Preventive Medicine in Pediatric Cardiology Practice.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to assess contemporary practice patterns of pediatric cardiologists with respect to cholesterol disorders and smoking-related illness. STUDY DESIGN: We sent 2 anonymous surveys to the members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery and the Pediheart online community. The surveys addressed training in and management of cholesterol disorders and smoking-related illness. RESULTS: There were 97 responses to the cholesterol disorders survey. A total of 51.6% reported little or no formal training on cholesterol disorders. A total of 56.4% underestimated the prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia by at least twofold. A total of 54.7% were at least somewhat comfortable prescribing statins. In 5 clinical vignettes, respondents frequently gave clinical recommendations in line with the 2019 American Heart Association guidelines although both undertreatment and overtreatment were recommended. There were 90 responses to the survey on smoking-related illness. Little or no formal training in nicotine addiction (52.3%) or smoking cessation (60.5%) was reported by respondents. Respondents screened for tobacco use in less than a one-third of hospitalizations and less than two-thirds of outpatient clinic visits. Screening for exposure to secondhand smoke was even less common. Twenty-seven percent of respondents never recommend a household smoking ban for their patients. A total of 83.3% were uncomfortable prescribing medications for their patients for smoking cessation, and 65.5% rarely or never refer patients for smoking cessation assistance. CONCLUSION: Although positioned to address the childhood origins of adult heart disease, those cardiologists surveyed placed a limited emphasis on cholesterol disorders and smoking-related disease in their clinical practice.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia Biomarker Distribution in Dried Blood Spots.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate distribution profiles of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and apolipoprotein B (apoB) as candidate markers of familial hypercholesterolemia in newborns, taking into consideration potential confounding factors, such as gestational age, birth weight, sex, and race. STUDY DESIGN: TC, LDL-C, and apoB were measured from 10 000 residual deidentified newborn dried blood spot cards. Concentrations for each biomarker were reported as multiples of the median, with emphasis on describing the 99th percentile values based on birth weight, gestational age, sex, and race. Seasonal variation of biomarkers was also explored. RESULTS: LDL-C and apoB had distribution curves with tails showing extreme elevation, whereas the distribution of TC was less elevated and had the smallest range. Neonates born at early gestational age and low birth weight had significantly greater 99th percentile of multiples of the median values for apoB but not TC or LDL-C. Differences in biomarker concentration based on sex and race were minimal. All biomarkers showed greatest concentrations in the winter as compared with summer months. CONCLUSIONS: LDL-C and apoB had distribution curves supporting candidacy for neonatal familial hypercholesterolemia screening. Future studies are needed to correlate newborn screening results with molecular testing to validate these 2 biomarkers, along with measured cholesterol levels later in childhood.

Practices and Attitudes Regarding Pediatric Cholesterol Screening Recommendations Differ Between Pediatricians and Family Medicine Clinicians.

Pediatricians had higher rates of ordering pediatric cholesterol screening than family medicine (FM) clinicians. This study aims to compare knowledge, attitude, and practices of clinicians' pediatric cholesterol screening practices and attitudes between these two specialties. A 14-item electronic survey using Likert scales was sent to all clinicians in the institution's Departments of Pediatrics and FM between 2018 and 2019. Chi-square and t-tests were used to compare pediatricians and FM clinicians. 22 clinicians from Pediatrics and 111 from FM completed the survey. Compared to FM clinicians, pediatricians were more familiar with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines, which are more vigorous in their recommendation of universal cholesterol screening. Pediatricians reported being more supportive of universal cholesterol screening in children (p < 0.05). In practice, pediatricians reported screening almost two thirds (64.8%) of eligible patients during the past year, while FM clinicians reported screening approximately one third (34.1%) of eligible patients (p < 0.001). Pediatricians were more likely to screen based on patient-specific risk factors and their practice decisions were more heavily influenced by published guidelines, institutional education, availability of non-fasting blood to be used for screening, and the availability of an institutional pediatric lipid clinic (p < 0.05). The differences in knowledge, attitudes, and practices of cholesterol screening may contribute to different screening rates among clinicians from FM and pediatrics. To improve patient care and reduce gaps, it is important to implement interventions at the institutional level as well as to adopt uniform guideline recommendations at the national level.

Differences in pediatric cholesterol screening rates between family physicians and pediatricians correlate with conflicting guidelines.

