Dignity in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Children are a uniquely vulnerable patient population with restricted abilities for self-advocacy and autonomy, risking infringement upon their dignity. Yet the concept of dignity in pediatrics remains underexplored relative to the adult literature and other outcome measures. OBJECTIVES: To characterize how dignity is defined, evaluated, and/or measured in pediatrics. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines across the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, PsycINFO, Global Health, Social Science Premium Collection, and Dissertation and Theses. We included publications from database inception through April 2023, in English, involving children aged 0-18 years, and prioritizing dignity as a central theme with a focus on defining, evaluating, or measuring dignity. Study descriptions and pertinent characteristics were extracted and synthesized using a predefined form. RESULTS: Forty-four articles met inclusion criteria; fewer than half comprised original research (20/44, 45%). Most studies (38/44, 86%) included description of the meaning of dignity, with emergence of salient themes around respect, communication, agency/autonomy, and privacy. Less than half (19/44, 43%) included a measurement or evaluation of dignity; approximately one-third described dignity therapy. More than one-third of publications focused on dignity at end of life (17/44, 39%) and included discussions of palliative medicine and hospice (15/44, 34%). CONCLUSION: Relatively few published studies describe dignity in pediatrics. Opportunities exist to broaden scholarship on this topic in partnership with patients, families, and clinicians, with the goal of assessing and strengthening dignity-centered care across the illness course and at the end of life.

Factors Associated With Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in a Cohort of Adult Home Parenteral Nutrition Patients.

BACKGROUND: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is a potentially life-threatening complication in home parenteral nutrition (HPN) patients. We investigated potential predictors of CLABSI in a cohort of adult HPN patients METHODS: Patients managed by the HPN service at the Hospital of University of Pennsylvania on January 1, 2018, were included and followed through June 30, 2019, using existing medical records to collect demographic and clinical data. CLABSIs were adjudicated prospectively by infectious disease experts. Variables with P ≤ .2, when comparing patients with CLABSIs and those without, were included in logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among 114 patients, mean age was 54 ± 16 years, 78/114 were female, and BMI was 25 ± 5.6. Median experience with HPN was 516 days (range, 15-10,281), and 30 had prior CLABSI. Catheter types were peripherally inserted central catheters (83/114), tunneled (27), and implanted (4). The incidence of CLABSI was 0.89 per 1000 catheter days. One multivariate model identified ostomy/wound (odds ratio [OR], 22.0; 95% CI, 4.8-101.7), tunneled/implanted catheter (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.4-13.9), and BMI < 18.5 (OR, 5.9; 95% CI, 1.4-24.2) as predictors of CLABSI. A second model identified patients with 2 potential predictors (OR, 22.9; 95% CI, 5.6-93.5) and tunneled/implanted catheter (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 2.1-21.8) at high risk of CLABSI. Whether CLABSIrates might be reduced by more intense training in wound or catheter care (especially for those with multiple predictors), different types of catheters, or rapid treatment of malnutrition will require further study.

Preparing the Patient for Home Parenteral Nutrition and for a Successful Course of Therapy.

Preparing the patient for home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is a collaborative effort among many different clinicians. Identifying patients who will transition home with parenteral nutrition (PN) as early as possible allows for a thoughtful and safe approach. Communication regarding the HPN goals is critical to the patient's success, whether the requirement for PN is temporary or permanent. Management of these complex patients is best served by a multidisciplinary team with expertise in the area of nutrition support. Adherence to available guidelines that define best practice is imperative in all aspects of care for the patient on HPN.

Testing Usability and Acceptability of a Web Application to Promote Physical Activity (iCanFit) Among Older Adults.

BACKGROUND: Most older Americans do not exercise regularly and many have chronic conditions. Among an increasing number of fitness mobile and Web apps, few are designed for older adults with chronic conditions despite high ownership rates of mobile tools and Internet access in this population. We designed a mobile-enabled Web app, iCanFit, to promote physical activity in this population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the usability and acceptability of iCanFit among older adults in a community setting. METHODS: A total of 33 older adults (aged 60 to 82 years) were recruited from communities to test iCanFit. Of these 33, 10 participants completed the usability testing in a computer room of a senior community center. A research assistant timed each Web application task and observed user navigation behavior using usability metrics. The other 23 participants used the website on their own devices at home and provided feedback after 2-3 weeks by completing a user-experience survey assessing ease of use, helpfulness, and satisfaction with iCanFit. RESULTS: Participants completed all 15 tasks on the iCanFit site in an average of 31 (SD 6.9) minutes; some tasks required more time or needed assistance. Participants' comments were addressed to improve the site's senior friendliness and ease of use. In the user-experience survey, participants reported high levels of usefulness and satisfaction. More than 56% (13/23) of participants indicated they would continue using the program and recommend it to their families or friends. CONCLUSIONS: Testing usability and acceptability is a very important step in developing age-appropriate and user-friendly Web apps, especially for older adults. Testing usability and acceptability in a community setting can help reveal users' experiences and feedback in a real-life setting. Our study suggested that older adults had a high degree of acceptance of iCanFit and could use it easily. The efficacy trial of iCanFit is currently underway.