Effect of lung volume preservation during spontaneous breathing trial on successful extubation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: protocol for a multicenter clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In standard weaning from mechanical ventilation, a successful spontaneous breathing test (SBT) consisting of 30 min 8 cmH2O pressure-support ventilation (PSV8) without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is followed by extubation with continuous suctioning; however, these practices might promote derecruitment. Evidence supports the feasibility and safety of extubation without suctioning. Ultrasound can assess lung aeration and respiratory muscles. We hypothesize that weaning aiming to preserve lung volume can yield higher rates of successful extubation. METHODS: This multicenter superiority trial will randomly assign eligible patients to receive either standard weaning [SBT: 30-min PSV8 without PEEP followed by extubation with continuous suctioning] or lung-volume-preservation weaning [SBT: 30-min PSV8 + 5 cmH2O PEEP followed by extubation with positive pressure without suctioning]. We will compare the rates of successful extubation and reintubation, ICU and hospital stays, and ultrasound measurements of the volume of aerated lung (modified lung ultrasound score), diaphragm and intercostal muscle thickness, and thickening fraction before and after successful or failed SBT. Patients will be followed for 90 days after randomization. DISCUSSION: We aim to recruit a large sample of representative patients (N = 1600). Our study cannot elucidate the specific effects of PEEP during SBT and of positive pressure during extubation; the results will show the joint effects derived from the synergy of these two factors. Although universal ultrasound monitoring of lungs, diaphragm, and intercostal muscles throughout weaning is unfeasible, if derecruitment is a major cause of weaning failure, ultrasound may help clinicians decide about extubation in high-risk and borderline patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Research Ethics Committee (CEIm) of the Fundació Unió Catalana d'Hospitals approved the study (CEI 22/67 and 23/26). Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov in August 2023. Identifier: NCT05526053.

Vancomycin and daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations as a predictor of outcome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the persistence of the adverse prognostic effect of elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia in a setting with low vancomycin use. METHODS: A retrospective study focusing on episodes of bacteraemia due to MRSA diagnosed from January 2010 through December 2015 was designed. The main outcome measures were 30-day mortality and treatment failure. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with patient mortality and treatment outcome. RESULTS: In total, 79 MRSA bacteraemia episodes were included. The vancomycin MIC was >1.0µg/mL in 53 episodes (67.1%). The presence of high vancomycin MIC was not associated with a higher mortality rate or treatment success. A daptomycin MIC≥0.5µg/mL was present in 16 (26.2%) of 61 episodes for which the daptomycin MIC was obtained and was associated with 30-day mortality in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio=4.72, 95% confidence interval 1.19-18.71). None of the antimicrobials used were associated with a lower risk of treatment failure or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The pernicious effect of high vancomycin MIC disappears in the absence of a predominant use of this antibiotic. However, a high daptomycin MIC in MRSA bacteraemia is associated with higher mortality in patients with bacteraemia, irrespective of antimicrobial treatment choice.

Impact of amikacin pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index on treatment response in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the association between the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index and treatment response to amikacin in critically ill patients. METHODS: An observational prospective study was designed. Critically ill adult patients with infection due to amikacin-sensitive Gram-negative bacteria treated with amikacin were included. Amikacin maximum (Cmax) and minimum (Cmin) plasma concentration samples were taken during the first 48-96h after the beginning of treatment. The impact of Cmax/MIC ratio and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio on early and final clinical response, microbiological eradication, development of resistant strains and renal toxicity was analysed using a multivariate model. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients received amikacin treatment, of whom 71 (83.5%) achieved a Cmax/MIC >6, 66 (77.6%) a Cmax/MIC >8, 64 (75.3%) a Cmax/MIC >10 and 72 (84.7%) an AUC/MIC >65. Clinical response at the end of treatment was significantly greater in patients with Cmax/MIC >6 [OR=5.48 (95% CI 1.28-11.40)], Cmax/MIC >8 [OR=6.01 (2.41-12.2)] and Cmax/MIC >10 [OR=8.02 (2.21-14.2)]. Cmax/MIC >10 was associated with a non-significant increase in microbiological eradication [OR=2.84 (0.76-10.61)]. Achieving Cmax/MIC >6 was associated with a lower proportion of patients with selection of resistant strains or with an increase in amikacin MIC (27.8% vs. 10.2%). Amikacin AUC was associated with development of nephrotoxicity [ROC curve 0.77 (0.66-0.87)]. CONCLUSIONS: The Cmax/MIC ratio of amikacin in critically ill patients is directly related to the response to treatment and the selection of resistant strains.

Using Discrete Event Simulation to predict KPI's at a Projected Emergency Room.

Discrete Event Simulation (DES) is a powerful factor in the design of clinical facilities. DES enables facilities to be built or adapted to achieve the expected Key Performance Indicators (KPI's) such as average waiting times according to acuity, average stay times and others. Our computational model was built and validated using expert judgment and supporting statistical data. One scenario studied resulted in a 50% decrease in the average cycle time of patients compared to the original model, mainly by modifying the patient's attention model.