Conflicting guidelines regarding universal pediatric cholesterol screening were released between 2011 and 2019, but the impact on screening rates remains understudied. The purpose of this study was to examine trends in pediatric cholesterol screening rates within a single institution in the United States and their association with release of national guidelines, local educational tools, and electronic health record (EHR) modifications. Order placement was defined as ordering a high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in a patient aged 9-21 years with ≥1 well visit in prior 3 years. Order placement rate (OPR) was calculated per month using 3 months' moving average smoothing and analyzed based on date, patient age, and specialty of ordering clinician. Timing of educational tools, EHR modifications, and national guideline release were analyzed for changes in OPR. Prior to release of 2011 guidelines recommending universal pediatric cholesterol screening, pediatrician OPR was 35% (95% CI: 29-43%) compared to 8% (7-11%) for family physicians. For both specialties, OPR increased after 2011 guidelines, educational initiatives, and EHR changes, but decreased after 2016, with a larger decrease for family physicians (p < 0.001 for all). OPR was consistently higher for pediatricians than for family physicians during the study period, with largest OPR changes correlating with release of guidelines. The findings from the study suggest that conflicting guidelines may contribute to lower overall OPR, and to different screening rates for children cared for by pediatricians compared to family physicians.

Novel Lipid Thresholds for Screening Predict the Need for Pharmacotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and HDL-C thresholds for pediatric nonfasting lipid screens that are more predictive of the need for lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy and estimate numbers of potentially avoidable fasting lipid panels. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective review of children and youths aged 8-21 years presenting for preventive cardiology care, initial lipid results, recommendations for pharmacotherapy, and presence of additional cardiovascular risk factors were noted. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis calculated threshold lipid values predicting the need for pharmacotherapy and were applied to 2 screening populations. Rates of potentially unnecessary fasting lipid panels were calculated. RESULTS: A non-HDL-C value >156 mg/dL for children with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factors and >199 mg/dL for children without risk factors conferred 95% or greater sensitivity in predicting a recommendation for pharmacotherapy with higher specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value compared with current guidelines. HDL-C was a poor predictor of pharmacotherapy. Application of the current thresholds to screening populations indicated that 38.5%-92.3% of follow-up fasting lipid panels would not result in pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSION: Using higher non-HDL-C and lower HDL-C thresholds could prevent unnecessary follow-up lipid panels and reduce patient anxiety, cost, and time. This could improve compliance with universal pediatric lipid screening for both health care providers and families.

Improving Universal Pediatric Lipid Screening.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the release of national guidelines, electronic health record (EHR) modifications, and educational initiatives correlated with changes in pediatricians' universal lipid screening practices. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of EHRs in an academic general pediatric practice was performed to measure the prevalence of order placement. A child was "screened" if an order was placed during a well-visit between 9 and 21 years of age. The prevalence of order placement for lipid screens on 22 374 patients from January 2010 to December 2015 was analyzed for date of order and patient age, then compared with timing of guidelines, local educational initiatives, and EHR modifications. Primary study outcome was lipid screening order placement over time. RESULTS: Order placement increased from 8.9% (95% CI 8.3%-9.5%) before any intervention to 50.0% (95% CI 48.8%-51.2%) over the last 12 months of the study period (P < .001). All age groups showed significant increases in order placement. Changes in screening were seen following guideline publications, educational initiatives, and EHR modifications (for all, P < .0001). Order completion was 69.6% (95% CI 68.9%-70.3%). The composite prevalence of screening (order placement multiplied by order completion) was 46.8% over the 6-year study period. CONCLUSIONS: Improved adherence to recommendations for universal lipid screening is possible through educational initiatives and EHR modifications. Inclusion of 12- to 16-year-old adolescents/teenagers as a targeted group for universal screening in addition to recommended age groups improved screening prevalence. Similar efforts could be applicable for implementation of other guidelines.

Referral Patterns and Cascade Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in a Pediatric Lipid Clinic.

