Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 18(1): 24-32, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27964909

ABSTRACT

Accurate assessment of pain and its management is a challenging aspect of pediatric care. Nurses, usually the primary caregivers, showed inadequate knowledge and restrictive attitudes toward pain assessment. We evaluated an educational intervention to improve nurses' assessment of pain in a teaching hospital in India. A convenient sample of nurses working in the neonatal intensive care unit, pediatric ward, pediatric intensive care unit, and pediatric cardiac intensive care unit were included in the study. Workshops to improve understanding of pain, its assessment, and management strategies were conducted. A modified and consensually validated Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain questionnaire-2008 consisting of 25 true/false questions, eight multiple choice questions, and two case scenarios was administered before, immediately after, and 3 months after the workshops to evaluate impact of the intervention. Eighty-seven nurses participated. Mean (standard deviation) experience was 4.04 (5.9) years. Thirty-seven percent felt that they could assess pain without pain scales. About half (49.4%) of the nurses had not previously heard of pain scales, while 47.1% reported using a pain scale in their routine practice. Significant improvement was observed between pretest and post-test total scores (15.69 [2.94] vs. 17.51 [3.47], p < .001) as well as the pretest and retention score (15.69 [2.94] vs. 19.40 [4.6], p < .001). Albeit the study site and sampling frame may limit the reliability of the findings, the educational intervention was successful, and better retention test scores suggest a cascading effect. Pain assessment and management education of children should be incorporated in the nursing curriculum and should be reinforced in all pediatric units.


Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Continuing/methods , Nurses/standards , Pain Measurement/standards , Pain/nursing , Adult , Education, Nursing, Continuing/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , India , Male , Middle Aged , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Pain/physiopathology , Pain Management/nursing , Pain Management/statistics & numerical data , Pain Measurement/methods , Pain Measurement/nursing , Pediatric Nursing/education , Pediatric Nursing/methods , Pediatric Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
J Trop Pediatr ; 63(5): 374-379, 2017 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28077611

ABSTRACT

Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) and umbilical venous catheter (UVC) in terms of success rate, complications, cost and time of insertion in neonatal intensive care were compared. Neonates requiring vascular access for minimum 7 days were included. Sample size of 72 per group was determined. Trial was registered at Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2015/02/005529). Success rates of the UVC and PICC were 68.1% and 65.3%, respectively (p = 0.724). Mean (SD) time needed for PICC and UVC insertion was 34.13 (34.69) and 28.31 (17.19) min, respectively (p = 0.205). Mean (SD) cost of PICC insertion vs. UVC insertion was 60.9 (8.6) vs. 11.9 (8.7) US dollars (p < 0.0001). Commonest cause for failure of UVC was displacement [6 (8.3%)] and that for PICC was blockage [9 (12.5%)]. CONCLUSIONS: UVC is a cheaper alternative to PICC, with similar success rate, short-term complications and time needed for insertion.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/instrumentation , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/economics , Catheterization, Peripheral/economics , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , India , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Male , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Risk , Time Factors , Umbilical Veins
3.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 16(3): 314-20, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25439124

ABSTRACT

Pain following cardiac intervention in children is a common, but complex phenomenon. Identifying and reporting pain is the responsibility of the nursing staff, who are the primary caregivers and spend the most time with the patients. Inadequately managed pain in children may lead to multiple short- and long-term adverse effects. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the knowledge and attitudes regarding postoperative pain in children among the nursing staff at B.M. Patel Cardiac Center, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat, India. The study included 42 of the 45 nurses employed in the cardiac center. The nurses participating in the study were responsible for the care of the pediatric patients. A modified Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain and a sociodemographic questionnaire were administered after obtaining written informed consent. The study was approved by the institutional Human Research Ethics Committee. Mean (SD) experience in years of the nursing staff was 2.32 (1.69) years (range 1 month to 5 years). Of the nurses, 67% were posted in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit (ICU). The mean (SD) score for true/false questions was 11.48 (2.95; range 7,19). The average correct response rate of the true/false questions was 45.9%. Knowledge about pain was only affected by the ward in which the nurse was posted. In first (asymptomatic) and second (symptomatic) case scenarios, 78.6% and 59.5% underestimated pain, respectively. Knowledge and attitudes regarding pain and its management is poor among nurses. Targeted training sessions and repeated reinforcement sessions are essential for holistic patient care.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Cardiovascular Nursing/standards , Clinical Competence/standards , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Pain, Postoperative/nursing , Adult , Coronary Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Critical Care Nursing/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , India , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Pain Management/nursing , Pediatric Nursing/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
4.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 15(1): 69-75, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24602426

