Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Curr Opin Genet Dev ; 14(2): 188-95, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15196466

ABSTRACT

Imprinted genes play important roles in development, and most are clustered in large domains. Their allelic repression is regulated by 'imprinting control regions' (ICRs), which are methylated on one of the two parental alleles. Non-histone proteins and nearby sequence elements influence the establishment of this differential methylation during gametogenesis. DNA methylation, histone modifications, and also polycomb group proteins are important for the somatic maintenance of imprinting. The way ICRs regulate imprinting differs between domains. At some, the ICR constitutes an insulator that prevents promoter-enhancer interactions, when unmethylated. At other domains, non-coding RNAs could be involved, possibly by attracting chromatin-modifying complexes. The latter silencing mechanism has similarities with X-chromosome inactivation.


Subject(s)
Epigenesis, Genetic/physiology , Genomic Imprinting/physiology , Animals , DNA-Binding Proteins , GTP-Binding Proteins/genetics , GTPase-Activating Proteins , Gene Expression Regulation/physiology , Insulin-Like Growth Factor II/genetics , Mice , Receptor, IGF Type 2/genetics , Repressor Proteins
2.
EMBO Mol Med ; 2(5): 159-71, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20432501

ABSTRACT

Epigenetic perturbations are increasingly described in cancer cells where they are thought to contribute to deregulated gene expression and genome instability. Here, we report the first evidence that a distinct category of chromosomal translocations observed in human tumours--those targeting 1q12 satellite DNA--can directly mediate such perturbations by promoting the formation of aberrant heterochromatic foci (aHCF). By detailed investigations of a 1q12 translocation to chromosome 2p, in a case of human B cell lymphoma, aberrant aHCF were shown to be localized to the nuclear periphery and to arise as a consequence of long range 'pairing' between the translocated 1q12 and chromosome 2 centromeric regions. Remarkably, adjacent 2p sequences showed increased levels of repressive histone modifications, including H4K20me3 and H3K9me3, and were bound by HP1. aHCF were associated to aberrant spatial localization and deregulated expression of a novel 2p gene (GMCL1) that was found to have prognostic impact in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Thus constitutive heterochromatin rearrangements can contribute to tumourigenesis by perturbing gene expression via long range epigenetic mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Cell Nucleus/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Heterochromatin/genetics , Lymphoma, B-Cell/genetics , Translocation, Genetic , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2/genetics , Humans
3.
CSH Protoc ; 2007: pdb.prot4767, 2007 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21357105

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTIONIn cells and tissues, the histone proteins that constitute the nucleosomes can present multiple post-translational modifications, such as lysine acetylation, lysine and arginine methylation, serine phosphorylation, and lysine ubiquitination. On their own, or in combination, these covalent modifications on the core histones are thought to play essential roles in chromatin organization and gene expression in eukaryotes. Importantly, patterns of histone modifications may be somatically conserved and can, thereby, maintain locus-specific repression/activity in defined lineages, or throughout development. Indirect immunofluorescence studies on cultured cells have been pivotal in unraveling the roles of histone modifications. However, to address in detail what happens at specific sites in vivo, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is the method of choice. Here, we describe how ChIP can be performed on non-fixed chromatin from animal cells or tissues (fresh or frozen) to analyze histone modifications at specific chromosomal sites. These protocols are suitable only for analyzing histones and their modifications. For other applications, chromatin immunoprecipitation should be performed on cross-linked chromatin.

4.
CSH Protoc ; 2007: pdb.prot4768, 2007 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21357106

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTIONAfter chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), different PCR-based approaches can be used to determine how much DNA is precipitated at a locus of interest. Real-time PCR amplification is often the preferred technique. One can also use duplex PCR amplification, which is the coamplification of a fragment from the region of interest and a control fragment (e.g., the actin gene, or the tubulin gene). This approach allows for estimating relative levels of specific histone modifications along chromosomal domains. For allele-specific studies (for instance, on dosage-compensation mechanisms or on genomic imprinting), electrophoretic detection of single-strand conformation polymorphisms (SSCP) or similar strategies such as hot-stop PCR can differentiate PCR products that represent the silent allele from those amplified from the active allele. If a polymorphic restriction site is present in one allele and absent in the other, the method of choice is hot-stop PCR. If no polymorphic restriction sites are available, but there are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that distinguish the alleles of interest, the best approach is to separate the PCR products derived from the two different alleles using SSCP. In SSCP, it is possible to discriminate denatured PCR products derived from one allele or the other because the secondary structure of each single strand will be directly dependent on the sequence itself. Hence, in nondenaturing gel conditions, each single strand will migrate differently. These four PCR-based methodologies to analyze immunoprecipitated chromatin (real-time PCR, duplex PCR, hot-stop PCR, and SSCP) are presented here.