Charts of 42 children with familial hypercholesterolemia from a dyslipidemia clinic were reviewed for initial cholesterol screen indication and cascade screening results. Indications were universal screening (8/28 after guideline release, none before), family history (26/42), risk factor (5/42), and other (3/42). Cascade screening identified 63 relatives with unknown familial hypercholesterolemia.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiometabolic health parameters in children with preexisting dyslipidemia.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns for worsening cardiometabolic health in children. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent social restrictions on pediatric cardiometabolic health factors. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients in a pediatric lipid clinic in the year prior to (3/18/2019-3/17/2020) and during (3/18/2020-3/17/2021) the COVID-19 pandemic was performed. Physical findings (body mass index [BMI], waist circumference [WC], and blood pressure), laboratory markers of cardiometabolic health (lipid panel, insulin resistance, and liver transaminases), self-reported exercise time, and lipid-lowering medications (metformin, statin, omega-3 fatty acids, fenofibrate) were compared. RESULTS: 297 subjects met inclusion criteria. Among subjects prescribed no medications or on stable medication doses (n=241), there were few changes in lipid panels. Among subjects with new or increased medication doses between pre-pandemic and pandemic intervals (n=62), there were increases in triglycerides (p= 0.019) and HgbA1c (p=0.046). There was no change in z-scores for both BMI and WC for either group. CONCLUSION: We observed concerning trends in markers of cardiovascular disease health (dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and diabetes), independent of changes in weight, in at-risk children during the recent COVID pandemic. Our findings suggest that this vulnerable population may benefit from more frequent monitoring and intense management during such events.

Low HDL-C is a non-fasting marker of insulin resistance in children.

OBJECTIVES: Childhood obesity and associated comorbidities, including insulin resistance, are increasing in the United States. Our objectives were to (1) determine the prevalence of insulin resistance in children seen in dyslipidemia clinic and (2) evaluate which aspects of the lipid profile correlate with insulin resistance. METHODS: Children and adolescents seen in a specialized pediatric dyslipidemia clinic without secondary diagnoses known to alter the lipid panel were included. Simultaneous fasting lipid panel, insulin, and glucose levels were available in 572 children (50.5% male). RESULTS: Mean patient age was 15.0 ± 3.6 years with the majority being over 10 years of age (92.5%). Mean BMI was 29.8 ± 8.1 kg/m2 and BMI standard deviation score was 1.80 ± 0.9. Mean HOMA-IR was 6.2 ± 5.7 with a range of 0.4-49.3, and interquartile range of 2.7-7.6. Triglyceride level had a positive correlation with HOMA-IR (p<0.001). HDL-C negatively correlated with HOMA-IR even controlling for triglyceride level by multivariate analysis (p=0.001) and HDL-C <30 mg/dL predicted IR with 41.5% PPV. CONCLUSIONS: In children and adolescents with dyslipidemia, insulin resistance is common and significantly correlates with reduced HDL-C levels. Non-fasting samples are easier to obtain in children and low HDL-C, which is minimally affected on non-fasting samples, could be an easily obtained indicator of IR. Increasing detection of insulin resistance in children with dyslipidemia may provide greater opportunities for lifestyle interventions and possible pharmacotherapy to modify cardiovascular risk.

Clinician Responses to Pediatric Lipid Screens Suggestive of Severe Dyslipidemia.

Objectives: To measure case detection and response time of severe pediatric dyslipidemia, defined as non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ≥190 mg/dL on the initial screening panel. Although low adherence to guidelines recommending universal pediatric lipid screening is well-documented, it is unknown how clinicians respond to pediatric lipid screening results suggestive of severe dyslipidemia. Study design: This study is a single-institution, retrospective review of patients 0-18 years of age with initial lipid panels completed from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2018. A chart review was conducted on all patients with non-HDL-C ≥190 mg/dL to determine indication(s) for the initial lipid panel, specialty of ordering clinician, type of action taken to an abnormal result (repeat laboratory tests, treatment, and/or referral), time from result to clinician action, and diagnosis. Results: There were 16 860 initial lipid panels that met the inclusion criteria; 178 (1.1%) had non-HDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, indicating severe dyslipidemia. The most common indication for screening was universal screening (52%). For all lipid panels with non-HDL ≥190 mg/dL, a clinician action was documented for 47% within 7 days and 69% within 30 days. No follow-up action was documented in 18 (9%). A clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia was the most common diagnosis, in 24% of patients. Conclusions: The majority of lipid panels with non-HDL-C ≥190 mg/dL had some action documented, although the actions varied. Universal screening was the most common indication for testing, clarifying its significance in identifying severe dyslipidemia. Further education and improved management protocols may help responses to severe dyslipidemia in children at high risk for premature cardiovascular disease.

Phenotypic Variability in Atherosclerosis Burden in an Old-Order Amish Family With Homozygous Sitosterolemia.