ABSTRACT

Neonates receiving care in intensive care units are highly likely to experience pain due to investigations and/or treatments carried out by the health care providers. Neonates are a vulnerable population because they are unable to vocalize their pain. Unaddressed and mismanaged pain can not only affect the child's comfort, but also may alter the development and cognitive abilities of the child in a later part of his/her life. Therefore it is entirely the caregiver's responsibility to accurately assess and manage neonatal pain. We assessed and compared the knowledge and attitudes regarding neonatal pain among the nurses posted in the various units of a pediatric department [pediatric ward, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)]. An appropriately modified Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain questionnaire was consensually validated, pretested, and then administered to the nursing staff of the pediatric department at a department at a hospital in Gujarat. Data were entered in Epi-Info and analyzed with the use of SPSS 14.0. The questionnaire was administered to 41 nurses working in the Department of Pediatrics, and the response rate was 97.5%. Mean age of the nurses in the study sample was 25.75 years (SD 5.513). The mean total score of the participants was 8.75 out of 17 (SD 2.549), which was unsatisfactory. The mean correct answer rate was 49.67% among the staff of NICU and 48.67% among the pediatric ward and PICU staff. The attitudes among the nurses were assessed. It was concluded that the nurses lack knowledge and that their attitudes also were hindering pain management. One of the barriers identified by the nurses was that physicians do not prescribe analgesics for managing neonatal pain. So not only the nursing staff, but all of the caregivers involved in neonatal care may be lacking in knowledge and hold perceptions and attitudes that hamper neonatal pain management.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/nursing , Acute Pain/therapy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Neonatal Nursing/methods , Pain Management/nursing , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Humans , India , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Pediatric Nursing/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
5.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 10(1): 462-467, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34017771

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Every year, globally 570,000 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer, out of which around 311,000 die. India contributes to about 132,000 new cases and 74,000 deaths yearly. One of the major risk factors for cervical cancer is infection with some types of human papillomavirus (HPV). This is both preventable (by vaccination) and detectable early (routine screening programs). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the knowledge and attitude in medical and paramedical students about cervical cancer and HPV vaccination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted, using predesigned and validated questionnaire. It was segregated into three parts: Q1-demographic details, Q2a-questions assessing knowledge, Q2b-questions assessing attitude. Our target population was female students (18-25 years) studying in medical, nursing, and physiotherapy colleges. Descriptive statistics of data was analyzed using SPSS 16.0. RESULTS: We had 73% response rate. Most participants belonged to upper middle and upper socioeconomic class, were pursuing MBBS, resided in villages, had educated parents, and had good health-care-seeking behavior. School education, television, and printed advertisements appeared to be underutilized. Around 50% of the participant had received chickenpox and typhoid vaccine, but only 8% had received HPV vaccine. The mean knowledge score was 5.19 ± 2.24, with 0.00 minimum and 11.0 maximum, out of a maximum possible score of 17. Only, place of residence appeared to effect the knowledge score. CONCLUSION: The study shows the dismal knowledge levels about HPV amongst students. Participants were interested in seeking knowledge; consider HPV vaccination provided they were provided with sufficient knowledge.

6.
Front Pediatr ; 4: 7, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26942166

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) undergo a multitude of painful and stressful procedures during the first days of life. Stress from this pain can lead to neurodevelopmental problems that manifest in later childhood and should be prevented. OBJECTIVE: To determine the number of painful procedures performed per day for each neonate, to verify documentation of painful procedures performed, and to, subsequently, note missed opportunities for providing pain relief to neonates. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study at a level III NICU located in a rural part of western India. A total of 69 neonates admitted for more than 24 h were included. Twenty-nine neonates were directly observed for a total of 24 h each, and another 40 neonatal records were retrospectively reviewed for the neonate's first 7 days of admission. All stressful and painful procedures performed on the neonate were recorded. Also recorded were any pharmaceutical pain relief agents or central nervous system depressants administered to the neonate before or at the time of the procedures. Average nurse-patient ratio was also calculated. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A documentation deficit of 2.2% was observed. The average nurse-patient ratio was 1.53:1. A total of 13711 procedures were recorded, yielding 44.1 (38.1 stressful, 3.8 mildly painful, and 2.2 moderately painful) procedures per patient day. Common stressful procedures were position changing (2501) and temperature recording (2208). Common mildly and moderately painful procedures were heel prick (757) and endotracheal suctioning (526), respectively. Use of pharmacological agents coincided with 33.48% of the procedures. The choice of drug and time of administration were inappropriate, indicating that the pharmacological agents were intended not for pain relief but rather for a coexisting pathology or as sedation from ventilation with no analgesia. CONCLUSION: Stressful procedures are common in the NICU; mildly and moderately painful procedures fairly common. Almost two-thirds of the times, no pharmaceutical pain relief methods were used, and when administered, the pharmaceutical agents were seldom intended for pain relief; this implies poor pain management practices and emphasizes the imperative need for educating NICU nurses, residents, fellows, and attendings.