5.
EMBO J ; 26(3): 720-9, 2007 Feb 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17255950

ABSTRACT

Only some imprinting control regions (ICRs) acquire their DNA methylation in the male germ line. These imprints are protected against the global demethylation of the sperm genome following fertilisation, and are maintained throughout development. We find that in somatic cells and tissues, DNA methylation at these ICRs is associated with histone H4-lysine-20 and H3-lysine-9 trimethylation. The unmethylated allele, in contrast, has H3-lysine-4 dimethylation and H3 acetylation. These differential modifications are also detected at maternally methylated ICRs, and could be involved in the somatic maintenance of imprints. To explore whether the post-fertilisation protection of imprints relates to events during spermatogenesis, we assayed chromatin at stages preceding the global histone-to-protamine exchange. At these stages, H3-lysine-4 methylation and H3 acetylation are enriched at maternally methylated ICRs, but are absent at paternally methylated ICRs. H4 acetylation is enriched at all regions analysed. Thus, paternally and maternally methylated ICRs carry different histone modifications during the stages preceding the global histone-to-protamine exchange. These differences could influence the way ICRs are assembled into specific structures in late spermatogenesis, and may thus influence events after fertilisation.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/chemistry , DNA Methylation , Genomic Imprinting/genetics , Histones/metabolism , Locus Control Region/genetics , Spermatogenesis/genetics , Animals , Blotting, Western , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation , Computational Biology , Histones/genetics , Male , Mice , Sex Factors
6.
Bioessays ; 28(5): 453-9, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16615080

ABSTRACT

Human chromosome 11p15 comprises two imprinted domains important in the control of fetal and postnatal growth. Novel studies establish that imprinting at one of these, the IGF2-H19 domain, is epigenetically deregulated (with loss of DNA methylation) in Silver-Russell Syndrome (SRS), a congenital disease of growth retardation and asymmetry. Previously, the exact opposite epigenetic alteration (gain of DNA methylation) had been detected at the domain's 'imprinting control region' (ICR) in patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome (BWS), a complex disorder of fetal overgrowth. However, more frequently, BWS is caused by loss of DNA methylation at the ICR that regulates the second imprinted domain at 11p15. Interestingly, a similar epigenetic alteration (with loss of methylation) at a putative ICR on human chromosome 6q24, is involved in transient neonatal diabetes mellitus (TNDM), a congenital disease with intrauterine growth retardation and a transient lack of insulin. Thus, fetal and postnatal growth is epigenetically controlled by different ICRs, at 11p15 and other chromosomal regions.


Subject(s)
Epigenesis, Genetic , Genomic Imprinting , Growth Disorders/genetics , Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11/genetics , DNA Methylation , Diabetes Mellitus/congenital , Diabetes Mellitus/genetics , Female , Growth Disorders/congenital , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Models, Genetic , Pregnancy , Syndrome
7.
Dev Genes Evol ; 215(3): 158-63, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15611849

ABSTRACT

The RYK subfamily of receptor tyrosine kinases is characterised by unusual, but highly conserved, amino acid substitutions in the kinase domain. The linotte/derailed gene encodes a Drosophila RYK subfamily member involved in embryonic and adult central nervous system development. Previous studies have shown that the kinase activity of this receptor is not required in vivo for its embryonic function. In this study, we have investigated the role of the cytoplasmic domain and the kinase activity of the linotte/derailed receptor tyrosine kinase in adult brain development. Our results indicate that these domains are not essential for adult brain development but they are required for the proper regulation of the activity of this receptor. This sheds light on a regulatory role for the kinase activity of a RYK subfamily member.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics , Animals , Base Sequence , Brain/enzymology , Brain/growth & development , DNA Primers , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic , Mutagenesis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
8.
EMBO J ; 21(23): 6560-70, 2002 Dec 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12456662

ABSTRACT

In different eukaryotic model systems, chromatin and gene expression are modulated by post-translational modification of histone tails. In this in vivo study, histone methylation and acetylation are investigated along the imprinted mouse genes Snrpn, Igf2r and U2af1-rs1. These imprinted genes all have a CpG-rich regulatory element at which methylation is present on the maternal allele, and originates from the female germ line. At these 'differentially methylated regions' (DMRs), histone H3 on the paternal allele has lysine-4 methylation and is acetylated. On the maternally inherited allele, in contrast, chromatin is marked by hypermethylation on lysine-9 of H3. Allele-specific patterns of lysine-4 and lysine-9 methylation are also detected at other regions of the imprinted loci. For the DMR at the U2af1-rs1 gene, we establish that the methyl-CpG-binding-domain (MBD) proteins MeCP2, MBD1 and MBD3 are associated with the maternal allele. These data support the hypothesis that MBD protein-associated histone deacetylase/chromatin-remodelling complexes are recruited to the parental allele that has methylated DNA and H3-K9 methylation, and are prevented from binding to the opposite allele by H3 lysine-4 methylation.


Subject(s)
DNA Methylation , Genomic Imprinting , Histones/metabolism , Lysine/metabolism , Nerve Tissue Proteins , Nuclear Proteins , Ribonucleoproteins , Animals , Autoantigens , Histones/genetics , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Proteins/genetics , Ribonucleoproteins, Small Nuclear/genetics , Splicing Factor U2AF , snRNP Core Proteins
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL