ABSTRACT
AIMS: This Delphi study was planned to examine global expert consensus with regard to utility, accuracy, and categorization of Bladder Contractility Index (BCI), Bladder Outlet Obstruction Index (BOOI), and the related evidence. This manuscript deals with children and follows previous manuscripts reporting on adult men and women. METHODS: Eighteen experts were invited to answer the two-round survey including three foundation questions and four survey questions. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. The ordinal scale (0-10) in Round 1 was classified into "strongly agree," "agree," "neutral," "disagree," and "strongly disagree" for the final round. A systematic search for evidence was conducted for therapeutic studies that have examined outcome stratified by the indices in children. RESULTS: Eleven experts participated in the survey with 100% completion. Consensus was not noted with regard to any of the questions. There was a general trend toward disagreement with the utility of the BCI and BOOI in children. Systematic search yielded one publication pertaining the value of the indices in predicting long-term outcome in boys treated for posterior urethral valves. CONCLUSIONS: This global Delphi survey of experts showed a general disinclination to use numerical indices for bladder contractility and bladder outflow obstruction in children. There is very little data on the use of the BCI and BOOI indices in children. The establishment of urodynamic indices in children might help refine the treatment of functional urological disorders in children.
Subject(s)
Urethral Obstruction , Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction , Male , Adult , Humans , Child , Female , Urinary Bladder , Delphi Technique , UrodynamicsABSTRACT
AIMS: This Delphi study was planned to examine global expert consensus with regard to utility, accuracy, and categorization of the bladder contractility index (BCI), bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI), and the related evidence. This manuscript deals with adult women and follows a previous manuscript reporting on adult men. METHODS: Twenty-nine experts were invited to answer the two-round survey including three foundation questions and 12 survey questions. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. The ordinal scale (0-10) in round 1 was classified into "strongly agree," "agree," "neutral," "disagree," and "strongly disagree" for the final round. A systematic search for evidence was conducted for therapeutic studies that have examined outcome stratified by the indices in women. RESULTS: Eighteen experts participated in the survey with 100% completion. Consensus was noted with regard to 2 of 12 questions, both in the negative. The experts had a consensus that BOOI was neither accurate nor useful and a similar negative trend was noted with regard to BCI. However, there was support, short of consensus, for the utility on an index of bladder contractility and bladder outflow obstruction. Systematic search yielded eight publications pertaining to stress urinary incontinence (n = 6), pelvic organ prolapse (n = 1), and intra-sphincteric botulinum toxin (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Experts had significant concerns with regard to the use of the male BCI and BOOI in adult women despite a general recognition of the need for numerical indices of contractility and obstruction. Systematic search showed a striking lack of evidence in this regard.
Subject(s)
Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction , Urinary Incontinence, Stress , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Urinary Bladder , Delphi Technique , Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction/drug therapy , Muscle Contraction , UrodynamicsABSTRACT
AIMS: This Delphi study was planned to examine global expert consensus with regard to utility, accuracy, and categorization of Bladder Contractility Index (BCI) and Bladder Outlet Obstruction Index (BOOI) and the related evidence. METHODS: Twenty-eight experts were invited to answer the two-round survey including three foundation questions and 15 survey questions. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. The ordinal scale (0-10) in round 1 was classified into "strongly agree," "agree," "neutral," "disagree," and "strongly disagree" for the final round. A systematic search for evidence was conducted for therapeutic studies that have examined outcome stratified by the indices in men. RESULTS: Nineteen experts participated in the survey with 100% completion. Consensus was noted with regard to 6 of 19 questions. Experts strongly agreed with utility of quantifying bladder contractility and bladder outflow obstruction with near unanimity regarding the latter. There was consensus that BCI and BOOI were accurate, that BCI was clinically useful, and for defining severe bladder outflow obstruction as BOOI > 80. Systematic search yielded 69 publications (BCI 45; BOOI 50). Most studies examined the indices as a continuous variable or by standard cutoffs (BCI 100, 150; BOOI 20, 40). CONCLUSION: There is general agreement among experts on need for indices to quantify bladder contractility and bladder outflow obstruction as well as with regard to accuracy and utility of BCI and BOOI indices. Few studies have examined the discriminant power of existing cutoffs or explored new ones. This is an extraordinary knowledge gap in the field of urology.
Subject(s)
Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction , Urinary Bladder , Adult , Humans , Male , Delphi Technique , Muscle Contraction , Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction/drug therapy , UrodynamicsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Since its emergence in 1967, flavoxate has been used to treat several urogenital tract disorders irrespective of the etiology of the underlying disease, but the main indications have been overactive bladder and urge symptomatology. With the advances in anticholinergic drugs, its popularity has decreased in recent decades. METHODS: In this review we summarize the current status of flavoxate in urogynecological practice focusing on its historical background, mechanism of action, efficacy, clinical experiences, outcomes, side effects and tolerability. We reviewed and analyze all the data and draw the major conclusions. We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library using the keyword "flavoxate", and summarized review articles, original studies and case reports published from 1970 to 2013. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We conclude that the minimal side effects and high tolerability of flavoxate make it worthy of consideration for the treatment of several clinical urogynecological conditions. It deserves more clinical studies to assess its efficacy as no randomized controlled trials have been performed with flavoxate during the last decade. More studies and novel drug formulations may reveal or improve its efficacy in daily practice.
Subject(s)
Flavoxate/therapeutic use , Parasympatholytics/therapeutic use , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/drug therapy , Female , Gynecology/trends , Humans , Medication AdherenceABSTRACT
According to the International Continence Society standardization reports, underactive bladder (UAB) is a decrease in detrusor contraction and/or shortening of the contraction time, resulting in an incomplete and/or prolongation of the bladder emptying within the normal time frame. It has been indicated that idiopathic, neurogenic, myogenic, and iatrogenic factors play a role in the etiology. To make a diagnosis, it is absolutely necessary to perform a pressure-flow study. Treatment alternatives are generally based on the evacuation of the lower urinary tract, independent of the etiology. UAB treatments are listed under the headings of conservative methods and clean intermittent catheterization, pharmacotherapy (alpha-blockers, cholinesterase inhibitors, muscarinic agonists, prostaglandin E2, and acotiamide), surgical treatments (sacral nerve stimulation-electrical stimulation, injections into the external sphincter, surgeries to be performed for bladder outlet obstruction, reduction cystoplasty, and latissimus dorsi detrusor myoplasty), and stem cell and gene therapies. It is still controversial whether satisfactory success is achieved in the treatment of patients with UAB. Owing to the better understanding of the pathophysiology, future developments in the pharmaceutical industry, gene therapy, and biomedical applications are expected to close the gap in the treatment.
ABSTRACT
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the most common type of urinary incontinence, and approximately 200 different methods have been described for its surgical management. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of SUI has led to the development of surgical therapies focused on creating a strong suburethral supportive layer and urethral resistance. The most important advantage of the pubovaginal sling (PVS) procedure is that it restores urethral resistance during stress maneuvers to prevent incontinence, while improving urethral coaptation at rest and allowing for spontaneous micturition. Various autologous, allograft, xenograft and synthetic materials have been used for the PVS. The autologous PVS procedure for the treatment of SUI offers the highest success rate and is the most commonly used PVS surgical method. Unlike xenograft and allograft materials, the autologous procedure does not result in a tissue reaction and is associated with a low rate of material-related complications.