Plus Sutures for preventing surgical site infection: a systematic review of clinical outcomes with economic and environmental models.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent ~ 20% of all hospital-acquired infections in surgical patients and are associated with prolonged hospital stay, admission to intensive care, and mortality. We conducted a systematic review with economic and environmental models to assess whether triclosan-coated sutures (Plus Sutures) provide benefits over non-coated sutures in the reduction of SSI risk. METHODS: Searches were conducted in fifteen databases. A total of 1,991 records were retrieved. Following deduplication and screening by two independent reviewers, 31 randomized controlled trials in adults and children were included in the review. Similarity of the studies was assessed by narrative review and confirmed by quantitative assessment. A fixed effects meta-analysis of SSI incidence model including all groups of patients estimated a risk ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.64 to 0.79) indicating those in the Plus Sutures group had a 29% reduction in the risk of developing an SSI compared with those in the control group (p < 0.001). Safety outcomes were analysed qualitatively. RESULTS: The economic model estimated the use of Plus Sutures to result in average cost savings of £13.63 per patient. Plus Sutures remained cost-saving in all subgroup analyses with cost-savings ranging between £11 (clean wounds) and £140 (non-clean wounds). The environmental impact of SSI is substantial, and the model suggests that the introduction of Plus Sutures could result in potential environmental benefits. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that Plus Sutures are associated with a reduced incidence of SSI across all surgery types alongside cost savings when compared with standard sutures.

Clinical outcomes of triclosan-coated barbed suture in open hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: We assessed clinical outcomes of patients undergoing open hernia repair using STRATAFIX™ Symmetric, a barbed triclosan-coated suture (TCS; Ethicon), versus conventional polydioxanone suture (PDS) for abdominal wall closure. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study identified patients undergoing hernia repair. The site used PDS from 2013 to 2016 and switched exclusively to barbed TCS in 2017. Outcomes were assessed at 30, 60, and 90 days. Multivariate regression analyses and Cox proportional hazards models were used. RESULTS: Of 821 hernia repairs, 446 used barbed TCS and 375 used conventional PDS. Surgical site infections (SSIs) were significantly less frequent with barbed TCS (60 days, 5.9% vs. 11.4%; P = 0.0083; 90 days, 5.9% vs. 11.7%; P = 0.006) and this remained consistent after multivariate adjustment (60 days, OR [95% CI]: 0.5 [0.3-0.9]; 90 days, 0.5 [0.3-0.9]). Among patients with SSI, deep SSIs were less frequent with barbed TCS (60 days, 9.1% vs. 35.7%; P = 0.022; 90 days, 9.1% vs. 34.9%; P = 0.0252). Barbed TCS significantly reduced the risk of perioperative complications (HR [95% CI]: 0.5[0.3-0.8]; P = 0.0058). Hospital length of stay was 2.5 days shorter with barbed TCS (mean [95% CI]: 5.7[4.9-6.6] vs. 8.2[7.3-9.1] days; P < 0.0001). No differences in reoperation rate over time were observed by type of suture (HR[95% CI]:1.3 [0.5-3.4]; P = 0.4793). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that patients who underwent open hernia repair appeared to recover equally well regardless of the suture type. In addition, the use of barbed TCS was associated with significantly reduced risk of perioperative complications and hospital length of stay.

Expert commentary on the challenges and opportunities for surgical site infection prevention through implementation of evidence-based guidelines in the Asia-Pacific Region.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a significant source of morbidity and mortality in the Asia-Pacific region (APAC), adversely impacting patient quality of life, fiscal productivity and placing a major economic burden on the country's healthcare system. This commentary reports the findings of a two-day meeting that was held in Singapore on July 30-31, 2019, where a series of consensus recommendations were developed by an expert panel composed of infection control, surgical and quality experts from APAC nations in an effort to develop an evidence-based pathway to improving surgical patient outcomes in APAC. METHODS: The expert panel conducted a literature review targeting four sentinel areas within the APAC region: national and societal guidelines, implementation strategies, postoperative surveillance and clinical outcomes. The panel formulated a series of key questions regarding APAC-specific challenges and opportunities for SSI prevention. RESULTS: The expert panel identified several challenges for mitigating SSIs in APAC; (a) constraints on human resources, (b) lack of adequate policies and procedures, (c) lack of a strong safety culture, (d) limitation in funding resources, (e) environmental and geographic challenges, (f) cultural diversity, (g) poor patient awareness and (h) limitation in self-responsibility. Corrective strategies for guideline implementation in APAC were proposed that included: (a) institutional ownership of infection prevention strategies, (b) perform baseline assessments, (c) review evidence-based practices within the local context, (d) develop a plan for guideline implementation, (e) assess outcome and stakeholder feedback, and (f) ensure long-term sustainability. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the risk of SSIs in APAC region will require: (a) ongoing consultation and collaboration among stakeholders with a high level of clinical staff engagement and (b) a strong institutional and national commitment to alleviate the burden of SSIs by embracing a safety culture and accountability.

Improving surgical site infection prevention in Asia-Pacific through appropriate surveillance programs: Challenges and recommendation.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a substantial clinical and economic burden on patients and the healthcare system. The prevention of SSIs entails surveillance activities which lead to effective mitigation strategies, which are lacking across Asia Pacific (APAC). This manuscript aims to document gaps and challenges across APAC that affect the undertaking of a successful SSI surveillance activities and to provide recommendations on overcoming such challenges. METHODS: A targeted literature review with relevance to APAC identified a series of salient points pertaining to SSI prevention guidelines, implementation, surveillance and outcomes, which was discussed in July 2019 at the APAC Surgical Site Infection Prevention Symposium. An expert panel, comprising eight multidisciplinary experts from APAC and the USA, subsequently amalgamated the key discussion points from the Symposium and their clinical experiences in developing this article. RESULTS: The barriers to implementing a successful and effective APAC SSI surveillance program were identified as: (a) lack of standardized definitions, reporting methodology and accountability, (b) lack of fiscal resources, (c) reporting variability and under-reporting, and (d) lack of safety culture. Implementing an effective surveillance program in APAC will require countries to develop a well-designed and robust surveillance plan and ensure adequate training for staffs involved. CONCLUSION: To improve SSI prevention in the region, it is imperative to encourage implementation of national programs with standardized methodologies and accountabilities. An ongoing APAC information exchange, including data and methodologies, will enable continuous learning within the APAC region.

Abdominal tuberculosis in children: review of 26 cases.

The protean clinical manifestations and varied complications of abdominal tuberculosis continue to challenge the diagnostic acumen and therapeutic skills of all physicians. Although abdominal tuberculosis in children has not been common in the United States over the past 2 decades, the authors found 26 case reports for the period 1980-1993. Three clinical patterns were evident: intestinal (13) peritoneal (9), and asymptomatic with incidental calcifications apparent on abdominal radiographs (4). The diagnosis was suspected for only 23% of these cases, which emphasizes the nonspecific symptomatology caused by this extrapulmonary manifestation and the need for a high index of suspicion to make a prompt diagnosis. In this study, 24 of the 26 (91%) were of Hispanic origin; the other two were indo-Chinese, another high-risk group. Most patients (88%) had a positive PPD skin test result. Mycobacteria were isolated from 15 of 21 (71.4%) cultures, with M bovis in 80% and M tuberculosis in 20%. Antituberculous chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment; surgery is reserved for tissue diagnosis in cases of peritoneal tuberculosis and for the management of complications of intestinal tuberculosis. The response to chemotherapy usually is excellent, and long-term sequelae are uncommon. It appears that steroids do not decrease the incidence or degree of fibrosis in intestinal tuberculosis.