Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
J Int Med Res ; 17 Suppl 2: 40B-46B, 1989.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2570001

ABSTRACT

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study, the antihistamine acrivastine, was used over prolonged periods for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. After the initial treatment period of 10 days, 8 mg acrivastine three times daily was significantly superior to placebo in controlling the symptoms of sneezing, itchy nose, running nose, watery eyes, itchy eyes and itchy throat. The benefit from acrivastine was also apparent in the second (14 days) and third (28 days) treatment periods, although the difference no longer reached statistical significance. This was probably due to the large proportion of non-responders in the placebo group who withdrew from the study owing to lack of efficacy. The investigators rated symptom control with acrivastine to be 'good' in comparison to 'poor' control with placebo treatment (P = 0.01) for all three periods. There were no significant differences between acrivastine and placebo in the incidence of adverse experiences at the end of each treatment period. Acrivastine is effective and well tolerated over prolonged periods (up to 52 days) for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.


Subject(s)
Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Triprolidine/therapeutic use , Adult , Clinical Trials as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/physiopathology , Triprolidine/analogs & derivatives
2.
Panminerva Med ; 24(4): 289-90, 1982.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7170118
5.
Ann Allergy ; 54(2): 142-7, 1985 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3970390

ABSTRACT

The relative allergenicities of Parietaria judaica and Parietaria officinalis have been studied by in vivo and in vitro techniques and a strong resemblance has been shown, with common allergenic polypeptides, though they differ in a group of anodic proteins. In vivo activity was very similar and both pollen extracts reacted with sera from patients who were sensitive to P. judaica, thus demonstrating a high rate of cross-reactivity. Extracts from both species may therefore be used interchangeably in diagnosis and immunotherapy.


Subject(s)
Pollen/immunology , Allergens/analysis , Animals , Cross Reactions , Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel , Humans , Isoelectric Focusing , Rabbits/immunology , Radioallergosorbent Test , Skin Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL