Disappearing colorectal liver metastases in the era of state-of-the-art triple-modality diagnostic imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic therapy can result in disappearance of colorectal liver metastases in up to 40% of patients. This might be an overestimation caused by suboptimal imaging modalities. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of imaging modalities and the incidence, management and outcome of patients with disappearing liver metastases (DLMs). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients treated for colorectal liver metastases at a high volume hepatobiliary centre between January 2013 and January 2015 after receiving induction or neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Main outcomes were use of imaging modalities, incidence, management and longterm outcome of patients with DLMs. RESULTS: Of 158 patients included, 32 (20%) had 110 DLMs. Most patients (88%) had initial diagnostic imaging with contrast enhanced-CT, primovist-MR and FDG-PET and 94% of patients with DLMs were restaged using primovist-MR. Patients with DLMs had significantly smaller metastases and the median initial size of DLMs was 10 mm (range 5-61). In the per lesion analysis, recurrence after "watch & wait" for DLMs occurred in 36%, while in 19 of 20 resected DLMs no viable tumour cells were found. Median overall (51 vs. 28 months, p < 0.05) and progression free survival (10 vs. 3 months, p = 0.003) were significantly longer for patients with DLMs. CONCLUSION: Even state-of-the-art imaging and restaging cannot solve problems associated with DLMs. Regrowth of these lesions occurs in approximately a third of the lesions. Patients with DLMs have better survival.

Dragon 1 Protocol Manuscript: Training, Accreditation, Implementation and Safety Evaluation of Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization (PVE/HVE) to Accelerate Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Hypertrophy.

STUDY PURPOSE: The DRAGON 1 trial aims to assess training, implementation, safety and feasibility of combined portal- and hepatic-vein embolization (PVE/HVE) to accelerate future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients with borderline resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. METHODS: The DRAGON 1 trial is a worldwide multicenter prospective single arm trial. The primary endpoint is a composite of the safety of PVE/HVE, 90-day mortality, and one year accrual monitoring of each participating center. Secondary endpoints include: feasibility of resection, the used PVE and HVE techniques, FLR-hypertrophy, liver function (subset of centers), overall survival, and disease-free survival. All complications after the PVE/HVE procedure are documented. Liver volumes will be measured at week 1 and if applicable at week 3 and 6 after PVE/HVE and follow-up visits will be held at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the resection. RESULTS: Not applicable. CONCLUSION: DRAGON 1 is a prospective trial to assess the safety and feasibility of PVE/HVE. Participating study centers will be trained, and procedures standardized using Work Instructions (WI) to prepare for the DRAGON 2 randomized controlled trial. Outcomes should reveal the accrual potential of centers, safety profile of combined PVE/HVE and the effect of FLR-hypertrophy induction by PVE/HVE in patients with CRLM and a small FLR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04272931 (February 17, 2020). Toestingonline.nl: NL71535.068.19 (September 20, 2019).

Systematic review on the treatment of ischaemic colitis.

AIM: Ischaemic colitis is uncommon. Aetiological factors include abdominal aortic surgery, drugs (especially inotropics) or rheumatoid diseases, such as Takayasu's or Buerger's diseases. However, there is often no triggering factor, and it may be part of multifactorial cardiac, respiratory, renal or metabolic failure. METHOD: A systematic review of the current literature on the management of ischaemic colitis was carried out. RESULTS: Ten retrospective trials (841 patients) were included. No randomized controlled or prospective trial of the management of ischaemic colitis was found. CONCLUSION: There is very little evidence base for the management of this condition.

Increased multimodality treatment options has improved survival for Hepatocellular carcinoma but poor survival for biliary tract cancers remains unchanged.

