Determining the validity of the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) tool for identifying patients for safe same-day discharge after primary shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Early discharge has been a target of cost-control efforts given the growing demand for joint replacement surgery. The Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) score, a medically based risk-assessment score, has shown high predictive ability in achieving safe early discharge following outpatient lower-extremity arthroplasty using a score threshold initially set at ≤59 points but more recently adapted to ≤79 points. However, no study has been performed using the OARA tool for shoulder replacement, which has been shown to have lower associated medical risks than lower-extremity arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine the OARA score threshold for same-day discharge (SDD) following shoulder arthroplasty and evaluate its effectiveness in selecting patients for SDD. We hypothesized that the OARA score threshold for shoulder arthroplasty would be higher than that for lower-extremity arthroplasty. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 422 patients who underwent primary anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty between April 2018 and October 2019 performed by a single surgeon. As standard practice, all patients were counseled preoperatively regarding SDD and given the choice to stay overnight. Medical history, length of stay, and 90-day readmissions were obtained from medical records. Analysis of variance testing and screening test characteristics compared the performance of the OARA score vs. the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) class and a previously published OARA score threshold used to define a low risk of outpatient lower-extremity arthroplasty. RESULTS: A preoperative OARA score cutoff of ≤110 points demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.0% for identifying patients with SDD after shoulder arthroplasty, compared with 66.7% using the hip and knee OARA score threshold of ≤59 points (P < .0001) and 80.4% using ASA-PS class ≤ 2 (P = .008). OARA scores ≤ 110 points also showed a negative predictive value of 98.9% and a false-negative rate of 2.0% but remained incomprehensive with a specificity of 24.0% (P < .0001). Analysis of variance demonstrated that mean OARA scores increased significantly with length of stay (P = .001) compared with ASA-PS classes (P = .82). Patients with OARA scores ≤ 110 points were also 2.5 times less likely to have 90-day emergency department visits (P = .04) than those with OARA scores > 110 points. There was no difference in 30- and 90-day readmission rates for patients with OARA scores ≤ 59 points, OARA scores ≤ 110 points, and ASA-PS classes ≤ 2. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that a preoperative OARA score threshold of ≤110 points is effective and conservative in screening patients for SDD following shoulder arthroplasty, with low rates of 90-day emergency department visits and readmissions. This threshold is a useful screening tool to identify patients who are not good candidates for SDD.

Early discharge on postoperative day 1 following lobectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer is safe in high-volume surgical centres: a national cancer database analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Shortening hospital length of stay after lobectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a challenge, and the literature regarding factors associated with safe early discharge is limited. We sought to evaluate the safety of postoperative day (POD) 1 discharge after lobectomy and its correlation with institutional caseload using the National Cancer Database, jointly sponsored by the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society. METHODS: We identified patients with stage I NSCLC (tumour ≤4 cm, clinical N0, M0) in the National Cancer Database who underwent lobectomy from 2010 to 2015. Hospital surgical volume was assigned based on total surgical volume for lung cancer. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: POD 1 discharge [length of stay (LOS) ≤ 1] and the standard discharge (LOS > 1). Outcome variables were compared in propensity matched cohorts, and the multivariable regression model was created to assess factors associated with LOS ≤ 1 and the occurrence of adverse events (unplanned readmissions, 30- and 90-day deaths). RESULTS: A total of 52 830 patients underwent lobectomy for stage I NSCLC across 1231 treating facilities; 3879 (7.3%) patients were discharged on day 1 (LOS ≤ 1), whereas 48 951 (92.7%) were discharged after day 1 (LOS > 1). Factors associated with LOS ≤ 1 included male sex, higher socioeconomic status, right middle lobectomy, minimally invasive surgery and high-volume centres. The risk of adverse events was higher for LOS ≤ 1 in low [odds ratio (OR): 1.913, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.448-2.527; P < 0.001] and median quartiles (OR: 2.258; 95% CI 1.881-2.711; P < 0.001), but equivalent in high-volume centres (OR: 0.871, 95% CI 0.556-1.364; P = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of early discharge on POD 1 following lobectomy are associated with lung cancer surgical volume. Implementation of 'enhanced recovery' protocols is likely related to safe early discharges from high-volume centres.

Partial thickness rotator cuff tears: Patient demographics and surgical trends within a large insurance database.

INTRODUCTION: Partial thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCT) are a common injury reported in 13-32% of the population, yet most of the current literature focuses on full thickness rotator cuff tears. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze trends among patients with PTRCT including: (1) demographics; (2) comorbidities; (3) cost of care; (4) setting of initial diagnosis; and (5) change in incidence of PTRCT or surgical approach over time. METHODS: A Medicare patient-population consisting of 44 million lives was retrospectively analyzed from 2007 to 2017 using International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes. Patients were identified for PTRCT using ICD-9 code: 726.13. The query yielded a total of 44,978 patients all of which had been previously diagnosed with PTRCT. Primary trends analyzed included: demographics, comorbidities, cost of care, initial setting of diagnosis, and change in incidence of PTRCT or surgical approach over time. RESULTS: PTRCTs and surgical repair of PTRCTs were most common in patients ages 65 to 69 and least common in patients who were 85 and older. Incidence of PTRCT was greater in females (54.12%) than males (45.88%). Comorbidities found within the population included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoarthritis of the shoulder. The average cost per episode of care totaled $9,923.26. PTRCTs were most commonly diagnosed in patients who resided in assisted living facilities (n = 27,106), making up 60% of the patient population. Reported incidence of PTRCT has increased substantially along with the surgical repair of PTRCT. CONCLUSION: Reported cases of PTRCT and its surgical repair have both increased substantially over time. Approximately 11.70% of patients with PTRCT undergo either open or arthroscopic procedure as a means of surgical repair. With the growing popularity of arthroscopic procedures for rotator cuff repair, further investigation should be performed to analyze trends and risk factors for PTRCT, a seemingly underrepresented orthopedic condition.