Tumor size and focality in breast carcinoma: Analysis of concordance between radiological imaging modalities and pathological examination at a cancer center.

CONTEXT: Accurate assessment of clinical and pathological tumor stage is crucial for patient treatment and prognosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the concordance between the tumor size and focality between radiological studies and pathology and to evaluate the impact of discrepancies on staging. DESIGN: Patients who underwent surgery for invasive breast carcinoma from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2015, were identified. RESULTS: Three imaging modalities (mammogram, ultrasound and MRI) were compared with gross examination and final pathology. 1152 preoperative radiological studies were evaluated for focality and 1019 were evaluated for tumor size. For all 3 radiographic modalities, there was a statistically significant difference between the mean tumor size on radiology and the final pathology report (mammogram, P < .001; ultrasound, P = .004; MRI, P < .001). In 29% of radiology studies, there was a discrepancy in stage. The error rate for determining focality was 28% for mammograms, 27% for ultrasounds, and 29% for MRIs. Tumor size from gross examination correlated with microscopic tumor size in 57% of cases, but gross examination had 88% concordance with the final pathology report in determining focality. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed statistically significant differences in mean tumor size reported across all 3 imaging modalities when compared to the final pathology report. MRI had the highest error rate, with a tendency to overestimate tumor size and number of foci. Among all diagnoses, cases of invasive carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component were most prone to discrepancies with imaging.

Silent Presentation of a Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas.

BACKGROUND Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare tumor frequently found in the head or tail of the pancreas. It mainly presents in young women between the 2nd and 3rd decades of life. A predilection for African Americans and Asians has been observed and is rarely reported in children. Most patients are symptomatic, with abdominal pain as the most common presenting symptom. Clinical laboratory test results are usually normal and pancreatic markers are not typically elevated. Metastatic disease is very uncommon, but most often metastasizes to the liver and regional lymph nodes. Prognosis is usually excellent after surgical resection. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 14-year-old Hispanic female who presented to the emergency department after a high-speed motor vehicle accident. She suffered multiple body traumas. Specifically, the patient referred severe epigastric pain. No significant past medical or surgical history was obtained. Laboratory workup was non-contributory. Further evaluation with abdomen and pelvis contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a pancreatic tail mass. Distal pancreatectomy followed. Pathologic diagnosis of SPN was established. CONCLUSIONS SPN is a rare exocrine tumor with excellent prognosis following resection. Imaging findings are suggestive, but a pathology evaluation is necessary to make the final diagnosis. Differential diagnosis includes entities such as mucinous cystic pancreatic tumor, pancreatic ductal carcinoma, and pancreatic serous cystadenoma. Radiologists play a vital role in the diagnosis, since many times, as in our case, it presents as an incidental finding. A small percentage of SPN neoplasms are associated with metastasis or local recurrence. Therefore, the aim of our case presentation is to review key imaging findings to guide early management and surgical planning.