Multinational institutional survey on patterns of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography use in adult cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To assess institutional patterns of perioperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) usage. DESIGN: The authors hypothesized that TEE is performed more frequently and comprehensively in academic centers, mainly by anesthesiologists, and barriers to performing TEE are due to inadequate resources. A survey was deployed to selected participants. Collated responses were assessed for demographic patterns in TEE practice, and 2-category comparisons were made with Chi-squared association tests. SETTING: Web-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Practitioners in cardiovascular anesthesia/surgery in 200 institutions. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Surveys were completed by respondents representing 200 centers in 27 countries and 1,727 anesthesiologists with a mean annual institutional volume of 924 cases. Most centers were in the USA (53%) and were defined as academic (83%). Anesthesiologists performed (85%) and also read/reported TEEs (78%) in most centers. Three-dimensional TEE is performed routinely at 40% of centers. TEE is used routinely for valve surgery in 95% of institutions compared to 68% for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Academic institutions assessed diastolic function more often than nonacademic centers (46% v 19%; p = 0.006). The most important reason cited for not using TEE in all cases was insufficient resource availability (47%). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that TEE is performed more comprehensively in academic centers, mainly by anesthesiologists, and that lack of resources is a significant barrier to routine TEE usage. TEE is used more often for valve surgery than for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and many centers use 3D TEE. This survey describes international TEE practice patterns and identifies limitations to universal adoption of TEE in cardiac surgery.

Strict glucose control does not affect mortality after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: The effects of both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia are deleterious to patients with neurologic injury. METHODS: On January 1, 2002, the neurointensive care unit at the University of Virginia Health System initiated a strict glucose control protocol (goal glucose < 120 mg/dl). The authors conducted an impact study to determine the effects of this protocol on patients presenting with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. RESULTS: Among the 834 patients admitted between 1995 and 2007, the in-hospital mortality was 11.6%. The median admission glucose for survivors was lower (135 vs. 176 mg/dl); however, on multivariate analysis, increasing admission glucose was not associated with a statistically significant increase in the risk of death (P = 0.064). The median average glucose for survivors was also lower (116 vs. 135 mg/dl). This was significant on multivariate analysis (P < 0.001); however, the effect was small (odds ratio, 1.045). Implementation of the strict glucose protocol decreased median average glucose (121 vs. 116 mg/dl, P < 0.001) and decreased the incidence of hyperglycemia. Implementation of the protocol had no effect on in-hospital mortality (11.7% vs. 12.0%, P = 0.876 [univariate], P = 0.132 [multivariate]). Protocol implementation was associated with an increased incidence of hypoglycemia (P < 0.001). Hypoglycemia was associated with a substantially increased risk of death on multivariate analysis (P = 0.009; odds ratio = 3.818). CONCLUSIONS: The initiation of a tight glucose control regimen lowered average glucose levels but had no effect on overall in-hospital mortality.