BACKGROUND: Primary hepatobiliary cancer incidence in the UK is rising and survival rates are low. Surgery is the main curative option for these cancers, but multimodality therapies are expanding. The aim of our original study was to determine trends in survival, over an 8-year period, of patients treated for primary hepatobiliary cancers at our tertiary referral Centre. METHOD: Patients treated for the most common types of primary hepatobiliary cancers, namely Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder cancer between January 2009 and December 2016 were retrospectively analysed from a prospective database linked to UK Hospital Episode Statistics data. RESULTS: A total of 1536 patients with primary hepatobiliary cancers were assessed and treatment plans formulated at our supra-regional specialist Hepatobiliary MDT. The primary hepatobiliary cancers treated were HCC (n = 836), Cholangiocarcinoma (n = 516), and Gallbladder cancer (n = 184). Survival for all the 3 cancers was significantly better with curative treatment. Overall median survival times were 350, 180, and 150 days respectively for HCC, Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder cancer. Excluding best supportive care patients, the respective survival figures were 900, 600, and 400 days. Survival for HCC patients improved over time and was significantly increased in the final 3 years of the study (p ≤ 0.011 for all). Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder cancer survivals were poor and did not change significantly over time. CONCLUSION: HCC outcome has improved in association with expanded multimodal therapies. Survivals for cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer remain poor in parallel with limited expansion of multimodal therapies highlighting an unmet therapeutic need for biliary tract cancers.

Establishment of a pediatric liver transplantation program: experience with 100 transplantation procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the primary factors that influence the development and consolidation of a pediatric liver transplantation program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 100 liver transplantation procedures performed in 84 pediatric patients between May 1990 and November 2007. The male-female ratio was 40:60. Mean (SD) age was 5 years (40 patients were younger than 2 years); cold ischemia time was 7.10 (3.1) hours; surgery time was 5.2 (2.2) hours; and time on the waiting list for transplantation was 75 (range, 1-1012) days. Indications for transplantation included cholestatic disease (43%), acute hepatic failure (AHF; 34%), metabolic disorders (14%), and cirrhosis (9%). Transplanted organs included 3 split grafts, 29 partial grafts, and 8 living-donor grafts. RESULTS: Mean graft survival was 70.4%, 59.2%, and 58.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Factors that influenced graft outcome were age younger than 2 years; surgery time more than 6 hours; and AHF vs cholestatic disease, metabolic disorders, and cirrhosis. There were no significant differences in long-term (51% vs 59%) and short-term (71% vs 70%) graft survival between procedures performed in 1990-1998 compared with those performed in 1999-2007; however, there was a higher percentage (P = .005) of recipients at high risk (age younger than 2 years or with AHF) in the later period. All data were consistent with those of the European Liver Transplant Registry 2007. CONCLUSIONS: A pediatric liver transplantation program can be established by a group experienced in liver transplantation.

Carney's triad: case report and review.

INTRODUCTION: Carney's triad is a rare pathogenic entity which consists of the association in young women of multiple condromatosis in the lung, gastric leiomyosarcoma, and extradrenal paraganglioma; although the presence of three at the same time is not required for its diagnosis. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 27-year-old woman who was diagnosed of pulmonary multiple hamartomatosis and gastric stromal tumor. DISCUSSION: A review of the literature shows the most important prognosis factors and therapeutic options. Surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors and extradrenal paraganglioma seems to be the best treatment up to date.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei treated by cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: results from a single centre

BACKGROUND: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare, slowly progressive disease whose prognosis depends primarily on the completeness of cytoreduction. The value of intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and of additional factors predicting long-term outcome and disease-free survival (DFS) remains poorly understood. This study aims to analyse survival rates and prognostic factors in patients undergoing maximal cytoreduction and HIPEC. METHODS: Thirty patients were selected from a prospective database of records for patients undergoing cytoreduction and HIPEC with mitomycin C or paclitaxel. Overall survival (OS), DFS, and the prognostic factors influencing them, were examined using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 44 months (range, 8-144). Histological classification of PMPs was DPAM in 6/30 of cases, PMCA-I in 10/30 and PMCA in 14/30. Complete cytoreduction (CC-0 and CC-1) was achieved in 28/30 of patients and CC-2 in 2/30. Median OS was 111 months (range 0-230) and five-year OS rate was 67%. Median DFS was 53.5 months (range 0-120) and 5-year DFS rate was 44%. Incomplete cytoreduction, lymph node involvement and PCI>20 were associated with poor prognosis for OS, while lymph node involvement, elevated CA-125 levels, unfavourable histology and previous chemotherapy were associated with poor outcomes for DFS. There was morbidity of Grade 3 or higher in 9/30. Post-operative mortality occurred in 1 case. CONCLUSION: Cytoreduction plus peritonectomy procedures combined with HIPEC is a safe treatment and could improve survival rates. Since the optimal cytoreduction is the primary prognostic factor, patients should be centralised under the care of experienced teams (AU)