ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In early-stage endometrial carcinoma, there is controversy regarding the prognostic value of the flow cytometric variables DNA ploidy (diploid vs. aneuploid) and S-phase fraction. In Sweden, the former is included in national guidelines despite poor scientific support and the latter is not used clinically. This study investigates the prognostic properties of these variables, together with classical histopathological variables, in multivariate analysis in a stringently stratified material. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive, population-based patient material restricted to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (n = 1140) was retrospectively collected from routinely reported data from medical records. Data on age, FIGO stage, degree of differentiation, S-phase fraction, DNA ploidy status, and adjuvant treatment were included in the study. Cumulative incidence curves with other causes of death as a competing risk were used for univariable analysis for the primary endpoint endometrial cancer death. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used for multivariate modeling of all endpoints, and for univariable analysis for the secondary endpoints overall survival and time to progression. RESULTS: An S-phase fraction value of >5.5% was associated with worse outcome (for endometrial cancer death: hazard ratio 2.25; 95% CI 1.38-3.67; p = 0.001, adjusted) and DNA ploidy status was not, for all endpoints tested. CONCLUSIONS: In FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, DNA ploidy status had no prognostic value, whereas the S-phase fraction may be used to identify those with a higher risk of adverse clinical outcome.