF (2.0% without hydrops, 0% with immune hydrops and 6.3% with NIHF; p=0.04). Of the 208 women with a PUBS performed, 74 had more than one PUBS procedure (mean 2.2, max 18). Transfusions were performed in 233 of the 455 (51.2%). Overall, 10.2% of the pregnancies had an intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) within 2 weeks of the procedure, which was most common in pregnancies with NIHF (3.2% without hydrops, 9.1% with immune hydrops and 31.7% with NIHF; p<0.01). The IUFD rate was 60% (3/5) in fetuses with parvovirus-mediated NIHF. CONCLUSIONS: PUBS has a high likelihood of success with a relatively low complication rate. The complication rate is highest in pregnancies with NIHF, and these pregnancies are also at a significantly higher risk of IUFD, particularly those patients with parvovirus-mediated NIHF. Our findings can be used when counseling patients who are considering PUBS for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.

Business of radiology 101: the state of radiology business practice and health care policy curricula at US radiology residency programs.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, content, and perceptions of curricula focused on radiology business practice and health care policy at US radiology residency training programs. METHODS: The desired survey population was trainees and faculty members of radiology residency programs in the United States. Three anonymous survey instruments were distributed, including an e-mail survey to the membership of the ACR RFS, a paper survey to ACR RFS delegates attending the 2010 AMCLC, and an e-mail survey to the membership of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR). RESULTS: Response rates for the surveys were 12%, 25%, and 21%, respectively. Members of the APDR and RFS agreed that understanding and competency in business practice and health care policy topics are important to the future careers of residents (total favorable sentiment >86% for APDR members and >96% for RFS members). Most survey respondents' home institutions offer some form of a noninterpretive curriculum (91% of APDR respondents, 74% of RFS respondents), but the breadth of topics addressed and educational time devoted to these curricula were quite variable. Subjective effectiveness of curricula was infrequently rated as very effective by 12% of APDR respondents and 6% of RFS respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the perceived importance of radiology business practice and health care policy education, and residency training requirements in competencies related to these subjects that have been in place for more than a decade, curricula addressing these items still seem to be in a stage of acceptance and development. Further commitment to and innovation within these curricula are requisite in educating our future radiologists.