Sitosterolemia is a rare atherogenic sterol storage disease with variability in its presentation requiring a high degree of clinical suspicion. We present 8 cases of sitosterolemia from an Amish kindred that, despite a background of decreased genetic and lifestyle variability, still had markedly variable presentations. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

In pediatric familial hypercholesterolemia, lipoprotein(a) is more predictive than LDL-C for early onset of cardiovascular disease in family members.

BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] ≥ 50 mg/dL predict atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in adults with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), but their role for children with FH is less clear. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationship between elevated Lp(a) and LDL-C levels in a pediatric population with FH and onset of ASCVD in family members. METHODS: Retrospective review of pediatric patients with FH identified LDL-C, Lp(a), and family history of ASCVD. Logistic regression modeling evaluated the association between the child's Lp(a) and peak LDL-C level with earliest age of ASCVD onset in their family. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine children from 109 families were identified. Children from families with early-onset ASCVD were 3 times more likely to have high Lp(a) than those with a family history of late-onset ASCVD (OR: 3.77, 95% CI: 1.16-12.25, P = .027) but were not more likely to have highly elevated peak LDL-C (≥190 mg/dL) (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.11-1.80, P = .26). CONCLUSION: Children with FH and family history of early-onset ASCVD were more likely to have Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL than children with FH and family history of late-onset ASCVD. Family history of early-onset ASCVD was more predictive of a child's Lp(a) level than of a child's peak LDL-C. Measurement of Lp(a) in children with FH may better characterize their cardiovascular risk, particularly when knowledge of family history is limited. Lp(a) testing may also identify children with FH that could benefit from more aggressive management to reduce ASCVD risk.

Safety of and cellular response to segmental bronchoprovocation in allergic asthma.

RATIONALE: Despite its incorporation into research studies, the safety aspects of segmental allergen bronchoprovocation and differences in cellular response among different allergens have received limited consideration. METHODS: We performed 87 segmental challenges in 77 allergic asthma subjects. Allergen dose was based on each subject's response to whole lung allergen challenge. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed at 0 and 48 hours. Safety indicators included spirometry, oxygen saturation, heart rate, and symptoms. RESULTS: Among subjects challenged with ragweed, cat dander, or house dust mite, there were no differences in safety indicators. Subjects demonstrated a modest oxygen desaturation and tachycardia during the procedure that returned to normal prior to discharge. We observed a modest reduction in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second following bronchoscopy. The most common symptoms following the procedure were cough, sore throat and fatigue. Total bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cell numbers increased from 13±4 to 106±108×10(4) per milliliter and eosinophils increased from 1±2 to 44±20 percent, with no significant differences among the three allergens. CONCLUSIONS: In mild allergic asthma, segmental allergen bronchoprovocation, using individualized doses of aeroallergens, was safe and yielded similar cellular responses.

Circadian variation of sputum inflammatory cells in mild asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma, like many conditions, demonstrates a circadian rhythm with a worsening of lung function in the early morning hours compared with in the late afternoon. OBJECTIVE: Because eosinophilic airway inflammation is a proposed mechanism for worsening asthma, we characterized circadian variation in airway eosinophils and determined its relationship to variability in airway function. METHODS: Pulmonary function testing, sputum induction, and phlebotomy were performed at 7 am and 4 pm in 11 allergic subjects with mild asthma. Sputum was analyzed for cell viability, differential, and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin levels. IL-5 levels in serum were measured by means of ELISA. RESULTS: Subjects had a significant decrease in FEV(1) (median [interquartile range] = 80% [70%-86%] vs 85% [82%-94%], P =.009) and a greater beta-agonist reversibility (median [interquartile range] = 13% [7%-32%] vs 8% [5%-14%], P =.024) in the early morning compared with in the late afternoon. Sputum analysis showed an increase in early morning total sputum leukocytes (median [interquartile range] = 4.3 x 10(6) [2.3 x 10(6) to 6.1 x 10(6)] vs 2.6 x 10(6) [1.7 x 10(6) to 3.6 x 10(6)], P =.044) and eosinophils (median [interquartile range] = 7.0 x 10(4) [2.7 x 10(4) to 18.7 x 10(4)] vs 3.6 x 10(4) [1.0 x 10(4) to 8.2 x 10(4)], P =.024). Furthermore, sputum eosinophils correlated with beta-agonist reversibility (R (s) = 0.665, P =.019). Finally, levels of IL-5 in serum and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin in sputum were significantly increased at 7 am. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that circadian variability in pulmonary function in asthma could be related to changes in airway eosinophil recruitment and activation.