At risk child: a contemporary analysis of injured children in London and the South East of England: a prospective, multicentre cohort study.

Background: Injury is a leading health burden in children yet relatively little is reported about the contemporary risks they face. Current national registry data may under-represent the true burden of injury to children. We aim to analyse contemporary patterns of paediatric trauma and identify current factors putting children at risk of injury. Methods: A 3-month prospective multicentre cohort evaluation of injured children across the London Major Trauma System was performed. All children receiving a trauma team activation; meeting National Institute for Health and Care Excellence CT head criteria; or admitted/transferred out due to trauma were included. Data were collected on demographics, mechanism and location of injury, and body region injured. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcome was safeguarding concerns. Results: 659 children were included. Young children were more likely to be injured at home (0-5 years old: 70.8%, n=167 vs adolescents: 15.6%, n=31). Adolescents were more likely to be injured in the street (42.7%, n=85). Head trauma caused over half of injuries in 0-5 years old (51.9%, n=121). Falls were common and increasingly prevalent in younger children, causing 56.6% (n=372) of injuries. In adolescents, penetrating violence caused more than one in five injuries (21.9%, n=50). Most injured children survived (99.8%, n=658), however, one in four (26.1%, n=172) had safeguarding concerns and a quarter of adolescents had police, third sector or external agency involvement (23.2%, n=53). Conclusions: This study describes modern-day paediatric trauma and highlights the variance in injury patterns in young children and adolescents. Importantly, it highlights differences in actual rates of injuries compared with those reported from current national registry data. We must understand real risks facing 21st century children to effectively safeguard future generations. The results provide an opportunity to reassess the current approach to injury prevention, child and adolescent safeguarding, and public health campaigns for child safety.

Challenges in managing proximal hypospadias: A 17-year single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: There are only a few publications in the medical literature reporting on complication rates in proximal hypospadias surgery, particularly with regard to long-term follow-up. METHODS: Over a 17.5-year period, we operated 100 patients with penoscrotal, scrotal and perineal hypospadias. Sixty-four had a single-stage repair, including 15 who received a buccal mucosa inlay "Snodgraft" repair. Thirty-six had a two-stage Bracka repair of which 19 received buccal or lower lip grafts and 17 had preputial grafts. Overall, 34 patients received buccal grafts. The median follow-up was eight years (range 1-16 years). Three patients were operated for residual chordee years later. RESULTS: Urethral fistulae occurred in a total of 26/100 (26.0%) cases, meatal stenosis in 16/100 (16.0%), wound breakdown in six (6.0%) and graft failure in one (1.0%). The fistula rate after the single-stage approach was 15/64 (23.4%), whereas it was 11/36 (30.6%) following two-stage repair (P = 0.4811). CONCLUSIONS: Proximal hypospadias remains a challenging condition to treat. It is possible to perform a single-stage repair in 64.0% of cases. This brings down the median number of operations to only two. Lower lip grafts were used in 34.0% but are now used in redo-surgeries only. Our fistula rate was 26.0% but has decreased significantly in recent years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.