ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Craniopharyngiomas (CP) are rare brain tumors that often result in visual impairment due to their proximity to the optic pathway. The optimal management approach to preserve visual function in these patients remains controversial. We sought to investigate visual outcomes of children with craniopharyngiomas based on treatment modality. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched in December 2022 for relevant articles. Articles were screened by title/abstract for relevance, then by full-text. Relevant demographic, intervention, and outcome data were extracted from included studies. RESULTS: A total of 59 studies were included, representing 2655 patients. The overall visual status (OVS) of patients receiving surgery alone was improved in 27.6% of reported outcomes, unchanged in 50.3%, and deteriorated in 22.1%. The OVS for patients receiving radiation alone was improved in 21.1%, unchanged in 42.1%, and deteriorated in 36.8%. Patients receiving surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy had OVS improvement in 27.4%, unchanged in 63.2%, and deteriorated in 9.4%. Of those receiving intracystic bleomycin, 23.1% had improvement in OVS, 46.2% remained unchanged, and 30.8% deteriorated. Of patients receiving interferon-α, 34.8% improved, 54.5% remained unchanged, and 10.6% deteriorated. CONCLUSION: OVS most frequently remained unchanged regardless of intervention. The greatest improvement in OVS was seen in those receiving interferon-α or surgery alone. The greatest OVS deterioration was noted with radiation alone. Future standardized, randomized, large-scale studies with focused assessment of ophthalmologic findings are key to further understanding the impact different interventions have on visual outcomes in these children.
Subject(s)
Craniopharyngioma , Pituitary Neoplasms , Vision Disorders , Child , Humans , Craniopharyngioma/surgery , Craniopharyngioma/therapy , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Pituitary Neoplasms/surgery , Pituitary Neoplasms/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Vision Disorders/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Patients with spina bifida (SB) were historically followed by pediatric providers throughout their entire lives. Through medical and surgical advancements, now more pediatric SB patients are living well into adulthood. Nonetheless, many patients fail to successfully transition to appropriate adult healthcare providers. The goal of this study was to identify factors that helped facilitate or hinder the successful transition of adolescent and young adult (AYA) SB patients to adult providers. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted exploring the transition care of SB patients using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Titles and abstracts from articles identified were read and selected for full-text review. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed in full and analyzed for study design, populations, interventions, and factors influencing transition. RESULTS: The primary search identified 2050 articles, of which 20 were included in the final review. Thirteen studies discussed factors relating to neurosurgical care, 8 referenced gastrointestinal and genitourinary considerations, 11 examined cognitive and psychosocial factors, and 17 explored healthcare system factors. Several barriers were consistently reported regarding communication, patient and parental attitudes and perceptions, and failure to embrace formalized and transparent protocols. Conflicting results were reported regarding the influence medical comorbidities had on a patient's ability to transition. CONCLUSIONS: The process of transitioning AYA SB patients to adult care is complex, involving an interplay of structural and psychosocial factors. The findings in this review suggest that some barriers can be alleviated with improved education, planning, and awareness of factors that influence transition care.
Subject(s)
Spinal Dysraphism , Transition to Adult Care , Humans , Spinal Dysraphism/therapy , Spinal Dysraphism/psychology , Transition to Adult Care/trends , Adolescent , Young Adult , AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of epidural spinal injections (ESIs) on postoperative surgical complications. METHODS: This retrospective all-payer database analysis identified 202,181 adult patients undergoing one- to three-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from 2010 to 2020. A 1:1 exact matching on comorbidities and demographics was performed, creating 2 cohorts: 1) patients who received an ESI within 90 days of surgery and 2) patients who did not receive an ESI. The primary outcome was surgical complication rates between groups at 30 days postoperatively. For the secondary outcome, patients were stratified based on injection time before surgery: 1-30, 31-45, 46-60, 61-75, and 76-90 days. Logistic regression was performed between groups to identify temporal associations of complication rates. The P value was set to 0.05 for the primary analysis, and the Bonferroni correction was utilized for the secondary outcome. RESULTS: Exact matching produced 12,491 pairs for analysis. Groups were well-matched on demographics, comorbidities, and fusion levels. The 30-day postoperative rates of surgical complications, hematomas, wound disruptions, or surgical site infections did not differ between groups (P > 0.05). The rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was increased in the ESI group (0.19% vs. 0.09%, P = 0.042). When temporally stratified, patients receiving an ESI within 30 days had significantly higher odds of CSF leak (odds ratio: 4.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.97-9.14). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who receive an ESI within 30 days of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion are at an increased risk for CSF leak. While the incidence of CSF leak remains small, it may be advisable to avoid ESIs at least 30 days before surgery for certain patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Implantable devices are increasingly more common for management of movement disorders, pain, and epilepsy. These devices are often complex and constructed of nonbiodegradable or hazardous materials. Therefore, proper postmortem handling of these devices is exceedingly important. Unfortunately, there is no consolidated resource available for postmortem neuromodulation device protocols. Thus, we surveyed and catalogued the protocols for implantable devices to summarize proper postmortem device protocols for implantable neurosurgical devices currently on the market. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of companies producing commonly implanted neurosurgical devices. Using information from company websites, user manuals, and catalogs we categorized devices into 3 groups: A (formal recommendation for explantation), B (recommendation for explantation without formal company protocol), and C (explantation is not necessary). We then compiled the data into a stoplight diagram, providing a clear postmortem disposal algorithm for each device category. RESULTS: Twelve companies were queried regarding 46 devices. Postmortem protocols were available for 50% (23/46) of devices; the remaining devices did not have formal recommendations. Overall, 50% of devices were classified as category A "red light" on the stoplight diagram based on recommendations, 10.9% as category B "yellow light," and the remaining 39.1% were classified as category C "green light" indicating they are safe to bury or cremate. CONCLUSIONS: Evolution in therapies and growth in functional neurosurgery has expanded the range of implantable neurosurgical devices. We provide an educational document summarizing their postmortem protocols. This resource aims to aid health-care providers and encourage proper disposal practices during burial or cremation.