7.
Ital J Pediatr ; 41: 25, 2015 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25881574

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy of and consistency in manual ventilation by trained healthcare professionals using three devices: self-inflating bag, flow-inflating bag, and T-piece resuscitator. METHODS: Prospective analytical study at a level III Neonatal unit of a tertiary care hospital. Forty participants (consultants, postgraduates, interns, and neonatal nurses - 10 each) manually ventilated a mannequin with the above three devices for three minutes each. This procedure was video recorded. The pressure delivered during the three minutes and the breath rates for the first minute, second minute, and third minute were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study population and group statistics were used for various parameters of interest. Factorial analysis of variance was conducted to determine the main effects of device and specialty of users. RESULTS: The mean (SD) peak inspiratory pressure of T-piece resuscitator was 16.5 (1.2), self-inflating bag (SIB) was 20.7 (4.4), and flow-inflating bag (AB) was 21.2 (5.0). The mean (SD) positive end expiratory pressure of T-piece resuscitator was 4.7 (0.9) cm of H2O and AB was 1.8 (1.7) cm of H2O. The maximum pressure delivered by T-piece resuscitator was 17.5, AB was 26.2, and SIB was 25.2 cm of H2O. Clinically appropriate breath rates were delivered using all of the devices. More effective breath rates were delivered using T-piece. There was no significant difference among the professional groups. CONCLUSIONS: The T-piece resuscitator provides the most consistent pressures and is most effective. Level of training has no influence on pressures delivered during manual ventilation.


Subject(s)
Positive-Pressure Respiration/instrumentation , Resuscitation/methods , Equipment Design , Humans , Manikins , Manometry , Treatment Outcome
8.
Indian Pediatr ; 52(6): 493-7, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26121725

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of oral sucrose in reducing pain/stress during echocardiography as estimated by Premature Infant Pain Profile score. DESIGN: Double-blind, parallel-group, randomized control trial. SETTING: Tertiary-care neonatal care unit located in Western India. PARTICIPANTS: Neonates with established enteral feeding, not on any respiratory support and with gestational age between 32 and 42 weeks requiring echocardiography. INTERVENTIONS: Neonates in intervention group received oral sucrose prior to echocardiography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessment was done using Premature Infant Pain Profile score. RESULTS: There were 104 examinations; 52 in each group. Baseline characteristics like mean gestational age (37.6 vs. 37.1), birth weight (2.20 vs. 2.08), and feeding status (Breastfeeding- 59.6% vs. 44.2%, paladai feeding- 13.5% vs. 13.5%, and gavage feeding- 26.9% vs. 42.3%) were comparable. The mean (SD) premature infant pain profile score was significantly higher in control group [(7.4 (3.78) vs. 5.2 (1.92), P <0.001]. CONCLUSION: Oral sucrose significantly reduces pain, and is safe to administer to neonates.


Subject(s)
Echocardiography/adverse effects , Pain Management/methods , Pain/drug therapy , Sucrose , Sweetening Agents , Administration, Oral , Female , Humans , India , Infant, Newborn , Male , Sucrose/administration & dosage , Sucrose/therapeutic use , Sweetening Agents/administration & dosage , Sweetening Agents/therapeutic use
9.
Indian J Pediatr ; 80(6): 470-5, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22847658

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the knowledge and perception regarding pain amongst nursing staff and to determine whether varying clinical exposure to painful procedures in children had any association with their perception of pain. METHODS: A consensually validated questionnaire containing combination of questions from basic (must know) and advanced (nice to know) areas of knowledge about nursing pediatric patients and questions related to nurses' perception about pain in pediatric patients was administered to the eligible nursing staff at a Rural Tertiary Care Hospital in Western India. The responses to the questionnaire were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the comparisons were made by applying chi-square test. RESULTS: Three Hundred and Fifty one usable questionnaires (83.37 %) out of 421 were returned. The knowledge of the nurses in general regarding pain was observed to be poor. Only 60 % of all the nurses had complete knowledge of all the basic questions asked. Only 3.1 % had answered all of the five advanced questions correctly, while 96.9 % of the nurses had answered one or more questions incorrectly. CONCLUSIONS: The deficit in knowledge and shortcomings in perception of nursing staff needs to be addressed and steps need to be taken to improve the nurse's knowledge and modify beliefs and attitude of the nursing staff towards the pain of the pediatric patients.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Pain/psychology , Child , Developing Countries , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , India , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Pain/diagnosis , Pain Measurement , Rural Health Services , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tertiary Healthcare
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL