Therapeutic approach to respiratory infections in lung transplantation.

Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are at life-long risk for infections and disseminated diseases owing to their immunocompromised state. Besides organ failure and sepsis, infection can trigger acute and chronic graft rejection which increases mortality. Medical prophylaxis and treatment are based on comprehensive diagnostic work-up including previous history of infection and airway colonisation to reduce long-term complications and mortality. Common bacterial pathogens include Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus, whilst Aspergillus and Cytomegalovirus (CMV) are respectively the commonest fungal and viral pathogens. Clinical symptoms can be various in lung transplant recipients presenting an asymptomatic to severe progress. Regular control of infection parameters, daily lung function testing and lifelong follow-up in a specialist transplant centre are mandatory for early detection of bacterial, viral and fungal infections. After transplantation each patient receives intensive training with rules of conduct concerning preventive behaviour and to recognize early signs of post transplant complications. Early detection of infection and complications are important goals to reduce major complications after lung transplantation.

Lung transplantation after endoscopic lung volume reduction.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) has become an established treatment option in selected patients with end-stage lung emphysema. ELVR, however, does not always prevent disease progression, and patients may inevitably be considered for lung transplantation. OBJECTIVES: Currently, limited data exist regarding the impact of preceding ELVR on lung transplantation outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center analysis of lung transplantation (LTx) waiting list candidates, who had previously undergone ELVR for emphysema between 2010 and 2014, was performed. Outcomes were compared to matched (1:2) controls who underwent LTx for emphysema without previous ELVR. The 12-month survival after LTx represented the primary end point. RESULTS: In total 23/693 (3%) patients listed for LTx between January 2010 and May 2014 had undergone ELVR, of whom 20/23 (87%) proceeded to LTx (ELVR group). Forty matched non-ELVR emphysema patients acted as controls. Bronchiectasis on CT prior to LTx was more evident in ELVR patients [11/20 (55%) vs. 12/40 (30%); p = 0.04] as well as airway colonization after LTx [10/20 (50%) vs. 6/40 (15%); p = 0.004]. Among ELVR patients, the most prevalent colonizing organism was Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (4/10 patients, 40%). No significant differences were observed in LTx waiting list time, duration of LTx procedure, ventilatory support, ICU stay after LTx or time to hospital discharge. One ELVR patient (5%) died 189 days after LTx from pneumonia, compared to 1 non-ELVR patient (3%) who died after 269 days (p = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Previous ELVR treatment was not associated with differing outcomes following LTx. Increased bacterial colonization rates were evident and warrant further investigation.

Peripheral neuropathy in patients with CPEO associated with single and multiple mtDNA deletions.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize peripheral nerve involvement in patients with chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) with single and multiple mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) deletions, based on clinical scores and detailed nerve conduction studies. METHODS: Peripheral nerve involvement was prospectively investigated in 33 participants with CPEO (single deletions n = 18 and multiple deletions n = 15). Clinically, a modified Total Neuropathy Score (mTNS) and a modified International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (mICARS) were used. Nerve conduction studies included Nn. suralis, superficialis radialis, tibialis, and peroneus mot. Early somatosensory evoked potentials were obtained by N. tibialis stimulation. RESULTS: Participants with multiple deletions had higher mTNS and mICARS scores than those with single deletions. Electrophysiologically in both sensory nerves (N. suralis and N. radialis superficialis), compound action potential (CAP) amplitudes and nerve conduction velocities were lower and mostly abnormal in multiple deletions than those in single deletions. Early somatosensory evoked potentials of N. tibialis revealed increased P40 latencies and decreased N35-P40 amplitudes in multiple deletions. Both sensory nerves had higher areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the decreased CAP amplitudes than the 2 motor nerves. The N. suralis had the best Youden index, indicating a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 72.2% to detect multiple deletions. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral nerve involvement in participants with multiple mtDNA deletions is an axonal type of predominant sensory neuropathy. This is clinically consistent with higher mTNS and mICARS scores. Sensory nerve involvement in participants with multiple deletions was not correlated with age at onset and duration of disease.