Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Emerg Med J ; 32(10): 813-6, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25527473

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The identification of serious injury is critical to the tasking of air ambulances. London's Air Ambulance (LAA) is dispatched by a flight paramedic based on mechanism of injury (MOI), paramedical interrogation of caller (INT) or land ambulance crew request (REQ).This study aimed to demonstrate which of the dispatch methods was most effective (in accuracy and time) in identifying patients with serious injury. METHODS: A retrospective review of 3 years of data (to December 2010) was undertaken. Appropriate dispatch was defined as the requirement for LAA to escort the patient to hospital or for resuscitation on-scene. Inaccurate dispatch was where LAA was cancelled or left the patient in the care of the land ambulance crew. The χ(2) test was used to calculate p values; with significance adjusted to account for multiple testing. RESULTS: There were 2203 helicopter activations analysed: MOI 18.9% (n=417), INT 62.4% (n=1375) and REQ 18.7% (n=411). Appropriate dispatch rates were MOI 58.7% (245/417), INT 69.7% (959/1375) and REQ 72.2% (297/411). INT and REQ were both significantly more accurate than MOI (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in accuracy between INT and REQ (p=0.36). Combining MOI and INT remotely identified 80.2% of patients, with an overtriage rate of 32.8%. Mean time to dispatch (in minutes) was MOI 4, INT 8 and REQ 21. CONCLUSIONS: Telephone interrogation of the caller by a flight paramedic is as accurate as ground ambulance crew requests, and both are significantly better than MOI in identifying serious injury. Overtriage remains an issue with all methods.


Subject(s)
Air Ambulances/standards , Triage , Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis , Humans , London , Remote Consultation/methods , Remote Consultation/standards , Retrospective Studies , Triage/methods , Triage/standards
2.
Resuscitation ; 107: 135-8, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27377669

ABSTRACT

This report describes the first use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) in the pre-hospital setting to control catastrophic haemorrhage. The patient, who had fallen 15 meters, suffered catastrophic internal haemorrhage associated with a pelvic fracture. He was treated by London's Air Ambulance's Physician-Paramedic team. This included insertion of a REBOA balloon catheter at the scene to control likely fatal exsanguination. The patient survived transfer to hospital, emergency angio-embolization and subsequent surgery. He was discharged neurologically normal after 52 days and went on to make a full recovery. The poor prognosis in catastrophic torso haemorrhage and novel endovascular methods of haemorrhage control are discussed. Also the challenges of Pre-Hospital REBOA are discussed together with the training and governance required for a safe system.


Subject(s)
Aorta , Balloon Occlusion/methods , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Hemorrhage , Multiple Trauma/complications , Pelvic Bones , Adult , Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/physiopathology , Hemorrhage/therapy , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Multiple Trauma/physiopathology , Pelvic Bones/diagnostic imaging , Pelvic Bones/injuries , Shock, Hemorrhagic , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL