Inequalities in access to biological treatments for psoriasis: results from the Italian Psocare registry.

BACKGROUND: Limited evidence is available on the impact of socioeconomic factors on drug prescriptions for psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To investigate factors influencing prescription of conventional vs. biological treatment for patients with psoriasis, based on the Italian Psocare registry, with a special focus on socioeconomic factors. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study evaluating the baseline data of patients included in the Psocare registry. All of the consecutive adult patients with a diagnosis of chronic plaque psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis who were prescribed a systemic treatment for psoriasis at participating centres were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the baseline factors associated with a biologics prescription were performed. RESULTS: From September 2005 to September 2009, 12 838 patients were identified. A multivariate analysis revealed that, among other factors, completing a level of education higher than lower secondary school and being employed as a manager or a professional were independent factors associated with a biologics prescription at entry in the registry. Additional analyses on the association between these two variables and a severe psoriasis condition [Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score > 20] revealed a significantly increasing trend of severe disease towards lower educational attainment, while unemployed patients were more likely to have a more severe condition compared with the other categories of workers. CONCLUSIONS: We documented inequalities of drug prescriptions for psoriasis in Italy, with a trend towards a higher frequency of prescription for more expensive biologics in higher socioeconomic sectors of the population.

Dose adjustment of biologic therapies for psoriasis in dermatological practice: a retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the large routine use of biologic drugs in psoriasis treatment, the majority of studies do not take into consideration dose-adjustment practice in 'real-life' dermatological setting. In routine clinical practice, the disease management may include a large number of conditions requiring non-standard dosage regimens, including dose escalation, dose reduction and/or off-label treatment interruption. OBJECTIVE: The ONDA (Outcome of non-standard dosing regimen in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis) study aim was to retrospectively analyse dose-adjustment strategies among biologic therapies for psoriasis in dermatological practice during a 3-year period. RESULTS: This retrospective, observational, multicentre study was carried out in 350 patients (68% male, 32% female) affected by plaque-type psoriasis (Pso) with a coexistence of psoriatic arthritis in 164 patients (46.9%). At baseline mean PASI score was 14.9 (SD 7.2). Dose adjustment was demonstrated to be a common practice with 70/350 patients (20%) who needed a dose variation during the treatment time, in particular a dose increase in 20/70 patients (28.6%) and a dose reduction in 50/70 patients (71.4%). Dose increase was due to inefficacy on Pso parameters in 60% of cases and to inefficacy of PsA parameters in 40% of cases, while dose reduction (or temporary off-label treatment interruption) was due to prolonged remission in 54% of cases, other reason in 18% of cases, patient choice or request in 14% of cases, occurrence of concomitant event in 12% of cases. CONCLUSION: Dose adjustment is a common clinical practice, consisting of frequent dose reduction when a disease prolonged remission is obtained or dose increase to improve efficacy on Pso and PsA disease parameters.